Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2023

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Research

Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of different treatments in reducing amniocentesis-associated pain and anxiety

verfasst von: Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud, Abdallah R. Allam

Erschienen in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Objective

This network meta-analysis compared different methods to determine which is most efficient at lowering pain and anxiety in women undergoing amniocentesis.

Method

We looked through all published randomized controlled trials in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and EM base. Anxiety and pain were the predominant results. We used the R software version 4.2.1 to analyze the data.

Results

We included a total of 20 studies, with sample sizes ranging from 60 to 570. Virtual reality was the most effective strategy for lowering pain during AC [MD = -1.30, 95% CI (-2.11, -0.49)]. In addition, paracetamol use was the most successful approach for lowering pain following AC [MD = -1.68, 95% CI (-1.99, -1.37)]. The use of H7 acupressure, however, was the strategy that significantly reduced anxiety following AC [SMD = -15.46, 95% CI (-17.77, -13.15)].

Conclusion

The most effective method for reducing pain is the combination of virtual reality with paracetamol. Whereas, the most effective way to reduce anxiety is to combine an ice gel pack with H7 acupressure before applying AC.
Begleitmaterial
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12884-023-06094-3.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
NMA
Network meta-analysis
AC
Amniocentesis
VR
Visual reality

Introduction

Prenatal diagnosis is an approach used by obstetricians to predict possible outcomes for each pregnancy such as congenital infections, alloimmunization, fetal genetic disorders, and fetal lung maturity. Receiving a prenatal diagnosis of congenital defects is momentous and emotionally challenging for women [1]. However, it provides a crucial opportunity for early intervention and informed decision-making regarding the management and care of the fetus [2].
The detection of fetal defects such as aneuploidy, a structural chromosome problem, requires invasive prenatal procedures such as amniocentesis (AC) and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) [1]. Over 190,000 AC procedures were carried out in the United States in 1997, making it a regularly used technique in obstetric practice [3]. The process is performed between 15 – 20 weeks after pregnancy, and the results are available in 7 to 14 days [4]. However, it carries risks such as membrane leakage, infection, and abortion with rates of 1.6%, 0.05%, and 1%, respectively [1, 5, 6]. Therefore, prenatal counseling is essential to prevent avoidable risks and costs for pregnant women [7].
High levels of anxiety have been reported in women undergoing AC [8], which may be due to fear of pain, fetal injury, and abortion, as well as concern about unfavorable results [9]. Moreover, anxiety might prolong the duration of the AC procedure, and contribute to procedure complications [10]. Studies have established a direct correlation between anxiety levels and pain intensity [11], with severe anxiety associated with increased pain during AC and chorionic villus sampling [1114].
Even the smallest hint of pain could make the patient uncooperative and prevent a successful prenatal diagnosis. Therefore, several studies looked into various methods to help women getting AC to feel less pain and anxiety. While some of these studies found their method helpful [1517], others did not [1820].
Therefore, our network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to compare different pain and anxiety management strategies to identify the most effective approach for minimizing discomfort during AC procedures.

Method

We followed the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)” standards to carry out this study [21]. Additionally, we strictly followed the steps provided in the “Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions” [22].

Literature search strategy

From inception till August 2022, the following keywords were used to search PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central: amniocentesis, amniocenteses, anesthesia, “local anesthesia”, lidocaine, “xylocaine”, EMLA, “lidocaine-prilocaine”, lignocaine, prilocaine, dalcaine, xylocitin, xylesthesin, xyloneural, otocaine, music, cryoanalgesia, “cold therapy”, “virtual reality”, “H7 acupressure”, “ethyl chloride”, “aromatic therapy”, “Light Pressure Effleurage”, education, paracetamol, Panadol, cryotherapy, “cold pack”, “Subfreezing room”, “Subfreezing”, “Light leg rubbing”, massage, analgesia, analgesic. Additionally, manual searches were conducted on Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and clinicaltrials.gov.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

We took included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled patients undergoing AC, compared various analgesics with one another, with a control, or with a placebo, and reported on pain perception, and anxiety. We excluded in vitro research, overlapping datasets, book chapters, reviews, cohort studies, case–control studies, and non-English articles. Using Endnote software, duplicates were eliminated, and then titles and abstracts of the retrieved references were checked. Eligible articles were then retrieved and underwent full-text screening. Additionally, we manually searched the reference lists of the papers that were included for other potentially qualifying studies.

Data extraction

We extracted the summary data, the population's baseline demographics, and the efficacy outcomes from the included studies.

Outcomes

Effective outcomes included anticipated pain, pain during the procedure, pain after the procedure, anxiety before the procedure, anxiety after the procedure, post-procedure pain, and anxiety, as well as willingness to undergo AC again if necessary.

Risk of bias

We used the Cochrane risk of bias instrument (version 2) as described in chapter 8.5 of the Cochrane Handbook to evaluate the risk of bias [23]. The randomization process, deviations from intended interventions, missing outcome data, measurement of the outcome, selection of the reported result, and overall bias were part of the quality assessment process.

Data analysis

We used the meta and netmeta tools in the R program version 4.2.1, to carry out network analysis. For pooling continuous outcomes, we used the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), and for dichotomous outcomes, we used the risk ratio (RR), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Chi-square and I-square tests were used to determine how heterogeneous the pooled studies were, with a heterogeneous connection being defined as one where the I2 > 50% and the Chi-square P-value < 0.1. For pooling homogeneous data, we utilized a common effect model, and for heterogeneous data, we used random-effect model.

Results

Data collection and characteristics of included studies

One thousand seven hundred three articles were found during database searches: 447 from PubMed, 280 from Web of Science, 640 from Scopus, 54 from CENTRAL, and 282 from other databases. We filtered 1019 items and deleted 684 duplicates. 983 were eliminated through the title and abstract screening process, and 20 [1520, 2437] acceptable studies were found after the full-text screening of the 36 publications that remained. A flowchart of the database search and study selection procedure is shown in Fig. 1.
The sample sizes of the included RCTs ranged from 60 to 570 people. Different approaches were contrasted with one another, with a control group, or with a placebo. The included subjects' average age ranged from 31.3 to 37.7 years, their average gestational age was 15.9 to 21.95 weeks, and their average body mass index was 22.93 to 27 kg/m2. The summary and the baseline characteristics of the included subjects in each study are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1
Summary of the included studies
Study ID
Study Design
NCT number
Site
Recruitment duration
Total Participants
Intervention
Control
Melcer 2021 [15]
Open Label RCT
NCT04491149
Israel
September to October 2020
65
VR (35)
Control (30)
Mohammadifard 2021 [16]
Single-blind RCT
IRCT20200401046914N1
Iran
June to September 2020
60
H7_Acupressure (30)
Control (30)
Rekawek 2019 [18]
Open Label RCT
NCT03140293
USA
October 2016 to May 2017
120
lidocaine_injection (63)
Ethyl_chloride (57)
Pongrojpaw 2007 [19]
Double-blind RCT
-
Thailand
October 2006 to April 2007
120
Lidocaine_prilocaine_cream (60)
Placebo (60)
Tuaktaew 2018 [17]
Double-blind RCT
NCT03035045
Thailand
August 2016 to June 2017
240
Paracetamol (120)
Placebo (120)
Schoubroeck 2000 [24]
Open Label RCT
-
Belgium
April to November 1998
220
lidocaine_injection (114)
Control (106)
Wax 2005 [25]
Single-blind RCT
-
USA
-
62
Subfreezing_temperature_needle (29)
Room_temperature_needle (33)
Telapol 2018 [26]
Open Label RCT
-
Thailand
May to November 2016
148
Ethyl_chloride (74)
Control (74)
Benchahong 2021 [27]
Single-blind RCT
TCTR20191115002
Thailand
December 2019 to May 2020
480
Ice_gel_pack_before_AC (120), Ice_gel_pack_after_AC (120), Ice_gel_pack_before_after_AC (120)
Control (120)
Elimian 2013 [28]
Double-blind RCT
NCT 00583011
USA
October 2007 to September 2009
76
lidocaine_injection (36)
Control (40)
Fischer 2000 [29]
Single-blind RCT
-
USA
April 1998 to July 1999
200
Effleurage (103)
Control (97)
Gordon 2007 [30]
Single-blind RCT
-
USA
January 1995 to March 2001
204
lidocaine_injection (101)
Control (103)
Hanprasertpong 2012 [31]
Single-blind RCT
-
Thailand
July 2009 to July 2010
372
Ice_gel_pack_before_AC (184)
Control (188)
Hanprasertpong 2015 [32]
Single-blind RCT
-
Thailand
July to September 2013
317
Menthol (158)
Control (159)
Hanprasertpong 2016 [20]
Single-blind RCT
-
Thailand
February to May 2013
332
Music (161)
Control (171)
Katsogiannou 2018 [33]
Single-blind RCT
-
France
March 2013 to February 2015
183
Nitrous_oxide (93)
Control (90)
Kuemanee 2021 [34]
Single-blind RCT
TCTR20191116001
Thailand
December 2019 to March 2020
240
Ice_gel_pack_before_AC (120)
Control (120)
Homkrun 2019 [35]
Single-blind RCT
TCTR20170528001
Thailand
June 2017 to January 2018
570
Xylocaine (191)
Control (379)
Kang 2020 [36]
Single-blind RCT
-
China
June 2012 to June 2014
100
Psychological_intervention (48)
Control (52)
Mojahed 2021 [37]
Open Label RCT
-
Iran
2020
80
Education (40)
Control (40)
Study ID
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ascertainment of pain
Aim
Melcer 2021 [15]
The trial was open to consecutive women who were going to get an obstetrically indicated mid-trimester AC
Women under the age of eighteen or with numerous pregnancies were not included in the sample. Women who needed pre-procedural anxiolytic or analgesic medication, had a history of motion sickness, epilepsy, or had a hearing or visual impairment were also eliminated
VAS
The study's objective is to compare the effectiveness of a VR intervention to a control group in terms of controlling acute pain and anxiety during amniocentesis
Mohammadifard 2021 [16]
The following conditions had to be met in order to qualify: gestational age of 15 to 18 weeks, literacy, desired pregnancy, score of ≤ 53 on the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory, absence of any obstetrical issues or medical conditions, abstinence from drugs and alcohol, absence of abnormal hand findings, maternal BMI in the range of 18.5 to 30 and absence of any history of recurrent abortions (more than three consecutive abortions), amniocentesis, known mental
Due to their unwillingness to cooperate, active vaginal bleeding, hospitalization, failure to complete the intervention twice weekly or three times intermittently throughout the study, multiple failed attempts at amniocentesis, and unusual sensitivity to pressure point touch, the participants were excluded from the study
-
The purpose of this study was to find out how H7 Acupressure affected pregnant women's anxiety during amniocentesis procedures
Rekawek 2019 [18]
The trial was open to all singleton pregnant women who underwent transabdominal CVS between 10 and 13 weeks and 6 days of gestation
Multiple pregnancies, known medication allergies, and hypersensitivity to local anesthetic were among the exclusion criteria
VAS
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to ascertain if topical ethyl chloride anesthetic spray administration compared to 1% lidocaine subdermal injection results in lower pain perception during transabdominal CVS
Pongrojpaw 2007 [19]
All of the expectant women who took part in the current study gave their consent to have an AC at the Maternal–Fetal Medicine Unit and were referred for genetic counseling in the second trimester of pregnancy
Multiple pregnancies or severe congenital anomalies found by sonography were excluded, as were known or suspected allergies to lidocaine prilocaine, psychiatric disorders, multiple attempts to insert a needle, and switching the puncture site where the cream was given because of fetal activity
VAS
The current study set out to determine whether local lidocaine-prilocaine cream application did in fact lessen pain during mid-trimester genetic AC
Tuaktaew 2018 [17]
For this study, the singleton pregnant patients undergoing their first genetic AC at Rajavithi Hospital's Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology were considered eligible
Psychiatric disorders, paracetamol allergies, AC in cases of suspected fetal anomalies identified by another prenatal diagnostic procedure, a patient's history of paracetamol use in the 24–48 h prior to the amniocentesis, and participants who declined to enroll in the study were the exclusion criteria
VAS
The study's goal is to determine whether paracetamol can reduce pain scores during AC
Schoubroeck 2000 [24]
Pregnant women undergoing AC
Multiple pregnancies, a known or suspected lignocaine allergy, an AC performed right away following the sonographic discovery of a severe fetal abnormality, a psychiatric illness, and a lack of proficiency in Dutch are all factors
VAS and VRS
This study sought to determine whether local anesthesia reduced pain during AC
Wax 2005 [25]
Participants in this institutionally approved study had to be females aged ≥ 18 who underwent an indicated second trimester genetic amniocentesis, be carrying a singleton, have a normal amniotic fluid volume, and not have had an amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in the previous pregnancy
Women who had previously undergone AC or CVS in the current pregnancy
VAS
In order to lessen pain associated with second trimester genetic AC, we conducted a randomized single-blinded trial comparing needles that were frozen to those that were at room temperature
Telapol 2018 [26]
Women who had never undergone AC and no fetal gross structural abnormalities detected by ultrasonographic examination were the inclusion criteria
Women who were known to be allergic to colds, ethyl chloride spray, had taken painkillers within the previous four hours, needed more than one puncture during the same procedure, could not follow the study's methodology, or had poor communication skills, were all excluded from the study
VAS
This study's goal was to evaluate the cryo-analgesic impact of ethyl chloride spray on pain management during AC in the second trimester
Benchahong 2021 [27]
Pregnancy, being between the ages of 18 and 45, having between 15 and 20 weeks of gestation, being without any ultrasonographic signs of foetal anomalies, and choosing AC as the prenatal diagnosis procedure are the inclusion criteria
Multifetal pregnancy, ultrasound evidence of a severe congenital anomaly, altered puncture site following cold compression during AC, repeated attempts, history of cold urticaria, pregnancy with Raynaud's phenomenon, use of painkillers that impair pain and temperature perception, abdominal skin infection, pregnancy with psychosis, and patients' refusal are all exclusion criteria
VAS
Evaluating the impact of cold therapy on a patient's perceived pain levels before and after an AC surgery
Elimian 2013 [28]
Ages between 18 and 45, consent for participation, singleton pregnancies, and gestational ages between 15 and 23 weeks were all inclusion criteria
We disqualified multiple-gestational women, people taking painkillers or other analgesics, people who declined to participate, and people who have a known lidocaine hypersensitivity. Additionally, we didn't include cases in which amnioinfusion or amnioreduction were advised
VAS and NRS
Assessing how local anaesthetic affects how much pain the mother feels during AC
Fischer 2000 [29]
-
-
VAS
Determining whether leg rubbing with gentle pressure during genetic AC lessens pain and anxiety associated with the procedure
Gordon 2007 [30]
-
-
VAS and NRS
The null hypothesis states that local anaesthetic does not reduce AC patient pain perception
Hanprasertpong 2012 [31]
Women who had second-trimester genetic AC due to advanced maternal age who were between 15 and 21 weeks pregnant (according to the latest menstrual period or ultrasonographic-biometric measurement)
Multiple pregnancies, a history of AC during a prior or ongoing pregnancy, the presence of foetal structural malformation, more than one attempt at needle insertion, participants who were unable to read or understand the questionnaire, or participants who declined to participate in our study were all exclusion criteria
VAS
Determining whether cryoanalgesia reduces the level of pain experienced during genetic AC in the second trimester
Hanprasertpong 2015 [32]
Expectant women scheduled for genetic AC between 15 and 20 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age
A foetal structural malformation, multiple pregnancies, AC experience during the current or a previous pregnancy, multiple needle insertion attempts, a history of smell or taste perception issues, a history of an upper respiratory infection or a diagnosis of allergic rhinitis within two weeks of the procedure, an inability to read or understand the questionnaire, and a refusal to participate in the study were all grounds for exclusion
VAS
Assessing the effectiveness of menthol-based aromatic treatment to reduce AC-related pain
Hanprasertpong 2016 [20]
Women who had a second trimester genetic AC due to advanced maternal age and were between 15 and 21 weeks pregnant based on their previous period or an ultrasonographic biometric measurement
Multiple pregnancies, foetal structural malformations, history of AC in a prior or ongoing pregnancy, multiple attempts at needle insertion, a history of hearing impairment, and participants who were illiterate, incapable of understanding the questionnaires, or who refused to participate in the study were all disqualified
VAS
Determining whether listening to music during genetic AC in the second trimester reduced pain perception
Katsogiannou 2018 [33]
Patients had to be pregnant adults (over 18), have gestational ages between 11 and 16 weeks, be receiving transabdominal CVS, have no contraindications to using N2O or local anaesthetic, and have no contraindications to transabdominal CVS
-
VAS
Our goal was to assess how well nitrous gas and local anaesthetic managed pain and anxiety during transabdominal CVS
Kuemanee 2021 [34]
The present study included pregnant women who had genetic AC between 15 and 22 weeks of gestation
Multifetal pregnancy, severe congenital anomaly previously detected by ultrasonography, cases of multiple needle puncture attempts during the procedure, cases of changing the puncture site due to foetal behavior, maternal psychiatric disorder, those who were contraindicated to cold therapy, and cases of refusal to participate in the current study were excluded
VAS
Assessing the impact of cryotherapy on pain management during genetic AC in the second trimester
Homkrun 2019 [35]
Singleton pregnancy and gestational ages of 16 to 20 weeks based on a trustworthy last menstrual cycle and sonographic biometry in the first half of pregnancy were the inclusion criteria
Pregnant women who (1) had a history of Xylocaine allergy, (2) had aberrant sensory function based on history, (3) couldn’t rate their pain using a visual analogue scale, and (4) couldn’t do an AC were excluded
VAS
Evaluating the impact of Xylocaine spray on the AC pain score
Kang 2020 [36]
-
-
VAS
The purpose of this study is to investigate how psychological psychotherapy can reduce pregnancy-related anxiety and dread in pregnant women as well as the surgical success rate
Mojahed 2021 [37]
Muslim and Iranian ethnicity, written informed consent to participate in the study, a minimal level of literacy, AC eligibility, gestational age of 15–20 weeks, a single pregnancy with a viable fetus, and a positive foetal screening test were the inclusion criteria
The study's initial exclusion criteria included pregnancy after infertility treatment and assisted reproductive techniques, history of AC, history of recurrent miscarriages, presence of major abnormalities in ultrasound, awareness of the specifics of amniocentesis, use of hookah, cigarettes, drugs, alcohol, psychotropic drugs, history of consulting a psychiatrist or psychologist for mood and mental disorders, taking medication, or hospitalization
-
The purpose of this study was to ascertain how schooling affected moms who were amniocentesis candidates' perceptions of stress
Abbreviations: RCT Randomized controlled trial, VR Virtual reality, BMI Body mass index, VAS Visual analogue scale, NRS Numerical rating scale, AC Amniocentesis, CVS Chorionic villous sampling, N2O Nitrous oxide
Table 2
Baseline characteristics of included participants
Study ID
Type of intervention
Number of participants in each group
Age (Years), M (SD)
Weight (Kg), M (SD)
Height (m), M (SD)
BMI (Kg/m2), M(SD)
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Melcer 2021 [15]
VR
30
30
34.9 (4.9)
36.7 (3.3)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mohammadifard 2021 [16]
H7_Acupressure
27
29
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Rekawek 2019 [18]
Lidocaine_injection
63
57
36.14 (4.87)
35.6 (4.91)
-
-
-
-
24.38 (4.82)
24.22 (5.34)
Pongrojpaw 2007 [19]
Lidocaine_prilocaine_cream
60
60
36.8 (3.79)
36.9 (3.41)
-
-
-
-
24.4 (4.2)
24.1 (3.6)
Tuaktaew 2018 [17]
Paracetamol
117
116
36.26 (3.78)
36.01 (4.66)
-
-
-
-
24.93 (3.81)
24.99 (4.98)
Schoubroeck 2000 [24]
Lidocaine_injection
114
106
34.1 (3.9)
33 (4.6)
62.7 (12.1)
67.7 (13)
-
-
-
-
Wax 2005 [25]
Subfreezing_temperature_needle
29
33
34.4 (6.1)
35.6 (3.6)
69 (15.3)
74.7 (18.1)
1.667 (0.071)
1.651 (0.071)
-
-
Telapol 2018 [26]
Ethyl_chloride
74
74
37.80 (2.83)
37.35 (2.54)
60.01 (10.59)
60.75 (10.34)
1.57 (0.0524)
1.59 (0.0605)
24.34 (4.07)
24.11 (3.82)
Benchahong 2021 [27]
Ice_gel_pack_before_AC
120
120
36.85 (3.07)
36.48 (3.71)
62 (10.07)
61.75 (10.73)
1.57 (5.8)
1.58 (5.47)
24.87 (3.61)
24.73 (4.16)
Ice_gel_pack_after_AC
120
36.8 (3.72)
62.36 (11.28)
1.58 (5.8)
24.6 (4.27)
Ice_gel_pack_before_after_AC
120
37.07 (3.07)
60.4 (11.28)
1.57 (5.47)
24.26 (4.38)
Elimian 2013 [28]
Lidocaine_injection
36
40
31.3 (6.5)
30.1 (7.5)
75.8 (14)
77.2 (17.1)
1.65 (0.06)
1.66 (0.08)
-
-
Fischer 2000 [29]
Effleurage
103
97
33.3 (5.2)
34.4 (5.3)
71.2 (13.6)
71.1 (17)
-
-
27 (5.1)
26 (5.8)
Gordon 2007 [30]
Lidocaine_injection
101
103
33.7 (5.7)
33.3 (5.9)
71.4 (11.3)
72.5 (15.4)
1.63 (0.07)
1.62 (0.07)
26.4 (3.8)
27.3 (5.1)
Hanprasertpong 2012 [31]
Ice_gel_pack_before_AC
184
188
37.3 (2.51)
37.1 (2.47)
-
-
-
-
24.3 (3.8)
24.4 (4.12)
Hanprasertpong 2015 [32]
Menthol
158
159
37.1 (2.1)
37.54 (2.57)
-
-
-
-
24.1 (4)
23.7 (3.5)
Hanprasertpong 2016 [20]
Music
161
171
37.4 (2.5)
37.1 (2.37)
-
-
-
-
25.27 (4.33)
24.8 (4.26)
Katsogiannou 2018 [33]
Nitrous_oxide
93
90
37.7 (0.54)
34.27 (0.64)
-
-
-
-
24.23 (0.57)
22.93 (0.5)
Kuemanee 2021 [34]
Ice_gel_pack_before_AC
120
120
36.8 (3.7)
36.5 (3.9)
-
-
-
-
24.9 (4.2)
24.7 (4.1)
Homkrun 2019 [35]
Xylocaine
191
379
36 (3)
36 (3)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Kang 2020 [36]
Psychological_intervention
48
52
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mojahed 2021 [37]
Education
40
40
32.9 (5.85)
34 (5.5)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Study ID
Occupation, n (%)
Education, n (%)
Housewife
Business owner
Government officer
Agriculture
Other
Less than high school
high school
Bachelor’s degree (collage)
Higher than bachelor’s degree
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Melcer 2021 [15]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mohammadifard 2021 [16]
22 (81.5%)
25 (86.2%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
5 (18.5%)
4 (13.7%)
8 (29.6%)
4 (13.8%)
7 (25.9%)
14 (48.3%)
12 (44.4%)
11 (37.9%)
-
-
Rekawek 2019 [18]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5 (7.9%)
4 (7.4%)
46 (73%)
40 (74.1%)
12 (19.1%)
10 (18.5%)
Pongrojpaw 2007 [19]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tuaktaew 2018 [17]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Schoubroeck 2000 [24]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wax 2005 [25]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Telapol 2018 [26]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Benchahong 2021 [27]
16 (13.3%)
9 (7.5%)
21 (17.5%)
15 (12.5%)
13 (10.8%)
19 (15.8%)
-
-
70 (58.3%)
77 (64.2%)
26 (21.7%)
30 (25%)
37 (30.8%)
38 (31.7%)
50 (41.7%)
40 (33.3%)
7 (5.8%)
12 (10%)
11 (9.2%)
18 (15%)
14 (11.7%)
-
-
77 (64.2%)
27 (22.5%)
37 (30.8%)
49 (40.8%)
7 (5.8%)
10 (8.3%)
15 (12.5%)
12 (10%)
-
-
83 (69.2%)
29 (24.2%)
35 (29.2%)
50 (41.7%)
6 (5%)
Elimian 2013 [28]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 (11.11%)
5 (12.5%)
14 (38.89%)
17 (42.5%)
18 (50%)
17 (42.5%)
-
-
Fischer 2000 [29]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Gordon 2007 [30]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hanprasertpong 2012 [31]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hanprasertpong 2015 [32]
26 (16.46%)
23 (14.47%)
-
-
42 (26.58%)
38 (23.90%)
13 (8.23%)
12 (7.55%)
77 (48.73%)
86 (54.09%)
-
-
59 (37.34%)
62 (38.99%)
98 (62.03%)
94 (59.12%)
1 (0.63%)
3 (1.89%)
Hanprasertpong 2016 [20]
28 (17.39%)
34 (19.88%)
-
-
40 (24.84%)
44 (25.73%)
13 (8.07%)
17 (9.94%)
80 (49.69%)
76 (44.44%)
-
-
61 (37.89%)
70 (40.49%)
97 (60.25%)
101 (59.06%)
3 (1.86%)
0 (0%)
Katsogiannou 2018 [33]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Kuemanee 2021 [34]
-
-
18 (15%)
15 (12.6%)
14 (11.7%)
19 (15.8%)
-
-
11 (9.2%)
9 (7.5%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
7 (5.7%)
12 (10%)
Homkrun 2019 [35]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Kang 2020 [36]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mojahed 2021 [37]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Study ID
Previous abdominal surgery, n (%)
Gestational age at AC or CVS (weeks), M(SD)
Gravidity, M(SD)
Parity, M (SD)
Parity, n (%)
Nulliparous
Multiparous
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Melcer 2021 [15]
-
-
18.9 (1.3)
18.4 (0.6)
2.4 (1.4)
3.1 (1.9)
0.9 (0.9)
1.3 (1.3)
-
-
-
-
Mohammadifard 2021 [16]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 (7.4%)
8 (27.6%)
25 (92.6%)
21 (72.4%)
Rekawek 2019 [18]
22 (34.9%)
12 (21.1%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
22 (34.9%)
26 (45.6%)
41 (65.1%)
31 (54.4%)
Pongrojpaw 2007 [19]
20 (33%)
12 (20%)
17.6 (1.6)
17.7 (1.5)
-
-
0.7 (0.8)
0.6 (0.7)
-
-
-
-
Tuaktaew 2018 [17]
-
-
18.43 (0.82)
18.40 (0.7)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Schoubroeck 2000 [24]
-
-
15.9 (1.3)
15.8 (1.4)
2.4 (1.2)
2.6 (1.4)
1.1 (0.9)
1.1 (1.1)
-
-
-
-
Wax 2005 [25]
-
-
16.5 (1.4)
16.6 (1.5)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Telapol 2018 [26]
10 (13.51%)
8 (10.81%)
21.95 (0.88)
22.02 (0.80)
-
-
-
-
22 (29.73%)
27 (36.49%)
52 (70.27%)
47 (63.51%)
Benchahong 2021 [27]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Elimian 2013 [28]
-
-
19.8 (2.6)
20.1 (2.4)
-
-
-
-
7 (19.44%)
12 (30%)
29 (80.55%)
28 (70%)
Fischer 2000 [29]
-
-
17.5 (1.5)
17 (1.4)
2.4 (0.8)
2.5 (0.7)
-
-
32 (31.1%)
25 (25.8%)
71 (68.9%)
72 (74.2%)
Gordon 2007 [30]
40 (39.6%)
44 (42.7%)
19.3 (5.5)
19.9 (6.6)
2.8 (1.4)
2.7 (1.6)
1.2 (1)
1.2 (1.1)
-
-
-
-
Hanprasertpong 2012 [31]
78 (42.4%)
73 (38.8%)
17.09 (0.89)
17.02 (0.76)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hanprasertpong 2015 [32]
73 (46.2%)
86 (54.09%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hanprasertpong 2016 [20]
79 (49.07%)
77 (45.03%)
17.27 (0.86)
17.23 (0.83)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Katsogiannou 2018 [33]
-
-
13.83 (0.09)
13.91 (0.09)
-
-
-
-
40 (43%)
29 (32.2%)
53 (57%)
61 (67.8%)
Kuemanee 2021 [34]
30 (25%)
40 (30.33%)
-
-
-
-
0.8 (0.67)
0.8 (0.83)
-
-
-
-
Homkrun 2019 [35]
-
-
17 (1)
17 (2)
-
-
-
-
46 (24.08%)
101 (26.64%)
145 (75.9%)
278 (73.35%)
Kang 2020 [36]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mojahed 2021 [37]
-
-
16.35 (0.93)
16.5 (1.08)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Study ID
Indication, n (%)
Prior AC or CVS, n (%)
Prior pregnancy, n (%)
Prior abortion, n (%)
Age risk
Genetic risk
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Intervention
Control
Melcer 2021 [15]
19 (63.3%)
23 (76.7)
-
-
3 (10%)
5 (16.7%)
-
-
12
12
Mohammadifard 2021 [16]
-
-
-
-
-
-
29 (100%)
27 (100%)
7 (25.9%)
7 (24.1%)
Rekawek 2019 [18]
36 (61%)
28 (52.8%)
-
-
25 (39.7%)
20 (35.7%)
-
-
-
-
Pongrojpaw 2007 [19]
56 (93%)
57 (95%)
4 (7%)
3 (5%)
1 (0.1%)
3 (0.5%)
-
-
-
-
Tuaktaew 2018 [17]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Schoubroeck 2000 [24]
54 (47%)
41 (39%)
2 (2%)
4 (4%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wax 2005 [25]
21 (69.69%)
23 (79.3%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Telapol 2018 [26]
-
-
-
-
-
-
44 (59.46%)
41 (55.4%)
24 (32.43%)
20 (27.03%)
Benchahong 2021 [27]
109 (90.8%)
105 (87.5%)
11 (9.2%)
15 (12.5%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
109 (90.8%)
11 (9.2%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
105 (87.5%)
15 (12.5%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Elimian 2013 [28]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Fischer 2000 [29]
61 (59.2%)
59 (60.8%)
-
-
12 (11.8%)
22 (22.7%)
-
-
-
-
Gordon 2007 [30]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hanprasertpong 2012 [31]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hanprasertpong 2015 [32]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hanprasertpong 2016 [20]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Katsogiannou 2018 [33]
-
-
-
-
11 (11.8%)
8 (8.9%)
-
-
-
-
Kuemanee 2021 [34]
109 (90.9%)
105 (87.6%)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Homkrun 2019 [35]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Kang 2020 [36]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mojahed 2021 [37]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Abbreviations: VR Virtual reality, BMI Body mass index, M Mean, SD Standard deviation, m meter, n number

Risk of bias assessment

High to low-quality studies were included. The majority of the examined studies exhibited a high risk of bias across the board. In Supplementary Materials, Figs. S1 and S2 depict a risk of bias graph and a risk of bias summary, respectively.

Outcomes

Anticipated pain (See Supplementary materials)

Anticipated pain was reported by 10 studies [17, 19, 20, 2527, 29, 31, 32, 34]. However, we removed WAX et al. [25], because their study resulted in two isolated networks. The most efficient method for reducing anticipated pain when compared to control was using an ice gel pack before AC; this method was significantly better [MD = -0.30, 95% CI (-0.54, -0.06)]. Figure 2 displays the NMA forest plot.

Pain during AC (See Supplementary materials)

Pain during AC was reported by six studies [15, 17, 18, 27, 34, 35]. However, we excluded Rekawek et al. [18], because their study resulted in two isolated networks. Virtual reality (VR) was the most effective approach for lowering pain during AC when compared to control [MD = -1.30, 95% CI (-2.11, -0.49)] after which ice gel pack before and after AC was the next most effective [MD = -0.93, 95% CI (-1.62, -0.23)]. Figure 3 displays the NMA forest plot.

Pain after AC (See Supplementary materials)

Pain after AC was reported by 14 studies [1719, 2430, 3336]. However, WAX et al. [25], was excluded because their study resulted in two isolated networks. Paracetamol was the most effective approach for lowering pain after AC when compared to control [MD = -1.68, 95% CI (-1.99, -1.37)] after which ice gel pack before and after AC was the next most effective [MD = -0.91, 95% CI (-1.30, -0.51)] Fig. 4 displays the NMA forest plot.

Anxiety before AC (See Supplementary materials)

Eight studies reported anxiety before AC outcome [16, 19, 20, 29, 31, 32, 36, 37] Ice gel pack before AC was the most effective approach for lowering anxiety before AC when compared to control [SMD = -2.30, 95% CI (-2.43, -2.17)] after which menthol was the next most effective [SMD = -2.00, 95% CI (-2.37, -1.63)]. Figure 5 displays the NMA forest plot.

Anxiety after AC (See supplementary materials)

Anxiety after AC was reported in five studies [16, 29, 33, 36, 37]. Katsogiannou et al. [33], were excluded because their study resulted in two isolated networks. H7-Acupressure was the most effective approach for lowering anxiety after AC when compared to control [SMD = -15.46, 95% CI (-17.77, -13.15)] after which psychological intervention was the next most effective [SMD = -6.78, 95% CI (-10.47, -3.09)]. Figure 6 displays the NMA forest plot.

Post-procedure pain and anxiety (See Supplementary materials)

Post-procedure pain and anxiety were reported in three studies [20, 31, 32]. The use of Ice gel pack before AC was the most effective method for reducing post-procedure pain and anxiety when compared to the control [MD = -0.60, 95% CI (-0.92, -0.28)]. Figure 7 displays the NMA forest plot.

Undergoing AC again if indicated (See Supplementary materials)

This outcome was reported in three studies [20, 24, 26]. Compared to the control group, the available strategies were not significant. Figure 8 displays the NMA forest plot.
Table 3 Summarizes the findings of the main outcomes.
Table 3
Summary of the main findings of the NMA
 
Main outcomes
Number of studies included in the NMA
The best therapeutic option
MD and 95% CI
Before the procedure
Anticipated pain
Ten studies
Ice gel pack
-0.30, (-0.54, -0.06)
Anxiety before AC
Eight studies
Ice gel pack
-2.30, (-2.43, -2.17)
Pain during AC
Five studies
Virtual reality
-1.30, (-2.11, -0.49)
After the procedure
Pain after AC
14 studies
Paracetamol
-1.68, (-1.99, -1.37)
Anxiety after AC
Five studies
H7 Acupressure
-15.46, (-17.77, -13.15)
Abbreviations: AC Amniocentesis, MD Mean difference, CI Confidence interval

Discussion

The present network meta-analysis compared different strategies to reduce pain and anxiety in prenatal diagnostic procedures. The VR intervention was the most successful in reducing pain during AC. The literature reported that paying attention to pain might affect the pain experience, can be used to explain this. It implies that deflecting attention away from pain can lower perceived pain levels [38]. Distraction is to make a painful stimulus seem less intense since people can’t focus on several sensory inputs at once [39]. Additionally, the VR’s multiple senses may impede nociception flow and lessen pain perception [40]. With a VR headset on, patients can leave the clinical setting and visit another world unconnected to the treatment and any potential pain [41]. Although the exact method by which VR relieves pain is yet unknown, given the well-known connection between pain and emotions, the analgesic impact of VR may be mediated by brain systems [40]. Additionally, VR is simple to use, reasonably priced, and has the benefit of no negative side effects.
The popular pain reliever paracetamol is safe for use during pregnancy [42]. It was successful in lowering pain following AC; however, it was ineffective during AC. The timing of drug intake before the surgery may help to explain this [17]. Further research is needed to determine the ideal premedication period. However, paracetamol has a number of benefits including broad therapeutic applicability, good tolerability, and good absorption after oral administration [43].
The anti-swelling and analgesic effects of cold therapy are widely established for treating soft tissue injuries [44], postoperative pain from gynecologic surgery [45], and perineal pain following vaginal delivery [46]. Reduced soft tissue temperature can have an analgesic effect by slowing the speed at which pain is transmitted. Therefore, applying an ice gel pack before and after receiving AC was useful in lowering pain only after receiving AC, not during receiving AC. Additionally, applying an ice gel pack prior to the AC helped to lower anxiousness. However, a prolonged or excessive exposure might have negative effects like burns and ulcers [46].
H7 Acupressure proved to be successful in lowering anxiety after AC. The results can be explained by a number of various mechanisms. Cortisol and stress are associated in that as stress rises, cortisol also rises. In the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, the stimulation of acupressure points alters hormonal-neuronal responses, which in turn controls cortisol output and induces calm. Additionally, by activating the anterior pituitary, acupressure can boost serotonin and dopamine release [47]. Serotonin and dopamine levels in the plasma rise, which reduces cortisol synthesis [48]. In addition, the stimulation of the acupressure point releases endorphins, which peak 30 min after the stimulation begins and remain elevated for 10 h. Similarly, serotonin levels are raised, and endorphins are released when the H7 acupoint is stimulated vigorously and repeatedly [49]. However, other factors must be taken into account while using this method as they may have an impact on the outcomes, such as the target population, the acupressure points employed, and the length of the acupressure.

Limitations

The majority of the included studies had a high overall risk of bias, which could have an impact on the study’s findings. We exclude some trials to conduct a single network meta-analysis.

Conclusion

VR was the most effective method for reducing pain during AC, whereas paracetamol was the best method for reducing pain following AC. Additionally, H7 Acupressure was the most effective for reducing anxiety after AC, while an ice gel pack was the best for reducing anxiety before AC. By combining and integrating these methods, healthcare workers will have the potential to significantly aid women who are having AC.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgment.

Declarations

Not available.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Anhänge

Supplementary Information

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL et al. Williams obstetrics. USA: McGraw-Hill Medical New York; 2014. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL et al. Williams obstetrics. USA: McGraw-Hill Medical New York; 2014.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA, Walsh MC. Genetic aspects of perinatal disease and prenatal diagnosis. 11th ed. Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Cleveland: Elsevier; 2020. Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA, Walsh MC. Genetic aspects of perinatal disease and prenatal diagnosis. 11th ed. Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Cleveland: Elsevier; 2020.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Seeds JW. Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(2):607–15.CrossRefPubMed Seeds JW. Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(2):607–15.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM et al. Obstetrícia de Williams-25. Brazil: McGraw Hill Brasil; 2021. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM et al. Obstetrícia de Williams-25. Brazil: McGraw Hill Brasil; 2021.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tara F, Lotfalizadeh M, Moeindarbari S. The effect of diagnostic amniocentesis and its complications on early spontaneous abortion. Electron Physician. 2017;8:2787–92. Tara F, Lotfalizadeh M, Moeindarbari S. The effect of diagnostic amniocentesis and its complications on early spontaneous abortion. Electron Physician. 2017;8:2787–92.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu WW, Hsieh CJ, Lee CN, Chen CL, Lin MW, Kang J, et al. Complication rates after chorionic villus sampling and midtrimester amniocentesis: a 7-year national registry study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118(7):1107–13. Hsu WW, Hsieh CJ, Lee CN, Chen CL, Lin MW, Kang J, et al. Complication rates after chorionic villus sampling and midtrimester amniocentesis: a 7-year national registry study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118(7):1107–13.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaresima P, Visconti F, Greco E, Venturella R, Di Carlo C. Prenatal tests for chromosomal abnormalities detection (PTCAD): Pregnant women’s knowledge in an Italian Population. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303;1185–90. Quaresima P, Visconti F, Greco E, Venturella R, Di Carlo C. Prenatal tests for chromosomal abnormalities detection (PTCAD): Pregnant women’s knowledge in an Italian Population. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303;1185–90.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tursinawati Y, Thain S, Choi C, Seow GHY. Amniocentesis increases level of anxiety in women with invasive prenatal diagnosis of down syndrome. Universa Med. 2015;34(2):112–20.CrossRef Tursinawati Y, Thain S, Choi C, Seow GHY. Amniocentesis increases level of anxiety in women with invasive prenatal diagnosis of down syndrome. Universa Med. 2015;34(2):112–20.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakić Radoš S, Košec V, Gall V. The psychological effects of prenatal diagnostic procedures: maternal anxiety before and after invasive and noninvasive procedures. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(12):1194–200.CrossRefPubMed Nakić Radoš S, Košec V, Gall V. The psychological effects of prenatal diagnostic procedures: maternal anxiety before and after invasive and noninvasive procedures. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(12):1194–200.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Brajenović-Milić B, Martinac Dorčić T, Kuljanić K, Petrović O. Stress and anxiety in relation to amniocentesis: do women who perceive their partners to be more involved in pregnancy feel less stressed and anxious? Croatian Med J. 2010;51(2):137–43.CrossRef Brajenović-Milić B, Martinac Dorčić T, Kuljanić K, Petrović O. Stress and anxiety in relation to amniocentesis: do women who perceive their partners to be more involved in pregnancy feel less stressed and anxious? Croatian Med J. 2010;51(2):137–43.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Klages K, Kundu S, Erlenwein J, Elsaesser M, Hillemanns P, Scharf A, et al. Maternal anxiety and its correlation with pain experience during chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis. J Pain Res. 2017;Volume 10:591–600.CrossRef Klages K, Kundu S, Erlenwein J, Elsaesser M, Hillemanns P, Scharf A, et al. Maternal anxiety and its correlation with pain experience during chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis. J Pain Res. 2017;Volume 10:591–600.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bot-Robin V, Sendon S, Bourzoufi K, Vaast P, Deken V, Dutoit P, et al. Maternal anxiety and pain during prenatal diagnostic techniques: a prospective study. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(6):562–8.CrossRefPubMed Bot-Robin V, Sendon S, Bourzoufi K, Vaast P, Deken V, Dutoit P, et al. Maternal anxiety and pain during prenatal diagnostic techniques: a prospective study. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(6):562–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Csaba A, Bush MC, Saphier C. How painful are amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling? Prenat Diagn. 2006;26:35–8. Csaba A, Bush MC, Saphier C. How painful are amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling? Prenat Diagn. 2006;26:35–8.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Locock L, Field K, McPherson A, Boyd PA. Women’s accounts of the physical sensation of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: expectations and experience. Midwifery. 2010;26(1):64–75.CrossRefPubMed Locock L, Field K, McPherson A, Boyd PA. Women’s accounts of the physical sensation of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: expectations and experience. Midwifery. 2010;26(1):64–75.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Melcer Y, Maymon R, Gal-Kochav M, Pekar-Zlotin M, Levinsohn-Tavor O, Meizner I, et al. Analgesic efficacy of virtual reality for acute pain in amniocentesis: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;261:134–8.CrossRefPubMed Melcer Y, Maymon R, Gal-Kochav M, Pekar-Zlotin M, Levinsohn-Tavor O, Meizner I, et al. Analgesic efficacy of virtual reality for acute pain in amniocentesis: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;261:134–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammadifard M, Salarfard M, Samieean M. The effect of H7 acupressure on amniocentesis anxiety in pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2021;10(4):222. Mohammadifard M, Salarfard M, Samieean M. The effect of H7 acupressure on amniocentesis anxiety in pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2021;10(4):222.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuaktaew T, Sudjai D, Pattanavijarn L. Oral paracetamol premedication effect on maternal pain in amniocentesis: a randomised double blind placebo-controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(8):1078–82.CrossRefPubMed Tuaktaew T, Sudjai D, Pattanavijarn L. Oral paracetamol premedication effect on maternal pain in amniocentesis: a randomised double blind placebo-controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(8):1078–82.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rekawek P, Stone JL, Robles B, Connolly KA, Bigelow CA, Tudela F, et al. Pain perception during transabdominal chorionic villus sampling: a randomized trial comparing topical ethyl chloride anesthetic spray and lidocaine injection. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;34(3):339–45.CrossRef Rekawek P, Stone JL, Robles B, Connolly KA, Bigelow CA, Tudela F, et al. Pain perception during transabdominal chorionic villus sampling: a randomized trial comparing topical ethyl chloride anesthetic spray and lidocaine injection. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;34(3):339–45.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pongrojpaw D, Somprasit C, Chanthasenanont A. The efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine cream to reduce pain in genetic amniocentesis. Med J Med Associ Thail. 2007;90(10):1992. Pongrojpaw D, Somprasit C, Chanthasenanont A. The efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine cream to reduce pain in genetic amniocentesis. Med J Med Associ Thail. 2007;90(10):1992.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanprasertpong T, Kor-anantakul O, Leetanaporn R, Suwanrath C, Suntharasaj T, Pruksanusak N, et al. Music listening to decrease pain during second trimester genetic amniocentesis: a randomized trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99(12):1272–6.PubMed Hanprasertpong T, Kor-anantakul O, Leetanaporn R, Suwanrath C, Suntharasaj T, Pruksanusak N, et al. Music listening to decrease pain during second trimester genetic amniocentesis: a randomized trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99(12):1272–6.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.CrossRefPubMed Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Altman DG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. 2008;5.1.0:187–241. Higgins JP, Altman DG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. 2008;5.1.0:187–241.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366. Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Schoubroeck D, Verhaeghe J. Does local anesthesia at mid-trimester amniocentesis decrease pain experience? A randomized trial in 220 patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(6):536–8.CrossRefPubMed Van Schoubroeck D, Verhaeghe J. Does local anesthesia at mid-trimester amniocentesis decrease pain experience? A randomized trial in 220 patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(6):536–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wax JR, Pinette MG, Carpenter M, Chard R, Blackstone J, Cartin A. Reducing pain with genetic amniocentesis—A randomized trial of subfreezing versus room temperature needles. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18(4):221–4.CrossRef Wax JR, Pinette MG, Carpenter M, Chard R, Blackstone J, Cartin A. Reducing pain with genetic amniocentesis—A randomized trial of subfreezing versus room temperature needles. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18(4):221–4.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Telapol K, Bumrungphuet S, Ayudhya NIN. Effect of Ethyl Chloride Spray for Pain reduction during amniocentesis: a non–blinded randomized controlled trial. Thai J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;26:75–82. Telapol K, Bumrungphuet S, Ayudhya NIN. Effect of Ethyl Chloride Spray for Pain reduction during amniocentesis: a non–blinded randomized controlled trial. Thai J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;26:75–82.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Benchahong S, Pongrojpaw D, Chanthasenanont A, Limpivest U, Nanthakomon T, Lertvutivivat S, et al. Cold therapy for pain relief during and after amniocentesis procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2021;47(8):2623–31.CrossRef Benchahong S, Pongrojpaw D, Chanthasenanont A, Limpivest U, Nanthakomon T, Lertvutivivat S, et al. Cold therapy for pain relief during and after amniocentesis procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2021;47(8):2623–31.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Elimian A, Goodman JR, Knudtson E, Wagner A, Wilson P, Williams M. Local anesthesia and pain perception during amniocentesis: a randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(12):1158–61.CrossRefPubMed Elimian A, Goodman JR, Knudtson E, Wagner A, Wilson P, Williams M. Local anesthesia and pain perception during amniocentesis: a randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(12):1158–61.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer RL, Bianculli KW, Sehdev H, Hediger ML. Does light pressure effleurage reduce pain and anxiety associated with genetic amniocentesis? A randomized clinical trial. J Maternal-Fetal Med. 2000;9(5):294–7. Fischer RL, Bianculli KW, Sehdev H, Hediger ML. Does light pressure effleurage reduce pain and anxiety associated with genetic amniocentesis? A randomized clinical trial. J Maternal-Fetal Med. 2000;9(5):294–7.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon MC, Ventura-Braswell A, Higby K, Ward JA. Does local anesthesia decrease pain perception in women undergoing amniocentesis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(1):55.e1-.e4.CrossRefPubMed Gordon MC, Ventura-Braswell A, Higby K, Ward JA. Does local anesthesia decrease pain perception in women undergoing amniocentesis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(1):55.e1-.e4.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanprasertpong T, Kor-Anantakul O, Prasartwanakit V, Leetanaporn R, Suntharasaj T, Suwanrath C. Efficacy of cryoanalgesia in decreasing pain during second trimester genetic amniocentesis: a randomized trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:563–6.CrossRefPubMed Hanprasertpong T, Kor-Anantakul O, Prasartwanakit V, Leetanaporn R, Suntharasaj T, Suwanrath C. Efficacy of cryoanalgesia in decreasing pain during second trimester genetic amniocentesis: a randomized trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:563–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanprasertpong T, Kor-anantakul O, Leetanaporn R, Suwanrath C, Suntharasaj T, Pruksanusak N, et al. Reducing pain and anxiety during second trimester genetic amniocentesis using aromatic therapy: a randomized trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(8):734–8.PubMed Hanprasertpong T, Kor-anantakul O, Leetanaporn R, Suwanrath C, Suntharasaj T, Pruksanusak N, et al. Reducing pain and anxiety during second trimester genetic amniocentesis using aromatic therapy: a randomized trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(8):734–8.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsogiannou M, Donato XC, Loundou A, Glowaczower E, Raffray M, Planchet-Barraud B, et al. Managing pain and anxiety during transabdominal chorionic villus sampling. A noninferiority randomized trial of nitrous oxide vs local anesthesia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;98(3):351–8.CrossRefPubMed Katsogiannou M, Donato XC, Loundou A, Glowaczower E, Raffray M, Planchet-Barraud B, et al. Managing pain and anxiety during transabdominal chorionic villus sampling. A noninferiority randomized trial of nitrous oxide vs local anesthesia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;98(3):351–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuemanee O, Pongrojpaw D, Chanthasenanont A, Benchahong S, Pattaraarchachai J, Bhamarapravatana K, et al. Reducing pain after second trimester genetic amniocentesis by postprocedural cryotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thail. 2021;104(8):1235–40.CrossRef Kuemanee O, Pongrojpaw D, Chanthasenanont A, Benchahong S, Pattaraarchachai J, Bhamarapravatana K, et al. Reducing pain after second trimester genetic amniocentesis by postprocedural cryotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thail. 2021;104(8):1235–40.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Homkrun P, Tongsong T, Srisupundit K. Effect of Xylocaine spray for analgesia during amniocentesis: a randomized controlled trial. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(13):1179–83.CrossRefPubMed Homkrun P, Tongsong T, Srisupundit K. Effect of Xylocaine spray for analgesia during amniocentesis: a randomized controlled trial. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(13):1179–83.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang C-M. Effects of psychological intervention and relevant influence factors on pregnant women undergoing interventional prenatal diagnosis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2020;83(2):202–5.CrossRefPubMed Kang C-M. Effects of psychological intervention and relevant influence factors on pregnant women undergoing interventional prenatal diagnosis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2020;83(2):202–5.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Mojahed S, Reyhanizadeh F, Tabatabaei RS, Dehghani A. Evaluation of the effect of education on perceived stress of mother candidates for amniocentesis. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:267.PubMedPubMedCentral Mojahed S, Reyhanizadeh F, Tabatabaei RS, Dehghani A. Evaluation of the effect of education on perceived stress of mother candidates for amniocentesis. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:267.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Eccleston C, Crombez G. Pain demands attention: a cognitive–affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(3):356.CrossRefPubMed Eccleston C, Crombez G. Pain demands attention: a cognitive–affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(3):356.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharar SR, Alamdari A, Hoffer C, Hoffman HG, Jensen MP, Patterson DR. Circumplex model of affect: a measure of pleasure and arousal during virtual reality distraction analgesia. Games Health J. 2016;5(3):197–202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sharar SR, Alamdari A, Hoffer C, Hoffman HG, Jensen MP, Patterson DR. Circumplex model of affect: a measure of pleasure and arousal during virtual reality distraction analgesia. Games Health J. 2016;5(3):197–202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman HG, Chambers GT, Meyer WJ III, Arceneaux LL, Russell WJ, Seibel EJ, et al. Virtual reality as an adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(2):183–91.CrossRefPubMed Hoffman HG, Chambers GT, Meyer WJ III, Arceneaux LL, Russell WJ, Seibel EJ, et al. Virtual reality as an adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(2):183–91.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Rebordosa C, Kogevinas M, Horváth-Puhó E, Nørgård B, Morales M, Czeizel AE, et al. Acetaminophen use during pregnancy: effects on risk for Congenital Abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(2):178e1-1787.CrossRef Rebordosa C, Kogevinas M, Horváth-Puhó E, Nørgård B, Morales M, Czeizel AE, et al. Acetaminophen use during pregnancy: effects on risk for Congenital Abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(2):178e1-1787.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Jóźwiak-Bebenista M, Nowak JZ. Paracetamol: mechanism of action, applications and safety concern. Acta Pol Pharm. 2014;71(1):11–23.PubMed Jóźwiak-Bebenista M, Nowak JZ. Paracetamol: mechanism of action, applications and safety concern. Acta Pol Pharm. 2014;71(1):11–23.PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuo C-C, Lin C-C, Lee W-J, Huang W-T. Comparing the antiswelling and analgesic effects of three different ice pack therapy durations: a randomized controlled trial on cases with soft tissue injuries. J Nurs Res. 2013;21(3):186–93.CrossRefPubMed Kuo C-C, Lin C-C, Lee W-J, Huang W-T. Comparing the antiswelling and analgesic effects of three different ice pack therapy durations: a randomized controlled trial on cases with soft tissue injuries. J Nurs Res. 2013;21(3):186–93.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Chumkam A, Pongrojpaw D, Chanthasenanont A, Pattaraarchachai J, Bhamarapravatana K, Suwannarurk K. Cryotherapy reduced postoperative pain in gynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Pain Res Treat. 2019;2019:2405159.PubMedPubMedCentral Chumkam A, Pongrojpaw D, Chanthasenanont A, Pattaraarchachai J, Bhamarapravatana K, Suwannarurk K. Cryotherapy reduced postoperative pain in gynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Pain Res Treat. 2019;2019:2405159.PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Francisco AA, De Oliveira SMJV, Steen M, Nobre MRC, De Souza EV. Ice pack induced perineal analgesia after spontaneous vaginal birth: Randomized controlled trial. Women Birth. 2018;31(5):e334–40.CrossRefPubMed Francisco AA, De Oliveira SMJV, Steen M, Nobre MRC, De Souza EV. Ice pack induced perineal analgesia after spontaneous vaginal birth: Randomized controlled trial. Women Birth. 2018;31(5):e334–40.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Valiee S, Bassampour SS, Nasrabadi AN, Pouresmaeil Z, Mehran A. Effect of acupressure on preoperative anxiety: a clinical trial. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2012;27(4):259–66.CrossRef Valiee S, Bassampour SS, Nasrabadi AN, Pouresmaeil Z, Mehran A. Effect of acupressure on preoperative anxiety: a clinical trial. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2012;27(4):259–66.CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Nahayati MA, Vaghar Seyyedin SA, Bahrami-Taghanki HR, Rezaee Z, Mehrpooya N, Rahimi H. Effect of acupressure on stress and anxiety of patients with multiple sclerosis: a sham-controlled randomized clinical trial. Complement Med J. 2020;10(3):270–83.CrossRef Nahayati MA, Vaghar Seyyedin SA, Bahrami-Taghanki HR, Rezaee Z, Mehrpooya N, Rahimi H. Effect of acupressure on stress and anxiety of patients with multiple sclerosis: a sham-controlled randomized clinical trial. Complement Med J. 2020;10(3):270–83.CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Choubsaz M, Amirifard N, Pourmatin S. Compare the effect of dry-cupping by stimulating the P6 and H7 point in controlling perioperative anxiety. Biomed Res. 2017;28(3):1070–4. Choubsaz M, Amirifard N, Pourmatin S. Compare the effect of dry-cupping by stimulating the P6 and H7 point in controlling perioperative anxiety. Biomed Res. 2017;28(3):1070–4.
Metadaten
Titel
Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of different treatments in reducing amniocentesis-associated pain and anxiety
verfasst von
Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud
Abdallah R. Allam
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06094-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Alter der Mutter beeinflusst Risiko für kongenitale Anomalie

28.05.2024 Kinder- und Jugendgynäkologie Nachrichten

Welchen Einfluss das Alter ihrer Mutter auf das Risiko hat, dass Kinder mit nicht chromosomal bedingter Malformation zur Welt kommen, hat eine ungarische Studie untersucht. Sie zeigt: Nicht nur fortgeschrittenes Alter ist riskant.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.