nach oben

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Erschienen in:

14.10.2023 | Otology

Normal linear and non-linear cochlear mechanisms and efferent system functioning in individuals with misophonia

verfasst von: Urs Suraj, Kavassery Venkateswaran Nisha, Prashanth Prabhu

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 4/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Misophonia, a condition characterized by heightened sensitivity and strong emotional reactions to specific sounds, has sparked considerable interest and debate regarding its underlying auditory mechanisms. The study aimed to understand the auditory underpinnings of two such potential inner ear systems, non-linear and linear outer hair cell functioning along with auditory efferent functioning in individuals with misophonia.

Methods

40 ears with misophonia (20 participants) and 37 ears without misophonia (20 participants), both having normal hearing sensitivity were included in this study. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were obtained in two conditions (with and without contralateral noise).

Results

Results of independent-samples t-test showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in the absolute amplitudes of both TEOAEs and DPOAEs between the individuals with and without misophonia. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) observed in the magnitude of suppression amplitude between the two groups for in both TEOAEs and DPOAEs between individuals with and without misophonia.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the cochlear and efferent auditory underpinnings examined in this study may not be major contributors to the development or manifestation of misophonia.

Schröder A, Vulink N, Denys D (2013) Misophonia: diagnostic criteria for a new psychiatric disorder. PLoS ONE 8:e54706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054706CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralADS

Patel NM, Fameen R, Shafeek N, Prabhu P (2023) Prevalence of Misophonia in College Going Students of India: A Preliminary Survey. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75:374–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03266-zCrossRefPubMed

Vitoratou S, Hayes C, Uglik-Marucha N et al (2023) Misophonia in the UK: Prevalence and norms from the S-Five in a UK representative sample. PLoS ONE 18:e0282777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282777CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Edelstein M, Brang D, Rouw R, Ramachandran VS (2013) Misophonia: physiological investigations and case descriptions. Front Hum Neurosci 7:296. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNHUM.2013.00296CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Aryal S, Prabhu P (2023) Understanding misophonia from an audiological perspective: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280:1529–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07774-0CrossRefPubMed

Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM (2003) Tinnitus retraining therapy for patients with tinnitus and decreased sound tolerance. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 36:321–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6665(02)00172-XCrossRefPubMed

Jastreboff PJ (2007) Tinnitus retraining therapy. Prog Brain Res 166:415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66040-3CrossRefPubMed

Thabet EM (2009) Evaluation of tinnitus patients with normal hearing sensitivity using TEOAEs and TEN test. Auris Nasus Larynx 36:633–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANL.2009.01.002CrossRefPubMed

Sarathy K, Jaya V (2017) Contralateral suppression of TEOAE in patients with tinnitus and normal hearing. Biomed J Sci Tech Res 1:1582–1584. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000492CrossRef

10.

Alshabory HF, Gabr TA, Kotait MA (2022) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in tinnitus patients. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 26:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0040-1722248CrossRef

11.

Xiong B, Liu Z, Liu Q et al (2019) Missed hearing loss in tinnitus patients with normal audiograms. Hear Res 384:107826. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEARES.2019.107826CrossRefPubMed

12.

Schaette R, McAlpine D (2011) Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 31:13452–13457. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Knudson IM, Shera CA, Melcher JR (2014) Increased contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions indicates a hyperresponsive medial olivocochlear system in humans with tinnitus and hyperacusis. J Neurophysiol 112:3197–3208. https://doi.org/10.1152/JN.00576.2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Schröder A, van Diepen R, Mazaheri A et al (2014) Diminished N1 auditory evoked potentials to oddball stimuli in misophonia patients. Front Behav Neurosci 8:123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Kumar S, Tansley-Hancock O, Sedley W et al (2017) The brain basis for misophonia. Curr Biol 27:527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2016.12.048CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Schröder A, Giorgi RS, Van Wingen G et al (2015) Impulsive aggression in misophonia: results from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 25:S307–S308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-977X(15)30374-6CrossRef

17.

Schröder A, van Wingen G, Eijsker N et al (2019) Misophonia is associated with altered brain activity in the auditory cortex and salience network. Sci Rep 9:7542. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44084-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralADS

18.

Eijsker N, Schröder A, Smit DJA et al (2021) Structural and functional brain abnormalities in misophonia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 52:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EURONEURO.2021.05.013CrossRefPubMed

19.

Schroder AE, Mazaheri A, Petropoulos D et al (2013) A diminished mismatch negativity response in misophonia, a potential marker for aggressive impulsivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 23:S177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-977X(13)70269-4CrossRef

20.

Delano PH, Elgoyhen AB (2016) Editorial: auditory efferent system: new insights from cortex to cochlea. Front Syst Neurosci 10:50. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00050CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Shera CA (2004) Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 25:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000121200.90211.83CrossRefPubMed

22.

Harrison WA, Norton SJ (1999) Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 20:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199902000-00007CrossRefPubMed

23.

Probst R, Hauser R (1990) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired ears. Am J Otolaryngol 11:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-0709(90)90083-8CrossRefPubMed

24.

Gorga MP, Neely ST, Bergman BM et al (1993) A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 94:2639–2648. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.407348CrossRefPubMedADS

25.

Liberman MC (2017) Noise-induced and age-related hearing loss: new perspectives and potential therapies. F1000Res 6:927. https://doi.org/10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.11310.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Asilador A, Llano DA (2021) Top-down inference in the auditory system: potential roles for corticofugal projections. Front Neural Circuits 14:615259. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNCIR.2020.615259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Xiao Z, Suga N (2002) Modulation of cochlear hair cells by the auditory cortex in the mustached bat. Nat Neurosci 5:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/NN786CrossRefPubMed

28.

Francis NA, Guinan JJ (2010) Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: implications for cochlear filter bandwidths. Hear Res 267:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2010.04.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Wahab NAA, Wahab S, Rahman AHA et al (2016) The hyperactivity of efferent auditory system in patients with schizophrenia: a transient evoked otoacoustic emissions study. Psychiatry Investig 13:82–88. https://doi.org/10.4306/PI.2016.13.1.82CrossRefPubMed

30.

Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM (2023) The neurophysiological approach to misophonia: theory and treatment. Front Neurosci 17:895574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.895574CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Orlikoff RF, Schiavetti NE, Metz DE (2014) Evaluating research in communication disorders. Pearson Education, London

32.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146CrossRefPubMed

33.

Elmoazen D, Kozou H, Elabassiery B (2020) Otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression in tinnitus sufferers with normal hearing. Egypt J Otolaryngol 36:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-020-00030-4CrossRef

34.

Johnson, Marsha, Doizer T (2013) Misophonia assessment questionnaire (MAQ). Revised by Misophonia Institute, Dozier T Livermore, CA. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjvydiy35yBAxVqbmwGHcxxCnUQFnoECBAQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmisophoniatreatment.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F02%2FBinder_all_forms.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1CR8-qUWrS_icANO4kVjeS&opi=89978449. Accessed on 6 July 2023

35.

Martin FN, Champlin CA (2000) Reconsidering the limits of normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol 11:64–66CrossRefPubMed

36.

Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

37.

Rosenthal R (1994) Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV (eds) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 231–244

Titel: Normal linear and non-linear cochlear mechanisms and efferent system functioning in individuals with misophonia
verfasst von: Urs Suraj
Kavassery Venkateswaran Nisha
Prashanth Prabhu
Publikationsdatum: 14.10.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 4/2024
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08273-6

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

16.05.2024 Pädiatrische Allergologie Nachrichten

Die große Mehrheit der vermeintlichen Penicillinallergien sind keine. Da das „Etikett“ Betalaktam-Allergie oft schon in der Kindheit erworben wird, kann ein frühzeitiges Delabeling lebenslange Vorteile bringen. Ein Team von Pädiaterinnen und Pädiatern aus Kanada stellt vor, wie sie dabei vorgehen.

Eingreifen von Umstehenden rettet vor Erstickungstod

15.05.2024 Fremdkörperaspiration Nachrichten

Wer sich an einem Essensrest verschluckt und um Luft ringt, benötigt vor allem rasche Hilfe. Dass Umstehende nur in jedem zweiten Erstickungsnotfall bereit waren, diese zu leisten, ist das ernüchternde Ergebnis einer Beobachtungsstudie aus Japan. Doch es gibt auch eine gute Nachricht.

Real-World-Daten sprechen eher für Dupilumab als für Op.

14.05.2024 Rhinosinusitis Nachrichten

Zur Behandlung schwerer Formen der chronischen Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) stehen seit Kurzem verschiedene Behandlungsmethoden zur Verfügung, darunter Biologika, wie Dupilumab, und die endoskopische Sinuschirurgie (ESS). Beim Vergleich der beiden Therapieoptionen war Dupilumab leicht im Vorteil.

Schwindelursache: Massagepistole lässt Otholiten tanzen

14.05.2024 Benigner Lagerungsschwindel Nachrichten

Wenn jüngere Menschen über ständig rezidivierenden Lagerungsschwindel klagen, könnte eine Massagepistole der Auslöser sein. In JAMA Otolaryngology warnt ein Team vor der Anwendung hochpotenter Geräte im Bereich des Nackens.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Normal linear and non-linear cochlear mechanisms and efferent system functioning in individuals with misophonia

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

Eingreifen von Umstehenden rettet vor Erstickungstod

Real-World-Daten sprechen eher für Dupilumab als für Op.

Schwindelursache: Massagepistole lässt Otholiten tanzen

Update HNO

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2024

Exploring the role of ChatGPT in clinical decision-making in otorhinolaryngology: a ChatGPT designed study

Machine learning for risk stratification of thyroid cancer patients: a 15-year cohort study

Impact of endolymphatic hydrops on the function of the horizontal canal during caloric stimulation in Ménière’s disease

Assessment of quality of life in thyroid cancer patients using the EORTC thyroid-specific questionnaire: a prospective cross-sectional study

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-to-eosinophil ratio as prognostic indicators for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Is the evolving role of artificial intelligence and chatbots in the field of otolaryngology embracing the future?

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

Eingreifen von Umstehenden rettet vor Erstickungstod

Real-World-Daten sprechen eher für Dupilumab als für Op.

Schwindelursache: Massagepistole lässt Otholiten tanzen

Update HNO