Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 2/2017

22.12.2016 | Review Article

On-scene treatment of spinal injuries in motor sports

verfasst von: M. Kreinest, M. Scholz, P. Trafford

Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Because spinal cord injuries can have fatal consequences for injured race car drivers, prehospital treatment of spinal injuries is a major concern in motor sports. A structured procedure for assessing trauma patients and their treatment should follow established ABCDE principles. Only then, a stable patient could be further examined and appropriate measures can be undertaken. For patients in an acute life-threatening condition, rapid transport must be initiated and should not be delayed by measures that are not indicated. If a competitor must first be extricated from the racing vehicle, the correct method of extrication must be chosen. To avoid secondary injury to the spine after a racing accident, in-line extrication from the vehicle and immobilization of the patient are standard procedures in motor sports and have been used for decades. Since immobilization can be associated with disadvantages and complications, the need for immobilization of trauma patients outside of motor sports medicine has become the subject of an increasing number of reports in the scientific literature. Even in motor sports, where specific safety systems that offer spinal protection are present, the indications for spinal immobilization need to be carefully considered rather than being blindly adopted as a matter of course. The aim of this article is to use recent literature to present an overview about the treatment of spinal injuries in motor sports. Further, we present a new protocol for indications for immobilizing the spine in motor sports that is based on the ABCDE principles and takes into account the condition of the patient.
Literatur
1.
Abram S, Bulstrode C. Routine spinal immobilization in trauma patients: what are the advantages and disadvantages? Surg J Royal Coll Surg Edinb Irel. 2010;8:218–22.
2.
Agrawal A. Cervical spine clearance: a review and understanding of the concepts. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2008;47:244–50.PubMed
3.
Anderson PA, Muchow RD, Munoz A, et al. Clearance of the asymptomatic cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:100–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Armstrong BP, Simpson HK, Crouch R, et al. Prehospital clearance of the cervical spine: does it need to be a pain in the neck? Emerg Med J EMJ. 2007;24:501–3.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Askins V, Eismont FJ. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. A comparison study. Spine. 1997;22:1193–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Bandiera G, Stiell IG, Wells GA, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule performs better than unstructured physician judgment. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:395–402.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Barkana Y, Stein M, Scope A, et al. Prehospital stabilization of the cervical spine for penetrating injuries of the neck—is it necessary? Injury. 2000;31:305–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Bauer D, Kowalski R. Effect of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in the healthy, nonsmoking man. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17:915–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Ben-Galim P, Dreiangel N, Mattox KL, et al. Extrication collars can result in abnormal separation between vertebrae in the presence of a dissociative injury. J Trauma. 2010;69:447–50.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Berg G, Nyberg S, Harrison P, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy measurement of sacral tissue oxygen saturation in healthy volunteers immobilized on rigid spine boards. Prehospital Emerg Care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Phys Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 2010;14:419–24.
11.
Bortsov AV, Platts-Mills TF, Peak DA, et al. Pain distribution and predictors of widespread pain in the immediate aftermath of motor vehicle collision. Eur J Pain (London, England). 2013;17:1243–1251.
12.
Burton JH, Dunn MG, Harmon NR, et al. A statewide, prehospital emergency medical service selective patient spine immobilization protocol. J Trauma. 2006;61:161–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Burton JH, Harmon NR, Dunn MG, et al. EMS provider findings and interventions with a statewide EMS spine-assessment protocol. Prehospital Emerg Care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Phys Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 2005;9:303–9.
14.
Chan D, Goldberg R, Tascone A, et al. The effect of spinal immobilization on healthy volunteers. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23:48–51.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Chan D, Goldberg RM, Mason J, et al. Backboard versus mattress splint immobilization: a comparison of symptoms generated. J Emerg Med. 1996;14:293–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Chandler DR, Nemejc C, Adkins RH, et al. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:1185–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
Connor D, Greaves I, Porter K, et al. Pre-hospital spinal immobilisation: an initial consensus statement. Emerg Med J EMJ. 2013;30:1067–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Cordell WH, Hollingsworth JC, Olinger ML, et al. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:31–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Craig GR, Nielsen MS. Rigid cervical collars and intracranial pressure. Intensive Care Med. 1991;17:504–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Davies G, Deakin C, Wilson A. The effect of a rigid collar on intracranial pressure. Injury. 1996;27:647–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Deakin ND, Roberts I, Collett A, et al. Keeping competitors safe: a four-qear study. Auto + Med. 2015;38–51.
23.
Deasy C, Cameron P. Routine application of cervical collars—what is the evidence? Injury. 2011;42:841–2.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Unfallchirurgie. S3—Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung AWMF-Register Nr. 012/019. 2011.
25.
Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Unfallchirurgie (Dgu); Sektion Intensiv- & Notfallmedizin SNa-aDUG. TraumaRegister DGU—Jahresbericht 2014. 2014.
26.
Dixon M, O’halloran J, Hannigan A, et al. Confirmation of suboptimal protocols in spinal immobilisation? Emerg Med J EMJ. 2015.
27.
Domeier RM, Evans RW, Swor RA, et al. The reliability of prehospital clinical evaluation for potential spinal injury is not affected by the mechanism of injury. Prehospital Emerg Care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Phys Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 1999;3:332–7.
28.
Domeier RM, Evans RW, Swor RA, et al. Prehospital clinical findings associated with spinal injury. Prehospital Emerg Care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Phys Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 1997;1:11–5.
29.
Domeier RM, Frederiksen SM, Welch K. Prospective performance assessment of an out-of-hospital protocol for selective spine immobilization using clinical spine clearance criteria. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46:123–31.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Dunn TM, Dalton A, Dorfman T, et al. Are emergency medical technician-basics able to use a selective immobilization of the cervical spine protocol?: a preliminary report. Prehospital Emerg Care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Phys Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 2004;8:207–11.
31.
Ebben WP, Suchomel TJ. Physical demands, injuries, and conditioning practices of stock car drivers. J Strength Condition Res Natl Strength Condition Assoc. 2012;26:1188–98.CrossRef
32.
Floß FM, Balbach P, Scholz M. Extrication. In: Kreinest M, editor. Schwerverletztenversorgung im Motorsport—Das RTTLS-Konzept. Berlin: MWV; 2013.
33.
Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E, et al. Distribution and patterns of blunt traumatic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38:17–21.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:344–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Grohs T, Archer S. Design of an extractable safety seat for the F1 Cockpit. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-3540. 2000.
36.
Hamilton RS, Pons PT. The efficacy and comfort of full-body vacuum splints for cervical-spine immobilization. J Emerg Med. 1996;14:553–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Hanson JA, Blackmore CC, Mann FA, et al. Cervical spine injury: a clinical decision rule to identify high-risk patients for helical CT screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:713–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Hasler RM, Exadaktylos AK, Bouamra O, et al. Epidemiology and predictors of spinal injury in adult major trauma patients: European cohort study. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cervical Spine Res Soc. 2011;20:2174–80.CrossRef
39.
Haut ER, Kalish BT, Efron DT, et al. Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good? J Trauma. 2010;68:115–20.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:94–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Hoffman JR, Wolfson AB, Todd K, et al. Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32:461–9.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Holla M. Value of a rigid collar in addition to head blocks: a proof of principle study. Emerg Med J EMJ. 2012;29:104–7.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Hood N, Considine J. Spinal immobilisaton in pre-hospital and emergency care: A systematic review of the literature. Australas Emerg Nurs J AENJ. 2015;18:118–37.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Horodyski M, Dipaola CP, Conrad BP, et al. Cervical collars are insufficient for immobilizing an unstable cervical spine injury. J Emerg Med. 2011;41:513–9.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Hostler D, Colburn D, Seitz SR. A comparison of three cervical immobilization devices. Prehospital Emerg Care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Phys Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 2009;13:256–60.
46.
Hunt K, Hallworth S, Smith M. The effects of rigid collar placement on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:511–3.CrossRefPubMed
47.
James CY, Riemann BL, Munkasy BA, et al. Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion During Application Among 4 Rigid Immobilization Collars. J Athl Train. 2004;39:138–45.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Johnson DR, Hauswald M, Stockhoff C. Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:369–72.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Kaul A, Abbas A, Smith G, et al. A revolution in preventing fatal craniovertebral junction injuries: lessons learned from the Head and Neck Support device in professional auto racing. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;1–6.
50.
Kolb JC, Summers RL, Galli RL. Cervical collar-induced changes in intracranial pressure. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17:135–7.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Kreinest M, Gliwitzky B, Schuler S, et al. Development of a new Emergency Medicine Spinal Immobilization Protocol for trauma patients and a test of applicability by German emergency care providers. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
53.
Lin HL, Lee WC, Chen CW, et al. Neck collar used in treatment of victims of urban motorcycle accidents: over- or underprotection? Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29:1028–33.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Lingner M, Scholz B, Kammermayer T, et al. Race Track Trauma Life Support—ein Konzept für die präklinische Behandlung von Schwerverletzten im Motorsport. Dtsch Z Sportmed. 2014;65:160–5.
55.
Luscombe MD, Williams JL. Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation. Emerg Med J EMJ. 2003;20:476–8.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Macias CA, Rosengart MR, Puyana JC, et al. The effects of trauma center care, admission volume, and surgical volume on paralysis after traumatic spinal cord injury. Ann Surg. 2009;249:10–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Mahshidfar B, Mofidi M, Yari AR, et al. Long backboard versus vacuum mattress splint to immobilize whole spine in trauma victims in the field: a randomized clinical trial. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2013;28:462–5.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Mccabe JB, Nolan DJ. Comparison of the effectiveness of different cervical immobilization collars. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15:50–3.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Meldon SW, Brant TA, Cydulka RK, et al. Out-of-hospital cervical spine clearance: agreement between emergency medical technicians and emergency physicians. J Trauma. 1998;45:1058–61.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Melvin JW, Begeman PC, Faller RK, et al. Crash protection of stock car racing drivers—application of biomechanical analysis of Indy car crash research. Stapp Car Crash J. 2006;50:415–28.PubMed
61.
Minoyama O, Tsuchida H. Injuries in professional motor car racing drivers at a racing circuit between 1996 and 2000. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38:613–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Mobbs RJ, Stoodley MA, Fuller J. Effect of cervical hard collar on intracranial pressure after head injury. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:389–91.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Muhr MD, Seabrook DL, Wittwer LK. Paramedic use of a spinal injury clearance algorithm reduces spinal immobilization in the out-of-hospital setting. Prehospital Emerg Care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Phys Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 1999;3:1–6.
64.
65.
Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286:1841–8.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Sundstrom T, Asbjornsen H, Habiba S, et al. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:531–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Theodore N, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, et al. Prehospital cervical spinal immobilization after trauma. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(Suppl 2):22–34.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Trafford P, Henderson M, Trammell T. Spinal injuries and motor sport. Auto + Med. 2014;30–41.
69.
Trammell T, Hubbard R. Medical and Technical Outcomes of HANS® Use in CART. SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-3350. 2002.
70.
Trammell TF, K. Spine fractures in drivers of open-wheeled open cockpit race cars. ASPETAR Sports Med J. 2012;1:196–202.
71.
Vaillancourt C, Stiell IG, Beaudoin T, et al. The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(663–671):e661.
72.
Vandemark RM. Radiology of the cervical spine in trauma patients: practice pitfalls and recommendations for improving efficiency and communication. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:465–72.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Walters BC, Hadley MN, Hurlbert RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries: 2013 update. Neurosurgery. 2013;60(Suppl 1):82–91.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Wölfl CG, Bouillon B, Lackner CK, et al. Prehospital Trauma Life Support® (PHTLS®). Unfallchirurg. 2008;111:688–94.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
On-scene treatment of spinal injuries in motor sports
verfasst von
M. Kreinest
M. Scholz
P. Trafford
Publikationsdatum
22.12.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0749-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

Focus on chest trauma

Original Article

Clinical DRUJ instability does not influence the long-term functional outcome of conservatively treated distal radius fractures

Original Article

Classification and treatment of distal radius fractures: a survey among orthopaedic trauma surgeons and residents

Original Article

Annual trauma load of the world’s largest indoor skiing center

Original Article

Clinic research on the treatment for humeral shaft fracture with minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis: a retrospective study of 128 cases

Letter to the Editor

Reply to letter: endovascular solutions for the management of penetrating trauma: an update on REBOA and axillo-subclavian injuries

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise