Introduction
Data and methods
Study subjects
Instruments and study methods
-
The spine was assessed at the transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes per the guidelines on foetal central nervous system ultrasound published by ISUOG [1]. Since a three-dimensional (3D) scan was not routine while examining the foetal spine, the radiologists only implemented the 3D scan if there was a susception of low-lying conus medullaris during a two-dimensional (2D) scan. To obtain a high-quality 3D volume of the foetal spine, we used intermediate-frequency transducers (4–8 MHz) to identify the position of CM. The acquisition angle ranged between 45° and 60° under skeleton mode [5]. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University First Hospital (protocol code 2013[572]).
-
Definition of Low-lying CM: When the CM was below L3 (excluding L3), it was diagnosed as low-lying CM, regardless of gestational age [1].
-
Foetal CM Position Examination: During the 3D examination, we first displayed the median sagittal section of the spine to obtain a clear view of CM (Fig. 1, white arrow). Then we instructed the pregnant woman to hold her breath and initiated a 3D volumetric scan (Fig. 1). We adjusted the parameters so that the D plane clearly showed the spine and ribs. We determined the position of the 12th thoracic vertebra based on the location of the 12th rib. Then we counted the lumbar vertebras (L) 1, 2, and 3 downwards until they were at the level of the reference point (Fig. 1, green dot). If the CM was between the 3rd and 4th lumbar vertebrae (L3-L4), this was recorded as 3.5.
-
Clinical Data Collection: The clinical baseline data of all pregnancies were collected: age, gestation week when low-lying conus medullaris was firstly detected, changes of CM position during pregnancy, presence of other non-spinal structural abnormalities, pregnancy outcome, gestational age at birth, and birth weight. The short-term postnatal follow-up by telephone ran until August 1, 2021, which included an assessment of symptoms and signs of motor and sensory neuron dysfunction [6].
-
The primary outcome of this study included: (1) clinical characteristics of low-lying CM cases; (2) the correlation between the CM location and spinal defect; (3) the final prognosis of low-lying CM.
-
Statistical Methods: The clinical data of patients with foetal conus medullaris found during pregnancy were analysed descriptively. The mean (± standard deviation) was calculated for measurement data, and the number of cases (percentage) was reported for count data. The conus medullaris positions of the spinal defects and normal spine groups were compared by t-test, and the differences were considered statistically significant with P < 0.05. Spine dysraphism was diagnosed according to clinical criteria. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to explore the diagnostic value of the conus medullaris position using 3D. The cut-off values were selected according to sensitivity and specificity. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS 25.0 software.
Results
General information
Clinical Data | Number |
---|---|
Age | 31.89 (± 4.46) |
Singleton | 33 (89.2%) |
Twin | 4 (10.8%) |
Gestation week at which “low-lying conus medullaris” was first detected | 23.81 (± 3.84) |
Spinal anomalies | |
Open spinal dysraphism | 3 (8.1%) |
Closed spinal dysraphism/Tethered spinal cord | 6 (16.3%) |
Dermatomal sinus | 1 (2.7%) |
Lipoma | 1 (2.7%) |
With other foetal structural abnormalities | 7 (18.9%) |
Complicated with spinal dysraphisms | 2 |
Bilateral Ventriculomegaly and bilateral hydronephrosis | 1 |
Cleft lip and palate | 1 |
Not complicated with spinal dysraphisms | 5 |
Absent nasal bone and hyperechogenic bowela | 1 |
Left renal agenesis and ventricular septal defecta | 1 |
Anal atresia | 1 |
Non-visulisation of gallbladder | 1 |
Short long bones & Foetal growth restrictiona | 1 |
Pregnancy Outcome | |
Live birth | 30 (81.1%) |
Termination of Pregnancy (TOP) | 7 (18.9%) |
Non-spinal abnormality | 3 |
Absent nasal bone and hyperechogenic bowela | 1 |
Left renal agenesis and ventricular septal defecta | 1 |
Short long bones & Foetal Growth restrictiona | 1 |
Open spina bifida | 3 |
Genetic abnormality arr[GRCh37]16q24.1(84850607_85984462) × 3 | 1 |
Spinal anomalies with the conus medullaris at a different location
Number of cases (%) | Open spinal dysraphism | Closed spinal dysraphism/Tethered spinal cord | |
---|---|---|---|
L3-L4 | 10 (27.0%) | 0 | 0 |
L4 | 20 (54.1%) | 1 | 2 |
L4-L5 | 2 (5.4%) | 1 | 1 |
L5 | 2 (5.4%) | 0 | 1 |
S1-S2 | 1 (2.7%) | 1 | 0 |
S2 | 1 (2.7%) | 0 | 1 |
S3 | 1 (2.7%) | 0 | 1 |
Comparison of CM location between foetuses with spinal defects and those with a normal spine
Conus medullaris position, mean (standard deviation) | P | |
---|---|---|
Open spinal dysraphism (N = 3) | 5 (1.32) | < 0.001 |
Closed dysraphisms/Tethered cord syndrome (N = 6) | 5.42 (1.69) | < 0.001 |
Normal spine (N = 28) | 3.8 (0.33) |
ROC curve analysis
Postnatal outcome after confirmed tethered spinal cord syndrome
Cases | Postnatal imaging | Postnatal management | Postnatal development |
---|---|---|---|
Case1 | Postal MRI detected CM at L4 and dermal cyst One month after birth | Surgical release + excision of the dermal cyst sinus two months after birth | Seven months old, with normal development |
Case2 | Postnatal MRI detected CM at the L3-L4 level Unknown MRI examination date | Surgical release at 11 months after birth | 16 months old, with slightly delayed gross motor function and paediatric recommendation for observation |
Case3 | Postnatal MRI detected CM at L4 One month after birth | Surgical release one month after birth | Ten months old, with normal development |
Case4 | Postnatal MRI suggested a borderline low CM unknown details | Expectant no surgery | 20 months old with normal development |
Case5 | Postnatal MRI detected lipoma and unknown CM position, Two months after birth, suggested tethered spinal cord, location unknown | Surgical release + lipoma removal at two months after birth | 18 months old, requires intermittent catheterisation |
Case6 | Postnatal MRI detected low CM, unknown details | Surgical release five months after birth | 28 months old, with normal development |