Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2015

01.07.2015 | Original Article

Prognostic factors in distractive extension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine

verfasst von: Kyung-Jin Song, Byung-Wan Choi, Chan-Il Park, Kwang-Bok Lee

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Sonderheft 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The subaxial spine has high risk of fatal damage by trauma and thereby requires more accurate and aggressive treatment. For the proper treatment and predicting the prognosis, the evaluation to reveal the risk factors for the prognosis is important. We analyzed the various factors contributing to the prognosis in distractive extension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine.

Methods

The study included 103 patients who were diagnosed as distractive extension injury of subaxial cervical spine. We evaluate the patient age, sex, cause of injury, initial neurological impairment, number and portion of injured segment, spinal stenosis, extent of soft tissue damage, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and degenerative spondylosis as a prognostic factor. To analyze the factor related with prognosis, the subjects were divided into group A, in which patients had neurological recovery ≥grade 2 on the ASIA scale or showed normal in final follow-up and group B, in which patients have no neurological recovery.

Results

Prognosis was not associated with age, sex, and cause of injury (P = 0.677, 0.541, and 0.965, respectively). Prognosis was poor in cases with spinal stenosis (P = 0.009), soft tissue damage ≥grade 3 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (P = 0.002), or severe neurological impairment (P ≤ 0.001). Logistic regression analysis also showed that prognosis was poor in cases with spinal stenosis (OR 5.03; 95 % CI 1.20–16.93), soft tissue damage ≥grade 3 on MRI (OR 7.63; 95 % CI 1.86–31.34), or severe neurological impairment (ASIA C, D, OR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.14–2.41; ASIA A, B, OR 18.43, 95 % CI 1.64–207.69).

Conclusion

The prognosis of patients with distractive extension injury of the subaxial cervical spine was poor in cases with spinal stenosis, severe soft tissue damage in MRI findings or severe initial neurological impairment.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, Lehmann TR, O’Brien RP (1982) A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine 197(1):1–27 (Phila Pa 1976)CrossRef Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, Lehmann TR, O’Brien RP (1982) A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine 197(1):1–27 (Phila Pa 1976)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KJ, Kim GH, Lee KB (2008) The efficacy of the modified classification system of soft tissue injury in extension injury of the lower cervical spine. Spine 33(15):E488–E493PubMedCrossRef Song KJ, Kim GH, Lee KB (2008) The efficacy of the modified classification system of soft tissue injury in extension injury of the lower cervical spine. Spine 33(15):E488–E493PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KJ, Lee KB (2008) The significance of soft tissue injury in lower cervical spine trauma. Neurosurg Q 18:28–33CrossRef Song KJ, Lee KB (2008) The significance of soft tissue injury in lower cervical spine trauma. Neurosurg Q 18:28–33CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Marar BC (1974) Hyperextension injuries of the cervical spine. The pathogenesis of damage to the spinal cord. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1655–1662PubMed Marar BC (1974) Hyperextension injuries of the cervical spine. The pathogenesis of damage to the spinal cord. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1655–1662PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Donovan WH, Graves DE, Haak M, Hudson LM, Priebe MM (2003) International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 26:S50–S56PubMed Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Donovan WH, Graves DE, Haak M, Hudson LM, Priebe MM (2003) International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 26:S50–S56PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Herzog RJ, Wiens JJ, Dillingham MF, Sontag MJ (1991) Normal cervical spine morphometry and cervical spinal stenosis in asymptomatic professional football players: plain film radiography, multiplanar computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 16:178–186CrossRef Herzog RJ, Wiens JJ, Dillingham MF, Sontag MJ (1991) Normal cervical spine morphometry and cervical spinal stenosis in asymptomatic professional football players: plain film radiography, multiplanar computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 16:178–186CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pavlov H, Torg JS, Robie B, Jahre C (1987) Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology 164:771–775PubMedCrossRef Pavlov H, Torg JS, Robie B, Jahre C (1987) Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology 164:771–775PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KJ, Choi BW, Lee KB, Chang H (2012) The relationship between soft tissue damages and neurologic deficits in distractive extension injury of the lower cervical spine. J Korean Orthop Assoc 47:15–20CrossRef Song KJ, Choi BW, Lee KB, Chang H (2012) The relationship between soft tissue damages and neurologic deficits in distractive extension injury of the lower cervical spine. J Korean Orthop Assoc 47:15–20CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor AR, Blackwood W (1948) Paraplegia in hyperextension cervical injuries with normal radiographic appearances. J Bone Jont Surg Br 30B(2):245–248 Taylor AR, Blackwood W (1948) Paraplegia in hyperextension cervical injuries with normal radiographic appearances. J Bone Jont Surg Br 30B(2):245–248
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Herkowitz HN (2011) Rothman-Simeone. The Spine, 6th edn. Elsevier Herkowitz HN (2011) Rothman-Simeone. The Spine, 6th edn. Elsevier
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedenberg BZB, Jack E (1959) Distractive extension injury. H. Newton Spencer; S. C. Tolentino: degenerative changes in the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41:61–102PubMed Friedenberg BZB, Jack E (1959) Distractive extension injury. H. Newton Spencer; S. C. Tolentino: degenerative changes in the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41:61–102PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stauffer ES, MacMillan M (1996) Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD (eds) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 4th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1475–1477 Stauffer ES, MacMillan M (1996) Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD (eds) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 4th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1475–1477
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hohl M (1974) Soft-tissue injuries of the neck in automobile accidents. Factors influencing prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1675–1682PubMed Hohl M (1974) Soft-tissue injuries of the neck in automobile accidents. Factors influencing prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1675–1682PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Eismont FJ, Clifford S, Goldberg M, Green B (1984) Cervical sagittal spinal canal size in spine injury. Spine 9:663–666 (Phila Pa 1976)PubMedCrossRef Eismont FJ, Clifford S, Goldberg M, Green B (1984) Cervical sagittal spinal canal size in spine injury. Spine 9:663–666 (Phila Pa 1976)PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Machino M, Kato F (2011) Mechanical patterns of cervical injury influence postoperative neurological outcome: a verification of the allen system. Spine 15;36(6):E441–E446 (Phila Pa 1976) Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Machino M, Kato F (2011) Mechanical patterns of cervical injury influence postoperative neurological outcome: a verification of the allen system. Spine 15;36(6):E441–E446 (Phila Pa 1976)
Metadaten
Titel
Prognostic factors in distractive extension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine
verfasst von
Kyung-Jin Song
Byung-Wan Choi
Chan-Il Park
Kwang-Bok Lee
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1479-z

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2015

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.