Introduction
Epidemiological research has shown that increased vegetable is associated with a reduced risk of several NCDs, including CVDs, high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer and metabolic syndromes [
1‐
5]. Furthermore, it has been reported that an optimal amount of vegetable consumption reduces the disease burden of CVDs, cancer and diabetes [
6]. In the 2017 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) analysis in Japan, assessing the impact of 67 risk factors, including behavioural, metabolic, environmental and occupational factors, on disease burden measured as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), low vegetable intake was the fifth most significant dietary risk factor affecting DALYs, following diets high in sodium, low in whole grains, fruits, nuts and seeds [
7,
8].
The recommended amount of vegetable consumption varies per country [
9]. In Japan, the government has set a consumption target for an average of 350 g of vegetables per capita by 2023 in their ten-year national health promotion plan “The second term of National Health Promotion Movement in the twenty-first century” (Health Japan 21 (the second term)) [
10]. According to the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHNS), however, the average vegetable consumption per capita for Japanese adults has steadily been below 300 g/day since 1947 (with an exception for 2006) [
11,
12]. Moreover, the trend points towards a decrease in vegetable consumption in recent years [
13], and the consumption target is thus unlikely to be attained.
This study aims to predict the future trend in vegetable intake and to estimate the disease burden of CVDs, cancer, DKDs under several scenarios of vegetable intake in Japan. By doing so, we aim to provide an empirical basis for future interventions and policies to improve the health of the people in Japan and other countries with low vegetable consumption.
Discussion
Based on a future forecast of DALY rates and probable scenarios, we estimated a ‘case for change’ in the level of vegetable consumption on the disease burden attributable to the different disease through 2040. In Japan, the current level of vegetable consumption is far from the target of the government guidelines and will not be achieved by 2040 if the current trend in vegetable consumption continues. Our analysis indicates that increased vegetable consumption would lead to a significant reduction in the burden of CVDs, cancer and DKDs.
In the reference forecast, all-age DALY rates were forecasted to continue increasing for CVDs, cancer, and DKDs, while age group-specific DALY rates showed different trends. There was no difference between the reference forecast and the worse case scenario in the DALY rates for all sex and age groups of the three diseases with overlapping PIs given that there was little difference in the vegetable intake of those scenarios. On the other hand, one of the greatest gaps of the estimated DALY rates between the reference and scenario forecasts was found among females aged 20–49, specifically between the reference forecast and both better and moderate case scenarios for all three diseases. This is in part due to the projection of younger females consuming fewer vegetables in the future, which also resulted in the widest gap between the estimated and the ideal level of vegetable consumption. By targeting this group for a public health intervention related to vegetable consumption, we can expect the greatest impact of reducing disease burden in Japan.
In accordance with previous studies, our study showed the benefits against CVDs by increased vegetable intake among younger female (20–49 years) and 50–69 years old age group [
20,
21]. Various nutrients in vegetables also demonstrate to protect against CVDs through a variety of mechanisms; a decrease of atherosclerosis in the blood vessel and blood pressure, and a lowering of the risk of oxidative damage [
22]. However, increasing vegetable intake was expected to benefit to a limited age group in this study. Another study suggested that 400 ± 30 g/ day of vegetable intake was set as a minimum theoretical risk of exposure to low vegetable intake against CVDs, indicating that our scenarios’ vegetable consumption level might be slightly short for obtaining significant health benefits [
23].
By increasing the vegetable intake at the total population level, the DALY rates for cancer decreased by 5.6%. Our estimates suggest 50–69 years old age group was expected to have the greatest benefits on reducing the burden from cancers if this age group consumed the ideal level of vegetables. Around 70% of total cancer cases were reported from over 65 years [
24], indicating a vigorous intervention to the middle-aged population may effectively help to reduce the burden from cancers. A report from World Cancer Research Fund suggests that low vegetable intake is associated with specific cancer risks including aerodigestive cancer (probable), and lung, breast, and colorectal cancers (limited suggestive) [
25]. Vegetables are also protective against certain types of cancers by blocking the action of and/ or suppressing carcinogens. For example, cruciferous vegetable and types of yellow vegetables contain protease inhibitors, isothiocyanates and carotenoids prevent the initial formation of cancer and/or oxidative damage of deoxyribonucleic acid [
6,
22].
Similar to the scenarios in cancer, DALY rates of DKD can possibility decrease by 8% for males and 13% for females. Although very limited evidence suggests a possible link between vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes in Japan [
26], there is a growing body of evidence on various type of diets that may prevent adult-onset diabetes [
27].
Internationally, Japan was ranked 62nd in the world by vegetable intake per capita in 2011 [
28]. China was ranked first in the world, consuming over three times more vegetables than Japan on a per capita basis. The tendencies that the younger population compared to older people, and females compared to males consume less vegetable were, however, similar to other countries [
6,
29]. WHO’s report found barriers to increasing vegetable intake as social, environmental, and economic reasons, including a lack of knowledge of the recommended dietary intake, personal and family eating habits, limited availability of vegetables, a lack of required vegetable for cooking due to less time for preparation, and a lack of intervention for promoting healthy eating [
30,
31]. Another study indicated that low socio-economic status consumed fewer quantities and varieties of vegetables in relation to vegetable prices [
32]. These factors influence food choice and dietary intake across individuals, countries and cultures.
The barriers above mentioned are relevant in the Japanese context as well. Japanese society today faces a general increase in preference for westernised diet and lifestyle, an increase in the availability of cooked and processed foods, and an increase the vegetable prices due to a consumption tax increase and repeated natural disasters in the recent years [
33,
34]. In addition, there is a reduced vegetable supply attributable to the ageing population of farmers and decrease in farming areas from urbanisation, resulting in the number of farmer decrease over the last decades [
33,
35]. It should be noted that climate change is also the main driver to influence the reduction in vegetable supply [
36]. In Japan, the multiple natural disasters damaged farms and led to a soaring price of vegetables in 2004, resulting in the lowest vegetable consumption in all-age-sex groups [
37].
The government enacted the Dietary Guidelines for the Japanese to enhance the balanced diet and promote nutritional education at the community level [
38]. This guideline was effective to translate the knowledge on the daily recommended diet to the general population. However, to tackle the diseases associated with low vegetable consumption, a combination of social, environmental and economic barriers must be addressed. For instance, it would be important to invest in policies which drive an increase in consumption first, including interventions to increase supply and access to vegetable. A report from Australia simulated that the high vegetable intake would reduce CVDs and some cancers would result in long-term benefits by saving government health expenditure of about one million dollars and translating it into producer return [
39]. As such, a comprehensive package and frames of policies are needed to encourage people to eat adequate quantities of vegetables. These include improvements in the food environment, food systems, and behaviours change communication across the life course.
Several limitations should be noted as in any forecasting study. First, our models may not have addressed enough to adjust possible risk predictors associated with the target disease. For example, the level of physical exercise and socio-economic status, which are well-known factors to influence the disease burden of NCDs, were unavailable. However, we put SDI into the models as a substitute for individual SES data. Second, although a change in vegetable intake and health outcomes may be explained in part by health performance, social determinants and environmental factors, including the price change of vegetables [
33], were not assessed. Other dietary factors, which may also have influenced the change in vegetable consumption [
40], were not included in the models to avoid over-adjustment. Third, while DALYs is an excellent measure to capture disease burden at the population level and a piece of key information for policymaking, DALYs itself cannot indicate what kind of and how much investment are needed to improve health outcomes [
41]. Lastly, because the dietary data from the NHNS was based on a weighted single-day dietary record, our analysis may not have captured the real trend of long-term nor seasonal changes in dietary patterns. Despite some limitations, our study uses the best available data that represents the Japanese population’s dietary pattern over time. Simple models like ours have advantages in allowing for a prompt exploration of dietary risk factors and relevant disease burden forecasts.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.