nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.09.2012 | Original Article

Psychometric validation and reliability analysis of a Spanish version of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a patient navigation research program study

verfasst von: Pascal Jean-Pierre, Kevin Fiscella, Paul C. Winters, Electra Paskett, Kristen Wells, Tracy Battaglia, Patient Navigation Research Program Group

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 9/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Patient satisfaction (PS), a key measure of quality of cancer care, is a core study outcome of the multi-site National Cancer Institute-funded Patient Navigation Research Program. Despite large numbers of underserved monolingual Spanish speakers (MSS) residing in USA, there is no validated Spanish measure of PS that spans the whole spectrum of cancer-related care. The present study reports on the validation of the Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Care (PSCC) measure for Spanish (PSCC-Sp) speakers receiving diagnostic and therapeutic cancer-related care.

Methods

Original PSCC items were professionally translated and back translated to ensure cultural appropriateness, meaningfulness, and equivalence. Then, the resulting 18-item PSCC-Sp measure was administered to 285 MSS. We evaluated latent structure and internal consistency of the PSCC-Sp using principal components analysis (PCA) and Cronbach coefficient alpha (α). We used correlation analyses to demonstrate divergence and convergence of the PSCC-Sp with a Spanish version of the Patient Satisfaction with Interpersonal Relationship with Navigator (PSN-I-Sp) measure and patients' demographics.

Results

The PCA revealed a coherent set of items that explicates 47% of the variance in PS. Reliability assessment demonstrated that the PSCC-Sp had high internal consistency (α = 0.92). The PSCC-Sp demonstrated good face validity and convergent and divergent validities as indicated by moderate correlations with the PSN-I-Sp (p = 0.003) and nonsignificant correlations with marital status and household income (all p _s > 0.05).

Conclusion

The PSCC-Sp is a valid and reliable measure of PS and should be tested in other MSS populations.

Bredart A, Razavi D, Roberson C et al (2001) Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients' satisfaction. Oncology 61:120–128PubMedCrossRef

Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358:1250–1261PubMedCrossRef

Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45:1829–1843PubMedCrossRef

Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington

Pascoe GC (1983) Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann 6:185–210PubMedCrossRef

Cleary PD, McNeil BJ (1988) Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care. Inquiry 25:25–36PubMed

Lenderking WR (2005) Brief reflections on treatment satisfaction. Value Health 8(1):S2–S5PubMedCrossRef

Saila T, Matilla E, Kaila M, Aalto P et al (2008) Measuring patient assessments of the quality of outpatient care: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 14(1):148–154PubMedCrossRef

Ware JE Jr, Snyder MK, Wright WR et al (1983) Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann 6:247–263PubMedCrossRef

10.

Williams B (1994) Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med 38(4):509–516PubMedCrossRef

11.

Attkisson CC, Zwick R (1982) The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann 5:233–237PubMedCrossRef

12.

Chow A, Meyer E, Darzi A, Athanassion T (2009) Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 146(3):435–443PubMedCrossRef

13.

Gold DT, McClung B (2006) Approaches to patient education: emphasizing the long-term value of compliance and persistence. Am J Med 119(4):S32–S37PubMedCrossRef

14.

Tomlinson JS (2006) Patient satisfaction: an increasingly important measure of quality. Ann Surg Oncol 13(6):764–765PubMedCrossRef

15.

Borras JM, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Navarro M et al (2001) Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 322(826):1–5

16.

Lipscomb J, Reeve BB, Clauser Sb et al (2007) Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: taking stock, moving forward. J Clin Oncol 25(32):5133–5140PubMedCrossRef

17.

Brédart A, Bottomley A (2002) Treatment satisfaction as an outcome measure in cancer clinical trials. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2:597–606PubMedCrossRef

18.

Freund K, Battaglia TA, Calhourn E, Dudley DJ et al (2008) National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures. Cancer 113(12):3391–3399PubMedCrossRef

19.

Liberati C, Confalonierie A, Martino G et al (1985) Patients' assessment of quality of care: a survey of a group of breast cancer patients in Italy. Tumori 71(5):491–497PubMed

20.

Bredart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Coens C, D’Haese S et al (2005) An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer 41:2120–2131PubMedCrossRef

21.

Oberst MT (1984) Methodology in behavioural and psychosocial cancer research. Patients' perceptions at care. Measurement of quality and satisfaction. Cancer 53(10 Suppl):2366–2375PubMed

22.

Stewart AL, Ware JE (1992) Measuring functioning and well-being: the medical outcomes study approach. Duke University Press, Durham

23.

Wiggers JH, Donovan KO, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW (1990) Cancer patient satisfaction with care. Cancer 66:610–616PubMedCrossRef

24.

Lo C, Burman D, Rodin G, Zimmermann C (2009) Measuring patient satisfaction in oncology palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE-patient scale. Qual Life Res 18(6):747–752. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9494-y PubMedCrossRef

25.

Teno JM, Lima JC, Lyons KD (2009) Cancer patient assessment and reports of excellence. Reliability and validity of advanced cancer patient perceptions of the quality of care. J Clin Oncol 27(10):1621–1626PubMedCrossRef

26.

U.S. Census Bureau (2004) “U.S. interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin,” Available at http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/usinterimproj/. Assessed 30 June 2011

27.

Guzman B (2001) The Hispanic Population, Population Census 200 Brief, C2KBK/01-3, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC

28.

Wolf MS, Chang CH, Davis TC, Makoul GT (2005) Development and validation of the Communication and Attitudinal Self-Efficacy (CASE) scale: cancer version. Patient Educ Couns 57:333–341PubMedCrossRef

29.

Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Freund KM, Clark J, Darnell J, Holden A, Post D, Patierno SR, Winters PC, Patient Navigation Research Program Group (2011) Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study. Cancer 117(4):854–861PubMedCrossRef

30.

Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters P, Paskett E, Wells K, Battaglia T, and The Patient Navigation Research Program group. Cross-cultural Validation of the Patient Satisfaction with Interpersonal Relationship with Navigator Measure. Psychooncology. doi:10.1002/pon.2018

31.

Kaiser H (1970) A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 35:401–415CrossRef

32.

Kaiser H (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39:31–36CrossRef

33.

Bartlett MS (1954) A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. J R Stat Soc 16(Series B):296–298

34.

Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1(2):245–276CrossRef

35.

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th ed). Allyn and Bacon, Boston

36.

Thurstone LL (1947) Multiple factor analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

37.

Nunnally JO (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

38.

Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass SL, Colman SS, Kumar RN, Brod M et al (2004) Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:12PubMedCrossRef

39.

Bredart A, Razuvi D, Robertson C, Batel-Copel L, Larson G, Lichosick D, Meyza J, Schraub S, Von L (2001) Comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: preliminary psychometric analysis in French, Polish, Swedish and Italian oncology patients. Patient Educ Couns 43(3):243–253PubMedCrossRef

40.

Greenfield TK, Attkisson CC (1989) Steps toward a multifactorial satisfaction scale for primary care and mental health services. Eval Program Plann 12:271–278CrossRef

41.

Sulmasy DP, McIlvane JM, Pasley PM, Rahn M (2002) A scale for measuring patient perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care and satisfaction with treatment: the reliability and validity of QUEST. J Pain Symptom Manage 23:458–547PubMedCrossRef

42.

Defossez G, Mathouwin-Pelissier S, Ingrand I, Gasquet I, Sifer-Rivierre L et al (2007) Satisfaction with care among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: development and first steps of validation of the REPERES-60 questionnaire. BMC Cancer 7:129. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-7-129 PubMedCrossRef

43.

Llewellyn CD, Robert H, McGurk M, Weinman J (2006) Development and preliminary validation of a new measure to assess satisfaction with information among head and neck cancer patients: the satisfaction with cancer information profile (SCIP). Head Neck 28(6):540–548PubMedCrossRef

44.

Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder CF (2007) Patient-reported outcomes in cancer: a review of recent research and policy initiatives. CA Cancer J Clin 57:278–300PubMedCrossRef

45.

Drennan J (2003) Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. J Adv Nurs 42(1):57–63PubMedCrossRef

46.

Chang JT, Hays RD, Shekelle PG, Mclean CH et al (2006) Patients' global ratings of their health care are not associated with the technical quality of their care. Ann Intern Med 144(9):665–672PubMed

47.

Napoles AM, Gregorich SE, Santoyo-Olsson J, O’Brien H, Stewart AL (2009) Interpersonal processes of care and patient satisfaction: do associations differ by race, ethnicity, and language? Health Serv Res 44(4):1326–1344PubMedCrossRef

48.

Rao M, Clarke A, Sanderson C, Hammersley R (2006) Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross-sectional study. BMJ 333(7557):19PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Psychometric validation and reliability analysis of a Spanish version of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a patient navigation research program study
verfasst von: Pascal Jean-Pierre
Kevin Fiscella
Paul C. Winters
Electra Paskett
Kristen Wells
Tracy Battaglia
Patient Navigation Research Program Group
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1297-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Positiver FIT: Die Ursache liegt nicht immer im Dickdarm

27.05.2024 Blut im Stuhl Nachrichten

Immunchemischer Stuhltest positiv, Koloskopie negativ – in solchen Fällen kann die Blutungsquelle auch weiter proximal sitzen. Ein Forschungsteam hat nachgesehen, wie häufig und in welchen Lokalisationen das der Fall ist.

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

ADT zur Radiatio nach Prostatektomie: Wenn, dann wohl länger

24.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Welchen Nutzen es trägt, wenn die Strahlentherapie nach radikaler Prostatektomie um eine Androgendeprivation ergänzt wird, hat die RADICALS-HD-Studie untersucht. Nun liegen die Ergebnisse vor. Sie sprechen für länger dauernden Hormonentzug.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Psychometric validation and reliability analysis of a Spanish version of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a patient navigation research program study