Abstract
Occupational dermatology is a professional field at the intersection of essentially four ethical realms: society, business, medical profession, and the individual.
The fundamental ethical frameworks of most important occupational health ethical guidelines build upon the consensus principles of human dignity and human rights.
Legal regimen and ethical guidelines are similar in that they build upon consensus social values, without which they are both illegitimate and ineffective.
Ethical literature in the field is scant and focuses too narrowly upon dilemmas posed by the medical professional’s conflicting loyalties to workers and employers.
The “International Code of Ethics for Occupational Health Professionals” (ICOH Code) provides resources for a more adequate ethical approach to occupational dermatology.
Among the key insights is the obligation to not just workers and employers, but also to society and the profession, i.e., to the social values and laws that share wide consensus, and to the principles and standards that have established the well-earned respect for medical care.
Divided loyalties should be resolved not by reducing health surveillance or the flow of information between medical professionals and workers, but by establishing fully transparent guidelines: Medical officials should be able to attain the information they need to ensure the safest possible workplace and workers should be assured that their rights and privacy are not violated.
Medical professionals have the duty to refrain from revealing information from employers when that revelation is a violation of workers’ informed consent, or when such an action would endanger the trust in their integrity and impartiality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baur X, Letzel S, Nowak D (2009) Ethik in der Arbeitsmedizin. Orientierungshilfe in ethischen Spannungsfeldern. Ecomed, Landsberg
Beauchamp T, Childress J (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Bercovitch L, Long TP (2007) Dermatoethics: a curriculum in bioethics and professionalism for dermatology residents at Brown Medical School. J Am Acad Dermatol 56:679–682
Board of the German Society for Occupational Medicine and Environmental Medicine e.V. (DGAUM) and the Bureau of the Association of German Company and Factory Doctors e.V. (VDBW) (2009) A code of ethics for occupational medicine. Ecomed, Landsberg
Brandt-Rauf PW (1989) Ethical conflict in the practice of occupational medicine. Br J Ind Med 46:63–66
Budnik LT, Baur X (2009) The assessment of environmental and occupational exposure to hazardous substances by biomonitoring. Dtsch Arztebl Int 106(6):91–97
Emanuel EJ (2002) Introduction to occupational medical ethics. Occup Med 17(4):549–558
Geier J, Krautheim A, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A (2011) Occupational contact allergy in the building trade in Germany: influence of preventive measures and changing exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84(4):403–411
Guidotti TL (2008) Occupational medicine and the construction of “difficult reputations”. New Solut 18(3):285–298
International Commission on Occupational Health (2002) International Code of Ethics for Occupational Health Professionals. http://www.icohweb.org/core_docs.asp. Accessed 20 March 2010
Knoepffler N (2004) Menschenwürde in der Bioethik. Springer, Berlin
Knoepffler N (2010) Angewandte Ethik. Ein systematischer Leitfaden. Böhlau (UTB), Köln
Kuhn J, Gensch R (2009) Ethical aspects of workplace health management. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 52(5):535–552
London L (2005) Dual loyalties and the ethical and humans rights obligations of occupational health professionals. Am J Ind Med 47:322–332
Marks JG, Elsner P, DeLeo VA (2002) Etiology of occupational skin disease. In: Marks JG, Elsner P, DeLeo VA (eds) Contact and occupational dermatology, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 303–313
Mettler H (1999) Problem Maurerkrätze: Es gibt eine Lösung. Trauma und Berufskrankheit 1:148–151
Peate WF (2002) Occupational skin disease. Am Fam Physician 66(6):1025–1032
Westerholm P (2007) Professional ethics in occupational health—Western European perspectives. Ind Health 45:19–25
Westerholm P, Nilstun T, Ovretveit J (2004) Practical ethics in occupational health. Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford
World Health Organization (2006) Environmental health criteria 232. Static fields. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/reports/ehcstatic/en/index.html. Accessed 11 Feb 2009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Knoepffler, N., O’Malley, M. (2012). Ethical Aspects. In: Rustemeyer, T., Elsner, P., John, SM., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Kanerva's Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02035-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02035-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02034-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02035-3
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine