Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie 5/2016

14.01.2016 | Originalien

Relative efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib, celecoxib, and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials based on patient withdrawal

verfasst von: Gwan Gyu Song, Young Ho Seo, Jae-Hoon Kim, Sung Jae Choi, Jong Dae Ji, MD PhD Young Ho Lee

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims

This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib, celecoxib, and naproxen at recommended dosages in patients with osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib 30–60 mg, celecoxib 200–400 mg, and naproxen 1000 mg, based on the number of patient withdrawals among those with OA, were included in this network meta-analysis. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs.

Results

Eight RCTs, including 5,942 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of patient withdrawals due to lack of efficacy was significantly lower in the etoricoxib 30–60 mg (OR 0.21, 95 % CrI 0.12–0.38), celecoxib 200–400 mg (OR 0.29, 95 % CrI 0.18–0.47), and naproxen 1000 mg (OR 0.31, 95 % CrI 0.18–0.51) groups than in the placebo group. The number of patient withdrawals due to lack of efficacy tended to be lower in the etoricoxib 30–60 mg group than in the naproxen 1000 mg and celecoxib 200–400 mg groups, although they did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.68, 95 % CrI 0.36–1.33 and OR 0.70, 95 % CrI 0.38–1.37, respectively). Ranking probabilities based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that etoricoxib 30–60 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment based on the number of withdrawals due to lack of efficacy (SUCRA = 0.9168) followed by celecoxib 200–400 mg (SUCRA = 0.5659), naproxen 1000 mg (SUCRA = 0.5171), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.000189). With respect to tolerability, the number of withdrawals due to adverse events was not significantly different among etoricoxib, celecoxib, naproxen, and placebo, although it tended to be lower with etoricoxib and placebo.

Conclusions

Etoricoxib 30–60 mg, celecoxib 200–400 mg, and naproxen 1000 mg were more efficacious than placebo. However, there was no significant difference in efficacy and tolerability between the medications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dieppe PA, Lohmander LS (2005) Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis. Lancet 365:965–973CrossRefPubMed Dieppe PA, Lohmander LS (2005) Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis. Lancet 365:965–973CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, Towheed T, Welch V, Wells G, Tugwell P (2012) American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res 64:465–474CrossRef Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, Towheed T, Welch V, Wells G, Tugwell P (2012) American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res 64:465–474CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mizuno K, Yamamoto S, Lands W (1982) Effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on fatty acid cyclooxygenase and prostaglandin hydroperoxidase activities. Prostaglandins 23:743PubMed Mizuno K, Yamamoto S, Lands W (1982) Effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on fatty acid cyclooxygenase and prostaglandin hydroperoxidase activities. Prostaglandins 23:743PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gabriel SE, Jaakkimainen L, Bombardier C (1991) Risk for serious gastrointestinal complications related to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 115:787–796CrossRefPubMed Gabriel SE, Jaakkimainen L, Bombardier C (1991) Risk for serious gastrointestinal complications related to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 115:787–796CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, Makuch R, Eisen G, Agrawal NM, Stenson WF (2000) Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 284:1247–1255CrossRefPubMed Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, Makuch R, Eisen G, Agrawal NM, Stenson WF (2000) Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 284:1247–1255CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Curtis SP, Bockow B, Fisher C, Olaleye J, Compton A, Ko AT, Reicin AS (2005) Etoricoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis over 52-weeks: a double-blind, active-comparator controlled trial. Bmc Musculoskelet Disord 6:58 (NCT00242489)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Curtis SP, Bockow B, Fisher C, Olaleye J, Compton A, Ko AT, Reicin AS (2005) Etoricoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis over 52-weeks: a double-blind, active-comparator controlled trial. Bmc Musculoskelet Disord 6:58 (NCT00242489)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo MC, Yoo WH, Kang SB, Park Y-W, Kim SS, Moon KH, Song YW, Min BW, Cho YJ, Moon S-H (2014) Etoricoxib in the treatment of Korean patients with osteoarthritis in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin 30:2399–2408CrossRefPubMed Yoo MC, Yoo WH, Kang SB, Park Y-W, Kim SS, Moon KH, Song YW, Min BW, Cho YJ, Moon S-H (2014) Etoricoxib in the treatment of Korean patients with osteoarthritis in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin 30:2399–2408CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bingham C, Sebba A, Rubin B, Ruoff G, Kremer J, Bird S, Smugar S, Fitzgerald B, O’Brien K, Tershakovec A (2007) Efficacy and safety of etoricoxib 30 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of osteoarthritis in two identically designed, randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority studies. Rheumatology 46:496–507CrossRefPubMed Bingham C, Sebba A, Rubin B, Ruoff G, Kremer J, Bird S, Smugar S, Fitzgerald B, O’Brien K, Tershakovec A (2007) Efficacy and safety of etoricoxib 30 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of osteoarthritis in two identically designed, randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority studies. Rheumatology 46:496–507CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Reginster J-Y, Malmstrom K, Mehta A, Bergman G, Ko A, Curtis S, Reicin A (2007) Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib compared with naproxen in two, 138-week randomised studies of patients with osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:945–951CrossRefPubMed Reginster J-Y, Malmstrom K, Mehta A, Bergman G, Ko A, Curtis S, Reicin A (2007) Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib compared with naproxen in two, 138-week randomised studies of patients with osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:945–951CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kongtharvonskul J, Anothaisintawee T, McEvoy M, Attia J, Woratanarat P, Thakkinstian A (2015) Efficacy and safety of glucosamine, diacerein, and NSAIDs in osteoarthritis knee: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 20:24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kongtharvonskul J, Anothaisintawee T, McEvoy M, Attia J, Woratanarat P, Thakkinstian A (2015) Efficacy and safety of glucosamine, diacerein, and NSAIDs in osteoarthritis knee: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 20:24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Choy E, Smith C, Dore C, Scott D (2005) A meta-analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of combining disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis based on patient withdrawal. Rheumatology 44:1414–1421CrossRefPubMed Choy E, Smith C, Dore C, Scott D (2005) A meta-analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of combining disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis based on patient withdrawal. Rheumatology 44:1414–1421CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:637–639CrossRefPubMed Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:637–639CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravindran V, Scott D, Choy E (2008) A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and toxicity of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biological agents for psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 67:855–859CrossRefPubMed Ravindran V, Scott D, Choy E (2008) A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and toxicity of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biological agents for psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 67:855–859CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YH, Bae SC, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG (2011) Associations between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep 38:3643–3651CrossRefPubMed Lee YH, Bae SC, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG (2011) Associations between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep 38:3643–3651CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YH, Rho YH, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG (2007) PADI4 polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 27:827–833CrossRefPubMed Lee YH, Rho YH, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG (2007) PADI4 polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 27:827–833CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalá-López F, Tobías A, Cameron C, Moher D, Hutton B (2014) Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction. Rheumatol Int 34:1489–1496CrossRefPubMed Catalá-López F, Tobías A, Cameron C, Moher D, Hutton B (2014) Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction. Rheumatol Int 34:1489–1496CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRefPubMed Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown S, Hutton B, Clifford T, Coyle D, Grima D, Wells G, Cameron C (2014) A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses--an overview and application of NetMetaXL. Syst Rev 3:110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown S, Hutton B, Clifford T, Coyle D, Grima D, Wells G, Cameron C (2014) A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses--an overview and application of NetMetaXL. Syst Rev 3:110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Salanti G, Ades A, Ioannidis JP (2011) Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol 64:163–171CrossRefPubMed Salanti G, Ades A, Ioannidis JP (2011) Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol 64:163–171CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo MC, Yoo WH, Kang SB, Park YW, Kim SS, Moon KH, Song YW, Min BW, Cho YJ, Moon SH, Bin SI, Baek HJ, Shim SC, Lee SW, Yoo DH, Mehta A, Skuban A, Cukrow DM, Vandormael K, Yan L (2014) Etoricoxib in the treatment of Korean patients with osteoarthritis in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin 30:2399–2408CrossRefPubMed Yoo MC, Yoo WH, Kang SB, Park YW, Kim SS, Moon KH, Song YW, Min BW, Cho YJ, Moon SH, Bin SI, Baek HJ, Shim SC, Lee SW, Yoo DH, Mehta A, Skuban A, Cukrow DM, Vandormael K, Yan L (2014) Etoricoxib in the treatment of Korean patients with osteoarthritis in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin 30:2399–2408CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bingham CO 3rd, Sebba AI, Rubin BR, Ruoff GE, Kremer J, Bird S, Smugar SS, Fitzgerald BJ, O’Brien K, Tershakovec AM (2007) Efficacy and safety of etoricoxib 30 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of osteoarthritis in two identically designed, randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority studies. Rheumatology 46:496–507CrossRefPubMed Bingham CO 3rd, Sebba AI, Rubin BR, Ruoff GE, Kremer J, Bird S, Smugar SS, Fitzgerald BJ, O’Brien K, Tershakovec AM (2007) Efficacy and safety of etoricoxib 30 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of osteoarthritis in two identically designed, randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority studies. Rheumatology 46:496–507CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lisse J, Espinoza L, Zhao SZ, Dedhiya SD, Osterhaus JT (2001) Functional status and health-related quality of life of elderly osteoarthritic patients treated with celecoxib. The journals of gerontology Series A. Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M167–175 Lisse J, Espinoza L, Zhao SZ, Dedhiya SD, Osterhaus JT (2001) Functional status and health-related quality of life of elderly osteoarthritic patients treated with celecoxib. The journals of gerontology Series A. Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M167–175
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensen WG, Fiechtner JJ, McMillen JI, Zhao WW, Yu SS, Woods EM, Hubbard RC, Isakson PC, Verburg KM, Geis GS (1999) Treatment of osteoarthritis with celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc 74:1095–1105CrossRefPubMed Bensen WG, Fiechtner JJ, McMillen JI, Zhao WW, Yu SS, Woods EM, Hubbard RC, Isakson PC, Verburg KM, Geis GS (1999) Treatment of osteoarthritis with celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc 74:1095–1105CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kivitz AJ, Moskowitz RW, Woods E, Hubbard RC, Verburg KM, Lefkowith JB, Geis GS (2001) Comparative efficacy and safety of celecoxib and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Int Med Res 29:467–479CrossRefPubMed Kivitz AJ, Moskowitz RW, Woods E, Hubbard RC, Verburg KM, Lefkowith JB, Geis GS (2001) Comparative efficacy and safety of celecoxib and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Int Med Res 29:467–479CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung AT, Malmstrom K, Gallacher AE, Sarembock B, Poor G, Beaulieu A, Castro R, Sanchez M, Detora LM, Ng J (2002) Efficacy and tolerability profile of etoricoxib in patients with osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo and active-comparator controlled 12-week efficacy trial. Curr Med Res Opin 18:49–58CrossRefPubMed Leung AT, Malmstrom K, Gallacher AE, Sarembock B, Poor G, Beaulieu A, Castro R, Sanchez M, Detora LM, Ng J (2002) Efficacy and tolerability profile of etoricoxib in patients with osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo and active-comparator controlled 12-week efficacy trial. Curr Med Res Opin 18:49–58CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Reginster JY, Malmstrom K, Mehta A, Bergman G, Ko AT, Curtis SP, Reicin AS (2007) Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib compared with naproxen in two, 138-week randomised studies of patients with osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:945–951CrossRefPubMed Reginster JY, Malmstrom K, Mehta A, Bergman G, Ko AT, Curtis SP, Reicin AS (2007) Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib compared with naproxen in two, 138-week randomised studies of patients with osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:945–951CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Essex MN, Bhadra P, Sands GH (2012) Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib versus naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial. J Int Med Res 40:1357–1370CrossRefPubMed Essex MN, Bhadra P, Sands GH (2012) Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib versus naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial. J Int Med Res 40:1357–1370CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YH, Woo J-H, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG (2010) Effect of glucosamine or chondroitin sulfate on the osteoarthritis progression: a meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 30:357–363CrossRefPubMed Lee YH, Woo J-H, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG (2010) Effect of glucosamine or chondroitin sulfate on the osteoarthritis progression: a meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 30:357–363CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore A, Makinson G, Li C (2013) Patient-level pooled analysis of adjudicated gastrointestinal outcomes in celecoxib clinical trials: meta-analysis of 51,000 patients enrolled in 52 randomized trials. Arthritis Res Ther 15:R6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore A, Makinson G, Li C (2013) Patient-level pooled analysis of adjudicated gastrointestinal outcomes in celecoxib clinical trials: meta-analysis of 51,000 patients enrolled in 52 randomized trials. Arthritis Res Ther 15:R6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramey DR, Watson DJ, Yu C, Bolognese JA, Curtis SP, Reicin AS (2005) The incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in clinical trials of etoricoxib vs. non-selective NSAIDs: an updated combined analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 21:715–722CrossRefPubMed Ramey DR, Watson DJ, Yu C, Bolognese JA, Curtis SP, Reicin AS (2005) The incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in clinical trials of etoricoxib vs. non-selective NSAIDs: an updated combined analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 21:715–722CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Varas‐Lorenzo C, Riera‐Guardia N, Calingaert B, Castellsague J, Salvo F, Nicotra F, Sturkenboom M, Perez‐Gutthann S (2013) Myocardial infarction and individual nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs meta‐analysis of observational studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 22:559–570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Varas‐Lorenzo C, Riera‐Guardia N, Calingaert B, Castellsague J, Salvo F, Nicotra F, Sturkenboom M, Perez‐Gutthann S (2013) Myocardial infarction and individual nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs meta‐analysis of observational studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 22:559–570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindhardsen J, Gislason GH, Jacobsen S, Ahlehoff O, Olsen AM, Madsen OR, Torp-Pedersen C, Hansen PR (2013) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 73:1515–1521. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203137CrossRef Lindhardsen J, Gislason GH, Jacobsen S, Ahlehoff O, Olsen AM, Madsen OR, Torp-Pedersen C, Hansen PR (2013) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 73:1515–1521. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203137CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Relative efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib, celecoxib, and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis
A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials based on patient withdrawal
verfasst von
Gwan Gyu Song
Young Ho Seo
Jae-Hoon Kim
Sung Jae Choi
Jong Dae Ji
MD PhD Young Ho Lee
Publikationsdatum
14.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0340-1855
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-1250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-015-0023-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen der DGRh

Mitteilungen der DGRh

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Battle of Experts: Sport vs. Spritze bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes

11.05.2024 DDG-Jahrestagung 2024 Kongressbericht

Im Battle of Experts traten zwei Experten auf dem Diabeteskongress gegeneinander an: Die eine vertrat die Auffassung „Sport statt Spritze“ bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes, der andere forderte „Spritze statt Sport!“ Am Ende waren sie sich aber einig: Die Kombination aus beidem erzielt die besten Ergebnisse.

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

10.05.2024 Hypercholesterinämie Nachrichten

Patienten mit Arteriosklerose-bedingten kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, die trotz Statineinnahme zu hohe Triglyzeridspiegel haben, profitieren von einer Behandlung mit Icosapent-Ethyl, und zwar unabhängig vom individuellen Risikoprofil.

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

In den USA ist erstmals eine bioresorbierbare Gefäßstütze – auch Scaffold genannt – zur Rekanalisation infrapoplitealer Arterien bei schwerer PAVK zugelassen worden. Das markiert einen Wendepunkt in der Geschichte dieser speziellen Gefäßstützen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.