Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 6/2008

01.12.2008 | Original Article

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Intermediate oncological results

verfasst von: Stéphane Larré, Chaker Kanso, Alexandre De La Taille, Andras Hoznek, Dimitrios Vordos, René Yiou, Clément-Claude Abbou, Laurent Salomon

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 6/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To report the intermediate oncological results of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy by retroperitoneal approach.

Methods

From 1995 to 2006, 146 consecutive patients with removal of a malignant kidney tumor by laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy were analysed retrospectively. The patients were followed clinically, biologically and radiologically every 6 months. Disease-free survival and specific survival were determined among patients free of metastasis at surgery.

Results

Patient’s average age was 61.1 years (25–85). The pathology of these cancers were: 108 clear cell carcinomas, 26 papillary carcinomas, 10 chromophobe carcinomas, and 2 miscellaneous. The T stage were: 105 pT1, 12 pT2, and 29 pT3 (TNM 2002). The Fuhrman grade were: I in 23 cases, II in 70 cases, III in 40 cases, and IV in 9 cases. The surgical margins were positive in 2. No port site recurrence occurred. The average follow-up was 35.4 months (1–137). Five patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Tumor progression was observed among 19 patients, in the form of a local (1) or remote recurrence (18). Fourteen patients died, including 7 because of their tumor. The disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years, were respectively 87.3 and 73.2%, and the cancer-specific survival were 96.2 and 92.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

The laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy offers intermediate oncological results compatible with appropriate carcinological efficacy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W (1969) The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 101:297–301PubMed Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W (1969) The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 101:297–301PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282PubMed Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC (1993) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 149:103–105PubMed Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC (1993) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 149:103–105PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillenburg W, Poulakis V, Skriapas K et al (2006) Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: quality of life, pain and reconvalescence. Eur Urol 49:314–322 Discussion 22-3PubMedCrossRef Dillenburg W, Poulakis V, Skriapas K et al (2006) Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: quality of life, pain and reconvalescence. Eur Urol 49:314–322 Discussion 22-3PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbou CC, Cicco A, Gasman D et al (1999) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 161:1776–1780PubMedCrossRef Abbou CC, Cicco A, Gasman D et al (1999) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 161:1776–1780PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al (2001) Results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 15:355–359 Discussion 75-6PubMedCrossRef Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al (2001) Results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 15:355–359 Discussion 75-6PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer 92:1843–1855PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer 92:1843–1855PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL et al (2000) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 164:1153–1159PubMedCrossRef Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL et al (2000) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 164:1153–1159PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan DY, Cadeddu JA, Jarrett TW, Marshall FF, Kavoussi LR (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166:2095–2099 Discussion 9-100PubMedCrossRef Chan DY, Cadeddu JA, Jarrett TW, Marshall FF, Kavoussi LR (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166:2095–2099 Discussion 9-100PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF et al (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173:38–41PubMed Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF et al (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173:38–41PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Al-Zahrani H, Vrabec G, Leeb K, Janetschek G (2004) Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 64:919–924PubMedCrossRef Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Al-Zahrani H, Vrabec G, Leeb K, Janetschek G (2004) Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 64:919–924PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE et al (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174:1222–1225PubMedCrossRef Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE et al (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174:1222–1225PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J et al (2002) Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 167:1257–1262PubMedCrossRef Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J et al (2002) Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 167:1257–1262PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Saika T, Ono Y, Hattori R et al (2003) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 62:1018–1023PubMedCrossRef Saika T, Ono Y, Hattori R et al (2003) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 62:1018–1023PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogeli TA, Burchardt M, Fornara P, Rassweiler J, Sulser T (2002) Current laparoscopic practice patterns in urology: results of a survey among urologists in Germany and Switzerland. Eur Urol 42:441–446PubMedCrossRef Vogeli TA, Burchardt M, Fornara P, Rassweiler J, Sulser T (2002) Current laparoscopic practice patterns in urology: results of a survey among urologists in Germany and Switzerland. Eur Urol 42:441–446PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficarra V, Novara G, Galfano A, Novella G, Schiavone D, Artibani W (2004) Application of TNM, 2002 version, in localized renal cell carcinoma: is it able to predict different cancer-specific survival probability? Urology 63:1050–1054PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Galfano A, Novella G, Schiavone D, Artibani W (2004) Application of TNM, 2002 version, in localized renal cell carcinoma: is it able to predict different cancer-specific survival probability? Urology 63:1050–1054PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Javidan J, Stricker HJ, Tamboli P et al (1999) Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 162:1277–1281PubMedCrossRef Javidan J, Stricker HJ, Tamboli P et al (1999) Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 162:1277–1281PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui KH, Shvarts O, Smith RB, Figlin RA, deKernion JB, Belldegrun A (2000) Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol 163:1090–1095 Quiz 295PubMedCrossRef Tsui KH, Shvarts O, Smith RB, Figlin RA, deKernion JB, Belldegrun A (2000) Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol 163:1090–1095 Quiz 295PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Harano M, Eto M, Omoto K et al (2005) Long-term outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized stage T1/T2 renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 19:803–807PubMedCrossRef Harano M, Eto M, Omoto K et al (2005) Long-term outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized stage T1/T2 renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 19:803–807PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam JS, Shvarts O, Pantuck AJ (2004) Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 45:692–705PubMedCrossRef Lam JS, Shvarts O, Pantuck AJ (2004) Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 45:692–705PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek H et al (2000) Carcinological risks and retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Eur Urol 38:606–612PubMedCrossRef Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek H et al (2000) Carcinological risks and retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Eur Urol 38:606–612PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Intermediate oncological results
verfasst von
Stéphane Larré
Chaker Kanso
Alexandre De La Taille
Andras Hoznek
Dimitrios Vordos
René Yiou
Clément-Claude Abbou
Laurent Salomon
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0306-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2008

World Journal of Urology 6/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Schützt auch die medikamentöse Gewichtsreduktion vor Krebs?

03.06.2024 ASCO 2024 Kongressbericht

Offenbar muss es nicht immer die bariatrische Chirurgie sein, wenn es darum geht, durch deutlichen Gewichtsverlust auch das Krebsrisiko günstig zu beeinflussen. Eine große Kohortenanalyse zur Behandlung mit GLP-1-Agonisten wurde dazu auf der ASCO-Tagung vorgestellt.

Mit dem Seitenschneider gegen das Reißverschluss-Malheur

03.06.2024 Urologische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Wer ihn je erlebt hat, wird ihn nicht vergessen: den Schmerz, den die beim Öffnen oder Schließen des Reißverschlusses am Hosenschlitz eingeklemmte Haut am Penis oder Skrotum verursacht. Eine neue Methode für rasche Abhilfe hat ein US-Team getestet.

Patrone im Penis bringt Urologen in Gefahr

30.05.2024 Operationen am Penis Nachrichten

In Lebensgefahr brachte ein junger Mann nicht nur sich selbst, sondern auch das urologische Team, das ihm zu Hilfe kam: Er hatte sich zur Selbstbefriedigung eine scharfe Patrone in die Harnröhre gesteckt.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.