Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Medical Research 1/2023

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Research

Roxadustat alleviates the inflammatory status in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance by increasing the short-chain fatty acids producing gut bacteria

verfasst von: Xiu-Nan Zhao, Shu-Xin Liu, Zhen-Zhen Wang, Shuang Zhang, Lian-Lian You

Erschienen in: European Journal of Medical Research | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Background

Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have improved the treatment of renal anemia, especially in patients resistant to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). HIF facilitates maintain gut microbiota homeostasis, which plays an important role in inflammation and iron metabolism, which are in turn key factors affecting ESA resistance. The current study aimed to investigate the effects of roxadustat on inflammation and iron metabolism and on the gut microbiota in patients with ESA resistance.

Methods

We conducted a self-controlled, single-center study including 30 patients with ESA resistance undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. All patients received roxadustat without iron agents for renal anemia. Hemoglobin and inflammatory factors were monitored. Fecal samples were collected before and after 3 months’ administration and the gut microbiota were analyzed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing.

Results

Hemoglobin levels increased after treatment with roxadustat for 3 months (P < 0.05). Gut microbiota diversity and abundance also changed, with increases in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria (Acidaminococcaceae, Butyricicoccus, Ruminococcus bicirculans, Ruminococcus bromii, Bifidobacterium dentium, Eubacterium hallii) (P < 0.05). Serum SCFA levels also increased (P < 0.05). Inflammatory factors, including interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon-γ, and endotoxin gradually decreased (P < 0.05). Serum hepcidin, ferritin, and total and unsaturated iron-binding capacities decreased (P < 0.05), while soluble transferrin receptor levels increased at each time point (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in serum iron and transferrin saturation at each time point. The abundance of Alistipes shahii was significantly negatively correlated with IL-6 and TNF-α (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Roxadustat alleviated renal anemia in patients with ESA resistance by decreasing inflammatory factors and hepcidin levels and improving iron utilization. These effects were at least partly mediated by improved diversity and abundance of SCFA-producing gut bacteria, probably via activation of HIF.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal anemia is estimated to affect 2 to 4 million of the approximately 20 million people in the United States with CKD [1], and > 90% of the 500,000 patients who undergo dialysis in China, leading to high hospitalization rates and a high incidence of cardiovascular events [2]. Renal anemia is a multifactorial process caused by relative erythropoietin (EPO) deficiency, uremia-induced inhibitors of erythropoiesis, shortened erythrocyte survival, and disordered iron homeostasis [3]. Resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) is mainly associated with abnormal iron metabolism and inflammatory anemia [46]. There has recently been great progress in the development of drugs for the treatment of renal anemia, including hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs), which have been shown to treat renal anemia safely and effectively, via multiple mechanisms [7]. The representative HIF-PHI, Roxadustat (FG-4592, FibroGen, Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA), has been widely used in clinical applications. Roxadustat induces hypoxia in cells, thus stimulating endogenous EPO synthesis, improving iron metabolism, and reducing inflammation [8]. HIF transcription factors comprise two subunits: an oxygen-sensitive α-subunit (HIF-1α, HIF-2α, or HIF-3α) and a constitutively expressed β-subunit [9]. HIF-1α is a master transcription factor related to cell proliferation and survival, iron metabolism, angiogenesis and glucose metabolism [10]. Notably, HIF-1α has been shown to maintain intestinal homeostasis by not only regulating the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier, but also improving the survival of intestinal microorganisms [11], while HIF-2α is involved in the regulation of intestinal iron transporters mediated by the intestinal microbiota. Intestinal microorganisms and their metabolites may inhibit HIF-2α under conditions of iron deficiency [12]. As the master intestinal transcriptional regulator of apical and basolateral iron transporters, HIF-2α is also sensitive to cellular iron and oxygen levels, which can affect transcriptional activation of the iron-absorption machinery to maintain systemic iron levels [1316].
The human gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem and a key component of gastrointestinal homeostasis. Many studies have shown that the gut microbiota in patients with CKD differs compared with that in healthy people [1719]. Changes in the gut microbiota and host reactions are related to the progression of CKD, as well as the increased risk of cardiovascular disease, uremic toxins, and inflammation [20, 21]. In 2011, Ritz proposed an “intestinal-renal syndrome” and derived the theory of an “intestinal-renal axis”, based on extensive studies [22]. This concluded that there was a bidirectional relationship between the kidney and intestine, in which functional impairment of one side could affect the normal function of the other side through various mechanisms, with important roles for the gut microbiota and its metabolites.
The mechanism of HIF-PHIs in the treatment of renal anemia has not yet been fully elucidated. We therefore conducted a prospective cohort study to explore the effect of roxadustat on the gut microbiota in hemodialysis (HD) patients with renal anemia and ESA resistance. The aim of this study was to determine if roxadustat could improve renal anemia in patients with ESA resistance by altering the intestinal microbiota, thereby correcting inflammation and iron metabolism disorders.

Materials and methods

Study population

Patients with renal anemia who underwent HD during January 2020 to December 2020 at Blood Purification Center of Dalian Municipal Central Hospital were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria were: patients aged ≥ 18 years with ESA resistance, whose dialysis age is more than 3 months, who had received stable HD three times weekly for > 12 weeks and who had complete medical records. The exclusion criteria were: diarrhea, enteral or parenteral nutrition intervention, gastrointestinal tumors, biliary inflammation, inflammatory bowel disease, and use of antibiotics, immunosuppressants, glucocorticoids, or probiotics in the past 3 months.
Anemia in CKD patients was defined according to the 2004 European Best Practice Guidelines Working Group [23] as follows: hemoglobin (Hb) levels were considered to be below normal if they were < 11.5 g/dL in women and < 13.5 g/dL in men (< 12 g/dL in those aged > 70 years), for patients living at altitudes < 1500 m.
ESA resistance was defined as failure to attain the target Hb concentration (Hb < 11 g/dL) despite receiving > 300 IU/kg/week (20,000 IU/week) erythropoietin or 1.5 mg/kg darbepoetin-alfa (100 mg/week) over a 3-month period, or a continued need for high dosages to maintain the target Hb level [23].
All study protocols conformed to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the institutional medical ethics committee of Dalian Municipal Central Hospital (No. YN2022-039-10), and all study patients provided written informed consent. The clinical information was extracted from the electronic medical records system of Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, and the privacy of the patients was fully protected. Fecal specimens were collected after routine diagnosis and treatment in the clinic, with no harm to the patients.

Laboratory measurements

The blood samples before and after 1 month, 3 months the application of roxadustat were collected. Approximately 3–5 mL venous blood samples for routine laboratory determinations were obtained immediately before dialysis treatment. Hemoglobin was determined by colorimetry using blood cell analyzer (XN-10, sysmex, Japan). Inflammatory factors, including interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, endotoxin and EPO were measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the kit of DRG from Germany. Iron-metabolism indicators, including hepcidin, ferritin, total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), unsaturated iron-binding capacity (UIBC), transferrin saturation (TS), serum iron (SI), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and serum short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were measured by ELISA using the kit of Meimian company from Jiangsu, China. Other laboratory parameters including albumin, creatine, urea nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus, β2 microglobulin, total cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured using an ADVIA 2400 Automatic Biochemistry Analyzer (Siemens, Germany). Dialysis adequacy was determined by the single-pool Kt/V (spKt/V), which was calculated quarterly using the second-generation equation of Daugirdas [24] based on pre- and post-HD blood urea, as follows: Kt/V = −ln(R − 0.008 × t) + [(4 − 3.5 × R) × UF/W], where R is the ratio of post-dialysis to pre-dialysis serum urea nitrogen concentration; t is the duration of HD (in hours); UF is the amount of ultrafiltration (in liters) during the HD session; and W is the post-dialysis weight (in kilograms).

Study design

This was a before–after control study of patients with renal anemia treated with roxadustat. All patients initially received roxadustat thrice weekly, based on body weight: patients weighing 45–< 60 kg received 100 mg roxadustat, and those weighing ≥ 60 kg received 120 mg three times weekly. No participant received iron agents during the study. Fecal specimens were collected before treatment and 3 months after the initiation of treatment with roxadustat. During the treatment, the hemoglobin level was measured every 2 weeks to adjust the dose of Roxadustat so that the hemoglobin level of participants can achieve the target of 110–120 g/L. Changes in Hb concentration, levels of inflammatory factors, indices of iron metabolism, and the occurrence of adverse effects were examined during the 3-month treatment period. The above information was obtained from medical records. Group A refers to the patients undergoing maintenance HD before treatment with roxadustat, while Group B refers to the same patients after treatment with roxadustat for 3 months.

Sample collection, DNA extraction, and 16S rRNA gene amplification sequencing

Fecal samples were collected at the hospital before each chemotherapy. Fresh fecal samples were collected from enrolled patients after natural defection in the clean toilet, using the scoop in the collection tube take 3–5 g fecal and place in the collection tube. The microbial genome was extracted using QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sample DNA purity and concentration were tested using a Nanodrop 2000 Spectrophotometer. We amplified the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene V3–V4 region using the TransGen AP221-02 Kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). The following PCR primers were used: 338F 5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′ and 806R 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′. The reaction volume (20 μL) comprised 5× FastPfu Buffer (4 μL), 2.5 mM dNTPs (2 μL), forward primer (0.8 μL), 5 μM reverse primer (0.8 μL), FastPfu Polymerase (0.4 μL), and template DNA (10 ng). Cycling proceeded as follows: 3 min at 95 °C twenty-seven cycles (30 sat 95 °C, 30 sat 55 °C, 45 sat 72 °C); 10 min at 72 °C. After amplicons extraction, samples were purified and quantified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, CA, USA) and QuantiFluor™-ST (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), respectively. Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar proportions and paired-end sequenced (2 × 250 bp) on the Illumina MiSeq platform with TruSeqTM DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

Bioinformatics

All fecal samples were analyzed by Novogene Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). Paired-end sequencing of the samples was then carried out using the Illumina NovaSeq sequencing platform. After read splicing and filtering, clustering of operational taxonomic unit (OTUs), species annotation, and abundance analysis were carried out using alpha and beta diversity analyses to examine the diversity of the gut microbiota. Alpha diversities of the fecal flora before and after roxadustat treatment were accessed using five metrics: Venn diagrams, species accumulation boxplots, rank abundance curves, rarefaction curves, and Shannon plots, which show species enrichment and distribution. Beta diversity is used to assess variations in species diversity between different environments. PCoA and PCA analyses [25, 26] showed the total intestinal flora differences. MRPP analysis showed differences in the bacterial compositions of the microbiota between two groups. T-tests provided the differences in the gut microbiota at each classification level (phylum, class, order, family, genus, species) between the two groups which emphasizes statistical significance and biological correlation, which can be used to identify significant differences in biomarkers between groups.

Sample size calculation

The equation for calculating sample size [27] is shown below.
$$n = \frac{{z^2 \times \hat{p}\left( {1 - \hat{p}} \right)}}{\varepsilon^2 },$$
z is the z score, ε is the margin of error, n is the population size, is the population proportion.
Determine the sample size necessary to estimate the alteration of gut microbiota after the application of roxadustat that identify as vegan with 95% confidence, and a margin of error of 20%. Assume a population proportion of 0.5, and unlimited population size. Remember that z for a 95% confidence level is 1.96. Refer to the table provided in the confidence level section for z scores of a range of confidence levels.
$$n = \frac{1.96^2 \times 0.5 \times 0.5}{{0.2^2 }} = 24.01.$$
Thus, for the case above, a sample size of at least 24 participants would be necessary.

Statistical analysis

Continuous normally distributed variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Data before and after the application of roxadustat at each time point were assessed by repeated-measures ANOVA, using Bonferroni analysis. The relationships between gut microbiota and clinical parameters were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 23 (IBM Corp., USA). Significant differences in relative abundances of genus between groups were corrected by Benn-Hochberg False discovery rate (FDR). All statistical tests were 2-sided, and P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. To detect the alteration in the inflammatory status after the application of Roxadustat, a sample size of 32 patients per group was necessary with a two-sided 5% significance level and a power of 80%.

Results

A total of 30 patients were included in this study to compare the changes in the gut microbiota spectrum after 3 months of roxadustat treatment (Fig. 1). The baseline characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. All participants were of Han ethnicity, born in northeastern China, and had a similar dietary pattern which did not alter during the 3 months. No adverse effects were observed during the 3 months of the participants’ medication. Changes in Hb levels during the 3 months are shown in Fig. 2. The Hb level in patient 7 was an outlier, but the results were confirmed by repeated analysis. Baseline Hb at enrollment was (85.93 ± 9.85) g/L, and this increased significantly to (94.97 ± 12.14) g/L after 2 weeks’ of roxadustat treatment (P < 0.001). Hb levels continued to increase gradually to (100.80 ± 11.97) g/L, (106.57 ± 13.06) g/L, and (109.20 ± 14.78) g/L after the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd months, respectively (P < 0.001). Ferritin, TIBC, UIBC, and hepcidin decreased significantly after the 1st and 3rd months (P < 0.05), while sTfR increased significantly (P < 0.05). Changes in iron-metabolism indices are shown in Table 2. Levels of inflammatory factors decreased significantly after the 1st and 3rd months (P < 0.001), as shown in Table 3.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of the participants
Variables
Values
Age (year)
54.40 ± 17.08
Gender (male%)
56.67
Dialysis age (year)
4.07 ± 3.87
Height (m)
1.69 ± 0.08
Weight (kg)
71.91 ± 16.76
Body mass index (kg/m2)
24.83 ± 5.10
Diabetes mellitus (%)
40.00
Coronary heart disease (%)
16.67
Hemoglobin (g/L)
89.27 ± 10.77
Albumin (g/L)
39.20 ± 5.07
Creatine (μmol/L)
839.87 ± 264.70
Urea nitrogen (mmol/L)
28.37 ± 6.79
Calcium (mmol/L)
2.20 ± 0.18
Phosphorus (mmol/L)
2.04 ± 0.58
β2 microglobulin (mmol/L)
41.83 ± 13.15
Triglyceride (mmol/L)
2.80 ± 2.62
Cholesterol (mmol/L)
3.69 ± 1.00
Kt/v
1.25 ± 0.20
Data are presented as means and standard deviations for continuous variables and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables
Table 2
Changes in iron-metabolism indices after initiation of roxadustat
Time
Ferritin (ng/mL)
SI (umol/L)
TIBC (umol/L)
UIBC (umol/L)
TS (%)
STfR (mg/L)
Hepcidin (ng/L)
Baseline (M0)
72.96 ± 14.16
15.72 ± 6.21
56.70 ± 10.83
41.49 ± 14.00
27.85 ± 12.20
38.46 ± 7.75
116.12 ± 17.46
M1
65.69 ± 12.00
16.63 ± 7.64
54.59 ± 8.65
37.97 ± 12.35
31.62 ± 15.82
41.63 ± 7.57
86.72 ± 16.97
M3
55.54 ± 13.73
15.47 ± 5.23
48.93 ± 12.97
33.46 ± 13.92
33.58 ± 14.99
50.18 ± 7.73
78.86 ± 15.90
F value
10.73
0.489
5.906
3.721
1.582
18.68
1034.523
P value
< 0.001
0.602
0.005
0.032
0.218
< 0.001
< 0.001
M0: before roxadustat; M1: 1 month after initiation of roxadustat; M3: 3 months after initiation of roxadustat (end of study)
Table 3
Changes in inflammatory factors after initiation of roxadustat
Time
IL-1 (ng/L)
IL-6 (ng/L)
TNF-α (ng/L)
IFN-γ (ng/L)
ET (ng/L)
Baseline (M0)
107.72 ± 17.54
36.54 ± 5.84
55.13 ± 10.58
52.28 ± 8.94
7.82 ± 1.94
M1
85.13 ± 15.97
30.05 ± 5.41
44.14 ± 10.02
37.15 ± 9.11
6.11 ± 1.72
M3
73.75 ± 16.26
28.84 ± 5.68
42.97 ± 9.93
35.42 ± 8.70
5.54 ± 1.55
F value
603.626
271.113
321.807
906.224
493.483
P value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
M0: before roxadustat; M1: 1 month after initiation of roxadustat; M3: 3 months after initiation of roxadustat (end of study)
EPO levels increased significantly (F = 1220.882, P < 0.001) from (6.76 ± 1.69) U/L at baseline to (9.33 ± 1.62) U/L after 1 month and (10.13 ± 1.56) U/L after 3 months.
Serum SCFA levels also increased significantly (F = 23.577, P < 0.001) from (53.21 ± 13.72) g/L at baseline to (60.71 ± 12.36) g/L after 1 month and (69.73 ± 11.67) g/L after 3 months.

Species richness and diversity

We assessed the alpha diversities of the fecal flora before and after roxadustat treatment using five metrics: Venn diagrams, species accumulation boxplots, rank abundance curves, rarefaction curves, and Shannon plots, to show species enrichment and distribution. Following clustering, common and unique OTUs among the groups were analyzed and displayed in a Venn diagram. There were 1618 unique OTUs in Group A, 1131 unique OTUs in Group B, and 5034 OTUs that were shared by both groups (Fig. 3A). The species accumulation boxplot suggests that the boxplot tends toward a more gradual position, indicating that the sample size was sufficient for analysis of the fecal microbiota (Fig. 3B). The slope of the rank abundance curve reflected the richness and evenness of the species in the sample (Fig. 3C): species richness was reflected by the width of the curve, and the uniformity of species in the sample was reflected by the smoothness of the curve in the vertical direction. The rarefaction curve reflected the richness and evenness of the species in the two groups (Fig. 3D): a flat curve indicated that the volume of sequencing data was reasonable. Microbial community diversity and richness were also evaluated using the Shannon indice. According to the OTU distribution, the Shannon index differed significantly between the two groups (Fig. 3E) (P = 0.047), suggesting that the community richness and diversity of the two groups differed.

Differences in microbiota between Group A and Group B

Beta diversity is used to assess variations in species diversity between different environments. The beta diversity measurements of the samples taken before and after roxadustat treatment are shown in Fig. 4A. PCoA (Fig. 4B) and PCA analyses (Fig. 4C) showed that the intestinal flora differed significantly between the two groups, but could not be completely separated. In addition, MRPP analysis (Table 4) also showed significant differences in the bacterial compositions of the microbiota between Groups A and B (P = 0.029).
Table 4
MRPP analysis between the groups
Group
A
Observed-delta
Expected-delta
Significance
A–B
0.006361
0.6359
0.64
0.029
The higher the Observe delta value, the smaller the intra group difference; the higher the Expect Delta value, the greater the inter group difference. A value greater than 0 indicates that the difference between groups is greater than the intra group difference, while A value less than 0 indicates that the intra group difference is greater than the inter group difference. Significance value less than 0.05 indicates significant difference
There were significant differences in the gut microbiota at each classification level (phylum, class, order, family, genus, species) between Groups A and B (t-tests, P < 0.05) (Fig. 5 and Table 5). There were significant differences between the two groups in the abundances of the following: Proteobacteria and Tenericutes at the phylum level; Gammaprotobacteria, Mollicutes and Coriobacteria at the class level; Enterobacteriales and Coriobacteriales at the order level; Enterobacteriaceae, Acidaminococcaceae, Christensenellaceae, and Eggerthellaceae at the family level; unidentified Enterobacteriaceae, unidentified Ruminococcaceae, Phascolarctobacterium, Intestinimonas, Bilophia, Anaerostipes, Butyricicoccus at the genus level; and Escherichia coli, Ruminococcus bicirculans, Alistipes shahii, Ruminococcus bromii, Blautia obeum, Bifidobacterium dentium, Parabacteroides goldsteinii, Collinsella aerofaciens, Eubacterium hallii, and Marseillibacter massiliensis at the species level (all P < 0.05). All the above bacteria were more abundant in Group B compared with Group A.
Table 5
Differences in the gut microbiota between Groups A and B (t-tests)
Bacteria
Abundance in Group A
Abundance in Group B
P value
95% CI
Proteobacteria
(0.0765 ± 0.041)
(0.1196 ± 0.0814)
0.001
(− 0.0062; − 0.0017)
Tenericutes
(0.0013 ± 0.0014)
(0.0052 ± 0.0059)
0.012
(− 0.0767; − 0.0096)
Gammaprotobacteria
(0.0601 ± 0.037)
(0.1021 ± 0.0728)
0.007
(− 0.0721; − 0.0119)
Mollicutes
(0.0013 ± 0.0014)
(0.0052 ± 0.0059)
0.012
(− 0.0062; − 0.0017)
Coriobacteria
(0.0015 ± 0.0013)
(0.0037 ± 0.0036)
0.004
(− 0.0036; − 0.0007)
Enterobacteriales
(0.0171 ± 0.0246)
(0.0576 ± 0.0643)
0.003
(− 0.0659; − 0.0150)
Coriobacteriales
(0.0014 ± 0.0013)
(0.0036 ± 0.0036)
0.003
(− 0.0036; − 0.0008)
Enterobacteriaceae,
(− 0.0171 ± 0.024)
(0.0576 ± 0.0643)
0.003
(− 0.6592; − 0.0150)
Acidaminococcaceae
(0.0047 ± 0.0049)
(0.0090 ± 0.0081)
0.016
(− 0.0078; − 0.0008)
Christensenellaceae
(0.0016 ± 0.0017)
(0.0031 ± 0.0003)
0.02
(− 0.0028; − 0.0002)
Eggerthellaceae
(0.0006 ± 0.0005)
(0.0018 ± 0.0017)
0.0007
(− 0.0019; − 0.0006)
Unidentified Enterobacteriaceae
(0.0146 ± 0.0233)
(0.0416 ± 0.051)
0.012
(− 0.0476; − 0.0062)
Unidentified Ruminococcaceae
(0.0259 ± 0.0142)
(0.0398 ± 0.0258)
0.014
(− 0.0247; − 0.0030)
Phascolarctobacterium
(0.0045 ± 0.0048)
(0.0084 ± 0.0078)
0.021
(− 0.0074; − 0.0006)
Intestinimonas
(0.0009 ± 0.0008)
(0.0178 ± 0.0015)
0.0098
(− 0.0014; − 0.0002)
Bilophia
(0.0012 ± 0.0007)
(0.0021 ± 0.0014)
0.0047
(− 0.0015; − 0.0003)
Anaerostipes
(0.0011 ± 0.0007)
(0.0017 ± 0.0013)
0.014
(− 0.0012; − 0.0001)
Butyricicoccus
(0.0006 ± 0.0003)
(0.0011 ± 0.0008)
0.007
(− 0.0008; − 0.0001)
Escherichia coli
(0.0146 ± 0.0233)
(0.0416 ± 0.0510)
0.011
(− 0.0476; − 0.0063)
Ruminococcus bicirculans
(0.0045 ± 0.0054)
(0.0077 ± 0.0065)
0.043
(− 0.0063; − 0.0001)
Alistipes shahii
(0.0037 ± 0.0036)
(0.0066 ± 0.0038)
0.003
(− 0.0048; − 0.001)
Ruminococcus bromii
(0.0035 ± 0.0025)
(0.0068 ± 0.0049)
0.002
(− 0.0054; − 0.001)
Blautia obeum
(0.0008 ± 0.0007)
(0.0020 ± 0.0032)
0.047
(− 0.0024; − 0.00002)
Bifidobacterium dentium
(0.00006 ± 0.00009)
(0.0002 ± 0.0004)
0.034
(− 0.0031; − 0.00001)
Parabacteroides goldsteinii
(0.0006 ± 0.0006)
(0.0016 ± 0.0022)
0.025
(− 0.0018; − 0.0001)
Collinsella aerofaciens
(0.0004 ± 0.0008)
(0.0016 ± 0.0022)
0.015
(− 0.002; − 0.0002)
Eubacterium hallii
(0.0009 ± 0.0006)
(0.0025 ± 0.0019)
0.0002
(− 0.0023; − 0.0008)
Marseillibacter massiliensis
(0.0008 ± 0.0011)
(0.0016 ± 0.0011)
0.017
(− 0.0013; − 0.0001)
In addition, we investigated the relationships between the alteration of gut microbiota and the D-value of clinical parameters before and after the 3 months application of roxadustat including Hb, inflammatory factors, and iron-metabolism indices, using Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis (Table 6). The correlation heatmap figure is presented in Fig. 6. The abundance of Alistipes shahii was significantly negatively correlated with IL-6 (R = − 0.41371) and TNF-α (R = − 0.37232) (both P < 0.05).
Table 6
Correlations between gut microbiota and clinical parameters
 
Escherichia_coli
Ruminococcus_bicirculans
Alistipes_shahii
R
P
R
P
R
P
Ferritin
− 0.07008
0.7129
− 0.46118
0.0103
− 0.0505
0.791
STfR
0.02558
0.8932
− 0.32058
0.0841
− 0.16618
0.3801
SCFAs
0.02694
0.8876
− 0.32636
0.0784
− 0.23397
0.2133
Serum iron
0.081
0.6705
− 0.15977
0.399
− 0.09546
0.6158
TIBC
− 0.08411
0.6586
− 0.22319
0.2358
− 0.26969
0.1495
UIBC
− 0.01846
0.9228
− 0.11635
0.5403
− 0.09232
0.6275
TS
0.11858
0.5326
0.02959
0.8767
− 0.00779
0.9674
IL-1
0.0621
0.7444
− 0.06388
0.7374
0.00556
0.9767
IL-6
− 0.07923
0.6773
− 0.27128
0.147
− 0.41371
0.0231
TNF-α
0.0612
0.748
− 0.17648
0.3509
− 0.37232
0.0428
IFN-γ
0.0612
0.748
− 0.27951
0.1347
− 0.0612
0.748
ET
− 0.18734
0.3215
0.0089
0.9628
− 0.28724
0.1238
Hepcidin
− 0.01402
0.9414
0.11394
0.5488
− 0.34784
0.0596
EPO
− 0.07928
0.6771
− 0.16746
0.3764
− 0.07482
0.6943
EPO-Ab
− 0.02206
0.9079
− 0.2861
0.1254
− 0.00535
0.9776
Hb
− 0.3532
0.0555
− 0.14819
0.4345
− 0.06752
0.723
 
Blautia_obeum
Bifidobacterium_dentium
Parabacteroides_goldsteinii
R
P
R
P
R
P
Ferritin
− 0.27061
0.1481
− 0.02781
0.884
0.19357
0.3054
STfR
0.00512
0.9786
− 0.2107
0.2637
0.16509
0.3833
SCFAs
− 0.17804
0.3466
0.00301
0.9874
− 0.20416
0.2792
Serum iron
− 0.08893
0.6403
− 0.06209
0.7445
− 0.04562
0.8108
TIBC
− 0.28915
0.1212
− 0.22566
0.2305
0.0375
0.844
UIBC
− 0.13241
0.4855
− 0.12727
0.5027
0.10502
0.5807
TS
0.0207
0.9136
0.06119
0.7481
− 0.03649
0.8482
IL-1
0.15674
0.4081
− 0.29716
0.1108
0.1941
0.3041
IL-6
− 0.24265
0.1964
− 0.3452
0.0617
0.02404
0.8997
TNF-α
− 0.10697
0.5737
− 0.10995
0.563
0.01903
0.9205
IFN-γ
− 0.14581
0.442
0.16937
0.3709
0.08558
0.653
ET
− 0.23959
0.2022
− 0.05852
0.7587
− 0.19671
0.2975
Hepcidin
− 0.08905
0.6398
− 0.09014
0.6357
− 0.25028
0.1822
EPO
− 0.1282
0.4996
− 0.29955
0.1078
− 0.08163
0.6681
EPO-Ab
− 0.13151
0.4885
− 0.23621
0.2089
0.02117
0.9116
Hb
− 0.31353
0.0916
0.22833
0.2249
− 0.27268
0.1449
 
Collinsella_aerofaciens
Eubacterium_hallii
Marseillibacter_massiliensis
R
P
R
P
R
P
Ferritin
− 0.22638
0.229
− 0.18156
0.337
0.11816
0.534
STfR
− 0.20211
0.2841
0.05674
0.7659
− 0.15732
0.4064
SCFAs
− 0.27988
0.1342
0.04252
0.8234
− 0.02316
0.9033
Serum iron
− 0.25125
0.1805
− 0.28152
0.1318
− 0.20298
0.282
TIBC
− 0.10197
0.5918
− 0.23923
0.2029
− 0.00045
0.9981
UIBC
0.12821
0.4995
0.03716
0.8454
0.17534
0.354
TS
− 0.20634
0.274
− 0.15931
0.4004
− 0.247
0.1882
IL-1
− 0.0726
0.703
0.08125
0.6695
− 0.10329
0.587
IL-6
− 0.13638
0.4724
− 0.20332
0.2812
− 0.25264
0.178
TNF-α
− 0.14963
0.43
− 0.09815
0.6058
− 0.27657
0.139
IFN-γ
− 0.09118
0.6318
0.08803
0.6437
0.25865
0.1675
ET
− 0.12088
0.5246
− 0.10759
0.5715
0.11227
0.5547
Hepcidin
− 0.11512
0.5447
− 0.21133
0.2623
− 0.20612
0.2745
EPO
− 0.19029
0.3138
− 0.25401
0.1756
− 0.12017
0.527
EPO-Ab
− 0.19853
0.2929
− 0.01092
0.9543
− 0.08803
0.6437
Hb
− 0.31449
0.0905
− 0.14096
0.4575
− 0.00858
0.9641
 
Butyricicoccus
Ruminococcus_bromii
  
R
P
R
P
  
Ferritin
0.11816
0.534
− 0.3175
0.0873
  
STfR
− 0.15732
0.4064
0.01847
0.9228
  
SCFAs
− 0.02316
0.9033
− 0.13592
0.4739
  
Serum iron
− 0.20298
0.282
− 0.40414
0.0268
  
TIBC
− 0.00045
0.9981
− 0.25081
0.1813
  
UIBC
0.17534
0.354
− 0.25081
0.1813
  
TS
− 0.247
0.1882
− 0.23829
0.2048
  
IL-1
− 0.10329
0.587
0.22415
0.2337
  
IL-6
− 0.25264
0.178
0.22415
0.2337
  
TNF-α
− 0.27657
0.139
− 0.10895
0.5666
  
IFN-γ
0.25865
0.1675
− 0.10895
0.5666
  
ET
0.11227
0.5547
− 0.14174
0.455
  
Hepcidin
− 0.20612
0.2745
− 0.14174
0.455
  
EPO
− 0.12017
0.527
− 0.14174
0.455
  
EPO-Ab
− 0.02206
0.9079
− 0.2861
0.1254
  
Hb
− 0.3532
0.0555
− 0.14819
0.4345
  

Discussion

The current study showed that Hb and EPO levels were increased after the administration of roxadustat in patients with ESA resistance undergoing maintenance HD. Roxadustat regulated the levels of inflammatory factors, increased iron utilization, and altered the diversity and abundance of the gut microbiota, especially in terms of SCFA-producing bacteria, thus alleviating ESA resistance.
In line with previous studies, roxadustat can effectively treat patients with renal anemia in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [28, 29]. Numerous clinical trials have shown the advantage of roxadustat compared with epoetin alfa [30]. The mechanism of roxadustat involves stimulating the manufacture of endogenous EPO, improving iron utilization [31] (indicated by suppression of hepatic hepcidin and upregulation of transport genes related to iron metabolism, such as DCYTB, DMT1, and TF), and reducing inflammation. Roxadustat is known to adjust the inflammatory microenvironment and ameliorate disorders of iron metabolism (the two main characteristics of renal anemia) in CKD patients, especially those with ESA resistance [3, 3235]. Notably, our results showed a dramatic change in the gut microbiota after the administration of roxadustat, particularly characterized by an increase in SCFA-producing bacteria. Meanwhile, our study showed the abundance of Alistipes shahii was negatively correlated with IL-6 and TNF-α levels. Alistipes shahii, known as SCFAs-producing bacteria, can significantly increase acetate and propionate so that relieve the bowel inflammation [36]. These results thus suggest that roxadustat may alleviate ESA resistance by regulating the gut microbiota.
CKD is considered to be a chronic inflammatory condition [37, 38] and to be closely linked to the gut microbiota [39, 40]. There is growing acceptance that the gut microbiota and its products affect the pathogenesis and development of CKD. Several factors, such as toxin accumulation [4143], inflammatory status, drugs (corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, antibiotics), and dietary restrictions may affect the gut microbiota [44]. Recent studies found differences in the composition and function of the gut microbiota between dialysis patients with ESRD and healthy controls [4547]. Jiang et al. found that butyrate-producing microbiota, such as Roseburia spp. and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, were significantly decreased in patients with any stage of CKD (n = 65) compared with healthy controls (n = 20) in a study in China. Wong et al. compared patients with ESRD (n = 24) and healthy controls (n = 12) in the United States, and showed that SCFAs played a dominant role in the gut microbiota related to uremic toxins in ESRD patients. Nineteen microbial families were increased, including 12 with urease-producing enzymes, five with uricase, and four with indole and p-cresol-producing enzymes, while four microbial families, including two with butyrate-producing enzymes, were decreased. Zhao et al. conducted a systematic review [48] of gut microbiota in patients with CKD, which showed significant increases in bacterial families possessing urease, uricase, and indole and p-cresol forming enzymes, and decreases in families possessing butyrate-forming enzymes among ESRD patients [49]. Previous studies comparing the intestinal flora between ESRD patients and healthy controls showed decreases in bacteria producing SCFAs, especially butyrate, in ESRD patients [48, 50]. Notably, however, the current study indicated that SCFA-producing bacteria increased after the administration of roxadustat. We thus speculated that the inflammatory and toxic microenvironment in patients with ESRD may be closely linked to the gut microbiota, which may play a dominant role in regulating ESA resistance.
Our results showed that SCFA-producing bacteria and serum SCFAs were increased and inflammatory factors were decreased after the administration of roxadustat. As an HIF-PHI, roxadustat can activate the HIF/PHD oxygen-sensing pathway, thus inducing the expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α. HIF-1α has an anti-inflammatory effect while HIF-2α affects iron utilization.
Recent studies have highlighted the prominent role of HIF-1α in maintaining intestinal homeostasis, not only by regulating the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier but also improving the survival of intestinal microorganisms [11]. The intestinal lumen in mammals is characterized by a hypoxic environment, which can induce the expression of several HIF-1 target genes in intestinal epithelial cells. Thus HIF-1α up-regulates genes involved in intestinal barrier function, such as MUC2, ITF, CLDN1, and other tight-junction proteins, and down-regulates nuclear factor (NF)-κB signal transduction and the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines to exert an immunosuppressive effect [51]. HIF-1α induced the development of SCFA-producing bacteria, which are key to maintaining intestinal homeostasis. First, SCFAs especially butyrate, provides the energy framework of colon cells [52, 53], also plays a crucial role in maintaining intestinal epithelial integrity, which is related to its ability to produce mucin and tight-junction proteins [5456]. Second, SCFAs, as a major mode of communication between the microbiota and host cells, have demonstrated several immunomodulatory effects [57]. SCFAs have anti-inflammatory effects by reducing the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and possibly reducing local macrophage infiltration. SCFAs also exert anti-inflammatory effects through inhibition of NF-κB activation in the host immune cells by binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPRs) 43 and 41 [5860]. In addition, SCFAs epigenetically regulates gene expression by inhibiting histone deacetylases, which can induce the differentiation of colonic Treg cells [61], and can also improve the host response to inflammation [62, 63]. These functions may also be conducive to the survival of the intestinal flora and may promote the interaction between the host and gut microorganisms. Meanwhile, the abundance of E. coli increased after Roxadustat treatment. In present, the function of E. coli of chronic kidney disease is still inexplicit. There is now substantial research showing that the E. coli is more abundant in patients with ESRD [17, 19, 64] and it may produce protein-bound uraemic toxins (PBUTs), such as indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate (PCS) [65]. In vitro, the level of E. coli was elevated after the application of rhuEPO. Thus, the upregulation of E. coli after roxadustat treatment maybe a result of the promotion of EPO [66]. The function of E. coli in ESRD patients is an unsettled question and need further study.
HIF-1 was first identified as a transcription factor regulating EPO in human hepatoma cells, while in vivo hypoxic stimulation of EPO and erythropoiesis is primarily mediated by HIF-2 [6769]. Intestinal iron absorption has recently been shown to be mainly regulated by HIF-2α, which is an oxygen- and iron-regulated transcription factor that directly targets the three key intestinal iron transporters: divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1), duodenal cytochrome b, and ferroportin (FPN) [15]. In the hypoxic environment of the duodenum, HIF-2α upregulates the expression of apical (DMT1) and basolateral (FPN) enterocyte iron transporters, thus improving iron absorption [70]. The importance of hypoxia signaling and the essential role of HIF-2α in iron homeostasis have been highlighted in several genetic and pathophysiologic mouse models [12]. These models showed that the gut microbiota regulates systemic iron homeostasis in the host in two ways: by repressing intestinal iron-absorption pathways via the inhibition of basal HIF-2α function, and by promoting cellular iron storage via the induction of FTN expression. The host iron-sensing mechanism is intimately connected to and regulated by the gut microbiome. The present study showed that hepcidin, ferritin, TIBC, and UIBC all decreased after the administration of roxadustat, indicating improved iron utilization. This could partly explain the reduced demand for iron in patients with renal anemia treated with roxadustat compared with ESAs. Hepcidin is a key regulator of iron absorption [71]. The commensal microbiota could regulate hepcidin expression during intestinal inflammation via STAT3 activation and modulation of erythropoietic activity [72]. Roxadustat could thus improve anemia by affecting iron metabolism, and especially by reducing hepcidin levels [73]. We, therefore, considered that roxadustat might correct ESA resistance via activation of HIF-2α to improve iron utilization.
Our study had several strengths. First, to the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to explore the effects of roxadustat on the gut microbiota in patients with renal anemia and ESA resistance undergoing maintenance HD. The results thus provide a basis for further studies to explore the mechanism of roxadustat for the treatment of renal anemia. Second, this was a before–after control study, which thus eliminated the potential effects of individual differences and other confounding factors on the results, whilst ensuring the accuracy of the results and reducing the sample size, with high statistical efficiency.
The study also had some limitations. First, the limited data meant that the study may have been influenced by some unmeasured confounders, such as exercise, diet, and sleep information. These factors could also affect the gut microbiota [7476], with potential implications for health. Second, although our results indicated that roxadustat significantly altered the gut microbiota, the species accumulation box plot suggested that the sample size was relatively limited. Further studies with larger sample sizes are therefore required. Third, the study enrolled patients from a single dialysis center, thus limiting the generalizability of the results to the overall HD population. Further studies are, therefore, needed to verify the current results.

Conclusions

Roxadustat alleviated renal anemia in patients with ESA resistance by decreasing inflammatory factors and hepcidin levels and improving iron utilization. These effects were at least partly mediated by improved diversity and abundance of SCFA-producing gut bacteria, probably via activation of HIF.

Acknowledgements

We thank International Science Editing (http://​www.​internationalsci​enceediting.​com) for editing this manuscript.

Declarations

The study protocol was approved by the institutional medical ethics committee of the Dalian Municipal Central Hospital (No. YN2022-039-10). All participants were provided written informed consent before data collection. The present study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowling TC. Prevalence, etiology, and consequences of anemia and clinical and economic benefits of anemia correction in patients with chronic kidney disease: an overview. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(13 Suppl 8):S3–7, S23–25. Dowling TC. Prevalence, etiology, and consequences of anemia and clinical and economic benefits of anemia correction in patients with chronic kidney disease: an overview. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(13 Suppl 8):S3–7, S23–25.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakhoul G, Simon JF. Anemia of chronic kidney disease: treat it, but not too aggressively. Clevel Clin J Med. 2016;83(8):613–24.CrossRef Nakhoul G, Simon JF. Anemia of chronic kidney disease: treat it, but not too aggressively. Clevel Clin J Med. 2016;83(8):613–24.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapter 2: Use of iron to treat anemia in CKD. Kidney International Supplements. 2012;2(4):292–8. Chapter 2: Use of iron to treat anemia in CKD. Kidney International Supplements. 2012;2(4):292–8.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapter 3: Use of ESAs and other agents**excluding iron which is discussed in Chapter 2, to treat anemia in CKD. Kidney International Supplements. 2012;2(4):299–310. Chapter 3: Use of ESAs and other agents**excluding iron which is discussed in Chapter 2, to treat anemia in CKD. Kidney International Supplements. 2012;2(4):299–310.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanbay M, Perazella MA, Kasapoglu B, et al. Erythropoiesis stimulatory agent- resistant anemia in dialysis patients: review of causes and management. Blood Purif. 2010;29(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRef Kanbay M, Perazella MA, Kasapoglu B, et al. Erythropoiesis stimulatory agent- resistant anemia in dialysis patients: review of causes and management. Blood Purif. 2010;29(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Del VL, Locatelli F. Investigational hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHI) for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018;27(7):613–21.CrossRef Del VL, Locatelli F. Investigational hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHI) for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018;27(7):613–21.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Locatelli F, Fishbane S, Block GA, et al. Targeting hypoxia-inducible factors for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(3):187–99.PubMedCrossRef Locatelli F, Fishbane S, Block GA, et al. Targeting hypoxia-inducible factors for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(3):187–99.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaelin WJ, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell. 2008;30(4):393–402.PubMedCrossRef Kaelin WJ, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell. 2008;30(4):393–402.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JW, Bae SH, Jeong JW, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) alpha: its protein stability and biological functions. Exp Mol Med. 2004;36(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRef Lee JW, Bae SH, Jeong JW, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) alpha: its protein stability and biological functions. Exp Mol Med. 2004;36(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan D, Coughlin LA, Neubauer MM, et al. Activation of HIF-1α and LL-37 by commensal bacteria inhibits Candida albicans colonization. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):808–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fan D, Coughlin LA, Neubauer MM, et al. Activation of HIF-1α and LL-37 by commensal bacteria inhibits Candida albicans colonization. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):808–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Das NK, Schwartz AJ, Barthel G, et al. Microbial metabolite signaling is required for systemic iron homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2020;31(1):115–30.PubMedCrossRef Das NK, Schwartz AJ, Barthel G, et al. Microbial metabolite signaling is required for systemic iron homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2020;31(1):115–30.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang H, Guo Q, Wang Y, et al. The efficiency of the posterior-only approach using shaped titanium mesh cage for the surgical treatment of spine tuberculosis in children: a preliminary study. J Orthop Surg. 2018;26(3):920440156. Zhang H, Guo Q, Wang Y, et al. The efficiency of the posterior-only approach using shaped titanium mesh cage for the surgical treatment of spine tuberculosis in children: a preliminary study. J Orthop Surg. 2018;26(3):920440156.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah YM, Matsubara T, Ito S, et al. Intestinal hypoxia-inducible transcription factors are essential for iron absorption following iron deficiency. Cell Metab. 2009;9(2):152–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shah YM, Matsubara T, Ito S, et al. Intestinal hypoxia-inducible transcription factors are essential for iron absorption following iron deficiency. Cell Metab. 2009;9(2):152–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor M, Qu A, Anderson ER, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2α mediates the adaptive increase of intestinal ferroportin during iron deficiency in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(7):2044–55.PubMedCrossRef Taylor M, Qu A, Anderson ER, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2α mediates the adaptive increase of intestinal ferroportin during iron deficiency in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(7):2044–55.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Singhal R, Mitta SR, Das NK, et al. HIF-2α activation potentiates oxidative cell death in colorectal cancers by increasing cellular iron. J Clin Investig. 2021;131(12): e143691.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Singhal R, Mitta SR, Das NK, et al. HIF-2α activation potentiates oxidative cell death in colorectal cancers by increasing cellular iron. J Clin Investig. 2021;131(12): e143691.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Poesen R, Windey K, Neven E, et al. The influence of CKD on colonic microbial metabolism. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(5):1389–99.PubMedCrossRef Poesen R, Windey K, Neven E, et al. The influence of CKD on colonic microbial metabolism. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(5):1389–99.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrios C, Beaumont M, Pallister T, et al. Gut-microbiota-metabolite axis in early renal function decline. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8): e134311.CrossRef Barrios C, Beaumont M, Pallister T, et al. Gut-microbiota-metabolite axis in early renal function decline. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8): e134311.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaziri ND, Wong J, Pahl M, et al. Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora. Kidney Int. 2013;83(2):308–15.PubMedCrossRef Vaziri ND, Wong J, Pahl M, et al. Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora. Kidney Int. 2013;83(2):308–15.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yilmaz MI, Solak Y, Saglam M, et al. The relationship between IL-10 levels and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(7):1207–16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yilmaz MI, Solak Y, Saglam M, et al. The relationship between IL-10 levels and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(7):1207–16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mafra D, Lobo JC, Barros AF, et al. Role of altered intestinal microbiota in systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(3):399–410.PubMedCrossRef Mafra D, Lobo JC, Barros AF, et al. Role of altered intestinal microbiota in systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(3):399–410.PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Locatelli F, Aljama P, Barany P, et al. Revised European best practice guidelines for the management of anaemia in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(Suppl 2):i1–47. Locatelli F, Aljama P, Barany P, et al. Revised European best practice guidelines for the management of anaemia in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(Suppl 2):i1–47.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993;4(5):1205–13.PubMedCrossRef Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993;4(5):1205–13.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Song Y, Westerhuis JA, Aben N, et al. Principal component analysis of binary genomics data. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20(1):317–29.PubMedCrossRef Song Y, Westerhuis JA, Aben N, et al. Principal component analysis of binary genomics data. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20(1):317–29.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ben SK, Ben AA. Principal component analysis (PCA). Tunis Med. 2021;99(4):383–9. Ben SK, Ben AA. Principal component analysis (PCA). Tunis Med. 2021;99(4):383–9.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yücel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021;31(1): 010502.PubMedCrossRef Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yücel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021;31(1): 010502.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan Z, Xu G. A novel choice to correct inflammation-induced anemia in CKD: oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor roxadustat. Front Med. 2020;7:393.CrossRef Yan Z, Xu G. A novel choice to correct inflammation-induced anemia in CKD: oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor roxadustat. Front Med. 2020;7:393.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Groenendaal-van DMD, Kerbusch V, Kaspera R, et al. Effect of kidney function and dialysis on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of roxadustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021;46(1):141–53.CrossRef Groenendaal-van DMD, Kerbusch V, Kaspera R, et al. Effect of kidney function and dialysis on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of roxadustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021;46(1):141–53.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Provenzano R, Shutov E, Eremeeva L, et al. Roxadustat for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease incident to dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36(9):1717–30.PubMedCrossRef Provenzano R, Shutov E, Eremeeva L, et al. Roxadustat for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease incident to dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36(9):1717–30.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta N, Wish JB. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors: a potential new treatment for anemia in patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(6):815–26.PubMedCrossRef Gupta N, Wish JB. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors: a potential new treatment for anemia in patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(6):815–26.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos-Silva A, Ribeiro S, Reis F, et al. Hepcidin in chronic kidney disease anemia. Vitam Horm. 2019;110:243–64.PubMedCrossRef Santos-Silva A, Ribeiro S, Reis F, et al. Hepcidin in chronic kidney disease anemia. Vitam Horm. 2019;110:243–64.PubMedCrossRef
33.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos EJF, Dias RSC, Lima JFDB, et al. Erythropoietin resistance in patients with chronic kidney disease: current perspectives. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2020;13:231–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Santos EJF, Dias RSC, Lima JFDB, et al. Erythropoietin resistance in patients with chronic kidney disease: current perspectives. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2020;13:231–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker BJ, Wearsch PA, Veloo A, et al. The genus Alistipes: gut bacteria with emerging implications to inflammation, cancer, and mental health. Front Immunol. 2020;11:906.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Parker BJ, Wearsch PA, Veloo A, et al. The genus Alistipes: gut bacteria with emerging implications to inflammation, cancer, and mental health. Front Immunol. 2020;11:906.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal N, Prchal JT. Anemia of chronic disease (anemia of inflammation). Acta Haematol. 2009;122(2–3):103–8.PubMedCrossRef Agarwal N, Prchal JT. Anemia of chronic disease (anemia of inflammation). Acta Haematol. 2009;122(2–3):103–8.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Anders HJ, Andersen K, Stecher B. The intestinal microbiota, a leaky gut, and abnormal immunity in kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2013;83(6):1010–6.PubMedCrossRef Anders HJ, Andersen K, Stecher B. The intestinal microbiota, a leaky gut, and abnormal immunity in kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2013;83(6):1010–6.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramezani A, Raj DS. The gut microbiome, kidney disease, and targeted interventions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(4):657–70.PubMedCrossRef Ramezani A, Raj DS. The gut microbiome, kidney disease, and targeted interventions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(4):657–70.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijers B, Evenepoel P, Anders HJ. Intestinal microbiome and fitness in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(9):531–45.PubMedCrossRef Meijers B, Evenepoel P, Anders HJ. Intestinal microbiome and fitness in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(9):531–45.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu X, Ouyang S, Xie Y, et al. Characterizing the gut microbiota in patients with chronic kidney disease. Postgrad Med. 2020;132(6):495–505.PubMedCrossRef Hu X, Ouyang S, Xie Y, et al. Characterizing the gut microbiota in patients with chronic kidney disease. Postgrad Med. 2020;132(6):495–505.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang T, Richards EM, Pepine CJ, et al. The gut microbiota and the brain–gut–kidney axis in hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(7):442–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yang T, Richards EM, Pepine CJ, et al. The gut microbiota and the brain–gut–kidney axis in hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(7):442–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Simoes-Silva L, Araujo R, Pestana M, et al. The microbiome in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Pharmacol Res. 2018;130:143–51.PubMedCrossRef Simoes-Silva L, Araujo R, Pestana M, et al. The microbiome in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Pharmacol Res. 2018;130:143–51.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao B, Alonzo-Palma N, Brooks B, et al. A pilot study on the effect of prebiotic on host-microbial co-metabolism in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(8):1309–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gao B, Alonzo-Palma N, Brooks B, et al. A pilot study on the effect of prebiotic on host-microbial co-metabolism in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(8):1309–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Crespo-Salgado J, Vehaskari VM, Stewart T, et al. Intestinal microbiota in pediatric patients with end stage renal disease: a Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium study. Microbiome. 2016;4(1):1–11.CrossRef Crespo-Salgado J, Vehaskari VM, Stewart T, et al. Intestinal microbiota in pediatric patients with end stage renal disease: a Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium study. Microbiome. 2016;4(1):1–11.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Stadlbauer V, Horvath A, Ribitsch W, et al. Structural and functional differences in gut microbiome composition in patients undergoing haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10.CrossRef Stadlbauer V, Horvath A, Ribitsch W, et al. Structural and functional differences in gut microbiome composition in patients undergoing haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10.CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao J, Ning X, Liu B, et al. Specific alterations in gut microbiota in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review. Ren Fail. 2021;43(1):102–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhao J, Ning X, Liu B, et al. Specific alterations in gut microbiota in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review. Ren Fail. 2021;43(1):102–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong J, Piceno YM, DeSantis TZ, et al. Expansion of urease- and uricase-containing, indole- and p-cresol-forming and contraction of short-chain fatty acid-producing intestinal microbiota in ESRD. Am J Nephrol. 2014;39(3):230–7.PubMedCrossRef Wong J, Piceno YM, DeSantis TZ, et al. Expansion of urease- and uricase-containing, indole- and p-cresol-forming and contraction of short-chain fatty acid-producing intestinal microbiota in ESRD. Am J Nephrol. 2014;39(3):230–7.PubMedCrossRef
50.
51.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SM, Donaldson GP, Mikulski Z, et al. Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota. Nature. 2013;501(7467):426–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lee SM, Donaldson GP, Mikulski Z, et al. Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota. Nature. 2013;501(7467):426–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatzidaki-Livanis M, Geva-Zatorsky N, Comstock LE. Bacteroides fragilis type VI secretion systems use novel effector and immunity proteins to antagonize human gut Bacteroidales species. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(13):3627–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chatzidaki-Livanis M, Geva-Zatorsky N, Comstock LE. Bacteroides fragilis type VI secretion systems use novel effector and immunity proteins to antagonize human gut Bacteroidales species. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(13):3627–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016;7(3):189–200.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016;7(3):189–200.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker AW, Duncan SH, McWilliam LE, et al. pH and peptide supply can radically alter bacterial populations and short-chain fatty acid ratios within microbial communities from the human colon. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(7):3692–700.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Walker AW, Duncan SH, McWilliam LE, et al. pH and peptide supply can radically alter bacterial populations and short-chain fatty acid ratios within microbial communities from the human colon. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(7):3692–700.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Corrêa-Oliveira R, Fachi JL, Vieira A, et al. Regulation of immune cell function by short-chain fatty acids. Clin Transl Immunol. 2016;5(4): e73.CrossRef Corrêa-Oliveira R, Fachi JL, Vieira A, et al. Regulation of immune cell function by short-chain fatty acids. Clin Transl Immunol. 2016;5(4): e73.CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Säemann MD, Böhmig GA, Österreicher CH, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of sodium butyrate on human monocytes: potent inhibition of IL-12 and up-regulation of IL-10 production. FASEB J. 2000;14(15):2380–2.PubMedCrossRef Säemann MD, Böhmig GA, Österreicher CH, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of sodium butyrate on human monocytes: potent inhibition of IL-12 and up-regulation of IL-10 production. FASEB J. 2000;14(15):2380–2.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Tedelind S, Westberg F, Kjerrulf M, et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of the short-chain fatty acids acetate and propionate: a study with relevance to inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(20):2826–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tedelind S, Westberg F, Kjerrulf M, et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of the short-chain fatty acids acetate and propionate: a study with relevance to inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(20):2826–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Saad MJA, Santos A, Prada PO. Linking gut microbiota and inflammation to obesity and insulin resistance. Physiology. 2016;31(4):283–93.PubMedCrossRef Saad MJA, Santos A, Prada PO. Linking gut microbiota and inflammation to obesity and insulin resistance. Physiology. 2016;31(4):283–93.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Hase K. Commensal microbiota regulates T cell fate decision in the gut. Semin Immunopathol. 2015;37(1):17–25.PubMedCrossRef Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Hase K. Commensal microbiota regulates T cell fate decision in the gut. Semin Immunopathol. 2015;37(1):17–25.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Galvão I, Tavares LP, Corrêa RO, et al. The metabolic sensor GPR43 receptor plays a role in the control of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in the lung. Front Immunol. 2018;9:142.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Galvão I, Tavares LP, Corrêa RO, et al. The metabolic sensor GPR43 receptor plays a role in the control of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in the lung. Front Immunol. 2018;9:142.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Vieira AT, Galvao I, Macia LM, et al. Dietary fiber and the short-chain fatty acid acetate promote resolution of neutrophilic inflammation in a model of gout in mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;101(1):275–84.PubMedCrossRef Vieira AT, Galvao I, Macia LM, et al. Dietary fiber and the short-chain fatty acid acetate promote resolution of neutrophilic inflammation in a model of gout in mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;101(1):275–84.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Rysz J, Franczyk B, Ławiński J, Olszewski R, Ciałkowska-Rysz A, Gluba-Brzózka A. The impact of CKD on uremic toxins and gut microbiota. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(4):252.PubMedCrossRef Rysz J, Franczyk B, Ławiński J, Olszewski R, Ciałkowska-Rysz A, Gluba-Brzózka A. The impact of CKD on uremic toxins and gut microbiota. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(4):252.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Gryp T, Huys GRB, Joossens M, Van Biesen W, Glorieux G, Vaneechoutte M. Isolation and quantification of uremic toxin precursor-generating gut bacteria in chronic kidney disease patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):1986.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gryp T, Huys GRB, Joossens M, Van Biesen W, Glorieux G, Vaneechoutte M. Isolation and quantification of uremic toxin precursor-generating gut bacteria in chronic kidney disease patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):1986.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittal A, Singh V, Chowdhary S, Moideen A, Kumar D, Maniar K, Bhattacharyya R, Banerjee D. The effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on bacterial growth: a dual-edged sword. Kidney Dis (Basel). 2019;5(2):81–90.PubMedCrossRef Mittal A, Singh V, Chowdhary S, Moideen A, Kumar D, Maniar K, Bhattacharyya R, Banerjee D. The effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on bacterial growth: a dual-edged sword. Kidney Dis (Basel). 2019;5(2):81–90.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Rankin EB, Biju MP, Liu Q, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2 (HIF-2) regulates hepatic erythropoietin in vivo. J Clin Investig. 2007;117(4):1068–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rankin EB, Biju MP, Liu Q, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2 (HIF-2) regulates hepatic erythropoietin in vivo. J Clin Investig. 2007;117(4):1068–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapitsinou PP, Liu Q, Unger TL, et al. Hepatic HIF-2 regulates erythropoietic responses to hypoxia in renal anemia. Blood. 2010;116(16):3039–48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kapitsinou PP, Liu Q, Unger TL, et al. Hepatic HIF-2 regulates erythropoietic responses to hypoxia in renal anemia. Blood. 2010;116(16):3039–48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastrogiannaki M, Matak P, Peyssonnaux C. The gut in iron homeostasis: role of HIF-2 under normal and pathological conditions. Blood. 2013;122(6):885–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mastrogiannaki M, Matak P, Peyssonnaux C. The gut in iron homeostasis: role of HIF-2 under normal and pathological conditions. Blood. 2013;122(6):885–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Malyszko J, Malyszko JS, Matuszkiewicz-Rowinska J. Hepcidin as a therapeutic target for anemia and inflammation associated with chronic kidney disease. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2019;23(5):407–21.PubMedCrossRef Malyszko J, Malyszko JS, Matuszkiewicz-Rowinska J. Hepcidin as a therapeutic target for anemia and inflammation associated with chronic kidney disease. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2019;23(5):407–21.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Shanmugam NKN, Trebicka E, Fu L, et al. Intestinal inflammation modulates expression of the iron-regulating hormone hepcidin depending on erythropoietic activity and the commensal microbiota. J Immunol. 2014;193(3):1398–407.PubMedCrossRef Shanmugam NKN, Trebicka E, Fu L, et al. Intestinal inflammation modulates expression of the iron-regulating hormone hepcidin depending on erythropoietic activity and the commensal microbiota. J Immunol. 2014;193(3):1398–407.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen N, Hao C, Liu B, et al. Roxadustat treatment for anemia in patients undergoing long-term dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(11):1011–22.PubMedCrossRef Chen N, Hao C, Liu B, et al. Roxadustat treatment for anemia in patients undergoing long-term dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(11):1011–22.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Matenchuk BA, Mandhane PJ, Kozyrskyj AL. Sleep, circadian rhythm, and gut microbiota. Sleep Med Rev. 2020;53: 101340.PubMedCrossRef Matenchuk BA, Mandhane PJ, Kozyrskyj AL. Sleep, circadian rhythm, and gut microbiota. Sleep Med Rev. 2020;53: 101340.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke SF, Murphy EF, O’Sullivan O, et al. Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity. Gut. 2014;63(12):1913–20.PubMedCrossRef Clarke SF, Murphy EF, O’Sullivan O, et al. Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity. Gut. 2014;63(12):1913–20.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotillard A, Kennedy SP, Kong LC, et al. Dietary intervention impact on gut microbial gene richness. Nature. 2013;500(7464):585–8.PubMedCrossRef Cotillard A, Kennedy SP, Kong LC, et al. Dietary intervention impact on gut microbial gene richness. Nature. 2013;500(7464):585–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Roxadustat alleviates the inflammatory status in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance by increasing the short-chain fatty acids producing gut bacteria
verfasst von
Xiu-Nan Zhao
Shu-Xin Liu
Zhen-Zhen Wang
Shuang Zhang
Lian-Lian You
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
European Journal of Medical Research / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 2047-783X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01179-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

European Journal of Medical Research 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe