Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Spine Journal
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 8/2012

01.08.2012 | Original Article

Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spine

verfasst von: Cédric Barrey, Sabina Champain, Sophie Campana, Aymen Ramadan, Gilles Perrin, Wafa Skalli

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 8/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the study was to report radiological outcomes after total disc replacement (TDR) in the cervical spine through a 24 months follow-up (FU) prospective study with a special focus on sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels.

Materials and methods

Thirty-two patients, who sustained one-level TDR with a ball-and-socket arthroplasty (Discocerv™ implant, Scient’x/Alphatec Spine, USA) were consecutively included in the study. Clinical (visual analogical scale and neck disability index) and radiological parameters were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at 3/6 months, 1-year and 2-year FU. Sagittal alignment, ranges of motion (ROM) and center of rotations (CORs) were analyzed using specific motion analysis software (Spineview™, Paris, France). Patients CORs were compared with those of a control group of 39 normal and asymptomatic subjects.

Results

Both local and C3–C7 lordosis significantly increased postoperatively (+8° and +13° at 2 years, respectively). At instrumented level ROM in flexion–extension (FE) was measured to 10.2° preoperatively versus 7.5° at 1 year and 6.1° at 2 years. There were no differences in ROM at adjacent levels between pre and postoperative assessments. When compared with control group and preoperative measurements, we noted postoperative cranial shift of the COR at instrumented level for patients group. In contrast, there was no difference in CORs location at adjacent levels.

Conclusion

Through this prospective study, we observed that cervical lordosis consistently increased after TDR. In addition, although ball-and-socket arthroplasty did not fully restore native segmental kinematics with significant reduction of motion in FE and consistent cranial shift of the COR, no significant changes in terms of ROM and CORs were observed at adjacent levels.
Literatur
1.
Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, Yone K, Sakou T, Nakanishi K (1999) Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 24:670–675PubMedCrossRef
2.
Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519–528PubMed
3.
Ishihara H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Nakamura H, Kimura T (2004) Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J 4:624–628PubMedCrossRef
4.
Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B et al (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:79–85PubMedCrossRef
5.
Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD et al (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27:2431–2434PubMedCrossRef
6.
Wigfield CC, Skrzypiec D, Jackowski A, Adams MA (2003) Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs. The influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:441–449PubMedCrossRef
7.
Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, Sell G, Vigna F, McAfee PC (2005) Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 30:1165–1172PubMedCrossRef
8.
Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J (2007) Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7:33–39PubMedCrossRef
9.
Barrey C, Campana S, Persohn S, Perrin G, Skalli W (2011) Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation. Eur Spine J (Epub ahead of print)
10.
Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Brayda-Bruno M, Fornari M (2008) Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review. Clin Biomech 23:1095–1104CrossRef
11.
Porchet F, Metcalf N (2004) Clinical outcomes with the prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 17:E6PubMedCrossRef
12.
Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N (2005) Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 30:1949–1954PubMedCrossRef
13.
Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:109–198CrossRef
14.
Rabin D, Pickett GE, Bisnaire L, Duggal N (2007) The kinematics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial cervical disc: a pilot study. Neurosurg 61:ONS100–ONS105
15.
Ramadan AS, Mitulescu A, Schmitt (2007) Total disc replacement with the Discocerv™ (Cervidisc Evolution) cervical prosthesis: early results of a second generation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 17:513–520CrossRef
16.
Sasso RC, Best NM (2008) Cervical kinematics after fusion and Bryan disc arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:19–22PubMedCrossRef
17.
Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Anderson PA, Fessler RG, Hacker RJ et al (2009) Comparison of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine 34:101–107PubMedCrossRef
18.
Rousseau MA, Cottin P, Levante S, Nogier A, Lazennec JY, Skalli W (2008) In vivo kinematics of two types of ball-and-socket cervical disc replacements in the sagittal plane. Cranial versus caudal geometric center. Spine 33:E6–E9PubMedCrossRef
19.
Powell JW, Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA, Hipp JA (2010) Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty. Computer-aided radiographic analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:89–95PubMedCrossRef
20.
Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A, Mazel C, DeGuise J, Skalli W (2006) Validation of new clinical quantitative software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J 15:982–991PubMedCrossRef
21.
Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG (2007) Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial with 24 month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:481–491PubMedCrossRef
22.
Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B et al (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:275–286PubMedCrossRef
23.
Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, Fuentes JM, Hovorka I, Huppert J, Steib JP, Vital JM et al (2009) Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C®) with up to 2 years follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:841–850PubMedCrossRef
24.
Anakwenze OA, Auerbach JD, Milby AH, Lonner BS, Balderston RA (2009) Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine 34:2001–2007PubMedCrossRef
25.
Johnson JP, Lauryssen C, Cambron HO, Pashman R, Regan JJ, Anand N, Bray R (2004) Sagittal alignment and the Bryan cervical artificial disc. Neurosurg Focus 17:E4CrossRef
26.
Fong SY, DuPlessis SJ, Casha S, Hurlbert RJ (2006) Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. Spine J 6:233–241PubMedCrossRef
27.
Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N (2006) Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 4:98–105PubMedCrossRef
28.
Kim SK, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC (2008) Effetcs of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 17:20–29PubMedCrossRef
29.
White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia
30.
Amevo B, Worth D, Bogduk N (1991) Instantaneous axes of rotation of the typical cervical motion segments: a study in normal volunteers. Clin Biomech 6:111–117CrossRef
31.
Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Novotny J, Antinnes J (1991) In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine. J Orthop Res 9:828–834PubMedCrossRef
32.
Holmes A, Wang C, Han ZH, Dang GT (1994) The range and nature of flexion-extension motion in the cervical spine. Spine 19:2505–2510PubMedCrossRef
33.
Watier B (1997) Etude expérimentale du rachis cervical: comportement mécanique in vitro et cinématique in vivo (thesis in French). Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers, Paris
34.
Bogduk N, Mercer S (2000) Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 15:633–648CrossRef
35.
Barrey C, Mosnier T, Jund J, Perrin G, Skalli W (2009) In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center. J Neurosurg Spine 11:538–546PubMedCrossRef
36.
Snyder JT, Tzermiadianos MN, Ghanayem AJ, Voronov LI, Rinella A, Dooris A et al (2007) Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement. Spine 32:2965–2969PubMedCrossRef
37.
Rousseau MA, Laporte S, Chavary-Bernier E, Lazennec JY, Skalli W (2007) Reproducibility of measuring the shape and three-dimensional position of cervical vertebrae in upright position using the EOS stereoradiography system. Spine 32:2569–2572PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spine
verfasst von
Cédric Barrey
Sabina Champain
Sophie Campana
Aymen Ramadan
Gilles Perrin
Wafa Skalli
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 8/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2180-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2012

European Spine Journal 8/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

A retrospective study of congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction treated by occipitocervical plate-rod systems

Grand Rounds

Expert’s comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled “Fusionless posterior hemivertebra resection in a 2-year-old child with 16 years follow-up” (by D. Jeszenszky, T. F. Fekete, F. S. Kleinstueck, D. Haschtmann, L. Bognár)

Erratum

Erratum to: Chronic neck pain and treatment of cognitive and behavioural factors: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial

Original Article

Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine. Part II: magnetic resonance imaging of over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects

Announcements

Announcements for issue 21-7-2012

Original Article

Cervical range of motion and strength in 4,293 young male adults with chronic neck pain

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

15.05.2024 Knie-TEP Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Operationsrobotern für den Einbau von Totalendoprothesen des Kniegelenks hat die Präzision der Eingriffe erhöht. Für die postoperative Zufriedenheit der Patienten scheint das aber unerheblich zu sein, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Lever-Sign-Test hilft beim Verdacht auf Kreuzbandriss

15.05.2024 Vordere Kreuzbandruptur Nachrichten

Mit dem Hebelzeichen-Test lässt sich offenbar recht zuverlässig feststellen, ob ein vorderes Kreuzband gerissen ist. In einer Metaanalyse war die Vorhersagekraft vor allem bei positivem Testergebnis hoch.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise