Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery 1/2023

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Research

Self-diagnose is associated with knowledge and attitude towards mental illness of university students in Indonesia

verfasst von: Naufal Arif Ismail, Intan Kusumaningtyas, Moetrarsi Sri Kanapsijah Firngadi

Erschienen in: The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Background

Mental illness is still stigmatized and poorly understood in Indonesian society, but university students could be a key target for promoting positive attitudes and increasing awareness. This study aims to explore the knowledge and attitudes of university students in Indonesia toward mental illness and to identify associated factors, emphasizing self-diagnosis.

Method

An analytical cross-sectional study on university students in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, was conducted from September to November 2022. Participants completed an online questionnaire about their sociodemographic data, mental health knowledge (utilized Mental Health Knowledge Schedule questionnaire), and attitudes toward mental illness (utilized Community Attitude to Mental Illness Inventory questionnaire). Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression were performed to analyze collected data.

Results

A total of 402 university students were included in the study. Results demonstrated that half of the students had good mental illness knowledge (50.7%), and slightly more than half had favorable attitudes (53.0%). Self-diagnosis was significantly associated with poorer knowledge and negative attitudes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19 to 4.50 and AOR: 2.12, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.99; P < 0.05, respectively). Additionally, students who had never studied psychology or psychiatry and had a family mental illness history were at higher risk (P < 0.05) for poor knowledge of mental illness (AOR: 2.24, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.25 and AOR: 1.82, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.30, respectively). Interestingly, students with lower monthly family incomes had more positive attitudes (AOR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86; P < 0.05). A very weak negative correlation (ρ = − 0.173; P < 0.001) between mental illness knowledge and attitudes was observed.

Conclusion

Promoting awareness and knowledge about mental health, as well as preventing self-diagnosis, is crucial in addressing the lack of knowledge and negative attitudes toward mental illness among university students in Indonesia, which is expected to play a role in the wider community ultimately.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
DALYs
Disability-adjusted life-years
MAKS
Mental Health Knowledge Schedule
CAMI
Community Attitude to Mental Illness Inventory
SD
Standard deviation
IDR
Indonesian Rupiah
USD
United States Dollar
AOR
Adjusted odds ratio
CI
Confidence interval

Background

Mental illness is a growing concern globally, with from 1990 to 2019, the number of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) worldwide due to mental disorders rose from 80.8 million to 125.3 million. The proportion of global DALYs linked to mental disorders also increased from 3.1% to 4.9% during this period [1]. According to Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) 2018 in Indonesia, the prevalence of schizophrenia and depression are 6.7‰ and 6.1%, respectively. Despite the high prevalence of these mental health conditions, many people who require treatment do not receive it. Nearly half (48.9%) of individuals with schizophrenia do not seek treatment due to reasons such as believing that they are already healthy (36.1%) or not wanting to visit a healthcare provider (33.7%) regularly. On the other hand, only 9% of individuals with depression who require therapy receive it [2].
There is still a significant stigma surrounding mental health issues, leading to a lack of awareness and understanding of mental illness. This issue is particularly pertinent in Indonesia, where mental health is often overlooked and considered a taboo subject [3, 4]. As a result, help-seeking behavior becomes less, especially for those who need it. Targeting university students through an intervention may be effective in promoting a positive and lasting attitude toward individuals with mental illness. Therefore, addressing the lack of knowledge and negative attitudes and behaviors toward mental illness among university students is crucial. This can be achieved by increasing awareness and knowledge about mental health, as well as promoting help-seeking and support among peers and the wider community [5, 6]. By doing so, we can encourage young adults to develop an empathetic and supportive mindset towards mental illness, which can persist throughout their adult lives.
Several studies have investigated the knowledge and attitudes of the general population and students toward mental illness in Indonesia [79]. However, none of these studies specifically examine self-diagnosis in association with knowledge and attitude, which could significantly influence individuals’ perceptions and attitudes toward mental illness. A systematic review has suggested that self-diagnosis is less accurate than a clinical diagnosis for common conditions in primary care [10]. Moreover, although artificial intelligence has progressed rapidly to date, it cannot completely replace the role and relationship of the traditional doctor–patient in diagnosing patients [11]. These outcomes might also be applicable in psychiatry settings. As a result, exploring self-diagnosis is crucial.
The present study aims to explore the knowledge and attitudes of university students in Indonesia toward mental illness and to identify associated factors, with a particular emphasis on evaluating the practice of self-diagnosis. This study will contribute to a better understanding of the current situation regarding mental health among this important demographic group in Indonesia, which is expected to help build better mental health awareness in society.

Methods

Study design

An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted from September to November 2022. A self-report questionnaire was shared online using Google Form links via institution email, LINE, and WhatsApp to undergraduate students of a university in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Incomplete data filling and refusal to participate were excluded from this study.

Sample size

The institution where the study was conducted is estimated to have 23,000 active students in 2022 (N total). The minimum sample size is calculated based on “the Sample Size for a Proportion or Descriptive Study” using the online application www.​openepi.​com. The hypothesized frequency of outcome (p) was 50%, the acceptable margin of error (d) was 5%, and the design effect (DEFF) was 1.0. The calculation resulted in a minimum sample size of 378 for a confidence level of 95%.

Questionnaire

A self-reported questionnaire consists of three parts. The first part included students’ sociodemographic characteristics such as gender, age, the origin of residence, settlement, relationship status, family income, year of study, study program, history of studying psychology or psychiatry, personal mental illness, family mental illness, and direct contact with individuals with mental illness. In addition, we asked, “Who diagnosed your mental illness?” to confirm a personal mental illness history and include only those diagnosed by doctors, psychiatrists, or psychologists.
The second part included the 12-item Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS) questionnaire to evaluate knowledge in relation to stigma toward mental illness. This questionnaire was developed by Evans-Lacko et al. [12]. We use the Indonesian version of MAKS that was adapted with permission from Sari and Yuliastuti [9]. This questionnaire item consists of a 5-point scale to indicate strongly agree (scale = 5) or strongly disagree (scale = 1). Incorrectly stated items were reverse-coded to reflect the direction of the correct response [12]. Higher MAKS scores reflect better knowledge. We dichotomized participants’ knowledge of mental illness using the mean score (41.31 ± 3.13) as the cut-off point (poor knowledge ≤ 41.31), as with similar methods previously reported [13]. The MAKS internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) was 0.763.
The third part included the 40-item Community Attitude to Mental Illness Inventory (CAMI) questionnaire to evaluate attitudes toward mental illness. This questionnaire was developed by Taylor and Dear [14]. The Indonesian version of CAMI was used in this study with permission [9]. A 5-point scale was also applicable in this questionnaire; a scale of 5 indicated strongly disagree, and a scale of 1 for strongly agree. Reverse-coded was applied for negatively stated items. A favorable attitude is reflected by a lower score CAMI. We categorize attitudes as favorable and unfavorable, with the mean score (111.50 ± 5.99) being a cut-off point (unfavorable attitude > 111.50), in accordance method to a previous study [13]. Cronbach’s α for the CAMI questionnaire was 0.813.

Statistical analysis

Collected data were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS version 26 (Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive data were presented as frequency, percentage, and, if applicable, mean ± standard deviation (SD), summarized into tables and graphs. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were performed in bivariate analysis. In addition, the correlation between MAKS and CAMI scores was analyzed using Spearman correlation. All variables in the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests with a P < 0.25 were included in multivariate logistic regression. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

This study involved 402 university students with a mean age of 20.13 ± 1.46. Most of them were females (74.9%), the origin of residents from the Yogyakarta and Central–East Java regions (61.9%), lived in urban areas (56.5%), were single (79.4%), and had a family income of > 2.72 million Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) (91.5%), 1 USD = 15,334 IDR in September 2022. The students’ proportion in the fourth year of study (37.8%) and the program of non-medicine and psychology (58.5%) was prevalent. Furthermore, about 41.0% of students have never studied psychology or psychiatry. We recorded that the majority of students have no personal (90.8%) and familial mental illness histories (84.8%) and have never had direct contact with individuals with mental illness (64.9%) (see Table 1). However, at least 12.9% of students self-diagnosed (see Fig. 1).
Table 1
Sociodemographic characteristic of participants (N = 402)
Variable
Frequency (N)
Percentage (%)
Gender
 Female
301
74.9
 Male
101
25.1
Age, mean ± SD
20.13 ± 1.46
 
Origin of residence
 Sumatera
46
11.4
 Banten, West Java, and Jakarta
69
17.2
 Yogyakarta and Central–East Java
249
61.9
 Central–East Indonesia
38
9.5
Settlement
 Urban
227
56.5
 Rural
175
43.5
Relationship status
 Single
319
79.4
 Dating
76
18.9
 Married
7
1.7
The family income per month (in a million IDR)
 ≤ 2.72
34
8.5
 > 2.72
368
91.5
Year of study
 First
74
18.4
 Second
89
22.1
 Third
87
21.6
 Fourth
152
37.8
Study program
 Medicine and psychology
167
41.5
 Non-medicine and psychology
235
58.5
Studying psychology or psychiatry history
 Never
165
41.0
 Lecture
99
24.6
 Seminars/internet/others
138
34.3
Personal mental illness history
 No
365
90.8
 Yes
37
9.2
Family mental illness history
 No
341
84.8
 Yes
61
15.2
Direct contact with individuals with mental illness
 No
261
64.9
 Yes
141
35.1
SD: standard deviation; IDR: Indonesian Rupiah (1 USD = 15,334 IDR in September 2022)

University students’ knowledge and attitude toward mental illness

Overall, there was a slight difference between those with good (50.7%) and poor (49.3%) mental illness knowledge, as well as favorable (53.0%) and unfavorable (47.0%) attitudes (Fig. 2).

Knowledge and associated factors toward mental illness

The results of the multivariate analysis demonstrated that having never studied psychology or psychiatry (adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 2.24, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.18 to 4.25), having a family mental illness history (AOR: 1.82, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.30), and did self-diagnosed (AOR: 2.31, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.50) were significant (P < 0.05) risk factors for poor knowledge of the mental illness (see Table 2).
Table 2
Association between variables of sociodemographic and knowledge
Variable
Knowledge, N (%)
COR (95% CI)
P
AOR (95% CI)
P
Poor
Good
Gender
 Female
140 (46.5)
161 (53.5)
0.65 (0.41 to 1.02)
0.058
0.70 (0.43 to 1.14)
0.152
 Male
58 (57.4)
43 (42.6)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Origin of residence
 Sumatera
21 (45.7)
25 (54.3)
0.90 (0.48 to 1.70)
0.751
  
 Banten, West Java, and Jakarta
36 (52.2)
33 (47.8)
1.17 (0.69 to 2.00)
0.558
  
 Central–East Indonesia
21 (55.3)
17 (44.7)
1.33 (0.67 to 2.64)
0.417
  
 Yogyakarta and Central–East Java
120 (48.2)
129 (51.8)
Reference
   
Settlement
 Rural
90 (51.4)
85 (48.6)
1.17 (0.79 to 1.73)
0.444
  
 Urban
108 (47.6)
119 (52.4)
Reference
   
Relationship status
 Married
3 (42.9)
4 (57.1)
0.79 (0.18 to 3.60)
0.764
  
 Dating
40 (52.6)
36 (47.4)
1.18 (0.71 to 1.94)
0.526
  
 Single
155 (48.6)
164 (51.4)
Reference
   
The family income per month (in a million IDR)
 ≤ 2.72
21 (61.8)
13 (38.2)
1.74 (0.85 to 3.59)
0.127
1.19 (0.55 to 2.58)
0.664
 > 2.72
177 (48.1)
191 (51.9)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Year of study
 First
30 (40.5)
44 (59.5)
0.80 (0.46 to 1.40)
0.434
0.66 (0.35 to 1.25)
0.203
 Second
46 (51.7)
43 (48.3)
1.25 (0.74 to 2.12)
0.398
0.89 (0.50 to 1.59)
0.704
 Third
52 (59.8)
35 (40.2)
1.74 (1.02 to 2.97)
0.041*
1.53 (0.86 to 2.73)
0.150
 Fourth
70 (46.1)
82 (53.9)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Study program
 Non-medicine and psychology
131 (55.7)
104 (44.3)
1.88 (1.26 to 2.81)
0.002*
1.26 (0.75 to 2.10)
0.387
 Medicine and psychology
67 (40.1)
100 (59.9)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Studying psychology or psychiatry history
 Never
98 (59.4)
67 (40.6)
2.80 (1.67 to 4.70)
0.000*
2.24 (1.18 to 4.25)
0.014*
 Seminars/internet/others
66 (47.8)
72 (52.2)
1.75 (1.03 to 2.99)
0.038*
1.53 (0.81 to 2.91)
0.195
 Lecture
34 (34.3)
65 (65.7)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Personal mental illness history
  Yes
12 (32.4)
25 (67.6)
0.46 (0.23 to 0.95)
0.032*
0.52 (0.24 to 1.10)
0.088
  No
186 (51.0)
179 (49.0)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Family mental illness history
  No
175 (51.3)
166 (48.7)
1.74 (0.99 to 3.05)
0.050
1.82 (1.00 to 3.30)
0.048*
  Yes
23 (37.7)
38 (62.3)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Direct contact with individuals with mental illness
  No
132 (50.6)
129 (49.4)
1.16 (0.77 to 1.75)
0.471
  
  Yes
66 (46.8)
75 (53.2)
Reference
   
Did self-diagnosed
  Yes
36 (69.2)
16 (30.8)
2.61 (1.40 to 4.88)
0.002*
2.31 (1.19 to 4.50)
0.013*
  No
162 (46.3)
188 (53.7)
Reference
 
Reference
 
IDR: Indonesian Rupiah (1 USD = 15,334 IDR in September 2022). COR: crude odds ratio. AOR: adjusted odds ratio
*Statistically significant (P < 0.05)

Attitude and associated factors toward mental illness

Participants with a monthly family income of ≤ 2.72 million IDR per month (AOR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86) significantly (P < 0.05) have a better attitude towards mental illness. Meanwhile, those who did self-diagnose (AOR: 2.12, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.99) significantly (P < 0.05) had unfavorable attitudes toward mental illness (see Table 3).
Table 3
Association between variables of sociodemographic and attitude
Variable
Attitude, N (%)
COR (95% CI)
P
AOR (95% CI)
P
Unfavorable
Favorable
Gender
 Female
141 (46.8)
160 (53.2)
0.97 (0.62 to 1.53)
0.906
  
 Male
48 (47.5)
53 (52.5)
Reference
   
Origin of residence
 Sumatera
21 (45.7)
25 (54.3)
1.03 (0.55 to 1.93)
0.933
  
 Banten, West Java, and Jakarta
34 (49.3)
35 (50.7)
1.19 (0.70 to 2.03)
0.526
  
 Central–East Indonesia
22 (57.9)
16 (42.1)
1.68 (0.84 to 3.36)
0.137
  
 Yogyakarta and Central–East Java
112 (45.0)
137 (55.0)
Reference
   
Settlement
 Rural
77 (44.0)
98 (56.0)
0.81 (0.54 to 1.20)
0.288
  
 Urban
112 (49.3)
115 (50.7)
Reference
   
Relationship status
 Married
5 (71.4)
2 (28.6)
2.93 (0.56 to 15.30)
0.258
  
 Dating
37 (48.7)
39 (51.3)
1.11 (0.67 to 1.83)
0.683
  
 Single
147 (46.1)
172 (53.9)
Reference
   
The family income per month (in a million IDR)
 ≤ 2.72
11 (32.4)
23 (67.6)
0.51 (0.24 to 1.08)
0.073
0.39 (0.18 to 0.86)
0.020*
 > 2.72
178 (48.4)
190 (51.6)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Year of study
 First
38 (51.4)
36 (48.6)
1.45 (0.83 to 2.54)
0.190
  
 Second
44 (49.4)
45 (50.6)
1.34 (0.80 to 2.27)
0.269
  
 Third
43 (49.4)
44 (50.6)
1.34 (0.79 to 2.28)
0.274
  
 Fourth
64 (42.1)
88 (57.9)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Study program
 Non-medicine and psychology
120 (51.1)
115 (48.9)
1.48 (0.99 to 2.21)
0.054
1.50 (0.98 to 2.29)
0.060
 Medicine and psychology
69 (41.3)
98 (58.7)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Studying psychology or psychiatry history
 Never
76 (46.1)
89 (53.9)
1.11 (0.67 to 1.84)
0.678
  
 Seminars/internet/others
70 (50.7)
68 (49.3)
1.34 (0.80 to 2.25)
0.268
  
 Lecture
43 (43.4)
56 (56.6)
Reference
   
Personal mental illness history
 Yes
20 (54.1)
17 (45.9)
1.36 (0.69 to 2.69)
0.368
  
 No
169 (46.3)
196 (53.7)
Reference
   
Family mental illness history
 No
152 (44.6)
189 (55.4)
0.52 (0.30 to 0.91)
0.020*
0.61 (0.34 to 1.10
0.101
 Yes
37 (60.7)
24 (39.3)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Direct contact with individuals with mental illness
 No
114 (43.7)
147 (56.3)
0.68 (0.45 to 1.03)
0.068
0.74 (0.48 to 1.14)
0.176
 Yes
75 (53.2)
66 (46.8)
Reference
 
Reference
 
Did self-diagnosed
 Yes
33 (63.5)
19 (36.5)
2.16 (1.18 to 3.95)
0.011*
2.12 (1.13 to 3.99)
0.019*
 No
156 (44.6)
194 (55.4)
Reference
 
Reference
 
IDR: Indonesian Rupiah (1 USD = 15,334 IDR in September 2022). COR: crude odds ratio. AOR: adjusted odds ratio
Fisher’s exact test
*Statistically significant (P < 0.05)

Correlation between knowledge and attitude toward mental illness

MAKS and CAMI scores displayed in Table 4 demonstrated a statistically significant negative correlation (P < 0.001), although this correlation is very weak (ρ = − 0.173). This finding suggests that better knowledge (reflected by higher MAKS scores) corresponds to a more favorable attitude (reflected by lower CAMI scores) toward individuals with mental illness.
Table 4
Correlation between attitude and knowledge
Correlation
ρ
P
MAKS score × CAMI score
− 0.173
0.000*
Correlation analysis using Spearman
*Statistically significant (P < 0.05)

Discussion

Indonesian university students’ knowledge, attitudes, and associated factors toward mental illness have been identified. This study revealed a slight difference between knowledge and attitudes toward mental illness. Although 50.7% of the participants had good mental illness knowledge, only 53% had favorable attitudes toward individuals with mental illness. Such factors, including never studying psychology or psychiatry, and having a family history of mental illness, were significant risk factors for poor knowledge of the mental illness. To our knowledge, this study is the first to reveal that self-diagnosing among university students in Indonesia contributes to poor knowledge and unfavorable attitudes toward people with mental illness.
One of the significant risk factors associated with poor knowledge of mental illness was not having studied psychology or psychiatry formally. In line with previous studies, those who received formal education about psychiatry, such as medical students, tend to have higher knowledge of mental health [8, 15]. Our result emphasizes the need to improve students’ mental health literacy and mental health education in university curriculums.
Our study found that self-diagnosis is a significant risk factor for poor knowledge and unfavorable attitudes toward mental illness. Self-diagnosing individuals often have inaccurate or incomplete knowledge about mental health conditions. It is crucial to highlight this finding because self-diagnosis may lead to a perpetuation of stereotypes and stigma surrounding certain mental health conditions. This happens when individuals use inaccurate or highly biased information to self-diagnose, which could result in negative assumptions about individuals with certain mental health conditions. Moreover, a previous study has reported that self-diagnosis among Indonesian university students can lead to mental health distress and interference with daily activities [16].
We observed that participants with a family history of mental illness did not make them well knowledgeable about mental illness. Contrary to our result, another study reported that those with a family history of mental illness tend to have good knowledge and attitudes toward mental illness [17, 18]. In fact, several Indonesian societies often over-stigmatize people with mental illness, and the discriminatory practice in the form of pasung (a practice of confining and detaining mentally ill individuals for months to years) still exists today. Pasung is fairly commonly carried out by their family members, especially those living in rural areas and poorly educated [2, 7, 19]. As iron stocks, social controls, and agents of change, university students who are well-educated about mental health might be engaged in addressing this condition by promoting mental health awareness and reducing stigma in society.
Interestingly, our study revealed that participants with a lower family income had more favorable attitudes toward mental illness. This finding contradicts a previous study that demonstrated a negative association between socioeconomic status and attitudes toward mental illness because they tend to have negative emotions, high survival pressures, and poor social and psychological skills [13]. Meanwhile, a similar study demonstrated that income is not associated with attitudes toward mental illness [9]. However, the present study was conducted in a specific cultural context. Different cultures and settings of the study might have variated results.
A similar finding to Hartini et al. [7], the current study also found a very weak negative correlation between knowledge and attitudes toward mental illness. Nevertheless, this result suggests that improving knowledge may lead to more favorable attitudes toward individuals with mental illness, particularly among university students.
This study has some limitations, such as only including university students from a single university, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations. This study used a cross-sectional design, making it difficult to establish causality or the direction of the observed associations. However, our study also has several strengths, including this is the first study in Indonesia to assess university students’ self-diagnoses of mental illness, providing valuable insight into their perceptions of their own mental health. Our study used a comprehensive questionnaire that covered a wide range of topics related to mental illness, which allowed us to obtain detailed information on the participants’ knowledge and attitudes. Also, this study provides an important baseline for future studies on mental health in Indonesia, highlighting the need for interventions to improve knowledge and attitudes toward mental illness among university students.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the findings of this study highlight the need for mental health education and awareness campaigns targeted toward Indonesian university students, particularly those who have not studied psychology or psychiatry and those who engage in self-diagnosis. The results also suggest that improving mental health literacy may help reduce stigma and promote positive attitudes toward individuals with mental illness.

Acknowledgements

The highest appreciation goes through all participants involved in this study.

Declarations

Procedures and protocols of the study were ethically approved by The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (Number: 7/Ka.Kom.Et/70/KE/VIII/2022). Prospective participants were informed online about the study aims, procedures, and confidentiality regarding the data filled in was maintained, and they voluntarily participated in the study before filling out the questionnaire.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare there is no competing interest.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9:137–50.CrossRefPubMedCentral GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9:137–50.CrossRefPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Subu MA, Wati DF, Netrida N, Priscilla V, Dias JM, Abraham MS, et al. Types of stigma experienced by patients with mental illness and mental health nurses in Indonesia: a qualitative content analysis. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021;15:77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Subu MA, Wati DF, Netrida N, Priscilla V, Dias JM, Abraham MS, et al. Types of stigma experienced by patients with mental illness and mental health nurses in Indonesia: a qualitative content analysis. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021;15:77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Subu MA, Holmes D, Elliott J, Jacob JD. Persistent taboo: understanding mental illness and stigma among Indonesian adults through grounded theory. Asian J Pharm Nurs Med Sci. 2017;5:1–11. Subu MA, Holmes D, Elliott J, Jacob JD. Persistent taboo: understanding mental illness and stigma among Indonesian adults through grounded theory. Asian J Pharm Nurs Med Sci. 2017;5:1–11.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shim YR, Eaker R, Park J. Mental health education, awareness and stigma regarding mental illness among college students. J Ment Heal Clin Psychol. 2022;6:6–15.CrossRef Shim YR, Eaker R, Park J. Mental health education, awareness and stigma regarding mental illness among college students. J Ment Heal Clin Psychol. 2022;6:6–15.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahorsu DK, Sánchez Vidaña DI, Lipardo D, Shah PB, Cruz González P, Shende S, et al. Effect of a peer-led intervention combining mental health promotion with coping-strategy-based workshops on mental health awareness, help-seeking behavior, and wellbeing among university students in Hong Kong. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021;15:6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahorsu DK, Sánchez Vidaña DI, Lipardo D, Shah PB, Cruz González P, Shende S, et al. Effect of a peer-led intervention combining mental health promotion with coping-strategy-based workshops on mental health awareness, help-seeking behavior, and wellbeing among university students in Hong Kong. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021;15:6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartini N, Fardana NA, Ariana AD, Wardana ND. Stigma toward people with mental health problems in Indonesia. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:535–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hartini N, Fardana NA, Ariana AD, Wardana ND. Stigma toward people with mental health problems in Indonesia. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:535–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Puspitasari IM, Garnisa IT, Sinuraya RK, Witriani W. Perceptions, knowledge, and attitude toward mental health disorders and their treatment among students in an Indonesian university. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:845–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Puspitasari IM, Garnisa IT, Sinuraya RK, Witriani W. Perceptions, knowledge, and attitude toward mental health disorders and their treatment among students in an Indonesian university. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:845–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sari SP, Yuliastuti E. Investigation of attitudes toward mental illness among nursing students in Indonesia. Int J Nurs Sci. 2018;5:414–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Sari SP, Yuliastuti E. Investigation of attitudes toward mental illness among nursing students in Indonesia. Int J Nurs Sci. 2018;5:414–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat McLellan J, Heneghan C, Roberts N, Pluddemann A. Accuracy of self-diagnosis in conditions commonly managed in primary care: diagnostic accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023;13: e065748.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McLellan J, Heneghan C, Roberts N, Pluddemann A. Accuracy of self-diagnosis in conditions commonly managed in primary care: diagnostic accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023;13: e065748.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans-Lacko S, Little K, Meltzer H, Rose D, Rhydderch D, Henderson C, et al. Development and psychometric properties of the mental health knowledge schedule. Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55:440–8.CrossRefPubMed Evans-Lacko S, Little K, Meltzer H, Rose D, Rhydderch D, Henderson C, et al. Development and psychometric properties of the mental health knowledge schedule. Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55:440–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkie M, Anbesaw T. Knowledge, attitude, and associated factors towards mental illness among residents of Dessie town, northeast, Ethiopia, a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21:614.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Birkie M, Anbesaw T. Knowledge, attitude, and associated factors towards mental illness among residents of Dessie town, northeast, Ethiopia, a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21:614.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor SM, Dear MJ. Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophr Bull. 1981;7:225–40.CrossRefPubMed Taylor SM, Dear MJ. Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophr Bull. 1981;7:225–40.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kihumuro RB, Kaggwa MM, Kintu TM, Nakandi RM, Muwanga DR, Muganzi DJ, et al. Knowledge, attitude and perceptions of medical students towards mental health in a university in Uganda. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kihumuro RB, Kaggwa MM, Kintu TM, Nakandi RM, Muwanga DR, Muganzi DJ, et al. Knowledge, attitude and perceptions of medical students towards mental health in a university in Uganda. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Maskanah I. The phenomenon of self-diagnosis in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on mental health. JoPS J Psychol Stud. 2022;1:1–10. Maskanah I. The phenomenon of self-diagnosis in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on mental health. JoPS J Psychol Stud. 2022;1:1–10.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Abi Doumit C, Haddad C, Sacre H, Salameh P, Akel M, Obeid S, et al. Knowledge, attitude and behaviors towards patients with mental illness: results from a national Lebanese study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0222172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abi Doumit C, Haddad C, Sacre H, Salameh P, Akel M, Obeid S, et al. Knowledge, attitude and behaviors towards patients with mental illness: results from a national Lebanese study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0222172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Simões de Almeida R, Trigueiro MJ, Portugal P, de Sousa S, Simões-Silva V, Campos F, et al. Mental health literacy and stigma in a municipality in the North of Portugal: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:3318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Simões de Almeida R, Trigueiro MJ, Portugal P, de Sousa S, Simões-Silva V, Campos F, et al. Mental health literacy and stigma in a municipality in the North of Portugal: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:3318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Laila NH, Mahkota R, Shivalli S, Bantas K, Krianto T. Factors associated with pasung (physical restraint and confinement) of schizophrenia patients in Bogor regency, West Java Province, Indonesia 2017. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19:162.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laila NH, Mahkota R, Shivalli S, Bantas K, Krianto T. Factors associated with pasung (physical restraint and confinement) of schizophrenia patients in Bogor regency, West Java Province, Indonesia 2017. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19:162.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Self-diagnose is associated with knowledge and attitude towards mental illness of university students in Indonesia
verfasst von
Naufal Arif Ismail
Intan Kusumaningtyas
Moetrarsi Sri Kanapsijah Firngadi
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-023-00760-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Nicht Creutzfeldt Jakob, sondern Abführtee-Vergiftung

29.05.2024 Hyponatriämie Nachrichten

Eine ältere Frau trinkt regelmäßig Sennesblättertee gegen ihre Verstopfung. Der scheint plötzlich gut zu wirken. Auf Durchfall und Erbrechen folgt allerdings eine Hyponatriämie. Nach deren Korrektur kommt es plötzlich zu progredienten Kognitions- und Verhaltensstörungen.

Schutz der Synapsen bei Alzheimer

29.05.2024 Morbus Alzheimer Nachrichten

Mit einem Neurotrophin-Rezeptor-Modulator lässt sich möglicherweise eine bestehende Alzheimerdemenz etwas abschwächen: Erste Phase-2-Daten deuten auf einen verbesserten Synapsenschutz.

Sozialer Aufstieg verringert Demenzgefahr

24.05.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Ein hohes soziales Niveau ist mit die beste Versicherung gegen eine Demenz. Noch geringer ist das Demenzrisiko für Menschen, die sozial aufsteigen: Sie gewinnen fast zwei demenzfreie Lebensjahre. Umgekehrt steigt die Demenzgefahr beim sozialen Abstieg.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.