Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2012

01.04.2012 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use

verfasst von: Joshua Nitsche, Connor Howell, Thomas Howell

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 4/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples at the time of cesarean section is associated with decreased in-hospital analgesic use compared to skin closure with surgical steel staples.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2008 comparing in-hospital analgesic use after cesarean section between patients ,who underwent skin closure with surgical steel staples and subcuticular absorbable polyglycolic acid staples.

Results

Eighty-nine subjects were included in the absorbable staple cohort and 95 were included in the steel staple group. There was a 1.5-fold decrease in ketorolac use (p < 0.0001) and a trend toward decreased ibuprofen use in the absorbable staple cohort (p = 0.06). There was no difference in hydrocodone/acetaminophen use between groups (p = 0.89).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the use of subcuticular absorbable staples for skin closure at the time of cesarean section may lead to less in-hospital analgesic use, and thereby positively impact a patient’s post-operative course. In addition, while reduced analgesic use may represent a small cost savings for each individual patient, there is the potential for significant savings when one considers the large number of cesarean sections performed in the US annually. Prospective studies will be required to assess the full impact of the use of this new skin closure technology.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S (2010) Births: preliminary data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep 58 (16) Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S (2010) Births: preliminary data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep 58 (16)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman AD, Allen VM, McNeil SA, Dempster J (2009) Pfannenstiel incision closure: a review of current skin closure techniques. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 31(6):514–520PubMed Altman AD, Allen VM, McNeil SA, Dempster J (2009) Pfannenstiel incision closure: a review of current skin closure techniques. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 31(6):514–520PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP (2005) Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1607–1617PubMedCrossRef Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP (2005) Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1607–1617PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh CA (2010) Evidence-based cesarean technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22 (2):110–115 Walsh CA (2010) Evidence-based cesarean technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22 (2):110–115
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW (1997) Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples versus subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med 42(10):627–630PubMed Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW (1997) Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples versus subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med 42(10):627–630PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E (2008) Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 138(1):29–33PubMedCrossRef Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E (2008) Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 138(1):29–33PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N (2009) A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200 (3):265 e261–e264 Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N (2009) A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200 (3):265 e261–e264
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson A, Young D, Reilly J (2006) Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect 64(1):30–35PubMedCrossRef Johnson A, Young D, Reilly J (2006) Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect 64(1):30–35PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N (2005) Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Am J Vet Res 66(11):1975–1984PubMedCrossRef Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N (2005) Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Am J Vet Res 66(11):1975–1984PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pineros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, Rodeheaver PF, Drake DB, Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT (2006) A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16(1):19–27PubMed Pineros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, Rodeheaver PF, Drake DB, Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT (2006) A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16(1):19–27PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatt D, Quick CR, Owen-Smith MS (1985) Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67(5):318–320PubMed Gatt D, Quick CR, Owen-Smith MS (1985) Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67(5):318–320PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Obermair A, Crandon A, Perrin L, Walsh T, Carrazo M, Nicklin J (2007) Randomized trial of skin closure after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery. ANZ J Surg 77(6):460–463PubMedCrossRef Obermair A, Crandon A, Perrin L, Walsh T, Carrazo M, Nicklin J (2007) Randomized trial of skin closure after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery. ANZ J Surg 77(6):460–463PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use
verfasst von
Joshua Nitsche
Connor Howell
Thomas Howell
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2121-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Alter der Mutter beeinflusst Risiko für kongenitale Anomalie

28.05.2024 Kinder- und Jugendgynäkologie Nachrichten

Welchen Einfluss das Alter ihrer Mutter auf das Risiko hat, dass Kinder mit nicht chromosomal bedingter Malformation zur Welt kommen, hat eine ungarische Studie untersucht. Sie zeigt: Nicht nur fortgeschrittenes Alter ist riskant.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.