nach oben

Erschienen in:

10.06.2023 | Scientific Article

Society of skeletal radiology position paper – recommendations for contrast use in musculoskeletal MRI: when is non-contrast imaging enough?

verfasst von: Jonathan D. Samet, Hamza Alizai, Majid Chalian, Colleen Costelloe, Swati Deshmukh, Vivek Kalia, Sarah Kamel, Jennifer Ni Mhuircheartaigh, Jimmy Saade, Eric Walker, Daniel Wessell, Laura M. Fayad

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The following White Paper will discuss the appropriateness of gadolinium administration in MRI for musculoskeletal indications. Musculoskeletal radiologists should consider the potential risks involved and practice the judicious use of intravenous contrast, restricting administration to cases where there is demonstrable added value. Specific nuances of when contrast is or is not recommended are discussed in detail and listed in table format. Briefly, contrast is recommended for bone and soft tissue lesions. For infection, contrast is reserved for chronic or complex cases. In rheumatology, contrast is recommended for early detection but not for advanced arthritis. Contrast is not recommended for sports injuries, routine MRI neurography, implants/hardware, or spine imaging, but is helpful in complex and post-operative cases.

Behzadi AH, Zhao Y, Farooq Z, Prince MR. Immediate allergic reactions to gadolinium-based contrast agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2018;286(2):471–82.PubMed

Lourenco A, Moy L, Baron P. Expert panel on breast imaging. ACR Appropriateness criteria breast implant evaluation. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:S13–25.PubMed

Grobner T. Gadolinium–a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(4):1104–8.PubMed

American College of Radiology. Manual on contrast media. 2020.

Weinreb JC, Rodby RA, Yee J, Wang CL, Fine D, McDonald RJ, et al. Use of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media in patients with kidney disease: consensus statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation. Radiology. 2021;298(1):28–35.PubMed

Costelloe CM, Amini B, Madewell JE. Risks and benefits of gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI. In: Seminars in ultrasound, CT and MRI. Elsevier; 2020. p. 170–82.

Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, Kitajima K, Takenaka D. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology. 2014;270(3):834–41.PubMed

McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, Thielen KR, et al. Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2015;275(3):772–82.PubMed

FDA U. FDA drug safety communication: FDA warns that gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are retained in the body; requires new class warning. 2018.

10.

Labiste CC, McElroy E, Subhawong TK, Banks JS. Systematic review: investigating the added diagnostic value of gadolinium contrast agents for osteomyelitis in the appendicular skeleton. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;1-12:1285–96.

11.

Herregods N, Jaremko J, Baraliakos X, Dehoorne J, Leus A, Verstraete K, et al. Limited role of gadolinium to detect active sacroiliitis on MRI in juvenile spondyloarthritis. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:1637–46.PubMed

12.

Weiss PF, Xiao R, Biko DM, Johnson AM, Chauvin NA. Detection of inflammatory sacroiliitis in children with magnetic resonance imaging: is gadolinium contrast enhancement necessary? Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(8):2250–6.PubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Kan JH, Young RS, Yu C, Hernanz-Schulman M. Clinical impact of gadolinium in the MRI diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:1197–205.PubMed

14.

Fayad LM, Jacobs MA, Wang X, Carrino JA, Bluemke DA. Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques. Radiology. 2012;265(2):340–56.PubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Tang H, Ahlawat S, Fayad LM. Multiparametric MR imaging of benign and malignant bone lesions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018;26(4):559–69.PubMed

16.

Verstraete KL, Lang P. Bone and soft tissue tumors: the role of contrast agents for MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2000;34(3):229–46.PubMed

17.

Mhuircheartaigh JN, Lin Y-C, Wu JS. Bone tumor mimickers: a pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014;24(03):225–36.PubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Del Grande F, Tatizawa-Shiga N, Jalali Farahani S, Chalian M, Fayad LM. Chemical shift imaging: preliminary experience as an alternative sequence for defining the extent of a bone tumor. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2014;4(3):173–80.PubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Dreizin D, Ahlawat S, Del Grande F, Fayad LM. Gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase chemical shift imaging: role in evaluating bone marrow. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(6):648–57.PubMed

20.

Khoo MM, Tyler PA, Saifuddin A, Padhani AR. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in musculoskeletal MRI: a critical review. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(6):665–81.PubMed

21.

MacKenzie JD, Gonzalez L, Hernandez A, Ruppert K, Jaramillo D. Diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging for pediatric musculoskeletal disorders. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37(8):781–8.PubMed

22.

Omoumi P. The Dixon method in musculoskeletal MRI: from fat-sensitive to fat-specific imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51(7):1365–9.PubMed

23.

Ma LD, Frassica FJ, McCarthy EF, Bluemke DA, Zerhouni EA. Benign and malignant musculoskeletal masses: MR imaging differentiation with rim-to-center differential enhancement ratios. Radiology. 1997;202(3):739–44.PubMed

24.

Ma LD, McCarthy EF, Bluemke DA, Frassica FJ. Differentiation of benign from malignant musculoskeletal lesions using MR imaging: pitfalls in MR evaluation of lesions with a cystic appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(5):1251–8.PubMed

25.

Sujlana P, Skrok J, Fayad LM. Review of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: technical aspects and applications in the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(4):875–90.PubMed

26.

Vanel D, Shapeero LG, De Baere T, Gilles R, Tardivon A, Genin J, et al. MR imaging in the follow-up of malignant and aggressive soft-tissue tumors: results of 511 examinations. Radiology. 1994;190(1):263–8.PubMed

27.

Erlemann R, Sciuk J, Bosse A, Ritter J, Kusnierz-Glaz CR, Peters PE, et al. Response of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma to preoperative chemotherapy: assessment with dynamic and static MR imaging and skeletal scintigraphy. Radiology. 1990;175(3):791–6.PubMed

28.

Ahmad ZY, Ahlawat S, Levin AS, Fayad LM. Bones and soft-tissue tumors: considerations for postsurgical imaging follow-up. Radiologic Clinics. 2022;60(2):327–38.PubMed

29.

LA FJ, Morris C, Fayad LM. Surveillance imaging in patients with tumor prostheses using anatomic and functional metal reduction MRI sequences. New York, NY: International Skeletal Society; 2017.

30.

Gao Y, Kalbasi A, Hsu W, Ruan D, Fu J, Shao J, et al. Treatment effect prediction for sarcoma patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy using radiomics features from longitudinal diffusion-weighted MRIs. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(17):175006.PubMed

31.

May DA, Good RB, Smith D, Parsons TW. MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors and tumor mimickers with intravenous gadolinium: experience with 242 patients. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26(1):2–15.PubMed

32.

Soldatos T, Ahlawat S, Montgomery E, Chalian M, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Multiparametric assessment of treatment response in high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas with anatomic and functional MR imaging sequences. Radiology. 2016;278(3):831–40.PubMed

33.

Hammer S, Uller W, Manger F, Fellner C, Zeman F, Wohlgemuth WA. Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3.0 Tesla for evaluation of hemodynamic characteristics of vascular malformations: description of distinct subgroups. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(1):296–305.PubMed

34.

Fayad L, Hazirolan T, Bluemke D, Mitchell S. Vascular malformations in the extremities: emphasis on MR imaging features that guide treatment options. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35(3):127–37.PubMed

35.

Del Grande F, Subhawong T, Weber K, Aro M, Mugera C, Fayad LM. Detection of soft-tissue sarcoma recurrence: added value of functional MR imaging techniques at 3.0 T. Radiology. 2014;271(2):499–511.PubMed

36.

Del Grande F, Ahlawat S, Subhangwong T, Fayad LM. Characterization of indeterminate soft tissue masses referred for biopsy: what is the added value of contrast imaging at 3.0 tesla? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45(2):390–400.PubMed

37.

Costelloe CM, Madewell JE. An approach to undiagnosed bone tumors. In: Seminars in ultrasound, CT and MRI. Elsevier; 2021. p. 114–22.

38.

Walker EA, Song AJ, Murphey MD. Magnetic resonance imaging of soft-tissue masses. Semin Roentgenol. 2010;45(4):277–97.PubMed

39.

Amini B, Murphy WA Jr, Haygood TM, Kumar R, McEnery KW, Madewell JE, et al. Gadolinium-based contrast agents improve detection of recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma at MRI. Radiology: Imaging. Cancer. 2020;2(2):e190046.

40.

Afonso PD, Kosinski A, Spritzer C. Following unenhanced MRI assessment for local recurrence after surgical resection of mesenchymal soft tissue tumors, do additional gadolinium-enhanced images change reader confidence or diagnosis? Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(5):806–13.

41.

Crombe A, Marcellin PJ, Buy X, Stoeckle E, Brouste V, Italiano A, et al. Soft-tissue sarcomas: assessment of MRI features correlating with histologic grade and patient outcome. Radiology. 2019;291(3):710–21.PubMed

42.

Ahlawat S, Fritz J, Morris CD, Fayad LM. Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors: review of conventional features and focus on nonmorphologic imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(1):11–27.PubMed

43.

Chou S-HS, Hippe DS, Lee AY, Scherer K, Porrino JA, Davidson DJ, et al. Gadolinium contrast enhancement improves confidence in diagnosing recurrent soft tissue sarcoma by MRI. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(5):615–22.PubMed

44.

Ahlawat S, Blakeley JO, Rodriguez FJ, Fayad LM. Imaging biomarkers for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology. 2019;93(11):e1076–84.PubMed

45.

Demehri S, Belzberg A, Blakeley J, Fayad L. Conventional and functional MR imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(8):1615–20.PubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Ahlawat S, Fayad LM. Imaging cellularity in benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: utility of the “target sign” by diffusion weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2018;102:195–201.PubMed

47.

Soldatos T, Durand DJ, Subhawong TK, Carrino JA, Chhabra A. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal infections: systematic diagnostic assessment and key points. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(11):1434–43.PubMed

48.

Alaia EF, Chhabra A, Simpfendorfer CS, Cohen M, Mintz DN, Vossen JA, et al. MRI nomenclature for musculoskeletal infection. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50(12):2319–47.PubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Lee YJ, Sadigh S, Mankad K, Kapse N, Rajeswaran G. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016;6(2):184.PubMedCentral

50.

Jennin F, Bousson V, Parlier C, Jomaah N, Khanine V, Laredo J-D. Bony sequestrum: a radiologic review. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:963–75.PubMed

51.

Kumar Y, Khaleel M, Boothe E, Awdeh H, Wadhwa V, Chhabra A. Role of diffusion weighted imaging in musculoskeletal infections: current perspectives. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:414–23.PubMed

52.

Raza K, Buckley CE, Salmon M, Buckley CD. Treating very early rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20(5):849–63.PubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Schett G, Gravallese E. Bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(11):656–64.PubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Stomp W, Krabben A, van der Heijde D, Huizinga TW, Bloem JL, Østergaard M, et al. Aiming for a simpler early arthritis MRI protocol: can Gd contrast administration be eliminated? Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1520–7.PubMed

55.

McQueen FM. The MRI view of synovitis and tenosynovitis in inflammatory arthritis: implications for diagnosis and management. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1154(1):21–34.PubMed

56.

Østergaard M, Boesen M. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. La radiologia medica. 2019;124(11):1128–41.PubMed

57.

Sudoł-Szopińska I, Jans L, Teh J. Rheumatoid arthritis: what do MRI and ultrasound show. J Ultrason. 2017;17(68):5–16.PubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Bernard SA, Kransdorf MJ, Beaman FD, Adler RS, Amini B, Appel M, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® chronic back pain suspected sacroiliitis-spondyloarthropathy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5):S62–70.PubMed

59.

Rudwaleit M, Jurik A-G, Hermann KA, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, Baraliakos X, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(10):1520–7.PubMed

60.

Althoff CE, Feist E, Burova E, Eshed I, Bollow M, Hamm B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of active sacroiliitis: do we really need gadolinium? Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(2):232–6.PubMed

61.

Baraliakos X, Hermann KA, Landewe R, Listing J, Golder W, Brandt J, et al. Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(8):1141–4.PubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Wang YJ, Griffith JF, Deng M, Li T, Tam L, Lee VW, et al. Vertebral body corner oedema vs gadolinium enhancement as biomarkers of active spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1017):e702–8.PubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Nusman CM, Hemke R, Benninga MA, Schonenberg-Meinema D, Kindermann A, van Rossum MA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the knee in children unaffected by clinical arthritis compared to clinically active juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1141–8.PubMed

64.

Kirchgesner T, Stoenoiu M, Michoux N, Durez P, Berg BV. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon water-and fat-only images to assess osteitis and erosions according to RAMRIS in hands of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021;102(7-8):439–45.PubMed

65.

Malhotra A, Kalra VB, Wu X, Grant R, Bronen RA, Abbed KM. Imaging of lumbar spinal surgery complications. Insights Imaging. 2015;6(6):579–90.PubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Yeom JA, Lee IS, Suh HB, Song YS, Song JW. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of early spondylodiscitis: interpretive challenges and atypical findings. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17(5):565–80.PubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Van Goethem J, Van de Kelft E, Biltjes I, Van Hasselt B, Van den Hauwe L, Parizel P, et al. MRI after successful lumbar discectomy. Neuroradiology. 1996;38:S90–6.PubMed

68.

McDonald MA, Kirsch CF, Amin BY, Aulino JM, Bell AM, Cassidy RC, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® cervical neck pain or cervical radiculopathy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(5):S57–76.PubMed

69.

Meng X-x, Zhang Y-q, Liao H-q, Liu H-c, Jiang H-l, Ke S-j, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of spinal tumor vascularity: correlation with angiography. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:3952–61.PubMed

70.

Hayashi D, Roemer FW, Mian A, Gharaibeh M, Müller B, Guermazi A. Imaging features of postoperative complications after spinal surgery and instrumentation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(1):W123–9.PubMed

71.

de Hooge M, van den Berg R, Navarro-Compan V, van Gaalen F, van der Heijde D, Huizinga T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints in the early detection of spondyloarthritis: no added value of gadolinium compared with short tau inversion recovery sequence. Rheumatology. 2013;52(7):1220–4.PubMed

72.

Smitaman E, Flores DV, Mejía Gómez C, Pathria MN. MR imaging of atraumatic muscle disorders. Radiographics. 2018;38(2):500–22.PubMed

73.

Kuo GP, Carrino JA. Skeletal muscle imaging and inflammatory myopathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007;19(6):530–5.PubMed

74.

Sudoł-Szopińska I, Jurik AG, Eshed I, Lennart J, Grainger A, Østergaard M, et al. Recommendations of the ESSR arthritis subcommittee for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in musculoskeletal rheumatic diseases. In: Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2015. p. 396–411.

75.

Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Oh HY, Choi JY, Chae HD, Ahn JM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequence with fat suppression for assessment of peripatellar synovitis: preliminary results and comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2017;283(3):769–78.PubMed

76.

Barendregt AM, van Gulik EC, Lavini C, Nusman CM, van den Berg JM, Schonenberg-Meinema D, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging for assessment of synovial inflammation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a promising imaging biomarker as an alternative to gadolinium-based contrast agents. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(11):4889–99.PubMedPubMedCentral

77.

Zurlo JV. The double-line sign. Radiology. 1999;212(2):541–2.PubMed

78.

Glickstein MF, Burk D Jr, Schiebler M, Cohen E, Dalinka M, Steinberg M, et al. Avascular necrosis versus other diseases of the hip: sensitivity of MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;169(1):213–5.PubMed

79.

Murphey MD, Foreman KL, Klassen-Fischer MK, Fox MG, Chung EM, Kransdorf MJ. From the radiologic pathology archives imaging of osteonecrosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2014;34(4):1003–28.PubMed

80.

Chan WP, Liu Y-J, Huang G-S, Lin M-F, Huang S, Chang Y-C, et al. Relationship of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head to perfusion changes in the proximal femur by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(3):637.PubMed

81.

Müller G, Månsson S, Müller MF, Johansson M, Björkman A. Increased perfusion in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI correlates with areas of bone repair and of bone necrosis in patients with Kienböck’s disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(2):481–9.PubMed

82.

Dillman JR, Hernandez RJ. MRI of Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(5):1394–407.PubMed

83.

Cerezal L, Abascal F, Canga A, García-Valtuille R, Bustamante M, Piñal F. Usefulness of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of the vascularity of scaphoid nonunions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(1):141–9.PubMed

84.

Dailiana Z, Zachos V, Varitimidis S, Papanagiotou P, Karantanas A, Malizos K. Scaphoid nonunions treated with vascularised bone grafts: MRI assessment. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(3):217–24.PubMed

85.

Ng AW, Griffith JF, Taljanovic MS, Li A, Tse W, Ho P. Is dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI useful for assessing proximal fragment vascularity in scaphoid fracture delayed and non-union? Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:983–92.PubMed

86.

Donati OF, Zanetti M, Nagy L, Bode B, Schweizer A, Pfirrmann CW. Is dynamic gadolinium enhancement needed in MR imaging for the preoperative assessment of scaphoidal viability in patients with scaphoid nonunion? Radiology. 2011;260(3):808–16.PubMed

87.

Larribe M, Gay A, Freire V, Bouvier C, Chagnaud C, Souteyrand P. Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of the viability of acute scaphoid fracture. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43:1697–703.PubMed

88.

Anderson SE, Steinbach LS, Tschering-Vogel D, Martin M, Nagy L. MR imaging of avascular scaphoid nonunion before and after vascularized bone grafting. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:314–20.PubMed

89.

Fox MG, Gaskin CM, Chhabra AB, Anderson MW. Assessment of scaphoid viability with MRI: a reassessment of findings on unenhanced MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(4):W281.PubMed

90.

Fox M, Wang D, Chhabra A. Accuracy of enhanced and unenhanced MRI in diagnosing scaphoid proximal pole avascular necrosis and predicting surgical outcome. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:1671–8.PubMed

91.

Sakai T, Sugano N, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Ochi T, Ohzono K. MR findings of necrotic lesions and the extralesional area of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Skeletal Radiol. 2000;29:133–41.PubMed

92.

Sebag G, Ducou Le Pointe H, Klein I, Maiza D, Mazda K, Bensahel H, et al. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced subtraction MR imaging–a simple technique for the early diagnosis of Legg-Calve-Perthes disease: preliminary results. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27:216–20.PubMed

93.

Kim HK, Kaste S, Dempsey M, Wilkes D. A comparison of non-contrast and contrast-enhanced MRI in the initial stage of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. Pediatr Radiol. 2013;43(9):1166–73.PubMed

94.

Miyanishi K, Hara T, Kaminomachi S, Maeda H, Watanabe H, Torisu T. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of subchondral insufficiency fracture of the femoral head: a preliminary comparison with that of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:583–9.PubMed

95.

Geith T, Niethammer T, Milz S, Dietrich O, Reiser M, Baur-Melnyk A. Transient bone marrow edema syndrome versus osteonecrosis: perfusion patterns at dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with high temporal resolution can allow differentiation. Radiology. 2017;283(2):478–85.PubMed

96.

Cheon J-E, Kim JY, Choi YH, Kim WS, Cho T-J, Yoo WJ. MRI risk factors for development of avascular necrosis after closed reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip: predictive value of contrast-enhanced MRI. Plos One. 2021;16(3):e0248701.PubMedPubMedCentral

97.

Nguyen JC, Back SJ, Barrera CA, Patel M, Nguyen MK, Hong S, et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: can contrast-enhanced MRI predict the development of avascular necrosis following surgery? Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50:389–97.PubMed

98.

Cummings EA, Reid GJ, Finley GA, McGrath PJ, Ritchie JA. Prevalence and source of pain in pediatric inpatients. Pain. 1996;68(1):25–31.PubMed

99.

Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Strouse PJ, Jan SC. Allergic-like breakthrough reactions to gadolinium contrast agents after corticosteroid and antihistamine premedication. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(1):187–90.PubMed

100.

Ahlawat S, Fayad LM. De novo assessment of pediatric musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors: beyond anatomic imaging. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):e194–202.PubMed

101.

Laine JC, Martin BD, Novotny SA, Kelly DM. Role of advanced imaging in the diagnosis and management of active Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(15):526–36.PubMed

102.

Hemke R, Kuijpers TW, Nusman CM, Schonenberg-Meinema D, van Rossum MA, Dolman KM, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI features in the early diagnosis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(11):3222–9.PubMedPubMedCentral

103.

Browne LP, Guillerman RP, Orth RC, Patel J, Mason EO, Kaplan SL. Community-acquired staphylococcal musculoskeletal infection in infants and young children: necessity of contrast-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of growth cartilage involvement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(1):194–9.PubMed

104.

Sconfienza LM, Albano D, Messina C, Silvestri E, Tagliafico AS. How, when, why in magnetic resonance arthrography: an international survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR). Eur Radiol. 2018;28:2356–68.PubMed

105.

Magee T. Imaging of the post-operative shoulder: does injection of iodinated contrast in addition to MR contrast during arthrography improve diagnostic accuracy and patient throughput? Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47:1253–61.PubMed

106.

Petsatodis E, Pilavaki M, Kalogera A, Drevelegas A, Agathangelidis F, Ditsios K. Comparison between conventional MRI and MR arthrography in the diagnosis of triangular fibrocartilage tears and correlation with arthroscopic findings. Injury. 2019;50(8):1464–9.PubMed

107.

Sutter R, Zubler V, Hoffmann A, Mamisch-Saupe N, Dora C, Kalberer F, et al. Hip MRI: how useful is intraarticular contrast material for evaluating surgically proven lesions of the labrum and articular cartilage? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(1):160–9.PubMed

108.

Vives MJ, Homesley D, Ciccotti MG, Schweitzer ME. Evaluation of recurring meniscal tears with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):868–73.PubMed

109.

McCauley TR. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee. Radiology. 2005;234(1):53–61.PubMed

110.

Magee T. MR versus MR arthrography in detection of supraspinatus tendon tears in patients without previous shoulder surgery. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43:43–8.PubMed

111.

Phelan N, Rowland P, Galvin R, O’Byrne JM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for suspected ACL and meniscal tears of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:1525–39.PubMed

112.

Oei EH, Ginai AZ, Hunink MM. MRI for traumatic knee injury: a review. In: Seminars in ultrasound, CT and MRI. Elsevier; 2007. p. 141–57.

113.

Potter HG, Schachar J. High resolution noncontrast MRI of the hip. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(2):268–78.

114.

Schleich C, Hesper T, Hosalkar HS, Rettegi F, Zilkens C, Krauspe R, et al. 3D double-echo steady-state sequence assessment of hip joint cartilage and labrum at 3 Tesla: comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative data. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:4360–71.PubMed

115.

Lasser EC. Nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(2):W80.PubMed

116.

Chopra A, Grainger A, Dube B, Evans R, Hodgson R, Conroy J, et al. Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5 T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:963–71.PubMed

117.

Chhabra A. Peripheral MR neurography: approach to interpretation. Neuroimaging Clin. 2014;24(1):79–89.

118.

Chhabra A, Madhuranthakam AJ, Andreisek G. Magnetic resonance neurography: current perspectives and literature review. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:698–707.PubMed

119.

Mazal AT, Faramarzalian A, Samet JD, Gill K, Cheng J, Chhabra A. MR neurography of the brachial plexus in adult and pediatric age groups: evolution, recent advances, and future directions. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020;17(2):111–22.PubMed

120.

Crim J, Ingalls K. Accuracy of MR neurography in the diagnosis of brachial plexopathy. Eur J Radiol. 2017;95:24–7.PubMed

121.

Harrell AD, Johnson D, Samet J, Omar IM, Deshmukh S. With or without? A retrospective analysis of intravenous contrast utility in magnetic resonance neurography. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49:577–84.PubMed

122.

Ahlawat S, Chhabra A, Blakely J. Magnetic resonance neurography of peripheral nerve tumors and tumorlike conditions. Neuroimaging Clin. 2014;24(1):171–92.

123.

Chhabra A, Williams E, Wang K, Dellon A, Carrino J. MR neurography of neuromas related to nerve injury and entrapment with surgical correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(8):1363–8.PubMedPubMedCentral

124.

Ahlawat S, Belzberg AJ, Montgomery AE, Fayad LM. MRI features of peripheral traumatic neuromas. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1204–12.PubMed

125.

Ahlawat S, Blakeley JO, Langmead S, Belzberg AJ, Fayad LM. Current status and recommendations for imaging in neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, and schwannomatosis. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49:199–219.PubMed

126.

Baltodano PA, Tong AJ, Chhabra A, Rosson GD. The role of magnetic resonance neurography in the postoperative management of peripheral nerve injuries. Neuroimaging Clin. 2014;24(1):235–44.

127.

Chhabra A, Wadhwa V, Thakkar RS, Carrino JA, Dellon AL. Recurrent ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow: correlation of surgical findings and 3-Tesla magnetic resonance neurography. Can J Plast Surg. 2013;21(3):186–9.PubMedPubMedCentral

128.

Thawait S, Wang K, Subhawong T, Williams E, Hashemi S, Machado A, et al. Peripheral nerve surgery: the role of high-resolution MR neurography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(2):203–10.PubMedPubMedCentral

129.

Subhawong TK, Wang KC, Thawait SK, Williams EH, Hashemi SS, Machado AJ, et al. High resolution imaging of tunnels by magnetic resonance neurography. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:15–31.PubMed

130.

Wang L, Niu Y, Kong X, Yu Q, Kong X, Lv Y, et al. The application of paramagnetic contrast-based T2 effect to 3D heavily T2W high-resolution MR imaging of the brachial plexus and its branches. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(3):578–84.PubMed

131.

Sneag DB, Daniels SP, Geannette C, Queler SC, Lin BQ, de Silva C, et al. Post-contrast 3D inversion recovery magnetic resonance neurography for evaluation of branch nerves of the brachial plexus. Eur J Radiol. 2020;132:109304.PubMed

132.

Chen W-C, Tsai Y-H, Weng H-H, Wang S-C, Liu H-L, Peng S-L, et al. Value of enhancement technique in 3D-T2-STIR images of the brachial plexus. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38(3):335–9.PubMed

133.

Zhang Y, Kong X, Zhao Q, Liu X, Gu Y, Xu L. Enhanced MR neurography of the lumbosacral plexus with robust vascular suppression and improved delineation of its small branches. Eur J Radiol. 2020;129:109128.PubMed

134.

Xu Z, Zhang T, Chen J, Liu Z, Wang T, Hu Y, et al. Combine contrast-enhanced 3D T2-weighted short inversion time inversion recovery MR neurography with MR angiography at 1.5 T in the assessment of brachial plexopathy. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. 2021;34:229–39.

135.

Zhang X, Li M, Guan J, Wang H, Li S, Guo Y, et al. Evaluation of the sacral nerve plexus in pelvic endometriosis by three-dimensional MR neurography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45(4):1225–31.

136.

Sneag DB, Queler S. Technological advancements in magnetic resonance neurography. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019;19:1–6.

137.

Deshmukh S, Tegtmeyer K, Kovour M, Ahlawat S, Samet J. Diagnostic contribution of contrast-enhanced 3D MR imaging of peripheral nerve pathology. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50:2509–18.PubMed

138.

Khodarahmi I, Isaac A, Fishman EK, Dalili D, Fritz J. Metal about the hip and artifact reduction techniques: from basic concepts to advanced imaging. In: Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2019. p. e68–81.

139.

Deshmukh S, Omar IM. Imaging of hip arthroplasties: normal findings and hardware complications. In: Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2019. p. 162–76.

140.

Koff MF, Burge AJ, Koch KM, Potter HG. Imaging near orthopedic hardware. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(1):24–39.PubMedPubMedCentral

141.

Fritz J, Lurie B, Miller TT, Potter HG. MR imaging of hip arthroplasty implants. Radiographics. 2014;34(4):E106–32.PubMed

142.

Talbot BS, Weinberg EP. MR imaging with metal-suppression sequences for evaluation of total joint arthroplasty. Radiographics. 2016;36(1):209–25.PubMed

143.

Müller GM, Månsson S, Müller MF, von Schewelov T, Nittka M, Ekberg O, et al. MR imaging with metal artifact-reducing sequences and gadolinium contrast agent in a case-control study of periprosthetic abnormalities in patients with metal-on-metal hip prostheses. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43:1101–12.PubMed

144.

Cyteval C, Bourdon A. Imaging orthopedic implant infections. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2012;93(6):547–57.PubMed

145.

White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M, Merchant N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology. 2000;215(1):254–62.PubMed

146.

Fritz J, Lurie B, Potter HG. MR imaging of knee arthroplasty implants. Radiographics. 2015;35(5):1483–501.PubMed

147.

Hash TW II, Maderazo AB, Haas SB, Saboeiro GR, Trost DW, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance angiography in the management of recurrent hemarthrosis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(8):1357–61.PubMed

148.

Food U, Administratin D. Information about soft tissue imaging and metal ion testing. 2014. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/metal-metal-hip-implants/information-about-soft-tissue-imaging-and-metal-iontesting.

149.

Roth CJ, Angevine PD, Aulino JM, Berger KL, Choudhri AF, Fries IB, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria myelopathy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(1):38–44.PubMed

150.

Patel ND, Broderick DF, Burns J, Deshmukh TK, Fries IB, Harvey HB, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria low back pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(9):1069–78.PubMed

151.

Ledermann HP, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Carrino JA. MR imaging findings in spinal infections: rules or myths? Radiology. 2003;228(2):506–14.PubMed

152.

Hong SH, Choi J-Y, Lee JW, Kim NR, Choi J-A, Kang HS. MR imaging assessment of the spine: infection or an imitation? Radiographics. 2009;29(2):599–612.PubMed

153.

Guan Y, Peck KK, Lyo J, Tisnado J, Lis E, Arevalo-Perez J, et al. T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to differentiate nonneoplastic and malignant vertebral body lesions in the spine. Radiology. 2020;297(2):382–9.PubMed

154.

Shah LM, Salzman KL. Imaging of spinal metastatic disease. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:769753.PubMed

155.

Agarwal V, Shah LM, Parsons MS, Boulter DJ, Cassidy RC, Hutchins TA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2021 Update. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18(5s):S73–s82.PubMed

156.

Vargas M, Gariani J, Sztajzel R, Barnaure-Nachbar I, Delattre B, Lovblad K, et al. Spinal cord ischemia: practical imaging tips, pearls, and pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(5):825–30.PubMedPubMedCentral

157.

Kister I, Johnson E, Raz E, Babb J, Loh J, Shepherd T. Specific MRI findings help distinguish acute transverse myelitis of Neuromyelitis Optica from spinal cord infarction. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016;9:62–7.PubMed

158.

Traboulsee A, Simon J, Stone L, Fisher E, Jones D, Malhotra A, et al. Revised recommendations of the consortium of MS centers task force for a standardized MRI protocol and clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(3):394–401.PubMedPubMedCentral

159.

Beckmann N, West O, Nunez D Jr. Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging and Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Spine Trauma. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16:S264–85.PubMed

160.

D’Aprile P, Tarantino A, Jinkins J, Brindicci D. The value of fat saturation sequences and contrast medium administration in MRI of degenerative disease of the posterior/perispinal elements of the lumbosacral spine. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:523–31.PubMed

161.

Mullin WJ, Heithoff KB, Gilbert TJ Jr, Renfrew DL. Magnetic resonance evaluation of recurrent disc herniation: is gadolinium necessary? Spine. 2000;25(12):1493–9.PubMed

162.

Grane P, Tullberg T, Rydberg J, Lindgren L. Postoperative lumbar MR imaging with contrast enhancement: comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Acta radiológica. 1996;37(3):366–72.PubMed

Titel: Society of skeletal radiology position paper – recommendations for contrast use in musculoskeletal MRI: when is non-contrast imaging enough?
verfasst von: Jonathan D. Samet
Hamza Alizai
Majid Chalian
Colleen Costelloe
Swati Deshmukh
Vivek Kalia
Sarah Kamel
Jennifer Ni Mhuircheartaigh
Jimmy Saade
Eric Walker
Daniel Wessell
Laura M. Fayad
Publikationsdatum: 10.06.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04367-8

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Society of skeletal radiology position paper – recommendations for contrast use in musculoskeletal MRI: when is non-contrast imaging enough?

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Radiologie

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Left fourth and sixth costovertebral dislocation abutting the aorta

Is total-body MRI useful as a screening tool to rule out malignant progression in patients with multiple osteochondromas? Results in a single-center cohort of 319 adult patients

Effectiveness of single intra-bursal injection of platelet-rich plasma against corticosteroid under ultrasonography guidance for shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized clinical trial

Prevalence and characteristics of benign cartilaginous tumours of the shoulder joint. An MRI-based study

Age-related prevalence and imaging characteristics of the superior acetabular roof notch in children, adolescents, and young adults

The tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance: a comparison study between EOS and MRI in the paediatric population

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Radiologie