nach oben

Erschienen in:

24.06.2015 | Original Research

Tract-Specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Before and After Decompressive Spinal Surgery: Preliminary Results

verfasst von: K. Y. Wang, BS, O. Idowu, MD, C. B. Thompson, MS, MBA, G. Orman, MD, C. Myers, MD, L. H. Riley III, MD, J. A. Carrino, MD, MPH, A. Flammang, MBA, W. Gilson, PhD, C. L. Sadowsky, MD, I. Izbudak, MD

Erschienen in: Clinical Neuroradiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics of the cervical spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were compared to those measured in healthy volunteers, using tract-specific region of interests (ROIs) across all cervical intervertebral disc levels.

Methods

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the cervical spinal cord was performed in four patients with CSM and in five healthy volunteers on a 3-T MR scanner. Region-specific fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were calculated on axial imaging with ROI placement in the anterior, lateral, and posterior regions of the spinal cord. FA and MD were also calculated on sagittal acquisitions. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to compare controls and patients before and after surgery.

Results

FA values were significantly lower (p = 0.050) and MD values were significantly higher (p = 0.014) in CSM patients measured at level of maximal compression before surgery than in healthy controls in lateral and posterior ROIs, respectively. In posterior ROIs, MD values were significantly higher in patients before surgery compared to controls at all levels except C7-T1.

Conclusion

Patients with CSM may demonstrate region-specific changes in DTI metrics when compared to healthy controls. Changes in DTI metrics may also occur at levels remote from site of compression.

Levine DN. Pathogenesis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62(4):334–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Singh A, Crockard HA, Platts A, Stevens J. Clinical and radiological correlates of severity and surgery-related outcome in cervical spondylosis. J Neurosurg. 2001;94(2 Suppl):189–98.PubMed

Montgomery DM, Brower RS. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinical syndrome and natural history. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23(3):487–93.PubMed

Phillips DG. Surgical treatment of myelopathy with cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1973;36(5):879–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ebersold MJ, Pare MC, Quast LM. Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1995;82(5):745–51.CrossRefPubMed

Moseley ME, Kucharczyk J, Mintorovitch J, Cohen Y, Kurhanewicz J, Derugin N, Asgari H, Norman D. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute stroke: correlation with T2-weighted and magnetic susceptibility-enhanced MR imaging in cats. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;11(3):423–9.PubMed

Demir A, Ries M, Moonen CT, Vital JM, Dehais J, Arne P, Caille JM, Dousset V. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Radiology. 2003;229(1):37–43.CrossRefPubMed

Hori M, Okubo T, Aoki S, Kumagai H, Araki T. Line scan diffusion tensor MRI at low magnetic field strength: feasibility study of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in an early clinical stage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23(2):183–8.CrossRefPubMed

Mamata H, Jolesz FA, Maier SE. Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: age and cervical spondylosis-related changes. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22(1):38–43.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Wen CY, Cui JL, Liu HS, Mak KC, Cheung WY, Luk KD, Hu Y. Is diffusion anisotropy a biomarker for disease severity and surgical prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Radiology. 2014;270(1):197–204.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Uda T, Takami T, Tsuyuguchi N, Sakamoto S, Yamagata T, Ikeda H, Nagata T, Ohata K. Assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging parameter at 3.0 T. Spine. 2013;38(5):407–14.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Budzik JF, Balbi V, Thuc V L, Duhamel A, Assaker R, Cotten A. Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(2):426–33.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Jones JG, Cen SY, Lebel RM, Hsieh PC, Law M. Diffusion tensor imaging correlates with the clinical assessment of disease severity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and predicts outcome following surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(2):471–8.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Nakamura M, Fujiyoshi K, Tsuji O, Konomi T, Hosogane N, Watanabe K, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Momoshima S, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M. Clinical significance of diffusion tensor tractography as a predictor of functional recovery after laminoplasty in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(2):147–52.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Onu M, Gervai P, Cohen-Adad J, Lawrence J, Kornelsen J, Tomanek B, Sboto-Frankenstein UN. Human cervical spinal cord funiculi: investigation with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(4):829–37.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Rossi C, Boss A, Steidle G, Martirosian P, Klose U, Capuani S, Maraviglia B, Claussen CD, Schick F. Water diffusion anisotropy in white and gray matter of the human spinal cord. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(3):476–82.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Smith SA, Jones CK, Gifford A, Belegu V, Chodkowski B, Farrell JA, Landman BA, Reich DS, Calabresi PA, McDonald JW, van Zijl PC. Reproducibility of tract-specific magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord at 3 T. NMR Biomed. 2010;23(2):207–17.PubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Song T, Chen WJ, Yang B, Zhao HP, Huang JW, Cai MJ, Dong TF, Li TS. Diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 (3):422–8.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Wang W, Qin W, Hao N, Wang Y, Zong G. Diffusion tensor imaging in spinal cord compression. Acta Radiologica. 2012;53(8):921–8.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Lee JW, Kim JH, Park JB, Park KW, Yeom JS, Lee GY, Kang HS. Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography in cervical compressive myelopathy: preliminary results. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(12):1543–51.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kara B, Celik A, Karadereler S, Ulusoy L, Ganiyusufoglu K, Onat L, Mutlu A, Ornek I, Sirvanci M, Hamzaoglu A. The role of DTI in early detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary study with 3-T MRI. Neuroradiology. 2011;53(8):609–16.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kerkovsky M, Bednarik J, Dusek L, Sprlakova-Pukova A, Urbanek I, Mechl M, Valek V, Kadanka Z. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic spinal cord compression: correlations between clinical and electrophysiological findings. Spine. 2012;37(1):48–56.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Petersen JA, Wilm BJ, von Meyenburg J, Schubert M, Seifert B, Najafi Y, Dietz V, Kollias S. Chronic cervical spinal cord injury: DTI correlates with clinical and electrophysiological measures. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(8):1556–66.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Deo AA, Grill RJ, Hasan KM, Narayana PA. In vivo serial diffusion tensor imaging of experimental spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res. 2006;83(5):801–10.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Ellingson BM, Ulmer JL, Kurpad SN, Schmit BD. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in chronic spinal cord injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(10):1976–82.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Nevo U, Hauben E, Yoles E, Agranov E, Akselrod S, Schwartz M, Neeman M. Diffusion anisotropy MRI for quantitative assessment of recovery in injured rat spinal cord. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Mair WG, Druckman R. The pathology of spinal cord lesions and their relation to the clinical features in protrusion of cervical intervertebral discs; a report of four cases. Brain. 1953;76(1):70–91.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Bedford PD, Bosanquet FD. Degeneration of the spinal cord associated with cervical spondylosis. Lancet. 1952;2(6724):55–9.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Shin JJ, Jin BH, Kim KS, Cho YE, Cho WH. Intramedullary high signal intensity and neurological status as prognostic factors in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152(10):1687–94.CrossRef

30.

Shedid D, Benzel EC. Cervical spondylosis anatomy: pathophysiology and biomechanics. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(1 Suppl 1):7–13. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000215430.86569.C4.

31.

Breig A, Turnbull I, Hassler O. Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis. A study on fresh cadaver material. J Neurosurg. 1966;25(1):45–56.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Ogino H, Tada K, Okada K, Yonenobu K, Yamamoto T, Ono K, Namiki H. Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine. 1983;8(1):1–15.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Ito T, Oyanagi K, Takahashi H, Takahashi HE, Ikuta F. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinicopathologic study on the progression pattern and thin myelinated fibers of the lesions of seven patients examined during complete autopsy. Spine. 1996;21(7):827–33.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Ohshio I, Hatayama A, Kaneda K, Takahara M, Nagashima K. Correlation between histopathologic features and magnetic resonance images of spinal cord lesions. Spine. 1993;18(9):1140–9.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Faiss JH, Schroth G, Grodd W, Koenig E, Will B, Thron A. Central spinal cord lesions in stenosis of the cervical canal. Neuroradiology. 1990;32(2):117–23.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Cooper RG, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA, Jenkins JP, West CG, Illingworth KJ, Jayson MI. Herniated intervertebral disc-associated periradicular fibrosis and vascular abnormalities occur without inflammatory cell infiltration. Spine. 1995;20(5):591–8.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Sliwa JA, Maclean IC. Ischemic myelopathy: a review of spinal vasculature and related clinical syndromes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(4):365–72.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Mamata H, Jolesz FA, Maier SE. Characterization of central nervous system structures by magnetic resonance diffusion anisotropy. Neurochem Int. 2004;45(4):553–60.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Wang MY, Shah S, Green BA. Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 204 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol. 2004;62(6):487–92.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Machino M, Yukawa Y, Hida T, Ito K, Nakashima H, Kanbara S, Morita D, Kato F. Persistent physical symptoms after laminoplasty: analysis of postoperative residual symptoms in 520 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 2012;37(11):932–6.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Zorub DS. Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 2: Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 32 cases. J Neurosurg. 1980;53(1):12–9.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Kumar VG, Rea GL, Mervis LJ, McGregor JM. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: functional and radiographic long-term outcome after laminectomy and posterior fusion. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(4):771–7. (discussion 777–778).CrossRefPubMed

43.

Chiles BW III, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cooper PR. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(4):762–9. (discussion 769–770).CrossRefPubMed

44.

Cheung WY, Arvinte D, Wong YW, Luk KD, Cheung KM. Neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy—a prospective study. Int Orthop. 2008;32(2):273–8.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Chagas H, Domingues F, Aversa A, Vidal Fonseca AL, de Souza JM. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. Surg Neurol. 2005;64(Suppl 1):S1:30–35.

46.

Acharya S, Srivastava A, Virmani S, Tandon R. Resolution of physical signs and recovery in severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy after cervical laminoplasty. Spine. 2010;35(21):E1083–7.CrossRefPubMed

47.

van Hecke W, Nagels G, Emonds G, Leemans A, Sijbers J, van Goethem J, Parizel PM. A diffusion tensor imaging group study of the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis patients with and without T2 spinal cord lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Maier SE, Mamata H. Diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1064:50–60.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Agosta F, Lagana M, Valsasina P, Sala S, Dall’Occhio L, Sormani MP, Judica E, Filippi M. Evidence for cervical cord tissue disorganisation with aging by diffusion tensor MRI. Neuroimage. 2007;36(3):728–35.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Vedantam A, Jirjis MB, Schmit BD, Wang MC, Ulmer JL, Kurpad SN. Characterization and limitations of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in the cervical spinal cord in neurologically intact subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(4):861–7.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Van Hecke W, Leemans A, Sijbers J, Vandervliet E, Van Goethem J, Parizel PM. A tracking-based diffusion tensor imaging segmentation method for the detection of diffusion-related changes of the cervical spinal cord with aging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(5):978–91.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Tract-Specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Before and After Decompressive Spinal Surgery: Preliminary Results
verfasst von: K. Y. Wang, BS
O. Idowu, MD
C. B. Thompson, MS, MBA
G. Orman, MD
C. Myers, MD
L. H. Riley III, MD
J. A. Carrino, MD, MPH
A. Flammang, MBA
W. Gilson, PhD
C. L. Sadowsky, MD
I. Izbudak, MD
Publikationsdatum: 24.06.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Neuroradiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1869-1439
Elektronische ISSN: 1869-1447
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0418-7

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Tract-Specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Before and After Decompressive Spinal Surgery: Preliminary Results