Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 2/2009

01.02.2009 | Original Research Article

Willingness to Pay for a Treatment for Pain in Multiple Sclerosis

verfasst von: Mr Michael Iskedjian, Olivier Desjardins, Charles Piwko, Basil Bereza, Barbara Jaszewski, Thomas R. Einarson

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 2/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease that affects 240 per 100 000 Canadians. Of these patients, 10–80% (average 70%) experience pain. Sativex® is a cannabis-based drug recently approved for neuropathic pain.
Objectives: In this study, we determine individuals’ preferences between two treatment options as well as the willingness to pay (WTP) for Sativex®, expressed as the amount they would pay in insurance premiums to have access to that treatment.
Methods: The WTP instrument comprised a decision board as a visual aid, and a questionnaire. A decision board helps clinicians standardize the presentation of treatment information. In this study, the decision board described two treatment options: a three-drug combination (gabapentin, amytriptyline, acetaminophen [paracetamol] {i.e. pills}) and the three-drug combination plus Sativex® (i.e. ‘pills and oral spray’). Information on efficacy and adverse effects was taken from trial data; wording was guided by a panel of neurologists and tested for clarity on lay people. The instrument was administered to 500 participants from Canada’s general population using the bidding game approach. Descriptive statistics were calculated.
Results: Mean (SD) age of participants was 39 (13) years, with a female: male distribution of 56: 44. The decision board was presented in both English (85%) and French (15%). Of 500 interviewees, 253 (50.6%) chose the ‘pills and oral spray’. Mean monthly WTP for the insurance premium for those who chose the ‘pills and oral spray’ was $Can8 (SD ± 15, median 4, range 0–200).
Conclusions: Assuming that 51% of the general population are willing to pay additional premiums as reported in this study, the premiums collected would cover the cost of Sativex® for all Canadian MS patients experiencing pain, with a surplus.
Fußnoten
1
The sample size was based on significance and a desired precision level of 5%. The calculation was based on the assumption that equal proportions of participants would select each of the three preference options (i.e. treatment option 1, treatment option 2 and indifferent). Furthermore, we assumed that ≥90% of the data collected would be usable. Therefore, we estimated that the minimum required sample size was 450 participants in total. We ended up collecting data from 500 participants.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruck G, Stadelmann C. Inflammation and degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 2003; 24 Suppl. 5: S265–7CrossRef Bruck G, Stadelmann C. Inflammation and degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 2003; 24 Suppl. 5: S265–7CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck C, Metz L, Svenson L, et al. Regional variation of multiple sclerosis prevalence in Canada. Multiple Sclerosis 2005; 11: 516–9PubMedCrossRef Beck C, Metz L, Svenson L, et al. Regional variation of multiple sclerosis prevalence in Canada. Multiple Sclerosis 2005; 11: 516–9PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Brichetto G, Messmer Uccelli M, Mancardi G, et al. Symptomatic medication use in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 458–60PubMedCrossRef Brichetto G, Messmer Uccelli M, Mancardi G, et al. Symptomatic medication use in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 458–60PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Archibald C, McGrath P, Ritvo P. Pain prevalence, severity and impact in a clinical sample of multiple sclerosis patients. Pain 1994; 58: 89–93PubMedCrossRef Archibald C, McGrath P, Ritvo P. Pain prevalence, severity and impact in a clinical sample of multiple sclerosis patients. Pain 1994; 58: 89–93PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Solaro C, Lunardi G, Mancardi G. Pain and MS. Int MS J 2003; 10 (1): 14–9PubMed Solaro C, Lunardi G, Mancardi G. Pain and MS. Int MS J 2003; 10 (1): 14–9PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Burks J. A review of current medical aspects of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Rehabil 1992; 6: 131–9 Burks J. A review of current medical aspects of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Rehabil 1992; 6: 131–9
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Indaco A, Iachetta C, Nappi C, et al. Chronic and acute pain syndromes in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1994; 16: 97–102 Indaco A, Iachetta C, Nappi C, et al. Chronic and acute pain syndromes in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1994; 16: 97–102
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Moulin D. Pain in central and peripheral demyelinating disorders. Neurol Clin 1998; 16: 889–97PubMedCrossRef Moulin D. Pain in central and peripheral demyelinating disorders. Neurol Clin 1998; 16: 889–97PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Piwko C, Desjardins OB, Bereza BG, et al. Pain due to multiple sclerosis: analysis of the prevalence and economic burden in Canada. Pain Res Manag 2007; 12 (4): 259–65PubMed Piwko C, Desjardins OB, Bereza BG, et al. Pain due to multiple sclerosis: analysis of the prevalence and economic burden in Canada. Pain Res Manag 2007; 12 (4): 259–65PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollman W, Feneberg W, Steinbrecher A, et al. Therapy of pain syndromes in multiple sclerosis: an overview with evidence-based recommendations. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2005; 73: 268–85CrossRef Pollman W, Feneberg W, Steinbrecher A, et al. Therapy of pain syndromes in multiple sclerosis: an overview with evidence-based recommendations. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2005; 73: 268–85CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gafni A. Willingness-to-pay as a measure of benefits: relevant questions in the context of public decision making about health care programmes. Med Care 1991; 29: 1246–52PubMedCrossRef Gafni A. Willingness-to-pay as a measure of benefits: relevant questions in the context of public decision making about health care programmes. Med Care 1991; 29: 1246–52PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien B, Gafni A. When do the ‘dollars’ make sense? Toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Med Dec Mak 1996; 16: 288–302CrossRef O’Brien B, Gafni A. When do the ‘dollars’ make sense? Toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Med Dec Mak 1996; 16: 288–302CrossRef
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gafni A. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) in the context of an economic evaluation of healthcare programs: theory and practice. Am J Manage Care 1997; 3 Suppl. 5: S21–32 Gafni A. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) in the context of an economic evaluation of healthcare programs: theory and practice. Am J Manage Care 1997; 3 Suppl. 5: S21–32
19.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien B, Goeree R, Gafni A, et al. Assessing the value of a new pharmaceutical: a feasibility study of contingent valuation in managed care. Med Care 1998; 36: 370–84PubMedCrossRef O’Brien B, Goeree R, Gafni A, et al. Assessing the value of a new pharmaceutical: a feasibility study of contingent valuation in managed care. Med Care 1998; 36: 370–84PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthews D, Rocchi A, Gafni A. Putting your money where your mouth is: willingness to pay for dental gel. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20 (4): 245–55PubMedCrossRef Matthews D, Rocchi A, Gafni A. Putting your money where your mouth is: willingness to pay for dental gel. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20 (4): 245–55PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine M, Gafni A, Markham B, et al. A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient’s preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Int Med 1992; 117: 53–8PubMed Levine M, Gafni A, Markham B, et al. A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient’s preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Int Med 1992; 117: 53–8PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 292: 435–41PubMedCrossRef Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 292: 435–41PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rog D, Nurmikko T, Friede T, et al. Randomized controlled trial of cannabis based medicine in central pain due to multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2005; 65: 812–9PubMedCrossRef Rog D, Nurmikko T, Friede T, et al. Randomized controlled trial of cannabis based medicine in central pain due to multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2005; 65: 812–9PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles M, Huberman A. Examples of strategies in qualitative inquiry: qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 1994: 27–30 Miles M, Huberman A. Examples of strategies in qualitative inquiry: qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 1994: 27–30
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddart G, et al. Cost-benefit analysis. In: Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al., editors. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York: Oxford University Press Inc, 2005: 203–31 Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddart G, et al. Cost-benefit analysis. In: Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al., editors. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York: Oxford University Press Inc, 2005: 203–31
Metadaten
Titel
Willingness to Pay for a Treatment for Pain in Multiple Sclerosis
verfasst von
Mr Michael Iskedjian
Olivier Desjardins
Charles Piwko
Basil Bereza
Barbara Jaszewski
Thomas R. Einarson
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2009
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200927020-00005

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2009

PharmacoEconomics 2/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Leading Article

Neuropathic Pain