Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Molekulare Medizin ((MOLMED))

  • 1151 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

1.3.8 Literatur

  • Antonarakis SE, McKusick VA (2000) OMIM passes the 1,000-disease-gene mark. Nat Genet 25:11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ACC (1994) Guidelines for Clinical Cytogenetics. The Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists and NEQAS, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berufsverband Medizinische Genetik eV (1997) Leitlinie zur zytogenetischen Labordiagnostik. Med Genet 9:560–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi DW, Simpson JL, Jackson LG et al (2002) Fetal gender and aneuploidy detection using fetal cells in maternal blood: analysis of NIFTY I data. National Institute of Child Health and Development Fetal Cell Isolation Study. Prenat Diagn 22:609–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg BD, Golbus MS, Hanson KH (1975) The psychological sequelae of abortion performed for a genetic indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122:799–808

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton BK, Schulz CJ, Burd LI (1993) Spectrum of limb disruption defects associated with chorionic villus sampling. Pediatrics 91:989–993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Collaborative CVS Amniocentesis Clinical Trial Group (1989) Multicentre randomised clinical trial of chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis. First report. Lancet i:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • CEMAT (Canadian Early and Mid-trimester Amniocentesis Trial) Group (1998) Randomised trial to assess safety and fetal outcome of early and midtrimester amniocentesis. Lancet 351:242–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tietung Hospital, Ansham (1975) Fetal sex prediction by sex chromatin of chorionic villi cells during early pregnancy. Chinese Medical Journal (Peking) 1:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Dequeker E, Cassiman JJ (2000) Genetic testing and quality control in diagnostic laboratories. Nat Genet 25:259–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eiben B, Trawicki W, Hammans W, Goebel R, Pruggmayer M, Epplen JT (1999) Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Evaluation of >3,000 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 14:193–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engel E (1980) A new genetic concept: uniparental disomy and its potential effect, isodisomy. Am J Med Genet 6:137–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans MI, Henry GP, Miller WA et al (1999) International, collaborative assessment of 146,000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specifie probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are used. Hum Reprod 14:1213–1216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Firth HV, Boyd PA, Chamberlain P, MacKenzie IZ, Lindenbaum RH, Huson SM (1991) Severe limb abnormalities after chorion villus sampling at 56–66 days’ gestation. Lancet i:762–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher JC (1986) Ethical issues in clinical trials of first trimester prenatal diagnosis. In: Brambati B, Simoni G (eds) Chorionic villus sampling. Marcel Dekker, Basel, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Froster UG, Jackson L (1996) Limb defects and chorionic villus sampling: results from an international registry, 1992–1994. Lancet 347:489–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs F, Riis R (1956) Antenatal sex determination. Nature 177:330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn S, Sant R, Holzgreve W (1998) Fetal cells in maternal blood: current and future perspectives. Mol Hum Reprod 4:515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Held KR, Eiben B, Miny P (2000) The long-term effect of external quality assessment on Performance in Service cytogenetics. Cytogenet Cell Genet 91:124–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogge WA, Schonberg SA, Golbus MS (1986) Chorionic villus sampling: experience of the first 1000 eases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:1249–1252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Höhn HW (1998) Fluid cell culture. In: Milunsky A (ed) Genetic disorders and the fetus: Diagnosis, prevention, treatment. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 128–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzgreve W, Miny P, Basaran S, Fuhrmann W, Beller FK (1987) Safety of placental biopsy in the second and third trimesters. N Engl J Med 317:1159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holzgreve W, Surbeck D, Hahn S (2003) Pränatale Diagnostik und Therapie — dem Mikrochimärismus auf der Spur. Swiss Med Forum 9:221–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LG, Wapner RA, Barr MA (1986) Safety of chorionic villus sampling. Lancet i: 674

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonatha W, Tettenborn U, Knörr K (1978) Amniozentese. In: Schmidt E, Dudenhausen JW, Saling E (Hrsg) Perinatale Medizin, Vol VII. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalousek DK, Dill FJ (1983) Chromosomal mosaicism confined to the placenta in human conceptions. Science 221:665–667

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalousek DK, Dill FJ, Pantzar T, McGillivray TC, Yong SL, Wilson RD (1987) Confined chorionic mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 77:163–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennerknecht I, Kramer S, Grab D, Terinde R (1993) Evaluation of amniotic fluid cell filtration: an experimental approach to early amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn 13:247–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotzot D (1999) Abnormal phenotypes in uniparental disomy (UPD): fundamental aspects and a critical review with bibliography of UPD other than 15. Am J Med Genet 82:265–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuliev AM, Modell B, Jackson L et al (1993) Risk evaluation of CVS. Prenat Diagn 13:197–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makowski EL, Prem K, Kaiser IH (1956) Detection of sex of fetuses by the incidence of sex chromatin in nuclei of cells in amniotic fluid. Science 124:542–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Milunsky A (1998) Genetic disorders and the fetus: diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Miny P, Heinimann K, Tercanli S, Holzgreve W (2003) Genetische Untersuchungen während der Schwangerschaft. Ther Umsch 60:455–461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miny P, Basaran S, Pawlowitzki IH, Horst J, Westendorp A, Niedner W, Holzgreve W (1989) Validity of cytogenetic analyses from trophoblast tissue throughout gestation. Am J Med Genet 33:136–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MRC Working Party on the Evaluation of Chorion Villus Sampling (1991) Medical Research Council European Trial of chorion villus sampling. Lancet 1:1491–1499

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Navia J, Nebel A, Oehler O, Theile U, Zabel B, Schleiermacher E (1996) microdissection and DOP-PCR-based reverse chromosome painting as a fast and reliable strategy in the analysis of various structural chromosome abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 16:915–922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler HL (1968) Antenatal detection of hereditary disorders. Pediatrics 42:912–918

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaides K, Brizot Mde L, Patel F, Snijders R (1994) Comparison of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping at 10–13 weeks’ gestation. Lancet 344:435–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pindar L, Whitehous M, Ocraft K (1992) A rare case of a false-negative finding in both direct and culture of a chorionic villus sample. Prenat Diagn 12:525–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads GG, Jackson LG, Schlesselmann SE et al (1989) The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. N Engl J Med 320:609–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt W, Jenderny J, Hecher K, Hackeloer BJ, Kerber S, Kochhan L, Held KR (2000) Detection of aneuploidy in chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 by QF-PCR in 662 selected pregnancies at risk. Mol Hum Reprod 6:855–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smidt-Jensen S, Permin M, Philip J, Lundsteen C, Zachary JM, Fowler SE, Grüning K (1992) Randomized comparison of amniocentesis and transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling. Lancet 340:1237–1244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders RJ, Noble P, Sebire N, Souka A, Nicolaides KH (1998) UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group. Lancet 352:343–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn C, Tercanli S, Holzgreve W (2003) Ultraschall in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele MW, Breg WR (1966) Chromosome analysis of human amniotic-fluid cells. Lancet 1:383–385

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg K, Bang J, Smidt-Jensen S et al (1997) Randomised study of risk of fetal loss related to early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling. Lancet 350:697–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg K, Bang J, Brocks V, Jensen FR, Smidt-Jensen S, Philip J (1995) Early sonographically guided amniocenteses with filtration technique: follow-up on 249 procedures. J Ultrasound Med 14:585–590

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabor A, Madsen M, Obel EB, Philip J, Bang J, Norgaard-Petersen B (1986) Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet i:1287–1293

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapner R, Thom E, Simpson JL et al (2003) First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18. N Engl J Med 349:1405–1413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO Working Group (1992) Risk evaluation of CVS. Document EUR/ICP/MCH 123. Copenhagen: Regional Office for Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong XY, Hahn S, Holzgreve W (2001) Prenatal identification of fetal genetic traits. Lancet 357:310–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holzgreve, W., Tercanli, S., Hahn, S., Miny, P. (2005). Pränatale Diagnostik. In: Ganten, D., Ruckpaul, K. (eds) Molekularmedizinische Grundlagen von fetalen und neonatalen Erkrankungen. Molekulare Medizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26524-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics