Skip to main content

Quality Improvement and Neurocritical Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Neurointensive Care

Abstract

In 1998 the Institute of Medicine established the Committee on the Quality of Healthcare in America in response to growing concern over the quality, safety, efficacy, and efficiency of healthcare in the USA. The primary motivation behind this committee was the belief that despite technological and scientific advances, very small gains had been made in quality of care and patient outcome. Quality improvement is the process by which we critically evaluate care provided by a practitioner in the context of the health system in which they work and enact changes in processes that moves us toward the goal of providing care that is patient and family centered, reproducible, safe, and evidence based; where there are no or inadequate data upon which to base care decisions, quality improvement encourages discovery to generate such information. Additionally, the emphasis on quality in medicine is intimately related to cost-effectiveness and cost reduction. There are a number of ICU-specific quality measures being reported to the UHC, CMS, and other reporting agencies. These measures include development of practices to prevent hospital-acquired conditions and have an emphasis on patient safety. In addition to these specific measures, other factors impact quality of care in a modern ICU, including team communication skills and effective information handoff. Communication is a critically important skill in the NeuroICU, linking physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, respiratory therapists, physical and occupational therapists, clerks, pharmacists, dietitians, and most importantly, the patient and their family. We expect the role of quality improvement to grow over the next decade, and it will make a significant impact on how we practice medicine in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stelfox HT, Palmisani S, Scurlock C, Orav EJ, Bates DW. The “To Err is Human” report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:174–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Longo DR, Hewett JE, Ge B, Schubert S. The long road to patient safety. JAMA. 2005;294:2858–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Institute of Medicine. About the IOM; 2011. http://www.iom.edu/About-IOM.aspx. Accessed 16 July 2013.

  6. AHRQ. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Mission and Budget; 2011. http://www.ahrq.gov/about/mission/index.html. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  7. AHRQ. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ quality indicators: patient safety indicators; 2010. http://www.ahrq.gov/health-care-information/topics/topic-patient-safety-indicators.html. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  8. NQF. National Quality Forum; 2011. http://www.qualityforum.org/Home.aspx. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  9. UHC. University HealthSystem Consortium; 2011. https://www.uhc.edu. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  10. AHRQ. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Your guide to choosing quality healthcare; 2010. http://www.ahrq.gov/index.html. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  11. Jha AK. Measuring hospital quality: what physicians do? How patients fare? Or both? JAMA. 2006;296:95–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. DesHarnais SI, Chesney JD, Wroblewski RT, Fleming ST, McMahon Jr LF. The risk-adjusted mortality index: a new measure of hospital performance. Med Care. 1988;26:1129–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klugman R, Allen L, Benjamin EM, Fitzgerald J, Ettinger W. Mortality rates as a measure of quality and safety, “caveat emptor”. Am J Med Qual. 2010;25:197–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pronovost PJ, Marsteller JA, Goeschel CA. Preventing bloodstream infections: a measurable national success story in quality improvement. Health Aff. 2011;30:628–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. CMS. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. Physician Quality Reporting System; 2011. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/PQRS/index.html?redirect=/PQRS/. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  16. Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Normand SL, Frank RG, Epstein AM. Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1895–902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Khanduja K, Scales DC, Adhikari NK. Pay for performance in the intensive care unit – opportunity or threat? Crit Care Med. 2009;37:852–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Krimsky WS, Mroz IB, McIlwaine JK, Surgenor SD, Christian D, Corwin HL, Houston D, Robison C, Malayaman N. A model for increasing patient safety in the intensive care unit: Increasing the implementation rates of proven safety measures. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:74–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Titsworth W, Hester J, Correia T, Reed R, Williams M, Guin P, Layon A, Archibald L, Mocco J. Reduction of catheter associated urinary tract infections among neurosurgical intensive care unit patients: a single institution’s success. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(4):911–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scheunemann LP, McDevitt M, Carson SS, Hanson LC. Randomized, controlled trials of interventions to improve communication in intensive care. Chest. 2011;139:543–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB. The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:493–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lyons MN, Standley TDA, Gupta AK. Quality improvement of doctors’ shift-change handover in neuro-critical care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. AHRQ. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ quality indicators: guide to patient safety indicators; 2007. http://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Downloads/Modules/PSI/V43/Composite_User_Technical_Specification_PSI_4.3.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. Mocco MD, MS, FAANS, FAHA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawson, M.F., Enneking, F.K., Mocco, J.D. (2013). Quality Improvement and Neurocritical Care. In: Layon, A., Gabrielli, A., Friedman, W. (eds) Textbook of Neurointensive Care. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5226-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5226-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5225-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5226-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics