Skip to main content

Cultural Motives of Plant Management and Domestication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethnobotany of Mexico

Abstract

We analysed the diversity of forms in which human communities of the Tehuacan Valley manage their plant resource, as well as the motivations and factors influencing how such management forms are and how intensely held. We explored and identified ecological, sociocultural, economic and technological factors that influence how the management forms and their intensity are, as well as the causal relationships between these factors and management decisions. Particularly, the factors mentioned were analysed in the context of scarcity and uncertainty in the availability of edible plant resources, as well as individual and collective responses that implement human beings to ensure their use. It was analysed with particular depth how people perceive uncertainty in availability of edible resources and the various ways in which they face it, how they build their decisions and develop techniques to mitigate the effects of such uncertainty. Most management forms involve artificial selection at different intensity levels. We characterized the type and intensity of management based on the following indicators: (1) complexity of the practices involved, (2) occurrence of artificial selection, (3) strategies, techniques and collective social regulations implemented in management, (4) energy invested in terms of labor, fossil energy and (5) amount of resources obtained per area unit. We found that the lowest values of management intensity corresponded to species under simple gathering or tolerance, mostly annual abundant plants occasionally consumed by few people. In contrast, the highest levels of management intensity were recorded in species with economic importance, mostly perennial with recognized variants whose management requires using tools, and which are protected by collective regulations. Nearly 67.6 % of variation of the management intensity was explained by risk variables, such as length-span of life cycle, reproductive system type, distribution, number of plant parts used, number of management forms and using regulations. Thus, people make decisions at individual or community levels involving strategies for controlling ecological and/or cultural factors in order to decrease uncertainty. Understanding current management processes seeks a better understanding of the history that led to the management and domestication of nature. It aims at providing more arguments for interpretations of archaeological data about the origin of management, domestication and agriculture. But also, it aims at contributing to the design and construction of future sustainable management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MacNeish RS. A summary of the subsistence. In: Byers DS, editor. The prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, Environment and subsistence, vol. 1. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MacNeish RS. The origins of agriculture and settled life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flannery KV, editor. Guilá Naquitz. New York: Academic; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barker G. The agricultural revolution in prehistory: why did foragers become farmers? New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith EC. Plant remains. In: Byers DS, editor. The prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, Environment and subsistence, vol. 1. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flannery KV. Origins and ecological effects of early domestication in Iran and the Near East. In: Ucko PJ, Dimbleby GW, editors. The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. Chicago: Aldine-Allerton; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris DR, Hillman GC, editors. Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploitation. London: Unwin Hyman; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harlan JR. Crops and man. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hillman GC. Late Pleistocene changes in wild plant-foods available to hunter-gatherers of the northern Fertile Crescent: possible preludes to cereal cultivation. In: Harris DR, editor. The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Casas A, Caballero J, Mapes C, Zárate S. Manejo de la vegetación, domesticación de plantas y origen de la agricultura en Mesoamérica. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México. 1997;61:31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Childe G. Man makes himself. London: Pitman; 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Braidwood R. Prehistoric men, Fieldiana, Popular Series, Anthropology, vol. 37. Chicago: Chicago Natural History Musem Press; 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alcorn JB. El te’lom huasteco: presente, pasado y futuro de un sistema de silvicultura indígena. Biótica. 1983;8(3):315–31.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ford R. Prehistoric food production in North America. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bye RA. The role of humans in the diversification of plants in Mexico. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J, editors. Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hildebrand EA. Motives and opportunities for domestication: an ethnoarchaeological study in southwest Ethiopia. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2003;22:358–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Blancas J, Casas A, Pérez-Salicrup D, Caballero J, Vega E. Ecological and socio-cultural factors influencing plant management in Náhuatl communities of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgs ES, Jarman MR. The origins of animal and plant husbandry. In: Higgs ES, editor. Papers in economic prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rindos D. The origins of agriculture: an evolutionary perspective. Orlando: Academic; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harris DR, editor. The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia. London: University College of London Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Casas A, Vázquez C, Viveros JL, Caballero J. Plant management among the Nahua and the Mixtec in the Balsas River Basin, México: an ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Hum Ecol. 1996;24(4):455–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Casas A, Otero-Arnaiz A, Pérez-Negrón E, Valiente-Banuet A. In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Ann Bot. 2007;100:1101–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zizumbo D, Colunga P. Los Huaves, la apropiación de los recursos naturales. Texcoco: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Caballero J. La dimension culturelle de la diversité vegetalle au Mexique. Journal D’Agriculture Traditionalle et de Botanique Apliquee, nouvelle seérie. 1994;36:145–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Blancas J, Casas A, Rangel-Landa S, Moreno-Calles A, Torres I, Pérez-Negrón E, Solís L, Delgado-Lemus A, Parra F, Arellanes Y, Caballero J, Cortés L, Lira R, Dávila P. Plant management in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley Mexico. Econ Bot. 2010;64(4):287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Camou-Guerrero A, Reyes-García V, Martínez-Ramos M, Casas A. Knowledge and use value of plant species in a Rarámuri community: A gender perspective for conservation. Hum Ecol. 2008;36:259–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bye RA. Incipient domestication of mustards in northwest Mexico. Kiva. 1979;44(2–3):237–56.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vargas-Ponce O. Diversity and structure of landraces of Agave grown for spirits under traditional agriculture: a comparison with wild populations of A. angustifolia (Agavaceae) and commercial plantations of A. tequilana. Am J Bot. 2009;96(2):448–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. González-Insuasti MS, Caballero J. Managing plant resources: how intensive can it be? Hum Ecol. 2007;35:303–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Casas A, Rangel S, Torres I, Pérez-Negrón E, Solís L, Parra F, Delgado A, Blancas J, Farfán B, Moreno A. In situ management and conservation of plant resources in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico: an ethnobotanical and ecological approach. In: De Albuquerque UP, Ramos M, editors. Current topics in ethnobotany. Kerala: Research Signpost; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  31. González-Insuasti MS, Martorell C, Caballero J. Factors that influence the intensity of non-agricultural management of plant resources. Agroforest Syst. 2008;74:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Altieri MA, Koohafkan P. Globally important ingenious agricultural heritage systems (GIAHS): extent, significance, and implications for development, GIAHS Second international workshop and steering committee meeting. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization: 7–9 June 2004. Rome: UN-FAO; 2004:1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hassan FA. Determination of the size, density, and growth rate of hunting-gathering populations. In: Polgar S, editor. Population, ecology and social evolution. The Hague: Mouton; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Valiente-Banuet A, Casas A, Alcántara A, Dávila P, Flores N, Arizmendi MC, Villaseñor JL, Ortega J. La vegetación del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México. 2000;67:24–74.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dávila P, Arizmendi MC, Valiente-Banuet A, Villaseñor JL, Casas A, Lira R. Biological diversity in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv. 2002;11:421–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Casas A, Valiente-Banuet A, Viveros JL, Caballero J, Cortés L, Dávila P, Lira R, Rodríguez I. Plant resources of the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2001;55:129–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lira R, Casas A, Rosas-López R, Paredes-Flores M, Pérez-Negrón E, Rangel-Landa S, Solís L, Torres I, Dávila P. Traditional knowledge and useful plant richness in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2009;63(3):271–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Turner NJ. “The Importance of a rose”: evaluating the cultural significance of plants in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish. Am Anthropol. 1988;90:272–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pieroni A. Evaluation of the cultural significance of wild food botanicals traditionally consumed in northwestern Tuscany, Italy. J Ethnobiol. 2001;21(1):89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  40. García-Frapolli E, Toledo VM, Martinez-Alier J. Apropiación de la naturaleza por una comunidad maya yucateca: un análisis económico-ecológico. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica. 2008;7:27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tardío J, Pardo-de-Santayana M. Cultural importance indices: a comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of southern Cantabria (northern Spain). Econ Bot. 2008;62(1):24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the financial support by DGAPA, UNAM (projects IN205111-3 and IN209214), and the CONACYT (projects CB-2008-01-103551 and CB-2013-01-221800), Mexico. We also thank Edgar Pérez Negrón, Heberto Ferreira and Alberto Valencia for field assistance and computer work. We especially thank the kindness and generosity of the peoples of the regions we have worked and that have shared their valuable knowledge and have permitted our work in their land.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Blancas Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blancas, J., Casas, A., Moreno-Calles, A.I., Caballero, J. (2016). Cultural Motives of Plant Management and Domestication. In: Lira, R., Casas, A., Blancas, J. (eds) Ethnobotany of Mexico. Ethnobiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6669-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics