Abstract
In 2001, the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) was approved for use in urology (www.fda.gov) and the technological improvements have translated to a paradigm shift, especially in the field of urologic oncology. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has quickly become the minimally invasive surgical procedure of choice at most centers of excellence and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy (RALPN/RALN) and cystectomy (RALC) are also increasing in numbers. The impetus for the robotic approach to surgical management is based on a combined need for minimally invasive treatment with optimal surgical outcomes. Historically, conventional laparoscopy has been at the forefront of minimally invasive surgical technique and the fundamental principles of robotic surgery are founded upon those used in laparoscopic surgery. However, the advanced technology utilized in robotics has required modifications of these techniques to capitalize on the enhanced capabilities of robotic surgery. Whereas laparoscopic surgery is limited by counterintuitive movement, 2D visualization, and a decreased range of motion, robotic surgery offers 3D visualization, seven degrees of freedom, and is a natural reflection of the surgeon’s movement. Robotic surgery therefore offers enhanced capabilities for visualization, surgical dexterity, and exposure to the surgical field but these are ultimately dependent on the proper placement of the ports used for access. This chapter will provide a comprehensive overview of the standard techniques for access and port placement in a number of major robotic urologic procedures focusing on the nuances of prostate, renal, bladder, and female robotic urologic surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gomella L, Pietrow P, Albala D. Basic laparoscopy. In: Graham S, Glenn J, Keane T, eds. Glenn’s Urological Surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2004:113.
Ahmad G, Duffy J, Phillips K, et al. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;16(2):CD006583.
Collins S, Lehman D, McDougall E, et al. AUA Handbook of Laparoscopic and Robotic Fundamentals. 1st ed. Linthicum, MD: American Urological Association; 2007.
Mikhail A, Stockton B, Orvieto M, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients. Urology. 2006;67:774–779.
Hemal A. Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy in the management of bladder cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2009;10:45–54.
Menon M, Hemal A, Tewari A. Robotic assisted radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in female patients: technique with preservation of the uterus and vagina. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:386–393.
Beecken W, Wolfram M, Engl T, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol. 2003;44:337–339.
Benway B, Wang A, Cabello J, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009;55:592–599.
Rogers C, Singh A, Blatt A, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol. 2008;53:514–523.
Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R, et al. da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2007;51:186–192.
Badani K, Hemal A, Fumo M, et al. Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study. World J Urol. 2006;24:198–201.
Mufarrij P, Woods M, Shah O, et al. Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J Urol. 2008;180:1391–1396.
Reddy K, Malik TG. Short-term and long-term follow-up of abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: initial experience in a district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;22:532–536.
Benson J, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;176:1418–1421.
Ostrzenski A. Laparoscopic colposuspension for total vaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996;55:147–152.
Akl M, Long J, Giles D, et al. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2009;21:2390–2394.
Elliott D, Krambeck A, Chow G. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol. 2006;176:655–659.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ritch, C.R., Badani, K.K. (2011). Port Placement in Robotic Urologic Surgery. In: Hemal, A., Menon, M. (eds) Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-114-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-114-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-113-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-114-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)