Skip to main content

Common Therapeutic Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Psychotherapeutic Stance
  • 649 Accesses

Abstract

The dynamic-relational model of therapy is based on the so-called common therapeutic factors in combination with the modern psychoanalytic and psychodynamic understanding of therapy. A distinction is often drawn between specific and common efficacy factors or mechanisms of change in psychotherapy. When working psychotherapeutically, it is helpful to be aware of certain common factors, factors that may form part of the foundation for the psychotherapeutic stance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, F. (1956). Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: Developments in theory, technique, and training. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F., & French, T. M. (1946). Psychoanalytic therapy: Principles and application. New York, NY: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, E., & Fonagy, P. (2016). When is truth relevant? Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 85, 275–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2016). Mentalization-based treatment for personality disorders: A practical guide. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E. C., Marcus, D. K., & Goodlad, J. K. (2013). Are the parts as good as the whole? A meta-analysis of component treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(4), 722–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuijpers, P., Driessen, E., Hollon, S. D., Oppen, P., Barth, J., & Andersson, G. (2012). The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 280–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., & Allison, E. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51, 372–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, C. R. (2004). Active ingredients in individual psychotherapy: Searching for common factors. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21(4), 516–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, C. R. (2009). Personlighedsforstyrrelser. Moderne relationel forståelse og behandling af borderlinelidelse [Personality disorders. Modern relational understanding and treatment of borderline disorder] (2nd ed.). Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2009). Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2014). Common factors: Post hoc explanation or empirically based therapy approach? Psychotherapy, 51, 500–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, K. M., & Wampold, B. E. (2014). Ten things to remember about common factor theory. Psychotherapy, 51, 519–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melcher, I. (2013). Franz Alexander und die moderne Psychotherapie. Gießen. Germany: Psychosozial-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. D., Hubble, M. A., Chow, D. L., & Seidel, J. A. (2013). The outcome of psychotherapy: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Psychotherapy, 50, 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muran, J. C., & Barber, J. P. (Eds.). (2010). The therapeutic alliance: An evidence-based guide to practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacht, S. (1962). The curative factors in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 43, 206–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C., & Lambert, M. J. (2011). Evidence-based psychotherapy relationships. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (2nd ed., pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfammatter, M., & Tschacher, W. (2012). Wirkfaktoren der Psychotherapie – eine Übersicht und Standortsbestimmung [Efficacy factors of psychotherapy—An overview]. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 60, 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfammatter, M., Junghan, U. M., & Tschacher, W. (2012). Allgemeine Wirkfaktoren der Psychotherapie: Konzepte, Widersprüche und eine Synthese [General efficacy factors of psychotherapy: Concepts, contradictions and a synthesis]. Psychotherapie in Psychiatrie, Psychotherapeustischer Medizin, 17, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflichthofer, D. (2012). Spielregeln der Psychoanalyse [Ground rules of psychoanalysis]. Gießen, Germany: Psychosozial-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, V. H. (1979). Psychoanalytische Haltung und Technik als Formen zwischenmenschlichen Umgangs [Psychoanalytic stance and technique and forms of interpersonal interactions]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse, 25, 34–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., et al. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The something more than interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 903–921.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Symington, J., & Symington, N. (1996). The clinical thinking of Wilfred Bion. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treurniet, N. (1997). On an ethic of psychoanalytic technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 66, 596–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschacher, W., Junghan, U. M., & Pfammatter, M. (2014). Towards a taxonomy of common factors in psychotherapy—Results of an expert survey. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 21, 82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z.-E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jørgensen, C. (2019). Common Therapeutic Factors. In: The Psychotherapeutic Stance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20437-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics