Skip to main content

The Basis of the Psychotherapeutic Stance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Psychotherapeutic Stance
  • 588 Accesses

Abstract

The effort to define the concept of the psychotherapeutic stance can be said to be about discerning the core of psychotherapeutic work. The psychotherapeutic stance has received remarkably little attention and remains largely unspecified in the contemporary therapy literature, which more or less presupposes the existence of a tacit consensus on what it means to adopt a psychotherapeutic stance or position or that the specific implications of the concept are somehow self-explanatory within a given treatment theory and method, which is far from the case. This chapter offers a brief outline of some of the main elements of what could be called a dynamic-relational understanding of pathology and psychotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2016). Mentalization-based treatment for personality disorders: A practical guide. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S. J. (2008). Polarities of experience: Relatedness and self-definition in personality development, psychopathology, and the therapeutic process. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom-Feshbach, J., & Bloom-Feshbach, S. (1996). The related-autonomous position: Psychological freedom, mourning, and the psychoanalytic stance. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 13, 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohleber, W. (2012). Was Psychoanalyse heute leistet [What psychoanalysis does today]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment. London, England: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druck, A. B. (1994). Multiple models and the psychoanalytic stance. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 14, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1985). The clinical diary of Sandor Ferenczi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S., & Rank, O. (1924). Entwicklungsziele der Psychoanalyse [The developmental aims of psychoanalysis]. Vienna, Austria: Turia + Kant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York, NY: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1955). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18, pp. 65–144). London, England: Hogarth (Original work published 1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1957). Instincts and their vicissitudes. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 109–140). London, England: Hogarth (Original work published 1915).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2013). Personalisierte Psychiatrie? Eine Kritik und Gegendarstellung [Personalized psychiatry? A critique and counterstatement]. In M. Heinze, J. E. Schlimme, & C. Kupke (Eds.), Personalisierte Psychiatrie. Zur Kritik eines Konzepts: BerlIn Parodos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard, G. O. (2014). Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge & human interests. Cambridge, England and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, P. (2011). Über die zukünftige Rolle der Psychopathologie: Grundlagen- oder Hilfswissenschaft? [The future role of psychopathology: Basic or ancillary science?] In T. Fuchs, K. Vogely, & M. Heinze (Eds.), Subjektivität und Gehirn (pp. 195–211). Berlin, Germany: Parados Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1939). New ways in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K. (1942). Allgemeine psychopathologie [General psychopathology] (4th ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, C. R. (1999). Den interpersonelle psykoanalyse. Nordisk Psykologi, 51, 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, C. R. (2008). Identitet. Psykologiske og kulturanalytiske perspektiver [Identity. Psychological and culture analysis perspectives]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, C. R. (2009). Personlighedsforstyrrelser. Moderne relationel forståelse og behandling af borderlinelidelse [Personality disorders. Modern relational understanding and treatment of borderline disorder] (2nd ed.). Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, C. R. (2014). ADHD. Bidrag til en kritisk psykologisk forståelse [ADHD. Contributions to a critical psychological understanding]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenelson, B. (2010). Holdning [Stance/attitude]. In Den Store Danske Encyklopædi. Retrieved from www.denstoredanske.dk.

  • Köhler-Weisker, A. (1986). Zum Begriff der Haltung des Psychoanalytikers am Beispiel einer Fokaltherapie [On the concept of the psychotherapist’s stance as an example of focal therapy]. Jahrbuch der Psychoanalyse, 18, 143–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchenhoff, J. (2001). Störungsspezifität und psychoanalytische Psychotherapie – ein Widerspruch? [Disorder specificity and psychoanalytic psychotherapy—a contradiction?] Psychotherapie. Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 51, 418–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchenhoff, J. (2013). Der Sinn im Nein und die Gabe des Gesprächs. Psychoanalytisches Verstehen zwischen Philosophie und Klinik [The meaning of no and the gift of conversation. Psychoanalytic understanding between philosophy and clinic]. Weilerswist. Germany: Velbrück Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchenhoff, J., & Warsitz, R.-P. (2017). Labyrinthe des Ohres. Vom therapeutischen Sinn des Zuhörens bei psychotischen und anderen Erfahrungen [The labyrinth of the ear. Of the therapeutic meaning of listening in relation to psychotic and other experiences]. Gießen. Germany: Psychosozial-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchenhoff, J., Prause, K., & Schulz, G. (2017). Engagement und Respekt. Psychotherapeutische Haltung und Bezieungsarbeit in der Psychotherapie mit psychotisch erlebenden Menschen [Commitment and respect: Psychotherapeutic attitude and work on analyst-patient relationships in psychotherapy for individuals with psychotic experience]. Psyche, 71, 60–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutter, P. (1988). Grundhaltung, professionelle Einstellungen und psychoanalytische Methode. In P. Kutter, R. Paramo-Ortega, & P. Zagermann (Eds.), Die psychoanalytische Haltung (pp. 17–29). Munich, Germany: Verlag Internationale Psychoanalyse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutter, P. (2003). Psychoanalytische Haltung – Klein, Bion und Selbstpsychologie – Basiskonflikt, Laios und Iokaste [Psychoanalytic Stance—Klein, Bion and self-psychology—basic conflict, Laius and Jocasta]. Zeitschrift für Individualpsychologie, 23, 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1990). Contemporary political philosophy. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H. (1995). Time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: A guide to clinical practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löchel, E. (2013). Ringen um psychoanalytische Haltung [Achieving the analytic attitude]. Psyche, 67, 1167–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzos, S. (2009). Lehrbuch der Psychodynamik. Die Funktion der Dysfunktionalität psychischer Störungen [Handbook of psychodynamics. The function of dysfunctionality of psychological disorders]. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, W. (2004). Einführung in die psychoanalytische Therapie. Bd.2 [Introduction to psychoanalytic therapy. Vol. 2]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, W. (2015). Psychoanalytische Behandlungstechnik. Konzepte und Themen psychoanalytisch begründeter Behandlungsverfahren [Psychoanalytic treatment technique. Concepts and themes of psychoanalytically motivated treatment methods]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. (2012). Conundrums: A critique of contemporary psychoanalysis. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nida-Rümelin, J. (2013). Philosophie einer humanen Bildung [The philosophy of a humane education]. Hamburg, Germany: Edition Körber-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. H., & Gabbard, G. O. (2010). The lure of the symptom in psychoanalytic treatment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 58, 533–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. (1983). The analytic attitude. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teising, M. (2014). Überlegungen zur Krankheitslehre der Psychoanalyse – heute [Some thoughts on pathology in psychoanalysis—today]. Jahrbuch der Psychoanalyse, 69, 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, R. S. (1995). The talking cures: The psychoanalyses and the psychotherapies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwiebel, R. (2007). Von der Angst Psychoanalytiker zu sein [On the fear of being a psychoanalyst]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jørgensen, C. (2019). The Basis of the Psychotherapeutic Stance. In: The Psychotherapeutic Stance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20437-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics