Skip to main content

The Influence of the Environment on Natural Resource Use: Evidence of Apparency

  • Chapter
Evolutionary Ethnobiology

Abstract

This chapter evaluates the mechanisms by which certain characteristics of a specific natural resource (particularly a plant), such as its environmental availability or chemical composition, can affect its local use. An evaluation of the factors that influence people’s decision to select and try a natural resource and, possibly, incorporate it in their social-ecological systems is the main guiding issue for this chapter. To address this issue, we explore the assumptions of the ecological apparency hypothesis (EAH), the optimal foraging theory (OFT) and the resource availability hypothesis (RAH). EAH, OFT and RAH were first introduced in classic ecological research but were subsequently adapted to the fields of human ecology and ethnobiology. We also discuss how these ideas can complement one another to explain people’s choices for plant resource use and management. Finally, we bring some evidence from the available literature in favor or against these assumptions, especially to what concerns the EAH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We hereby adopt the concept of Berkes and Folke (1998:4). Thus, “the term ecological system (ecosystem) is used in the conventional ecological sense to refer to the natural environment. We hold the view that social and ecological systems are in fact linked, and that the delineation between social and natural systems is artificial and arbitrary. Such views, however, are not yet accepted in conventional ecology and social science. When we wish to emphasize the integrated concept of humans-in-nature, we use the terms social-ecological system and social-ecological linkages.”

  2. 2.

    The use value (UV) for a given plant is the simple ratio of the number of uses cited divided by that reported by people. We recommend Medeiros M et al. (2011) to access the different measures of the relative importance of a resource that have been designed by ethnobotanists over the last 20 years, as well as the variations that have been proposed for calculating the UV.

References

  • Albuquerque UP (2006) Re-examining hypotheses concerning the use and knowledge of medicinal plants: a study in the Caatinga vegetation of NE Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2(30):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque UP (2010) Implications of ethnobotanical studies on bioprospecting strategies of new drugs in semi-arid regions. Open Complement Med J 2:21–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Almeida ALS et al (2007) Medicinal plants of the Caatinga (semi-arid) vegetation of NE Brazil: a quantitative approach. J Ethnopharmacol 114:325–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque UP,Ramos MA,Melo JG (2012) New strategies for drug discovery in tropical forests based on ethnobotanical and chemical ecological studies, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 140(1):197–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Alencar NL, Araújo TAS, Amorim ELC, Albuquerque UP (2009) Can the apparency hypothesis explain the selection of medicinal plants in an area of Caatinga vegetation? A chemical perspective. Acta Bot Bras 23:910–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alencar NL, Araújo TAS, Amorim ELC, Albuquerque UP (2010) The inclusion and selection of medicinal plants in traditional pharmacopoeias – evidence in support of the diversification hypothesis. Econ Bot 64:68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida CFCBR, Silva TCL, Amorim ELC, Maia MBS, Albuquerque UP (2005) Life strategy and chemical composition as predictors of the selection of medicinal plants from the Caatinga (Northeast Brazil). J Arid Environ 62:127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida CFCBR, Amorim ELC, Albuquerque UP (2011) Insights into the search for new drugs from traditional knowledge: an ethnobotanical and chemical-ecological perspective. Pharm Biol 49:864–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo TAS, Alencar NL, Amorim ELC, Albuquerque UP (2008) A new approach to study medicinal plants with tannins and flavonoids contents from the local knowledge. J Ethnopharmacol 120:72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In: Berkes F, Folke C (eds) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Heller MV, Aizprua R et al (2003) Using ecological criteria to design plant collection strategies for drug discovery. Front Ecol Environ 1:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowden CC (2012) Game theory, evolutionary stable strategies and the evolution of biological interactions. Nat Educ Knowled 3(10):6

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha LVFC, Albuquerque UP (2006) Quantitative ethnobotany in an Atlantic Forest fragment of Northeastern Brazil- implication to conservation. Environ Monit Assess 114:1–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahdouh-guebas F, Mathenge C, Kairo JG, Koedam N (2000) Utilization of mangrove wood products around Mida Creek (Kenya) amongst subsistence and commercial users. Econ Bot 54:513–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson JR, Cates RG (2004) Screening for anticancer agents from Sonoran desert plants: a chemical ecological approach. Pharm Biol 42:478–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endara MJ, Coley PD (2011) The resource availability hypothesis revisited: a meta-analysis. Funct Ecol 25:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeny PP (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. In: Wallace JW, Mansell RL (eds) Recent Advances in Phytochemistry. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira Júnior WS, Ladio AH, Albuquerque UP (2011) Resilience and adaptation in the use of medicinal plants with suspected anti-inflammatory activity in the Brazilian Northeast. J Ethnopharmacol 138:238–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeano G (2000) Forest use at the Pacific Coast of Chocó, Colômbia: a quantitative approach. Econ Bot 54:358–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence A, Phillips OL, Reategui A, Lopez M, Rose S, Wood D (2005) Local values for harvested forest plants in Madre de Dios, Peru: towards a more contextualized interpretation of quantitative ethnobotanical data. Biodivers Conserv 14:45–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linstädter A, Kemmerling B, Baumman G, Kirscht H (2013) The importance of being reliable – Local ecological knowledge and management of forage plants in a dryland pastoral system (Morocco). J Arid Environ 95:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena RFP, Araújo EL, Albuquerque UP (2007) Does the local availability of woody caatinga plants (Northeastern Brazil) explain their use value? Econ Bot 61:347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena RFP, Medeiros PM, Araújo EL, Alves AGC, Albuquerque UP (2012) The ecological apparency hypothesis and the importance of useful plants in rural communities from Northeastern Brazil: An assessment based on use value. J Environ Manage 96:106–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado B, Caballero J, Delgado-Salinas A, Lira R (2013) Relationship between use value and ecological importance of floristic resources of seasonally dry tropical forest in the Balsas River Basin, México. Econ Bot 67(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marufu L, Ludwing J, Andreae MO, Meixner FX (1997) Domestic biomass burning in rural and urban Zimbabwe - Part A. Biomass Bioenerg 12:53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros MFT, Silva OS, Albuquerque UP (2011) Quantification in ethnobotanical research: an overview of indices used from 1995 to 2009. Sitientibus Sér Ci Biol 11(2):211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros PM, Almeida ALS, Silva TC, Albuquerque UP (2011) Pressure indicators of wood resource use in an Atlantic forest area, northeastern Brazil. Environ Manage 47:410–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros PM, Almeida ALS, Silva TC, Albuquerque UP (2012) Socioeconomic predictors of domestic wood use in an Atlantic forest area (northeastern Brazil): a tool toward conservation efforts. Int J Sust Dev World 19:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro JM, Albuquerque UP, Lins Neto EMF, Araújo EL, Amorim ELC (2006a) Use patterns and knowledge of medicinal species among to rural communities in Brazil is semi-arid northeastern region. J Ethnopharmacol 105:173–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro JM, Lins Neto EMF, Albuquerque UP, Araújo EL, Amorim ELC (2006b) The effects of seasonal climate changes in the Caatinga on tannin levels in Myracrodruon urundeuva and Anadenanthera colubrina. Rev Bras Farmacogn 16:338–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips O (1996) Some quantitative methods for analyzing ethnobotanical knowledge. In: Alexiades MN (ed) Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: a field manual. New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp 171–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips O, Gentry AH (1993a) The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypothesis tests with a new quantitative technique. Econ Bot 47:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips O, Gentry AH (1993b) The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Econ Bot 47:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldati GT, Albququerque UP (2012) Ethnobotany in intermedical spaces: the case of the Fulni-ô Indians (Northeastern Brazil). J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. doi:10.1155/2012/648469

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepp JR (2004) The role of weeds as sources of pharmaceuticals. J Ethnopharmacol 92:163–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stepp JR, Moerman DE (2001) The importance of weeds in ethnopharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol 75:19–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Top N (2004) Variation in woodfuel consumption patterns in response to forest availability in Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia. Biomass Bioenerg 27:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre-Cuadros MA, Isbele GA (2003) Traditional ecological knowledge and use of vegetation in southeastern Mexico: a case study from Solferino, Quintana Roo. Biodivers Conserv 12:2455–2476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voeks RA (1996) Tropical forest healers and habitat preference. Econ Bot 50:381–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the Pernambuco State Foundation for Science and Technology (FACEPE - APQ - 1264-2.05/10) and the National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq - Proc. 471989/2012-6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albuquerque, U.P. et al. (2015). The Influence of the Environment on Natural Resource Use: Evidence of Apparency. In: Albuquerque, U., De Medeiros, P., Casas, A. (eds) Evolutionary Ethnobiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19917-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics