Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revision

  • Chapter
LCS® Mobile Bearing Knee Arthroplasty

  • 230 Accesses

Abstract

Revision knee replacement surgery requires a thorough knowledge of normal and pathologic anatomy, especially when mechanical implant failure is accompanied by bone and soft tissue loss. The bone defect classification of Engh [8] is useful to quantitate the extent of bony and soft tissue pathology in the tibia and femur (Fig. 1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buechel FF (1990) A sequential three step lateral release for correcting fixed valgus knee deformities during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 260: 170–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buechel FF (1991) Cemented and cementless revision arthroplasty using rotating-platform total knee implants: A 12-year experience. Orthop Review 71–75

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buechel FF (1991) Patellar tendon bone grafting for patellectomized patients having total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 271: 72–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buechel FF (1997) Rebar screws: an inexpensive alternative in revision TKA. Presented at the 13 Annual Current Concepts in Joint Replacement Meeting. Orlando, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buechel FF (1998) Mobile-bearing joint replacement options in post-traumatic arthritis of the knee. Orthopedics 21 (9): 1027–1031.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buechel FF (2001) Recurrent LCS rotating platform dislocation in revision TKR: mechanism, management and report of two cases. Orthopaedics (In Press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ, D’Alessio J (2001) Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop 388: 41–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Engh GA (1997) Bone defect classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Williams and Wilkins,Md,pp 63–120.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Insall JW (1984) Surgical approaches to the knee. In: Insall JN (ed). Surgery of the knee. Churchill Livingston, New York, pp 4–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zimlich RN, Fulbright BM, Freidman RJ (1996) Current status of anticoagulation therapy after total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surgeons. 4: 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barrack RL, Rorabeck C, Burt M, Sawhney J (1999) Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty. CORR 367: 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrack LR, Lyons TR, Ingraham RQ, Johnson JC (2000) The use of a modular rotating-hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthropl 7: 858–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley GW (2000) Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting. CORR 371: 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Channer MA, Glisson RR, SeaberAV, Vail TP (1996) Use of bone compaction in total knee arthroplasty.] Arthropl 6: 743–749.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clatworthy MG, Ballance J, Brick GW, Chandler HP, Gross AE (2001) The use of structural allograft for uncontaint defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. JBJS 83-A 3: 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Engh GA (1997) Bone defect classification, In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revison total knee arthroplasty. Williams & Wilkins, t, pp 63–120.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ewald F (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. CORR 248: 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fitzek JG, Barden B (2000) Rekonstruktionsmöglichkeiten nach Fehlschlägen in der Knieendoprothetik. In: Imhoff AB (Hrsg) Fortbildung Orthopädie, Bd 3. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, S 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoeffel DP, Rubash HE (2000) Revision total knee arthroplasty. CORR 380: 116–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Inglis AE, Walker PS (1991) Revision of failed knee replacements using fixed-axis hinges. JBJS 73 B: 757–761.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Insall J, Dorr L, Scott R, Scott N (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. CORR 248: 13–14

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jones RE, Skedros JG, Chan AJ, Beauchamp DH, Harkins PC (2001) Total knee arthroplasty using the s-rom mobile- bearing hinge prosthesis. J Arthropl 3: 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim YH (1967) Salvage of failed hinge knee arthroplasty with a total condylar iii type prosthesis, CORR 221: 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kirk PG (1997) Selecting an implant: a comparison of revision implant systems. In: Engh GA,Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Williams& Wilkins, S 137–165.

    Google Scholar 

  25. v.Lenthe GH, De Waal Malefijt MC,Huiskes R (1997) Stress shielding after total knee replacement may cause bone resorption in the distal femur. JBJS 79 B 1: 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C, Lotke PA (2001) Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty. Influence of stem design. J Arthropl 1: 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Markus PA, Friederich NF, Widmer H, Müller W (1999) Lateral approach to the knee combined with an osteotomy of the tibial tuberosity. Op Orthop Traum 3: 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McAuley JP, Engh GA (1997) Allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Williams& Wilkins, S 252–274.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Scuderi GR (2001) Revision total knee arthroplasty. How much constraint is enough? CORR 392: 300–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsahakis PJ, Beaver WB, Brick GW (1994) Technique and results of allograft reconstruction in revision total knee arthroplasty. CORR 303: 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vince KG, Long W (1995) Revision knee arthroplasty. The limits of press fit medullary fixation. CORR 317: 172–177.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang JS, Tägil M, Aspenberg P (2000) Load-bearing in-creases new bone formation in impacted and morselized allografts. CORR 378: 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Westrich GH, Mollano AV, Sculco TP, Buly RL, Laskin RS, Windsor R (2000) Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severely affected knees. CORR 379: 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Whiteside LA,Bicalho PS (1998) Radiologic and histologic analysis of morselized allograft in revision total knee replacement. CORR 357: 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Accardo NJ,Noiles D.C., Pena R, Accardo Jr NJ (1979) Noiles total knee replacement procedure. Orthopedics 2: 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bain AM (1973) Replacement of the knee joint with the Walldius prosthesis using cement fixation. Clin Orthop 94: 65–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bargar WL,Cracchiolo A, Amstutz HC (1980) Results with the constrained total knee prosthesis in treating severely disabled patients and patients with failed total knee replacements. 1 Bone Joint Surg 62 A: 504–512

    Google Scholar 

  38. Barrack RL, Lyons TR, Ingraham RQ, Johnson JC (2000) The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15: 858–866.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop 356: 111–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. David HG, Bishay M, James ETR (1998) Problems with the rotaflex: a 10-year review of a rotating hinge prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 13: 402–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Flynn LM (1979) The Noiles hinge knee prosthesis with axial rotation. Orthopedics 2: 602–605.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hui FC, Fitzgerald RH (1980) Hinged total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 62 A: 513–519.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Insall JN, Aglietti P, Baldini A, Easley ME (2001) Meniscal-bearing knee replacement. In: Insall JN, Scott VVN (eds) Surgery of the knee, 3rd Edition. Churchill-Livingstone, New York, p 1721

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jones EC, Insall JN,Inglis AH, Ranawat CS (1979) Guepar knee arthroplasty results and late complications. Clin Orthop 140: 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jones RE (1996) Management of the bone deficient knee: management of complex revision problems with a modular total knee system. Orthopaedics 19: 802–806.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jones RE, Barrack RL, Skedros JG (2001) Modular, mobile- bearing hinge total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392: 306–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jones RE, Skedros JG, Chan AJ, Beauchamp DH, Harkins PC (2001) Total knee arthroplasty using the S-ROM mobile-bearing hinge prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 16: 279–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kabo J M, Yang RS, Dorey FJ.Eckardt JJ (1997) In vivo rotational stability of the kinematic rotating hinge knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 336: 166–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Karpinski MRK, Grimer RJ (1987) Hinged knee replacement in revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 220: 185–191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kester MA,Cook SD, Harding AF, Rodriquez RP,Pipkin CS (1988) An evaluation of the mechanical failure modalities of a rotating hinge knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 228: 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  51. LaFortune MA.Cavanaugh PR.Sommer III HJ, Kalenak A (1992) Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. J Biomechanics 25: 347–357.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lettin AWF, Kavanagh TG, Scales JT (1984) The long-term results of Stanmore total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 66B: 349–354.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Matthews LS, Goldstein SA, Kolowich PA, Kaut’er H (1986) Spherocentric arthroplasty of the knee: a long-term and final follow up evaluation. Clin Orthop 205: 58–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rand JA.Chao EYS.Stauffer RN (1987) Kinematic rotating- hinge total knee arthroplasty. I Bone Joint Surg 69 A: 489–497.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ritter MA (1977) The Herbert total knee replacement: a longer than three year follow-up. Clin Orthop 129: 232–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shindell R, Neumann R, Connolly JF, Jardon OM (1986) Evaluation of the Noiles hinged knee prosthesis: a five- year study of seventeen knees. J Bone Joint Surg 68 A: 579–585.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Trent PS, Walker PS (1976) Ligament length patterns, strength, and rotational axes of the knee joint. Clin Orthop 117: 263–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Walldius B (1960) Arthroplasty of the knee using an endoprosthesis: 8 years experience. Acta Orthop Scand 30: 137–148.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Watson JR, Wood H, Hill RCJ (1976) The Shiers arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 58B: 300–304.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Watt NAR, Hughes SPF (1987) Early results with Rotaflex rotating hinge knee replacement. J. R Coll Surg Edinb 32: 361–365.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Westrich GH, Anthony VM, Sculco TP, Buly RL, Laskin RS, Windsor R (2000) Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severely affected knees. Clin Orthop 379: 195–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wilson FC Venters GC (1976) Results of knee replacement with the Walldius prosthesis. Clin Orthop 120: 39–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. F. F. Buechel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. G. Fitzek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. D. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hospital Slotervaart Ziekenhuis, Louwesweg 6, 1066 EC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Karel J. Hamelynck MD, PhD

  2. Orthopaedic Hospital of Wisconsin, 575 West Riverwoods Parkway, #204, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53212, USA

    James B. Stiehl MD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buechel, F.F., Fitzek, J.G., Jones, R.D. (2002). Revision. In: Hamelynck, K.J., Stiehl, J.B. (eds) LCS® Mobile Bearing Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59347-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59347-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63944-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59347-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation