Skip to main content

The Historical Perspective of Mobile-Bearing Knee Implants

  • Chapter
LCS® Mobile Bearing Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Conventional fixed-bearing total knees have mid to long- term follow-ups of 10–15 years demonstrating good results [6, 12, 13]. The patients in most studies of fixed- bearing implants have been older patients with low activity levels, and subsequently low demands on the implant [4].Twenty to twenty-five year results with fixed- bearing designs are unknown at this time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM (1986) The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. I Bone Joint Surg 68 A: 1041–1051

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blunn GW, Walker PS, Joshi A, Hardinge K (1991) The dominance of cyclic sliding in producing wear in total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 273: 253–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Callaghan JJ (2000) Reduction of polyethylene wear in mo-bile-bearing knees. Orthopaedics Today, Thorofare, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  4. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Murray DW, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Dorr LD (2000) Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. J Bone joint Surg 82 A: 1020–1037

    Google Scholar 

  5. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan FM, Johnston RC (2000) Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 82 A: 705–711

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colliza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1995) The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow- up. J Bone Joint Surg 77 A: 1713–1720

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J J (1992) The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty: a risk factor in unconstrained meniscal prostheses. Clin Orthop 276: 245–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. James P (2000) Making the transition from a fixed-bearing to a mobile-bearing design. Orthopedics Today, Thorofare, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones VC, Barton DC, Fitzpatrick DP, Auger DD, Stone MH, Fisher J (1999) An experimental model of tibial counter- face polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: the influence of design and kinematics. Biomed Mater Eng 9: 189–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parks NL, Engh GA, Topoleski LDT, Emperado J (1998) Modular tibial insert micromotion: a concern with con-temporary knee implants. Clin Orthop 356: 10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters PC, Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Vinh TN (1992) Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 74 A: 864–876

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ranawat CS, Flynn Jr WF, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ (1993) Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: a 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop 286: 94–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD (1998) Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system: results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg SOB: 850–858

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sorrells RB (1996) Primary knee arthroplasty: long-term outcomes, the rotating platform mobile bearing TKA. Orthopedics 19: 793–796

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Trent PS, Walker PS (1976) Ligament length patterns, strength, and rotational axes of the knee joint. Clin Orthop 117: 263–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wasielewski RC, Parks N, Williams I, Surprenant H, Collier JP, Engh G (1997) Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear debris. Clin Orthop 345: 53–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, R.D. (2002). The Historical Perspective of Mobile-Bearing Knee Implants. In: Hamelynck, K.J., Stiehl, J.B. (eds) LCS® Mobile Bearing Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59347-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59347-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63944-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59347-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics