Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Codierungsstrategien — Grundlagen und Evaluation

  • Chapter
Cochlea-Implantat

  • 358 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Weltweit wurden bis heute schätzungsweise über 10000 Cochlea-Implantate (CI) eingesetzt, in zunehmendem Maß bei Kleinkindern. Obwohl noch nicht alle Aspekte dieser noch jungen medizintechnischen Errungenschaft vollständig geklärt sind, wurde mittlerweile ein technologischer Reifegrad erreicht, welcher gekennzeichnet ist durch hohe Zuverlässigkeit, große Erfolgschancen und geringe Komplikationsraten. Die aktuelle Forschung und Entwicklung zielt auf die weitere Verbesserung und Optimierung der Sprachverständlichkeit sowie vereinfachtere und objektivere Methoden der Prozessoranpassung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alich G (1985) Anmerkungen zum Freiburger Sprachverständnistest (FST). Sprache Stimme Gehör 9:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesalski P, Lippert KL, Bohnert A (1985) Erfahrungen in der audiologisch-rehabilitativen Betreuung von gehörlosen Schulkindern mit einer Cochlea-Implanttherapie. Sprache Stimme Gehör 9:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd A, Nittrouer S (1988) Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 84:101–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bögli H (1993) Sprachverarbeitungsverfahren für ein mehrkanaliges Cochlear Implant. Dissertation, ETH Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark GM, Tong YC, Patrick JF (1990) Cochlear Prostheses. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London Melbourne New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo J, Parkins CW (1987) A model of electrical excitation of the mammalian auditory-nerve neuron. Hear Res 31: 287–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng L, Geisler CD (1987) A composite auditory model for processing speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 82/6:2001–2012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillier N, Spillmann T (1992) Deutsche Version der Minimal Auditory Capability (MAC)-Test-Batterie: Anwendungen bei Hörgeräte- und CI-Trägern mit und ohne Störlärm. In: Kollmeier B (Hrsg) Moderne Verfahren der Sprachaudiometrie. Median-Verlag, Heidelberg, S 238–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillier N, Senn C, Schlatter T, Stöckli M, Utzinger U (1990) Wearable digital speech processor for cochlear implants using a TMS320C25. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 469:120–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillier N, Battmer RD, Döring WH, Müller-Deile J (1995) Multicentric field evaluation of a new spectral peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. Audiology 34:145–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobie RA, Dillier N (1985) Some aspects of temporal coding for single-channel electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell RC, Martin LFA, Tong YC (1982) A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient. J Speech Hear Res 25:509–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley H (1939) The Vocoder. Bell Labs Rec 18:122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg LS, House WF (1982) Initial experience with the cochlear implant in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 91:67–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann H (1976) Das Gutachten des Hals-Nasen-Ohren- Arztes. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley CC, Wilson BS, White MW (1989) Models of the neural responsiveness to electrical stimulation. In: Miller MJ, Spelman FA (eds) Cochlear implants. Models of the electrically stimulated ear. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JL (1972) Speech analysis, synthesis and perception. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghitza O (1987) Auditory nerve representation criteria for speech analysis/synthesis. IEEE Trans ASSP 35/6:736–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann R, Topp G, Klinke R (1984) Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 13:47–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, Stiglbrunner HK (1985) Psychoacoustical temporal processing and speech understanding in cochlear implant patients. In: Schindler RA, Merzenich MM (eds) Cochlear implants. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Honert C van den, Stypulkowski PH (1987 a) Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli. Hear Res 29:207–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honert C van den, Stypulkowski PH (1987b) Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Hear Res 29:195–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jayant N (1993) Signal compression based on models of human perception. Proc IEEE 81:1385–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt DH (1980) Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. J Acoust Soc Am 67:971–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmeier B (1992) Moderne Verfahren der Sprachaudiometrie. Audiol Akust Suppl. 1–348

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay C, McDermott HJ, Vandali A, Clark GM (1991) Preliminary results with a six spectral maxima sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus multiple-electrode cochlear implant. J Otolaryng Soc Austral 6/5:354–359

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen TA, Mountain DC (1985) Model of d.c. potential in the cochlea: Effects of voltage-dependent cilia stiffness. Hear Res 17:127–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich MM (1985) UCSF cochlear implant device. In: Merzenich MM, Schindler RA (eds) Cochlear implants. Raven Press, New York, pp 121–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA, Nicely PE (1955) An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 27:338–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motz H, Rattay F (1986) A study of the application of the Hodgkin-Huxley and the Frankenhaeuser-Huxley model for electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve. Neuroscience 18/3:699–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owens E, Schubert ED (1977) Development of the California Consonant Test. J Speech Hear Res 20:463–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick JF (1995) Implant designs for future coding strategies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 104/166:137–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisoni DB, Sawusch JR (1975) Some stages of processing in speech perception. (Proceedings of the Symposium on Dynamic Aspects of Speech Perception, pp 16–35)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popelka GR, Gittelman DA (1984) Audiologic findings in a child with a single-channel cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Disord 49:254–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler RA, Merzenich MM (1975) Chronic intracochlear electrode implantation: cochlear pathology and acoustic nerve survival. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 202–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CD (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech Journal 27:623–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd RK, Franz BK, Clark GM (1990) The biocompatibility and safety of cochlear prostheses. In: Clark GM et al. (eds) Cochlear Prostheses. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London Melbourne New York, pp 69–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA et al. (1994) Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol Suppl 15:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotschek J (1982) Ein Reimtest für Verständlichkeitsmessungen mit deutscher Sprache als ein verbessertes Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Sprachübertragungsgüte. Fernmelde Ing 36 (4/5):1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman FA, Clopton BM, Pfingst BE (1982) Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear-implications for the cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 92/Suppl 97:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Lowder MW et al. (1985) Audiological results with two single channel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 94/2:133–139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenberg EL von, Kollmeier B (1989) Sprachverständlichkeitsmessungen für die Audiologie mit einem Reimtest in deutscher Sprache: Erstellung und Evaluation von Testlisten. Audiol Akust 28:50–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenberg EL von, Brinch J, Money DK, West R, Avunduk K (i993) Comparative Reliability of Cochlear Implants. In: Fraysse B, Deguine O (eds) Cochlear Implants: New Perspectives. Karger, Basel (Ader ORL, vol 48, pp 79–84)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang MD, Bilger RC (1973) Consonant confusions in noise: A study of perceptual features. J Acoust Soc Am 54: 1248–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel H von (1985) Reichen die heute verfügbaren sprachaudiometrischen Verfahren zur Hörgeräte-Anpassung? Teil 2. Audiol Akust 24:102–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM (1991) Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352:236–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng FG, Shannon RV (1992) Loudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 60:231–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. N. Dillier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany

    Thomas Lenarz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dillier, N. (1998). Codierungsstrategien — Grundlagen und Evaluation. In: Lenarz, T. (eds) Cochlea-Implantat. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80004-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80004-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-80005-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80004-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation