Skip to main content

Selection and Technique for Lumpectomy

  • Conference paper
Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer IV

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 127))

Abstract

The performance of a proper lumpectomy requires balancing the features required for cancer control against those for best cosmesis. Certain caveats have been established by custom without evaluation of their true importance. These include the need for clear margins, concerns for any extensive component of duct carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS), and the size of the primary tumor. Surveys of present clinical practice indicate that lumpectomy has not replaced mastectomy as the common operation for breast cancer in most centers. This suggests an incorrect understanding of the relation of lumpectomy or mastectomy to distant treatment failures, and also of the importance of local tumor control as a factor in the selection of primary treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER, Bauer M, Wolmark N, Wickerham L, Deutsch M, Montague E, Margolese R, Foster R (1985) Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation. N Engl J Med 312:11:674–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, Poisson R, Pilch Y, Redmond C, Fisher E, Wolmark N, Deutsch M, Montague E, Saffer E, Wickerham L, Lerner H, Glass A, Shibata H, Deckers P, Ketcham A, Oishi R, Russell I (1985) Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 312:11:665–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, Margolese R, Wolmark N, Wickerham L, Fishier E, Deutsch M, Caplan R, Pilch Y, Glass A, Shibata H, Lerner H, Terz J, Sidorovitch L (1989) Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 320:13:822–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurtz JM, Amalric R, Brandone H, Ayme Y, Sjpitalier JM (1988) Results of wide excision for mammary recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 61:1969–1972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morgenstern L, Kaufman PA, Friedman NB (1975) The case against tylectomy for carcinoma of breast - factor of multicentricity. Am J Surg 130:251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sandison AT (1975) Multicentric breast cancer: incidence of new cancers in homolateral breast after partial mastectomy. Cancer 35:475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crile G (1975) Results of conservative treatment of breast cancer at 10 and 15 years. Ann Surg 181:26–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland R, Solke H, Veling J et al. (1985) Histologic multifocality of T1, T1–2 breast carcinomas - implications for clinical trials of breast conserving surgery. Cancer: 979–990

    Google Scholar 

  9. Veronesi U, Volterrani F, Luini V, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Zucali R, Galimberti V, Rasponi A, Di Re E, Squicciarini P, Salvadori B (1990) Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 26:6:671–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher B, Anderson S, Fisher ER, Redmond C, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N, Mamounas EP, Deutsch M, Margolese RG (1991) Significance of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after lumpectomy. Lancet 338:8763:327–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Margolese, R.G. (1993). Selection and Technique for Lumpectomy. In: Senn, HJ., Gelber, R.D., Goldhirsch, A., Thürlimann, B. (eds) Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer IV. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 127. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84745-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84745-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-84747-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84745-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics