Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nachhaltigkeit von E-Health-Projekten

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
E-Health-Ökonomie

Zusammenfassung

Der Einsatz von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik im Gesundheitswesen, kurz E-Health, wird schon länger als Möglichkeit gesehen, das Gesundheitswesen effektiver zu gestalten und dadurch Kosten zu sparen sowie die Qualität der Versorgung zu verbessern. Die Verstetigung innovativer, auf modernen E-Health-Technologien basierender intersektoraler medizinischer Versorgung scheitert in Deutschland heute jedoch häufig an der fehlenden Verwertungsbasis und dem Pilotcharakter durchgeführter E-Health-Projekte, die wiederum als Negativbeispiel für eine breitenwirksame Übertragung von Lösungen herangezogen werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Andreassen HK, Kjekshus LE, Tjora A (2015) Survival of the project: a case study of ICT innovation in health care. Soc Sci Med 132:62–69. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin CY, Woodard CJ (2008) The architecture of platforms: a unified view. SSRN Electron J. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1265155

  • Benedict M, Schlieter H (2015) Governance guidelines for digital healthcare ecosystems. Stud Health Technol Inform 233–240. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-524-1-233

  • Benedict M, Schlieter H, Burwitz M (2015) Certification of service-oriented eHealth platforms – derivation of structured criteria for interoperability and expandability. In: Proceedings of Healthcare Informatics 2015, SCITEPRESS, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Bont A de , Bal R (2008) Telemedicine in interdisciplinary work practices: on an IT system that met the criteria for success set out by its sponsors, yet failed to become part of every-day clinical routines. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8:47. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-8-47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourquard K, Parisot C, Berler A (2013) D4.1: Interoperability label/certification processes. ANTILOPE – Adoption and take up of standards and profiles for eHealth Interoperability

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown B, Hanson M, Liverman D, Merideth R Jr (1987) Global sustainability: toward definition. Environ Manage 11:713–719. doi:10.1007/BF01867238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkard C, Widjaja T, Buxmann P (2012) Software ecosystems. Wirtschaftsinf 54:43–47. doi:10.1007/s11576-011-0307-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu DJ (2012) Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: the case of enterprise software. MIS Q 36:263–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Coorevits P, De Moor G, Devlies J et al (2011) D4.2: Processing interoperability testing, semantic and functional criteria. HITCH – Healthcare Interoperability Testing and Conformance Harmonisation

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Patten BC (1995) Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecol Econ 15:193–196. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(95)00048-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crasso M, Rodriguez JM, Zunino A, Campo M (2010) Revising WSDL documents: why and how. IEEE Internet Comput 14:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dini P, Nicolai A (2007) A scientific foundation for digital ecosystems. In: Nachira F, Nicolai A, Dini P et al (Hrsg) Digital business ecosystems. European Commission, Bruxulles, S 24–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2008) Opening platforms: how, when and why? SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1264012

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, Directorate-General for the Information Society and Media, Deloitte & Touche (2013) eHealth European Interoperability Framework first proposal technical layer. Publications Office, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach G (2001) What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 3:e20. doi:10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanta GB, Pretorius L, Erasmus L (2015) An evaluation of eHealth systems implementation frameworks for sustainability in resource constrained environments: a literature review. In: IAMOT 2015 Conference Proceedings, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Galin D (2004) Software quality assurance: from theory to implementation. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, England; New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2008) How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 49:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersch M, Rüsike T (2011) Diffusionshemmnisse innovativer E-Health Anwendungen im deutschen Gesundheitswesen. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2011) Micro-strategizing in platform ecosystems: a multiple case study. In: ICIS 2011 Proceedings, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräber S, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B et al (2002) Rahmenkonzepte für das Informationsmanagement in Krankenhäusern: Ein Leitfaden. Arbeitsgruppe „Methoden und Werkzeuge für das Management von Krankenhausinformationssystemen“ der Dt. Gesellschaft für Med. Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie.(gmds) Homburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Guédria W, Naudet Y, Chen D (2008) Interoperability maturity models – Survey and comparison – . In: On the move to meaningful Internet systems: OTM 2008 Workshops. Springer, S 273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Guédria W, Chen D, Naudet Y (2009) A maturity model for enterprise interoperability. In: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009 Workshops. Springer, S 216–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Häckl D (2010) Neue Technologien Im Gesundheitswesen: Rahmenbedingungen und Akteure. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Level 7 (2012) HL7 Service-aware interoperability framework: canonical definition specification, release 2. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=3. Zugegriffen: 10. Juli 2015

  • HITCH (2011) HITCH final report including consolidated roadmap and recommendations. http://hitch-project.eu/sites/www.hitch-project.eu/files/HITCH-Roadmap-V1.1.pdf. Zugegriffen: 10. Juli 2015

  • Homburg V (1999) The political economy of information management: a theoretical and empirical analysis of decision making regarding interorganizational information systems. University of Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (1990) IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology. Office 121990:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanellis P, Paul RJ (1997) On the nature of inter-organisational information systems and the issue of adaptability. IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, S 391–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazman R, Klein M, Clements P (2000) ATAM: method for architecture evaluation. SEI, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch RF, Nambisan S (2015) Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Q 39:155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray E, Burns J, May C et al (2011) Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study. Implement Sci 6:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelt V van, Sprenger M (2013) D1.1: Refinement definition document. ANTILOPE – Adoption and take up of standards and profiles for eHealth Interoperability

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltoniemi M (2006) Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems. Emergence Complex Organ 8:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers K, Johnston RB, Klein S (2004) The shaping of inter-organisational information systems: main design considerations of an international comparative research project. In: 17th Bled eCommerce Conference: „eGlobal“, (Y. Tan, D. Vogel, J. Gricar, G. Lenarts.), Faculty of Organizational Science, University of Maribor, Bled, Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander L, Henfridsson O, Svahn F (2010) Transforming ecosystem relationships in digital innovation. In: ICIS, S 138

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroetmann K (2013) eHealth: Wundermittel oder Irrweg? – Eine Spurensuche aus europäischer Perspektive. Thesenpapier zur Gesundheitstelematik – Ziele, Strategien und Impulse wichtiger Stakeholder für eine funktionelle Gesundheitstelematik in Deutschland 104–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary – platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf Syst Res 21:675–687. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Web Services Interoperability Organization (2010) Basic profile – Version 2.0 (Final). http://www.ws-i.org/profiles/basicprofile-2.0-2010-11-09.html. Zugegriffen: 15. Sep. 2015

  • West J (2003) How open is open enough?: melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res Policy 32:1259–1285. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2015) E-health. http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story021/en/. Zugegriffen: 10. Juli 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftsinformatik, insbes. Systementwicklung, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland

    Hannes Schlieter, Martin Benedict & Martin Burwitz

Authors
  1. Hannes Schlieter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Benedict
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Burwitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Schlieter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IEKF Institut für Effizienz Kommunikation Forschung GmbH, Ibbenbüren, Germany

    Stefan Müller-Mielitz

  2. Hochschule Niederrhein, Krefeld, Germany

    Thomas Lux

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schlieter, H., Benedict, M., Burwitz, M. (2017). Nachhaltigkeit von E-Health-Projekten. In: Müller-Mielitz, S., Lux, T. (eds) E-Health-Ökonomie. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10788-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10788-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10787-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10788-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation