Skip to main content

How Well Does That Rating Scale Work? How Do You Know, Too?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences

Abstract

This chapter provides readers with specific guidance as to how to evaluate aspects of their rating scale (e.g., how well the scale works). A simple non-Rasch technique is presented that involves a global examination of the percentage of all answers to all items for each rating category. Next is a discussion of the ins and outs of evaluating the probability of a given respondent selecting a specific rating category for a particular item. We call this plot “the hills.” The chapter finishes with a consideration of disordering. Investigating disordering involves computing the mean measure of all respondents answering one item and then computing a mean person measure as a function of rating scale selection. The chapter finishes up with a summary discussion between the two students, Keywords and Phrases, Quick Tips, Data Files, References, and Additional Readings. As in almost all chapters, sample analyses are used to reinforce the chapter topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Campbell, T., Abd-Hamid, H., & Chapman, H. (2010). Development of instrument to assess teacher and student perceptions of inquiry experiences in science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2012). Winsteps (Version 3.74) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.html

Additional Readings

  • Additional consideration of disordered steps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, F., Wright, B., & Linacre, J. M. (1992). Disordered steps? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analysis of a rating scale using Rasch analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien, T., Hsu, S., Tai, C., Guo, H., & Su, S. (2008). Using Rasch analysis to validate the revised PSQI to assess sleep disorders in Taiwan’s hi-tech workers. Community Mental Health Journal, 44(6), 417–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • An introductory article that considers the issue of how well a rating scale works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. V., Conrad, K. M., Chang, K., & Piazza, J. (2002). An introduction to Rasch measurement for scale development and person assessment. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 10, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boone, W.J., Staver, J.R., Yale, M.S. (2014). How Well Does That Rating Scale Work? How Do You Know, Too?. In: Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics