Abstract
This chapter provides readers with specific guidance as to how to evaluate aspects of their rating scale (e.g., how well the scale works). A simple non-Rasch technique is presented that involves a global examination of the percentage of all answers to all items for each rating category. Next is a discussion of the ins and outs of evaluating the probability of a given respondent selecting a specific rating category for a particular item. We call this plot “the hills.” The chapter finishes with a consideration of disordering. Investigating disordering involves computing the mean measure of all respondents answering one item and then computing a mean person measure as a function of rating scale selection. The chapter finishes up with a summary discussion between the two students, Keywords and Phrases, Quick Tips, Data Files, References, and Additional Readings. As in almost all chapters, sample analyses are used to reinforce the chapter topic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Campbell, T., Abd-Hamid, H., & Chapman, H. (2010). Development of instrument to assess teacher and student perceptions of inquiry experiences in science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 13–30.
Hayes, J. R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.
Linacre, J. M. (2012). Winsteps (Version 3.74) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.html
Additional Readings
Additional consideration of disordered steps.
Shaw, F., Wright, B., & Linacre, J. M. (1992). Disordered steps? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 225.
Analysis of a rating scale using Rasch analysis.
Chien, T., Hsu, S., Tai, C., Guo, H., & Su, S. (2008). Using Rasch analysis to validate the revised PSQI to assess sleep disorders in Taiwan’s hi-tech workers. Community Mental Health Journal, 44(6), 417–425.
An introductory article that considers the issue of how well a rating scale works.
Smith, E. V., Conrad, K. M., Chang, K., & Piazza, J. (2002). An introduction to Rasch measurement for scale development and person assessment. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 10, 189–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boone, W.J., Staver, J.R., Yale, M.S. (2014). How Well Does That Rating Scale Work? How Do You Know, Too?. In: Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6856-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6857-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)