Skip to main content

Crossover Studies with Binary Responses

  • Chapter
Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials

Summary

The two-period crossover trial has the evident advantage that by the use of within-patients comparisons, the usually larger between-patient variability is not used as a measuring stick to compare treatments. However, a prerequisite is that the order of the treatments does not substantially influence the outcome of the treatment. Crossover studies with a binary response (such as yes/no or present/absent), although widely used for initial screening of new compounds, have not previously been studied for such order effects. In the present paper we use a mathematical model based on standard statistical tests to study to what extent such order effects, here identical to carryover effects, may reduce the power of detecting a treatment effect. We come to the conclusion that in spite of large carryover effects the crossover study with a binary response remains a powerful method and that testing for carryover effects makes sense only if the null hypothesis of no treatment effect cannot be rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

8. References

  1. Cleophas TJM: A simple analysis of carryover studies with one-group interaction. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 32: 322–328.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cleophas TJ: Underestimation of treatment effect in crossover trials. Angiology 1990;41:855–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown BW: The crossover experiment for clinical trials. Biomerrics 1980;36:69–79

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barker M, Hew RJ, Huitson A, Poloniecki J: The two-period crossover trial. Bias 1982; 9: 67–112.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Louis TA, Lavori PW, Bailar JC, Polansky M: Crossover and self-controlled design in clinical research. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Willan AR, Pater JL: Carryover and the two-period clinical trial. Biometrics 1986;42:593–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Packer M: Combined beta-adrenergic and calcium entry blockade in angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 709–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleiss JL: A critique of recent research on the two-treatment crossover design. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman PR: The performance of the two-stage analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials. Stat Med 1989; 8: 1421–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Senn S. Crossover trials in clinical research. Wiley & Sons, Chicester, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hills M. Armitage P: The two-period crossover trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 8: 7–20.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gart JJ: An exact test for comparing matched proportions in crossover designs. Biometrika 1969; 56: 57–80.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prescott RJ: The comparison of success rates in crossover trials in the presence of an order effect. Appl Stat 1981; 30: 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fidler V: Change-over clinical trials with binary data: mixed model-based comparisons of tests. Biometrics 1984; 40: 1063–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bavry JH: Design Power (TM). Scientific software Inc., 1988, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cleophas TJM, Tavenier P. Clinical trials of chronic diseases. J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 35: 594–598.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cleophas TJM, Tavenier P. Fundamental issues of choosing the right type of trial. Am J Ther 1994; 1: 327–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cleophas, T.J., Zwinderman, A.H., Cleophas, T.F. (2002). Crossover Studies with Binary Responses. In: Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0337-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0337-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0570-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0337-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics