Skip to main content

Structural Drivers of Inequities in Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Health Inequities in India

Abstract

This introductory chapter provides the backdrop against which the evidence on health inequities in India, synthesised in later chapters, may be understood. In this chapter, we argue that the extreme economic inequalities underlying significant inequities in health are fuelled by forces of neo-liberal globalisation. The chapter illustrates with facts and figures that the neo-liberal economic policies that were adopted in India since the mid-1980s have increased income and wealth inequalities. While economic growth has been significant, the benefits have not accrued to those in the lowest income and wealth categories. Growth has not generated adequate employment to absorb the surplus rural labour or the new entrants into the labour force. A large proportion of workers experience insecure livelihoods and poor living and working conditions. These adversities are experienced disproportionately by those already disadvantaged based inter alia on class, caste and gender, and may be expected to impact the pattern of inequities in health in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is our contention that these are the processes through which social inequality is enforced, and not the causes or drivers.

  2. 2.

    Before the 1980s, national industry and agriculture were protected from competition from imported goods. The growth of monopolies was legally restricted. Small-scale and cottage industries were protected, incentives provided for setting up industries in economically less-developed regions; major public-sector enterprises were vested with responsibility for infrastructural development, mining and production of iron and steel. Subsidies for inputs in agriculture and low-interest credit for agricultural investment were provided. Price controls were in place in priority sectors including for drugs. Public investment in health and education made health services and education free or heavily subsidised at the point of delivery.

  3. 3.

    A note on terminologies is in order here. While we would prefer to use the terms Dalit and Adivasi, and have done so when we are referring to these population groups, where we cite data from published sources, we have maintained the terminologies used by the authors of the study. Thus in almost all places where studies are cited, the terms SC and ST, or as is often the case, SC/ST is used.

  4. 4.

    There is great diversity among those classified as “Scheduled Tribes” under the Constitution of India in terms of cultural traits, social organization and modes of living. They also vary with respect to their exposure to and integration into mainstream society.

References

  • Abraham, V. (2013). Missing labour or consistent de-feminisation. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(31), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1958). The nature of prejudice. New York: Garden City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altamirano-Jimenez, I. (2013). Indigenous encounters with neoliberalism: Place, women and the environment in Canada and Mexico. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadullah, M. N., & Yalonetzky, G. (2010). Inequality of educational opportunity in India: Changes over time and across states. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp5146.pdf.

  • Asian Development Bank. (2013). India: Gender equality diagnostic of selected sectors. Manila: ADB. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/33970/files/india-gender-equality-diagnostic.pdf.

  • Balakrishnan, R. (2005). Rural women and food security in Asia and the Pacific: Prospects and paradoxes. Bangkok: Food and Agricultural Organisation, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., & Piketty, T. (2005). Top Indian incomes 1922–2000. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, R. B. (2013). Conditions of SC/ST households: A story of unequal improvement. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(41), 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braveman, P. (2014). What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Reports, 129(2), 5–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Braveman, P. & Gruskin, S. (2003). Defining equity in health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 254–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, M. (2016). Just how high is income inequality in India. Retrieved from http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/JKZYjYjixRipa95tw2AOXK/Just-how-high-is-income-inequality-in-India.html.

  • Chakravarty, P., & Dehejia, V. (2016). India’s curious case of economic divergence. Mumbai: IDFC Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, S., & Gupta, N. (2009). Levels of living and poverty patterns: A district-wise analysis for India. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(9), 94–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhibber, A., Ghosh, J., & Palanivel, T. (2009). The global financial crisis and the Asia-Pacific region: A synthesis study incorporating evidence from country case studies. UNDP Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific, Colombo. Retrieved from www.indiaenvironmentporal.org.in/files/p116.pdf.

  • Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabla-Norris, E., Kochhar, K., Suphaphiphat, N., Ricka, F., & Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. Washington, D.C.: IMF Staff Discussion Note.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, P. (2012). Wage inequality in India: Decomposition by sector, gender and activity status. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(50), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1945). Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review, 10(2), 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, S., & Shire, G. (2015). Race, migration and neoliberalism: How neoliberalism benefits from discourses of exclusion. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/magazine/1P3-3697090941/race-migration-and-neoliberalism.

  • Dejardin, A. K., & Owens, J. (2009). Asia in the global economic crisis: Impacts and responses from a gender perspective. Paper presented all ILO workshop on responding to the economic crisis-coherent policies for growth, employment and decent work in Asia and Pacific, Manila, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S., & Kulkarni, V. (2008). Changing educational inequalities in India in the context of affirmative action. Demography, 45(2), 245–270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R., & Palshikar, S. (2008). Occupational mobility: How much does caste matter? Economic and Political Weekly, 43(34), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S. (2003). Caste inequalities in India today. In S. Deshpande (Ed.), Contemporary India: A sociological view. Penguin, New Delhi. Retrieved from http://cscs.res.in/dataarchive/textfiles/textfile.2009-08-19.3842312690/file.

  • Djurfeldt, G., Athreya, V., Jayakumar, N., Lindberg, S., Rajagopal, A., & Vidyasagar, R. (2008). Agrarian change and social mobility in Tamil Nadu. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(45), 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eapen, M., Jeyaranjan, J., Harilal, N., Swaminathan, P., & Kanji, N. (2003). Liberalisation, gender and livelihoods: The cashew nut case. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S., & Martin, B. (2015). Challenging economic inequality: Tactics and stratgies. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(49), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • EQUINET Steering Committee. (2004). Policy paper 15: Reclaiming the state: Advancing people’s health, challenging injustice. Harare: EQUINET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2013). How feminism became capitalism’s handmaidenAnd how to reclaim it. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/14/feminism-capitalist-handmaiden-neoliberal.

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and Schuster In.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2012). Report of the 59th standing committee on finance (2011–12), current economic situation and policy options. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2014). Report of the high-level committee on the socio-economic, health and educational status of tribal communities in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Tribal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guru, G. (2016). Shifting categories in the discourse on caste and class. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(47), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). History of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, R. A. (2012). Globalization and its special and significant impacts on indigenous communities. Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No 12–19, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hnatkovska, V., Lahiri, A., & Paul, S. B. (2013). Breaking the caste barrier: Intergenerational mobility in India. Human Resources, 48(2), 435–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Forum on Globalization. (2011). Globalization: Effects on indigenous people. Retrieved from http://www.choike.org/nuevo_eng/informes/1755.html.

  • Jayaraj, D., & Subramanian, S. (2013). On the inter-group inclusiveness of India’s consumption expenditure growth. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(10), 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juego, B., & Schmidt, J. D. (2009). The political economy of the global crisis: Neo-liberalism, financial crises, and emergent authoritarian liberalism in Asia. Paper presented at the Fourth Asian Political and International Studies Association [APISA] Congress—Asia in the Midst of Crises: Political, economic, and social Dimensions, Manila, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, D., Prasad, C. B., Pritchett, L., & Babu, S. D. (2010). Rethinking inequality: Dalits in UP in the market reform era. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(35), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersley, R., & Stierli, M. (2015). Global wealth in 2015: Underlying trends remain positive, credit suisse. Retrieved from https://www.credit-suisse.com/us/en/about-us/research/research-institute/news-and-videos/articles/news-and-expertise/2015/10/en/global-wealth-in-2015-underlying-trends-remain-positive.html.

  • Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2010). Discrimination. Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0013.xml.

  • Kohli, A. (2006). Politics of economic growth in India, 1980–2005. Part II. The 1990s and beyond. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(14), 1361–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, R. (1997). Rise of the Dalits and the renewed debate on caste. In C. Patha (Ed.), State and politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, D. M. (2015). The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism. USA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, U., & Subramanian, A. (2012). Growth in India’s states in the first decade of the 21st century: Four facts. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(3), 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (2004). The industrial revolution: Past and future. Retrieved from https://minneapolisfed.org/publications/the-region/the-industrial-revolution-past-and-future.

  • Mander, H. (2004). The ripped chest, public policy and the poor in India. Bangalore: Books for Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2015). The Health gap: The challenge of an unequal world. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. (2015). Rural elites and limits to SC assertiveness in rural Malwa, Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(52), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, S. S. (2012). Distress-driven employment and feminisation of work in Kasargod district, Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(26&27), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meher, R. (2009). Globalization, displacement and the livelihood issues of tribal and agriculture dependent poor people: The case of mineral-based industries in India. Journal of Developing Societies, 25, 457–480. doi:10.1177/0169796X0902500403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motiram, S., & Singh, A. (2012). How close does the apple fall to the tree. Some evidence from India on intergenerational mobility. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(40), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navsarjan Trust and RFK Centre for Justice and Human Rights. (2010). Understanding untouchability: A comprehensive study of practices and conditions in 1589 villages. Surat and Washington, DC: Navsarjan Trust and RFK Centre for Justice and Human Rights. Retrieved from www.indianet.nl/pdf/UnderstandingUntouchability.pdf.

  • NITI Aayog. (2016). Under five mortality in India. Retrieved from http://niti.gov.in/content/under-5-mortality-rate-u-5mr-1000-live-births.

  • Oxfam International. (2016). An economy for the 1%. How power and privilege in the economy drive extreme inequality and how this can be stopped. 210 Oxfam Briefing Paper. Oxford, Oxfam International. Retrieved from https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp210-economy-one-percent-tax-havens-180116-en_0.pdf.

  • Palriwala, R. (2005). Dowry and globalised capitalism. In Globalization and the women’s movement in India. Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.cwds.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GlobalisationReport.pdf.

  • People’s Health Movement—India. (2007). Indian women’s health charter. Retrieved from http://phm-india.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=12&Itemid=4.

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T., & Qian, N. (2009). Income inequality and progressive income taxation in China and India, 1986–2015. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(2), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikherit, D. (2015). Dalit mobilization and faction politics in rural Andhra Pradesh: Everyday life of a Dalit NGO and Agricultural Labour Union. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(52), 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purewal, N. (2016). Neoliberal patrimony in Modi’s India. Presentation at SSAI panel discussion: ‘Assessing Modi’s track record eighteen months on’. Retrieved from https://www.soas.ac.uk/south-asia-institute/events/file107717.pdf.

  • Rajan, R. G. (2010). Fault lines, how hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, L., & Rao, V. (2004). The determinants of gender equity in India: Examining Dyson and Moore’s thesis with new data. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 239–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S. (2014). Women and the economy in India: Insights from the data on MIGRATION. Massachusetts: Brenden University. Retrieved from https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2015/retrieve.php?pdfid=1002.

  • Ravallion, M. (2000). Should poverty measures be anchored to national accounts? Economic and Political Weekly, 35(35/36), 3245–3252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Registrar General of India. (2011). Census of India, 2011. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., & Mehta, B. S. (2010). Income inequality in India: Pre- and post-reform periods. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(37), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguino, S. (2009). The global economic crisis, its gender implications and policy responses. Paper prepared for gender perspectives on the financial crisis panel at the fifty-third session of the commission on the status of women, United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., & Himanshu. (2005). Poverty and inequality in India: Getting closer to the truth. Data and dogma: The great Indian poverty debate. New Delhi: Macmillan. Retrieved from http://www.networkideas.org/featart/may2004/Poverty_WC.pdf.

  • Sengupta, A., & Das, P. (2014). Gender wage discrimination across social and religious groups in India: Estimates with unit level data. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(21), 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, A., Kannan, K. P., & Raveendran, G. (2008). India’s common people: Who are they, how many are they and how do they live? Economic and Political Weekly, 43(11), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. B. (2016). Living together separately: Dalits in an emergent collectivity in a Rajasthan Village. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(33), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: Norton & Co. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/jun/05/price-of-inequality-united-states.

  • Solar, O., & Irwin, A. (2010). A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 (Policy and Practice). Geneva: World Health Organization, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sood, A. (2016). Politics of growth-script and post script. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(29), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teltumbde, A. (2010). The persistence of caste: The Khairlanji murders and India’s hidden apartheid. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorat, S. (2007). Human poverty and socially disadvantaged groups in India. New Delhi: UNDP. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/india/docs/human_poverty_socially_disadvantaged_groups_india.pdf.

  • Thorat, S., & Sabharwal, S. (2010). Caste and social exclusion: Issues related to concept, indicators and measurement. New Delhi: Indian Institute of Dalit Studies and UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorat, S., & Sadana, N. (2009). Caste and ownership of private enterprises. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(23), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topalova, P. (2008). India: Is the rising tide lifting all boats. IMF working paper 08/54. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=21767.0.

  • United Nations. (2009). State of the world’s indigenous people 2009. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2016). The sustainable development goals report. New York: United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/The%20Sustainable%20Development%20Goals%20Report%202016.pdf.

  • United Nations Children’s Fund. (2011). Global inequality: Beyond the bottom billion—A rapid review of income distribution in 141 countries. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2016). Human development report. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1976). International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. Geneva: UNHCHR. Retrieved from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cescr.htm.

  • Unni, J., & Raveendran, G. (2007). Growth of employment (1993-94 to 2004-05): Illusion of inclusiveness. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(3), 196–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uraguchi, Z. B. (2010). Food price hikes, food security, and gender equality: Assessing the roles and vulnerability of women in households of Bangladesh and Ethiopia. Gender and Development, 18(3), 491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan, A. (2014). Some notes in the Indian economy in crisis. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(24), 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakulabharanam, V. (2010). Does class matter? Class structure and worsening inequality in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(29), 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakulabharanam, V., & Motiram, S. (2012). Understanding poverty and inequality in urban India since reforms. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(47&48), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayabhaskar, M., & Kalaiyarasan, A. (2014). Caste as social capital: The Tiruppurstory. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(10), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, A., Bredenkamp, C., & Buisman, L. R. (2014). Progress on global health goals: Are the poor being left behind? World Bank Research Observer, 29, 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2000). The essential Wallerstein. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisskopf, T. E. (2011). Why worry about inequality in the booming Indian economy? Economic and Political Weekly, 46(47), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, M., & Dahlgren, G. (2006). Concepts and principles for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up Part 1. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2015). The global gender gap 2015. Geneva: WEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2016). It’s time to demolish the myth of trickle-down economics. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/07/it-s-time-to-demolish-the-myth-of-trickle-down-economics/.

  • World Health Organization. (2013). Handbook on health inequality monitoring with a focus on low and middle income countries. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. K. Sundari Ravindran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ravindran, T.K.S., Gaitonde, R., Srinivas, P.N. (2018). Structural Drivers of Inequities in Health. In: Ravindran, T., Gaitonde, R. (eds) Health Inequities in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5089-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5089-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5088-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5089-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics