Skip to main content

Mens’ Conditions of Employment and the Division of Childcare Between Parents

  • Chapter
Work-Life Balance in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: The Future of Work Series ((TFW))

Abstract

It has long been clear that the increase in women’s paid employment has not evoked a compensating increase in the time men spend on childcare (Young and Willmott, 1973; Pilcher, 2000; Gershuny, 2000). Gershuny et al. (1994) suggested that adaptation was delayed in the 1980s by the childhood experience of that generation of parents, whose own parents generally have adopted a traditional sexual division of labour. Today, however, the majority of parents of young children grew up in the 1970s and 1980s, under a rather different domestic regime. Though attitudes have undoubtedly changed and there is good evidence that many men are spending more time with their children (Sullivan, 2000), the gender imbalance continues (O’Brien and Shemilt, 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, T., Forth, J., Metcalf, H. and Kirkby, S. (2001) The Gender Pay Gap, London: Cabinet Office; Women and Equality Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Loy, M. and Wharton, A.S. (2002) ‘Empioyees’ Use of Work—Family Policies and the Workplace Social Context’, Social Forces 80(3): 813–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, S. and Sales, J. (2001) ‘Household Work in the UK: An analysis of the British Household Panel Survey 1994’, Work Employment and Society 15(2): 233–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, H., Erickson, M., Stephenson, C. and Williams, S. (2000) Myths at Work, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandth, B. and Kvande, E. (2002) ‘Reflexive Fathers: Negotiating Parental Leave and Working Life’, Gender, Work and Organisation 15(2): 186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruegel, I. (2001) ‘The Full Monty: The Feminisation of Employment and the unemployment of men’ in Noon, M. and Ogbonna, E., Work and Inequality, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruegel, I. (2004) ‘Seeking the Critical Mass: Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects of Feminisation and Management in Britain in the 1990s’, in Stewart, P. (ed.) Employment, Trade Union Revival and the Future of Work, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. (2002) ‘Fatherhood, Masculinity and Work in Silicon Valley’ in Gerstel, N. (ed.), Families at Work: Expanding the Bounds, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cully, M., Woodland, S. and O’Reilly, A. (1999) Britain at Work as depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dex, S. and Smith, C. (2001a) Which British employees have access to family-friendly policies? An analysis of the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey, Judge Institute Research Paper No. WP/01, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, C. (2001) ‘The Temporal Re-organisation of Employment and Household Rhythm of Work Schedules’, American Journal ofBehavioural Science 44(7): 1199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, E. and Smith, K. (1996) Parenting in the 1990s, London: Family Policy Studies Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, K. and Gershuny, J. (1999) ‘Leisure in the UK across the Twentieth Century’. Working Paper 1999. 03 Institute for Social and Economic Research, Colchester: University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (1999) Taking Time: Parental Leave Policy and Corporate Culture, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J., Godwin, M. and Jones, S. (1994) ‘Domestic Revolution a Process of Lagged Adaptation’ in Anderson, M., Bechhofer, F. and Gershuny, J. (eds), The Social and Political Economy of the Household, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2000) Changing Times, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. and Pratt, G. (1995) Gender, Work and Space, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, S. (1996) ‘The Gender Earnings gap: Evidence from the UK’, Fiscal Studies 7(2): 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrop, A. and Moss, P. (1995) ‘Trends in Parental Employment’, Work, Employment and Society 9(4): 421–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1997) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work, New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Valle, I., Arthur, S., Millward, C. and Scott, J. (2002) Happy families? Atypical work and its influence on family life’, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Feuvre, N. (1999) ‘Gender, Occupational Feminization and Reflexivity: a Cross National Perspective’ in Crompton, R. (ed.), Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. and Shemilt, I. (2003) Working Fathers: Earning and Caring, Manchester: EOC Discussion Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of National Statistics (2001) Social Focus on Men, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrons, D. (2003) ‘The New Economy and the Work-life Balance: Conceptual explorations and a case study of the New Media’, Gender, Work and Organisation 10(1): 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilcher, J. (2000) ‘The Domestic Division of Labour in the Twentieth Century: Change Slow-a-coming’, Work, Employment and Society 14: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B.F., McBrier, D.B. and Kmec, J.A. (1999) ‘The Determinants and Consequences of Workplace Sex and Race Composition’, Annual Review of Sociology 25: 335–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. (1999) ‘The Effects of Family Obligation and Workplace Resources on Men and Women’s Use of Family Leave’ in Hudson, R. and Parcel, T.L. (eds), Research into the Sociology of Work 7: 261–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (1991) The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline ofLeisure, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O. (2000) ‘The Division of Domestic Labour: Twenty Years of Change’, Sociology 34(3): 437–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, C. (1994) ‘Segregation Sexism and Labour Supply’ in MacEwen Scott, A. (ed.), Gender Segregation and Social Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warin, J., Solomon, Y., Lewis, C. and Langford, W. (1999) Fathers, Work and Family Life, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, W.J., Sandberg, J.F., Davies-Keen, P.E., and Hollerth, S.L. (2001) ‘Children’s time with fathers in intact families’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 63(1): 136–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. and Willmott, P. (1973) The Symmetrical Family, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Irene Bruegel and Anne Gray

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruegel, I., Gray, A. (2005). Mens’ Conditions of Employment and the Division of Childcare Between Parents. In: Work-Life Balance in the 21st Century. The Future of Work Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373594_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics