Skip to main content

From a Project Team to a Community of Practice? An Exploration of Boundary and Identity in the Context of Healthcare Collaboration

  • Chapter
Patient-Centred Health Care

Part of the book series: Organizational Behaviour in Health Care ((OBHC))

Abstract

Communities of practice (CoPs) have been used both as a theoretical heuristic to analyse inter-group knowledge-sharing in health care (Ferlie et al., 2005) and as a knowledge mobilization tool enabling learning, innovation and problem-solving within and across healthcare organizations (Ranmuthugala et al., 2011). This chapter aims to enhance our understanding of CoPs by providing an empirical account of an emergent, multiprofessional, knowledge-brokering community which developed from a project team functioning alongside other project teams in a large-scale healthcare partnership. By discussing the practical implications of the team-to-CoP conversion for intra-organizational processes, such as boundary spanning and identity construction, the chapter provides useful insights for those intent on cultivating CoPs within their own organizations to enhance communication, coordination and innovation in patient-centred care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. (1989). ‘Social Identity Theory and the Organization’, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M. and Hawkins, C. (2005). ‘The Nonspread of Innovations: The Mediating Role of Professionals’, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, J. and le May, A. (2011). Practice-Based Evidence for Healthcare: Clinical Mindlines. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, J., le May, A., Jefferson, H., Webb, D., Lovelock, R., Powell, J. and Lathlean, J. (2003). ‘A Case Study of Knowledge Management in Multiagency Consumer-Informed ‘Communities of Practice’: Implications for Evidence-Based Policy Development in Health and Social Services’, Health, 7, 283–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R. and Clark, T. (2006). ‘Within and Beyond Communities of Practice: Making Sense of Learning through Participation, Identity and Practice’, Journal of Management Studies, 43, 641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S. and McDonald, R. (2008). The Politics of Healthcare in Britain. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P. M. (2004). Going Virtual: Distributed Communities of Practice. London: Idea Group Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kislov, R., Harvey, G. and Walshe, K. (2011). ‘Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: Lessons from the Theory of Communities of Practice’, Implementation Science, 6, 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranmuthugala, G., Plumb, J. J., Cunningham, F. C., Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J. I., and Braithwaite, J. (2011). ‘How and Why Are Communities of Practice Established in the Healthcare Sector? A Systematic Review of the Literature’, BMC Health Services Research, 11, 273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). ‘Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39’, Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagliaventi, M. R. and Mattarelli, E. (2006). ‘The Role of Networks of Practice, Value Sharing, and Operational Proximity in Knowledge Flows between Professional Groups’, Human Relations, 59, 291–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1979). ‘An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict’. In W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). ‘Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems’, Organization, 7, 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C. and Snyder, W. M. (2000). ‘Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier’, Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Roman Kislov

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kislov, R. (2013). From a Project Team to a Community of Practice? An Exploration of Boundary and Identity in the Context of Healthcare Collaboration. In: Keating, M.A., McDermott, A.M., Montgomery, K. (eds) Patient-Centred Health Care. Organizational Behaviour in Health Care. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137308931_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics