Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Brief History of Experimental Ethics

  • Chapter
Experimental Ethics

Abstract

The recent years have seen a continual rise of interest in the empirical study of questions traditionally located in moral philosophy, that is, studies in Experimental Ethics. Figure 4.1 shows the respective trends of publication numbers listed in the most prominent online repository for philosophical research, philpapers.org, for the last three decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Shehab, A. J. (2002), ‘A Cross-sectional Examination of Levels of Moral Reasoning in a Sample of Kuwait University Faculty Members’, Social Behavior and Personality, 30, pp. 813–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. W., A. Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel, and A. R. Damasio (1999) ‘Impairment of Social and Moral Behavior Related to Early Damage in Human Prefrontal Cortex’, Nature Neuroscience, 2, 11, pp. 1032–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvan, M. (2013a) ‘Bad News for Conservatives? Moral Judgments and the Dark Triad Personality Traits: A Correlational Study’, Neuroethics, 6, 2, pp. 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvan, M. (2013b) ‘A Lot More Bad News for Conservatives, and a Little Bit of Bad News for Liberals? Moral Judgments and the Dark Triad Personality Traits: A Follow-up Study’, Neuroethics, 6, 1, pp. 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (2008) ‘Moral Masquerades: Experimental Exploration of the Nature of Moral Motivation’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7, 1, pp. 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, J. R. and W. Buckwalter (2010) ‘The Epistemic Side-effect Effect’, Mind and Language, 25, pp. 474–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J. L. and S. Fleischman (eds) (1995) Modality in Grammar and Discourse (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. (2003) Behavior Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby (1994) ‘Better Than Rational: Evolutionary Psychology and the Invisible Hand’, The American Economic Review, 84, 2, pp. 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. B. (2012) ‘The Antiquity of Empathy’, Nature, 336, pp. 874–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditto, P. H., D. A. Pizarro, and D. Tannenbaum (2009) ‘Motivated Moral Reasoning’, Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, pp. 307–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J. (1998) ‘Persons, Situations, and Virtue Ethics’, Nous, 32, 4, pp. 504–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. and S. Gächter (1998) ‘Reciprocity and Economics: The Economic Implications of Homo Reciprocans’, European Economic Review, 42, 3–5, pp. 845–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltz, A. and E. T. Cokely (2008) ‘The Fragmented Folk: More Evidence of Stable Individual Differences in Moral Judgments and Folk Intuitions’, in Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1771–1776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, G. P. and J. M. Darley (2008) ‘The Psychology of Meta-ethics: Exploring Objectivism’, Cognition, 106, 3, pp. 1339–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, G. P. and J. M. Darley (2010) ‘The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, pp. 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, G. P. and J. M. Darley (2012) ‘Why Are Some Moral Beliefs Perceived to be More Objective Than Others?’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, pp. 250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., P. J. Rentfrow, and W. B. Swann (2003) ‘A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains’, Journal of Research in Personality, 37, pp. 504–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gräfenhain, M. and A. Wiegmann (2013) ‘Scientific Study of Morals’, in C. Lutege (ed.) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics (Netherlands: Springer), pp. 1477–1501.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2007) ‘The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul’, in W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.) Moral Psychology, Vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 35–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., R. B. Sommerville, L. E. Nystrom, J. M. Darley, and J. D. Cohen (2001) ‘An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment’, Science, 293, pp. 2105–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. and J. Haidt (2002) ‘How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 12, pp. 517–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., S. A. Morelli, K. Lowenberg, L. E. Nystrom, and J. D. Cohen (2008) ‘Cognitive Load Selectively Interferes with Utilitarian Moral Judgment’, Cognition, 107, pp. 1144–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001) ‘The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment’, Psychological Review, 108, 4, pp. 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2007). ‘The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology’, Science, 316, pp. 998–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. and J. Graham (2007) ‘When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions That Liberals May Not Recognize’, Social Justice Research, 20, pp. 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M., F. Cushman, L. Young, R. Kang-Xing Jin, and J. Mikhail (2007) ‘A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications’, Mind & Language, 22, 1, pp. 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., J. S. Heine, and A. Norenzayan (2010) ‘The Weirdest People in the World?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 2–3, pp. 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, H. Gintis, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, and R. McElreath (2001) ‘In Search of Homo Economicus: Experiments in 15 Small-scale Societies’, American Economic Review, 91, pp. 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., R. McElreath, J. Ensminger, A. Barr, C. Barrett, A. Bolyanatz, J. C. Cardenas, M. Gurven, E. Gwako, N. Henrich, C. Lesorogol, F. Marlowe, D. Tracer, and J. Ziker (2006) ‘Costly Punishment Across Human Societies’, Science, 312, 5868, pp. 1767–1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, J. (2010) ‘How (Not) to React to Experimental Philosophy’, Philosophical Psychology, 23, 4, pp. 447–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N. and D. L. Paulhus (2010) ‘Differentiating the Dark Triad Within the Interpersonal Circumplex’, in L. M. Horowitz and S. N. Strack (eds), Handbook of Interpersonal Theory and Research (New York: Guilford), pp. 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppinen, A. (2007) ‘The Rise and Fall of Experimental Philosophy’, Philosophical Explorations, 10, 2, pp. 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D., S. Stich, K. J. Haley, S. J. Eng, and D. M. T. Fessler (2007) ‘Harm, Affect, and the Moral/Conventional Distinction’, Mind & Language, 22, pp. 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. (2003) ‘Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language’, Analysis, 63, 279, pp. 190–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. and A. Burra (2006) ‘The Folk Concepts of Intention and Intentional Action: A Cross-cultural Study’, Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6, 1–2, pp. 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. and S. Nichols (2008) ‘An Experimental Philosophy Manifesto’, in J. Knobe and S. Nichols (eds) Experimental Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. and E. Roedder (2009) ‘The Ordinary Concept of Valuing’, Philosophical Issues, 19, pp. 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J., W. Buckwalter, S. Nichols, P. Robbins, H. Sarkissian, and T. Sommers (2012) ‘Experimental Philosophy’, Annual Review of Psychology, 63, pp. 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. and R. Kramer (1969) ‘Continuities and Discontinuities in Childhood and Adult Moral Development’, Human Development, 12, pp. 93–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., C. Levine, and A. Hewer (1983) Moral Stages: A Current Formulation and a Response to Critics (Basel, New York: Karger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B., C. A. Gleason, E. W. Wright, and D. K. Pearl (1983) ‘Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness- potential): The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary Act’, Brain, 106, 3, pp. 623–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, J. and R. Holton (2012) ‘What in the World Is Weakness of Will?’, Philosophical Studies, 157, 3, pp. 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. R. and F. Cushman (2007) ‘Intentional Action, Folk Judgments, and Stories: Sorting Things Out’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 1, pp. 184–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail, J. (2002) ‘Law, Science, and Morality: A Review of Richard Posner’s “The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory”’, Stanford Law Review, 54, pp. 1057–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail, J. (2007) ‘Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence and the Future’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 4, pp. 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail, J. (2009) ‘Moral Grammar and Intuitive Jurisprudence: A Formal Model of Unconscious Moral and Legal Knowledge’, Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, pp. 27–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J. and R. de Oliveira-Souza (2007) ‘Moral Judgments, Emotions, and the Utilitarian Brain’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, pp. 319–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer, T. (2004) ‘On Praise, Side Effects, and Folk Ascriptions of Intentionality’, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24, 2, p. 196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer, T. and E. Nahmias (2007) ‘The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy’, Philosophical Explorations, 10, 2, pp. 123–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer, T. and A. Feltz (2008) ‘The Actor-Observer Bias and Moral Intuitions: Adding Fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s Fire’, Neuroethics, 1, 2, pp. 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. (2004) ‘After Objectivity: An Empirical Study of Moral Judgment’, Philosophical Psychology, 17, 1, pp. 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., K. M. Page, and K. Sigmund (2000) ‘Fairness versus Reason in the Ultimatum Game’, Science, 289, 5485, pp. 1773–1775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. P. and M. S. Nucci (1982) ‘Children’s Responses to Moral and Social Conventional Transgressions in Free-play Settings’, Child Development, 53, 5, pp. 1337–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. P. and E. Turiel (1978) ‘Social Interactions and the Development of Social Concepts in Preschool Children’, Child Development, 49, 2, pp. 400–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzoni, S., M. Siegal, and L. Surian (2009) ‘Foreknowledge, Caring, and the Sideeffect Effect in Young Children’, Developmental Psychology, 45, 1, pp. 289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit D. and J. Knobe (2009) ‘The Pervasive Impact of Moral Judgment’, Mind and Language, 24, 5, pp. 586–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J., L. Misenheimer, and J. Knobe (2011) ‘The Ordinary Concept of Happiness (and Others Like It)’, Emotion Review, 71, pp. 929–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J., S. Nyholm, and S. Liao (2011) ‘The Ordinary Concept of Happiness’ (New Haven, CT: Yale University), Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952) The Origins of Intelligence in Children (Madison: International University Press), Original work published 1936.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1997) The Moral Judgment of the Child (New York: Free Press), Original work published 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkissian, H., J. Park, D. Tien, J. C. Wright, and J. Knobe (2011) ‘Folk Moral Relativism’, Mind & Language, 26, 4, pp. 482–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T. and N. Steinbeis (2009) ‘Differential Roles of Fairness- and Compassion- based Motivations for Cooperation, Defection, and Punishment’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, pp. 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snarey, J. R. (1985) ‘The Cross-cultural Universality of Social-moral Development: A Critical Review of Kohlbergian Research’, Psychological Bulletin, 97, 2, pp. 202–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sripada, C. (2012) ‘Mental State Attributions and the Side-effect Effect’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 1, pp. 232–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, R. S. and R. Hertwig (2011) ‘Time and Moral Judgment’, Cognition, 119, 3, pp. 454–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann, M. R., J. Nagel, and A. Wiegmann (2012) ‘Moral Judgment’, in K. J. Holyoak and R. G. Morrison (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 364–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F. and M. Tomasello (2009) ‘Varieties of Altruism in Children and Chimpanzees’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 9, pp. 397–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Niklas Dworazik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hannes Rusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität München, Germany

    Christoph Luetge  & Matthias Uhl  & 

  2. Justus Liebig University Giessen & Technische Universität München, Germany

    Hannes Rusch

Copyright information

© 2014 Niklas Dworazik and Hannes Rusch

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dworazik, N., Rusch, H. (2014). A Brief History of Experimental Ethics. In: Luetge, C., Rusch, H., Uhl, M. (eds) Experimental Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409805_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation