Skip to main content

The Moral Behavior of Ethicists and the Role of the Philosopher

  • Chapter
Experimental Ethics

Abstract

Professional ethicists appear to behave no differently than do non-ethicists of similar social background. However, ethicists also appear to embrace more stringent moral norms than do non-ethicists, at least on some issues. Part 1 will summarize the empirical evidence. Part 2 will discuss one possibly attractive response: that an ethicist’s role is to espouse and defend moral norms, with no special obligation to live according to the norms she espouses and defends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen, R. (2011) ‘Goodbye’, New York Times Magazine, Feb. 27 issue, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/magazine/27FOB-Ethicist-t.html.

  • Rust, J. and E. Schwitzgebel (2013) ‘Ethicists’ and Nonethicists’ Responsiveness to Student Emails: Relationships among Expressed Normative Attitude, Self-Described Behavior, and Empirically Observed Behavior’, Metaphilosophy, 44, pp. 350–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2009) ‘Do Ethicists Steal More Books?’, Philosophical Psychology, 22, pp. 711–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2013) ‘Are Ethicists Any More Likely to Pay Their Registration Fees at Professional Meetings?’, Economics & Philosophy, 29, pp. 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. and J. Rust (2009) ‘The Moral Behaviour of Ethicists: Peer Opinion’, Mind, 118, pp. 1043–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. and J. Rust (2010) ‘Do Ethicists and Political Philosophers Vote More Often Than Other Professors?’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, pp. 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. and J. Rust (2014) ‘The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: Relationships among Self-Reported Behavior, Expressed Normative Attitude, and Directly Observed Behavior’, Philosophical Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. and J. Rust (forthcoming) ‘The Behavior of Ethicists’, in W. Buckwalter and J. Sytsma (eds), Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E., J. Rust, L. T.-L. Huang, A. T. Moore, and J. Coates (2012) ‘Ethicists’ Courtesy at Philosophy Conferences’, Philosophical Psychology, 25, pp. 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Eric Schwitzgebel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwitzgebel, E. (2014). The Moral Behavior of Ethicists and the Role of the Philosopher. In: Luetge, C., Rusch, H., Uhl, M. (eds) Experimental Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409805_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics