Skip to main content
Themenschwerpunkt

To What Extent Do Age, Period, and Cohort Patterns Account for Time Trends and Social Inequalities in Smoking?

Welchen Einfluss haben Alters-, Perioden- und Kohorteneffekte auf zeitliche Veränderungen und soziale Ungleichheiten im Rauchverhalten?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/0939-5911/a000047

Aims: This paper evaluates nonconfounded and independent age, period, and cohort effects on time trends and social disparities in smoking behavior. Methods: Data from nine waves of the German Epidemiological Survey of Substance Abuse (ESA) conducted between 1980 and 2009 were used. A total of N = 73,782 individuals aged 18 and older were included in the analyses. Using cross-classified random-effects models, fixed effects of age (level 1) as well as random effects of periods and cohorts (level 2) on 30-day smoking prevalence and average number of cigarettes per day were estimated. Analyses were stratified by socioeconomic status (SES). Results: Independent of SES, positive and curvilinear age effects emerged. Prevalence and amount of smoking declined sharply over time and revealed an inversion of the social gradient in 2003. This was due to a stronger decrease of smoking in the highest SES group compared to the other groups. Cohort effects were nonlinear and inconsistent. Conclusion: The emergence of increasing social disparities in smoking implies the need to specifically address the situation of low-SES groups when developing tobacco control measures.


Ziele: Ziel dieser Studie ist die Analyse unabhängiger Alters-, Perioden- und Kohorteneffekte auf zeitliche Trends und soziale Ungleichheiten im Rauchverhalten. Methode: Die Analysen basieren auf Daten von neun Erhebungszeitpunkten des Epidemiologischen Suchtsurveys (ESA), die zwischen 1980 und 2009 realisiert wurden. Insgesamt wurden N = 73,782 Personen im Alter zwischen 18 und 64 Jahren eingeschlossen. Mithilfe von Mehrebenen-Modellen wurden feste Effekte von Alter (Ebene 1) sowie Zufallseffekte von Perioden und Geburtskohorten (Ebene 2) auf die 30-Tage-Prävalenz des Rauchens und die durchschnittliche Konsummenge geschätzt. Die Analysen wurden getrennt für drei sozioökonomische Schichten durchgeführt. Ergebnisse: Unabhängig vom sozialen Status ergaben sich positive und kurvenförmige Alterseinflüsse. Prävalenz und Konsummenge nahmen über die Zeit signifikant ab, wobei sich die Unterschiede zwischen den sozialen Gruppen im Jahr 2003 umkehrten. Dies resultierte aus einem stärkeren Rückgang des Rauchens in der höchsten im Vergleich zu den anderen Schichten. Kohorteneffekte waren nicht linear und inkonsistent. Schlussfolgerung: Aufgrund zunehmender sozialer Ungleichheiten im Rauchverhalten ist es notwendig, die spezifische Situation benachteiligter Gruppen bei der Entwicklung von künftigen Tabakkontrollmaßnahmen zu berücksichtigen.

References

  • Ahacic, K. , Kennison, R. , Thorslund, M. (2008). Trends in smoking in Sweden from 1968 to 2002: Age, period, and cohort patterns. Preventive Medicine, 46, 558–564. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, S. , Kraus, L. , Stonner, T. , Metz, K. (2008). Tabakkonsum, Nikotinabhängigkeit und Trends. Ergebnisse des Epidemiologischen Suchtsurveys 2006 [Tobacco use, nicotine dependence and trends. Results of the 2006 Epidemiological Survey of Substance Abuse]. Sucht, 54, S26–S35. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Baumert, J. , Ladwig, K. H. , Döring, A. , Löwel, H. , Wichmann, H. E. (2005). Zeitliche Veränderungen und Einflussfaktoren des Rauchverhaltens im Hinblick auf die Umsetzung von Präventionsmaßnahmen [Temporal changes and determinants of smoking habits with respect to prevention]. Gesundheitswesen, 67(Suppl. 1), S46–S50. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bobak, M. , Jarvis, M. J. , Skodova, Z. , Marmot, M. (2000). Smoke intake among smokers is higher in lower socioeconomic groups. Tobacco Control, 9, 310–312. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brenner, H. (1993). A birth cohort analysis of the smoking epidemic in West Germany. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 47, 54–58. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brownson, R. C. , Hopkins, D. P. , Wakefield, M. A. (2002). Effects of smoking restrictions in the workplace. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 333. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cavelaars, A. E. , Kunst, A. E. , Geurts, J. J. , Crialesi, R. , Grötvedt, L. , Helmert, U. , ... Mackenbach, J. P. (2000). Educational differences in smoking: International comparison. British Medical Journal, 320, 1102–1107. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davy, M. (2006). Time and generational trends in smoking among men and women in Great Britain, 1972–2004/05. Health Statistics Quarterly, 32, 35–43. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deutsche Bundesbank. (2010). Zeitreihe UJFB99: Verbraucherpreisindex. Verfügbar unter www.bundesbank.de/statistik/statistik_zeitreihen.php?func=row&tr=UJFB99&year=. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Doll, R. , Peto, R. , Boreham, J. , Sutherland, I. (2004). Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. British Medical Journal, 328, 1519–1528. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emery, S. , Gilpin, E. A. , Ake, C. , Farkas, A. J. , Pierce, J. P. (2000). Characterizing and identifying “hard-core” smokers: Implications for further reducing smoking prevalence. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 387–394. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giskes, K. , Kunst, A. E. , Ariza, C. , Benach, J. , Borrell, C. , Helmert, U. , ... Mackenbach, J. P. (2007). Applying an equity lens to tobacco-control policies and their uptake in six Western-European countries. Journal of Public Health Policy, 28, 261–280. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giskes, K. , Kunst, A. E. , Benach, J. , Borrell, C. , Costa, G. , Dahl, E. , ... Mackenbach, J. P. (2005). Trends in smoking behavior between 1985 and 2000 in nine European countries by education. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 395–401. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harris, J. E. (1983). Cigarette smoking among successive birth cohorts of men and women in the United States during 1900–80. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 71, 473–479. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hopkins, D. P. , Razi, S. , Leeks, K. D. , Priya Kalra, G. , Chattopadhyay, S. K. , Soler, R. E. (2010). Smokefree policies to reduce tobacco use a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38, S275–S289. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • House, J. S. , Lantz, P. M. , Herd, P. (2005). Continuity and change in the social stratification of aging and health over the life course: Evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal study from 1986 to 2001/2002 (Americans’ Changing Lives Study). The Journals of Gerontology, 60(Spec No. 2), 15–26. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huisman, M. , Kunst, A. E. , Mackenbach, J. P. (2005a). Educational inequalities in smoking among men and women aged 16 years and older in 11 European countries. Tobacco Control, 14, 106–113. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huisman, M. , Kunst, A. E. , Mackenbach, J. P. (2005b). Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: Comparing education and income. Preventive Medicine, 40, 756–764. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huisman, M. , Kunst, A. E. , Bopp, M. , Borgan, J. K. , Borrell, C. , Costa, G. , ... Mackenbach, J. P. (2005c). Educational inequalities in cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and older men and women in eight western European populations. Lancet, 365, 493–500. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, U. , Hanke, M. , Meyer, C. , Schumann, A. (2005). Gender and age differences among current smokers in a general population survey. BMC Public Health, 5, 57. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Junge, B. , Nagel, M. (1999). Das Rauchverhalten in Deutschland [Smoking behavior in Germany]. Gesundheitswesen, 61, S121–S125. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kotz, D. , West, R. (2009). Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: It’s not in the trying, but in the succeeding. Tobacco Control, 18, 43–46. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kraus, L. , Pabst, A. (2010). Studiendesign und Methodik des Epidemiologischen Suchtsurveys 2009 [Study design and methodology of the 2006 Epidemiological Survey of Substance Abuse]. Sucht, 56, 315–326. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kröger, C. , Mons, U. , Klärs, G. , Orth, B. , Maschewsky-Schneider, U. , Lampert, T. (2010). Evaluation des Gesundheitszeils “Tabakkonsum reduzieren” [Assessing the health target “Reduce tobacco consumption”]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 53, 91–102. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kunst, A. E. , Giskes, K. , Mackenbach, J. P. (2004). Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in the European Union. Applying an equity lense to tobacco control policies. Rotterdam: European Network for Smoking Prevention. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lampert, T. , Burger, M. (2005). Verbreitung und Strukturen des Tabakkonsums in Deutschland [Distribution and patterns of tobacco consumption in Germany]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 48, 1231–1241. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lampert, T. , List, S. M. (2009). Tabak – Zahlen und Fakten zum Konsum [Tobacco – Figures and facts]. In Deutsche Hauptstelle für Suchtfragen (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch Such 2009 (S. 51–71). Geesthacht: Neuland Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lopez, A. D. , Collishaw, N. E. , Piha, T. (1994). A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tobacco Control, 3, 242–247. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mason, W. M. , Fienberg, S. E. (1985). Cohort analysis in social research: Beyond the identification problem. New York: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mendez, D. , Warner, K. E. , Courant, P. N. (1998). Has smoking cessation ceased? Expected trends in the prevalence of smoking in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 148, 249–258. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Niederdeppe, J. , Fiore, M. C. , Baker, T. B. , Smith, S. S. (2008). Smoking-cessation media campaigns and their effectiveness among socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged populations. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 916–924. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pampel, F. C. (2005). Diffusion, cohort change, and social patterns of smoking. Social Science Research, 34, 117–139. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rohrmann, S. , Becker, N. , Kroke, A. , Boeing, H. (2003). Trends in cigarette smoking in the German centers of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): The influence of the educational level. Preventive Medicine, 36, 448–454. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaap, M. M. , van Agt, H. M. E. , Kunst, A. E. (2008). Identification of socioeconomic groups at increased risk for smoking in European countries: Looking beyond educational level. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10, 359–369. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schulze, A. , Lampert, T. (2006). Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey: Soziale Unterschiede im Rauchverhalten und in der Passivrauchbelastung in Deutschland [German Health Survey: Social differences in smoking behavior and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke]. Berlin: Robert Koch Institut. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schulze, A. , Mons, U. (2006). The evolution of educational inequalities in smoking: A changing relationship and a crossover effect among German birth cohorts of 1921–1970. Addiction, 101, 1051–1056. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siahpush, M. , Heller, G. , Singh, G. (2005). Lower levels of occupation, income and education are strongly associated with a longer smoking duration: Multivariate results from the 2001 Australian National Drug Strategy Survey. Public Health, 119, 1105–1110. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Those who continue to smoke. Is achieving abstinence harder and do we need to change our interventions? Bethesda, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • U.S.Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). Health behaviors of adults: United States, 2005–2007. Bethesda, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vartiainen, E. , Seppala, T. , Lillsunde, P. , Puska, P. (2002). Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 167–170. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • White, V. , Hill, D. , Siahpush, M. , Bobevski, I. (2003). How has the prevalence of cigarette smoking changed among Australian adults? Trends in smoking prevalence between 1980 and 2001. Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl. 2), ii67–ii74. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winkler, J. , Stolzenberg, H. (1999). Der Sozialschichtindex im Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey [Social class index in the Federal Health Survey]. Gesundheitswesen, 61, S178–S183. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yang, Y. (2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review, 73, 204–226. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yang, Y. , Land, K. C. (2006). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to data on trends in verbal test scores. Sociological Methodology, 36, 75–97. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar