Response Selection and Attention Orienting
A Computational Model of Simon Effect Asymmetries
Abstract
Recently, there has been a redirection of research efforts toward the exploration of the role of hemispheric lateralization in determining Simon effect asymmetries. The present study aimed at implementing a connectionist model that simulates the cognitive mechanisms implied by such asymmetries, focusing on the underlying neural structure. A left-lateralized response-selection mechanism was implemented alone (Experiment 1) or along with a right-lateralized automatic attention-orienting mechanism (Experiment 2). It was found that both models yielded Simon effect asymmetries. However, whereas the first model showed a reversed pattern of asymmetry compared with human, real data, the second model’s performance strongly resembled human Simon effect asymmetries, with a significantly greater right than left Simon effect. Thus, a left-side bias in the response-selection mechanism produced a left-side biased Simon effect, whereas a right-side bias in the attention system produced a right-side biased Simon effect. In conclusion, results showed that the bias of the attention system had a larger impact than the bias of the response-selection mechanism in producing Simon effect asymmetries.
References
(2001). Cortical plasticity of spatial stimulus-response associations: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Neuroreport, 12, 973–977.
(1997). In , Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 135–172). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
(1984). Disorders of perceived auditory lateralization after lesions of the right hemisphere. Brain, 107, 37–52.
(1993). A PET study of visuospatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 1202–1226.
(1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptual Performance, 20, 731–750.
(1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptual Performance, 21, 837–854.
(2004). The role of human parietal cortex in attention networks. Brain, 127, 650–659.
(1975). The effect of the irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427–439.
(2007). Neural mechanisms for response selection: Comparing selection of responses and items from working memory. Neuroimage, 34, 446–454.
(2006). Time course of functional connectivity between dorsal premotor and contralateral motor cortex during movement selection. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 7452–7459.
(1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of S-S and S-R consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptual Performance, 25, 688–714.
(1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on Performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.
(1991). Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 29, 1163–1177.
(1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 309–325.
(1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language and memory. Annals of Neurology, 28, 597–613.
(1997). Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using emission tomography. Brain, 120, 515–533.
(1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863–1874.
(1987). How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? Neuropsychologia, 25, 135–145.
(1995). Activation of response codes by relevant and irrelevant stimulus information. Acta Psychologica, 90, 275–286.
(2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles. Data, theory, and application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
(1987). Reorienting of attention across the horizontal and vertical meridian: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31–40.
(2007). Effects of rTMS conditioning over the fronto-parietal network on motor versus visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 513–524.
(2006). The Simon effect and handedness: Evidence for a dominant-hand attentional bias in spatial coding. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1059–1069.
(1986). Parallel distributed processing: Exploration in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
(2001). Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 656–661.
(2003). The left parietal and premotor cortices: Motor attention and selection. Neuroimage, 20, S98–S100.
(2001). The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: The distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 698–710.
(1997). The left partietal cortex and motor attention. Neuropsychologia, 9, 1261–1273.
(2001). Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: The selection of actions. Neuropsychologia, 39, 105–113.
(1998). Temporary interference in human lateral promoter cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain, 121, 785–799.
(1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.
(1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions toward the stimulus source. Acta Psychologica, 47, 63–81.
(2006). Asymmetrical hemispheric EEG activation evoked by stimulus position during the Simon task. Neuroscience Letters, 399, 215–219.
(1991). Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127–135.
(2000). Response priming in the Simon paradigm. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Experimental Brain Research, 135, 353–359.
(2007). The measurement of left/right asymmetries in the Simon effect: A fine-grained analysis. Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 50–61.
(2000). The role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptual Performance, 26, 648–670.
(1992). An integrated model of the Simon effect. In , Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 331–350). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
(1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147–162.
(1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.
(1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193–205.
