Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0084-5345.31.3.204

Zusammenfassung.Theoretischer Hintergrund: Es ist belegt, daß VLBW-Kinder (< 1500g) vermehrt motorische und/oder geistige Behinderungen aufweisen. Dagegen werden subtilere Beeinträchtigungen ohne offensichtliche Behinderung kontrovers diskutiert. Fragestellung: Das kognitive Leistungsprofil und grobmotorische Fertigkeiten von 33 neurologisch unauffälligen 8jährigen VLBW-Kindern werden mit 224 NBW-Kindern (≥ 2500g) verglichen. Methode: Die Daten resultieren aus einer prospektiven Längsschnittstudie mit 362 Kindern mit unterschiedlicher organischer und psychosozialer Risikobelastung. Ergebnisse: Nonverbale Funktionen der VLBW-Gruppe fielen signifikant schlechter als in der NBW-Gruppe aus, während verbale Fähigkeiten unauffällig waren. Unabhängig vom Geburtsgewicht beeinträchtigte eine hohe psychosoziale Belastung ausschließlich sprachliche Leistungen. Intraindividuelle Profilanalysen der VLBW-Gruppe ergaben keine spezifischen Defizite. Schlußfolgerung: Die Ergebnisse unterstützen die Annahme von suboptimalen rechtshemisphärischen Funktionen bei VLBW-Kindern sowie eine additive Verknüpfung von psycho-sozialer Belastung und niedrigem Geburtsgewicht.


Impaired cognitive and motor functioning in very low birth weight children at 8 years of age

Abstract.Background: While severe handicaps of VLBW children (<1500g) are well documented, subtle deficits require more research. Objectives: Profiles of the cognitive and motor abilities of 33 neurologically intact VLBW children at 8 years of age are described and compared with those of 224 NBW children (≥ 2500g). Methods: The data result from a prospective longitudinal study of a cohort of 362 children with different psychosocial and organic risk factors. Results: Nonverbal abilities of the VLBW group were lower than those of the NBW children. A reduction of language skills is brought about by a high psychosocial risk, independent of birthweight. The test profiles in the VLBW group revealed no specific deficits. Conclusions: The findings indicate suboptimal right-hemispheric functions in VLBW children and a main effects model of psychosocial risk and low birthweight.

Literatur

  • Angermaier, M. (1974). Psycholinguistischer Entwicklungstest . Weinheim: Beltz . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Breslau, N. (1995). Psychiatric sequelae of low birth weight. Epidemiologic Reviews, 17, 96– 106 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dammann, O. , Walther, H. , Allers, B. et al. (1996). Development of a regional cohort of VLBW children at six years: Cognitive abilities are associated with neurological disability and social background. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 97– 108 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fuggle, P. , Tokar, S. , Grant, D. , Smith, I. (1992). Rising IQ scores in British children: recent evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 1241– 1247 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hack, M. , Breslau, N. , Aram, D. et al. (1992). The effect of very low birth weight and social risk on neurocognitive abilities at school age. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 412– 420 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hack, M. , Klein, N. K. , Taylor, H. G. (1995). Long-term developmental outcomes of low birth weight infants. The Future of Children, 5, 176– 196 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaufman, A. , Kaufman, N. (1983). K-ABC: Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children . (dt: Melchers, P. & Preuß, U. (1991). Frankfurt: Swets & Zeitlinger). Circle Pines: American Guidance Service . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Keller, H. , Ayub, B. V. , Saigal, S. , Bar-Or, O. (1998). Neuromotor ability in 5 to 7-year-old children with very low or extremely low birthweight. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 40, 661– 666 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kiphard, E. , Schilling, F. (1974). Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK) . Weinheim: Beltz . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klebanov, K. K. , Brooks-Gunn, J. , McCormick, M. C. (1994). Classroom behavior of very low birth weight elementary school children. Pediatrics, 94, 700– 708 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levy-Shiff, R. , Einat, G. , Mogilner, M. et al. (1994). Biological and environmental correlates of developmental outcome of prematurely born infants in early adolescence. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 19, 63– 78 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Linder, M. , Grissemann, H. (1980). Zürcher Lesetest . Bern: Huber . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Laucht, M. , Esser, G. , Schmidt, H. (2000). Längsschnittforschung zur Entwicklungsepidemiologie psychischer Störungen: Zielsetzung, Konzeption und zentrale Ergebnisse der Mannheimer Risikokinderstudie. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 29, 246– 262 . First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Laucht, M. , Schmidt, M. H. , Esser, G. (2002). Motorische, kognitive und sozial-emotionale Entwicklung von 11-jährigen mit frühkindlichen Risikobelastungen: späte Folgen. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 30, 5– 19 . First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Luoma, L. , Herrgard, E. , Martikainen, A. (1998). Neuropsychological analysis of the visuomotor problems in children born preterm at < 32 weeks of gestation: a 5-year prospective follow-up. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 40, 21– 30 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mutch, L. , Leyland, A. , McGee, A. (1993). Patterns of Neuropsychological function in a low-birthweight population. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 35, 943– 956 . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, R. (1982). Diagnostischer Rechtschreibtest für zweite Klassen (DRT 2) . Weinheim: Beltz . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, R. (1990). Diagnostischer Rechtschreibtest für erste Klassen (DRT 1) . Weinheim: Beltz . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Olsen, P. , Vainiopää, L. , Päällö, E. et al. (1998). Psychological findings in preterm children related to neurologic status and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatrics, 102, 329– 336 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paneth, N. , Rudelli, R. , Monte, W. et al. (1990). White matter necrosis in very low birth weight infants: neuropathologic and ultrasonographic findings in infants surviving six days and longer. Journal of Pediatrics, 116, 975– 984 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peh, D. , Rathenow, P. (1984). Test Grundanforderungen Rechtschreiben für die erste und zweite Klasse, TGR 1/2 . Weinheim: Beltz . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Roth, S. C. , Baudin, J. , McCormick, D. C. et al. (1993). Relation between unltrasound appearance of the brain of very preterm infants and neurodevelopmental impairment at eight years. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 35, 755– 768 . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Saigal, S. , Rosenbaum, P. , Szatmari, P. , Campbell, D. (1991). Learning disabilities and school problems in a regional cohort of extremely low birthweight (< 1000 grams) children: A comparison with term controls. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 12, 294– 300 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saigal, S. , Szatmari, P. , Rosenbaum, P. et al. (1990). Cognitive abilities and school performance of extremely low birth weight children and matched term control children at age 8 years: A regional study. Journal of Pediatrics, 118, 751– 760 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scottish Low Birthweight Study Group (1992). Scottish Low Birthweight Study: II. Language attainment, cognitive status and behavioral problems. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 67, 682– 686 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skranes, J. S. , Vik, T. , Nilsen, G. et al. (1997). Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging and mental and motor function of very low birth weight children at six years of age. Neuropediatrics, 28, 149– 154 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sommerfelt, K. , Ellertsen, B. , Markstad, T. (1993). Personality and behaviour in eight-year-old, non-handicapped children with birth weight under 1500 g. Acta paediatrica, 82, 723– 728 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stewart, A. , Rifkin, L. , Amess, P., et al. (1999). Brain structure and neurocognitive and behavioural function in adolescents who were born very preterm. The Lancet, 353, 1653– 1657 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, H. , Hack, M. , Klein, N. , Schatschneider, C. (1995). Achievement in children with birth weights less than 750 g with normal cognitive abilities: evidence for specific learning disabilities. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 20, 703– 719 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vohr, B. R. , Garcia-Coll, C. , Oh, W. (1989). Language and neurodevelopmental outcome of low-birthweight infants at three years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31, 582– 590 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weiß, R. , Osterland, J. (1977). Grundintelligenztest CFT1 . Braunschweig: Westermann . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wolke, D. , Meyer, R. (1999). Ergebnisse der Bayerischen Entwicklungsstudie: Implikationen für Theorie und Praxis. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 8, 23– 35 . First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Wolke, D. , Ratschinski, G. , Ohrt, B. , Riegel, K. (1994). The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. European Journal of Pediatrics, 153, 906– 915 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar