The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
LettersFull Access

Mental Illness Recognition and Referral by Catholic Priests in North Carolina

Deinstitutionalization ushered in an era of community-based care in which early recognition and treatment of mental illness is emphasized. Identifying individuals with mental illness or substance abuse problems and getting them into treatment is a persistent difficulty. Some persons seek treatment directly from health care professionals, but researchers have found that many turn first to clergy (13). Clergy have been described as a kind of “gateway” to the health care system, particularly for persons from ethnic minority groups, who may be impeded by financial difficulties, be unfamiliar with local resources, or have concerns about stigma (2).

Editor's note: This letter is part of TRAININGrounds, an occasional series of reports by trainees to highlight the academic work of psychiatric residents and fellows and to encourage research by trainees in psychiatry. Prospective authors should contact Joseph M. Cerimele, M.D., series editor, to discuss possible submissions: Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1230, New York, NY 10029 (e-mail: ).

However, little is still known about what clergy do when they encounter people with psychiatric problems. They may feel uncomfortable or inadequately trained to recognize mental illness (1,4). They may also feel disinclined to refer people to mental health providers who do not have a similar religious worldview or if they believe that providers might undermine a person's religious faith (1,2,5). These factors could delay or preclude treatment.

Because Catholics constitute a quarter of the U.S. population and represent the largest single religious denomination in the country, we conducted an online survey of Catholic priests in North Carolina to better understand how comfortable and capable they are with identifying and responding to individuals with mental illness. We also wanted to understand the importance that priests place on a shared worldview with providers. A 16-question survey was distributed to all Catholic priests (approximately 300) in North Carolina via diocesan Listservs. It included a questionnaire eliciting demographic information (age, years as a priest, level of mental health training, and parish setting) and information about the respondent's comfort level with identifying and responding to mental illness. Four vignettes described cases of mania, major depression, domestic abuse, and moderate alcohol use. Respondents chose to handle cases themselves or refer to a fellow priest, family or friends, a mental health professional, a primary care physician, or other. Data were collected between October and November 2011. The study was granted exemption by the institutional review board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Forty-eight priests completed the survey (response rate of 15%–20%). Most (87%) felt comfortable recognizing mental illness, and most (87%–92%) sent vignette patients for additional services when circumstances were severe (for example, mania, domestic abuse, and suicide risk). Most (85%) felt that it was either “critical” or “important” that providers have a similar religious or philosophical worldview, which suggests that although priests may have concerns about providers' handling of specific matters of faith or morals, most understood the need to involve other providers in a crisis.

Although the low response rate limits generalizability, Catholic priests appeared to understand and feel comfortable with their role in the caregiving system. Future research could explore the types of people and problems that priests encounter and the referral process and identify areas of common ground to facilitate collaboration. Nonetheless, priests can be seen as able and willing partners in community mental health providers' efforts to identify and treat people with mental illness, domestic abuse, or substance abuse problems.

The authors are affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill.

Acknowledgments and disclosures

The authors thank the Diocese of Raleigh, the Diocese of Charlotte, the Department of Psychiatry at the University of North Carolina, and the Center for Spirituality, Religion, and Medicine at Duke University.

The authors report no competing interests.

References

1 Larson DB , Hohmann AA , Kessler LG , et al.: The couch and the cloth: the need for linkage. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 39:1064–1069, 1988 AbstractGoogle Scholar

2 Lee HB , Hanner JA , Cho SJ , et al.: Improving access to mental health services for Korean American immigrants: moving toward a community partnership between religious and mental health services. Psychiatry Investigation 5:14–20, 2008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

3 Wang PS , Berglund PA , Kessler RC : Patterns and correlates of contacting clergy for mental disorders in the United States. Health Services Research 38:647–673, 2003 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Farrell JL , Goebert D : Collaboration between psychiatrists and clergy in recognizing and treating serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 59:437–440, 2008 LinkGoogle Scholar

5 Curlin FA , Odell S , Lawrence RE , et al.: The relationship between psychiatry and religion among US physicians. Psychiatric Services 58:1193–1198, 2007 LinkGoogle Scholar