The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2009.60.1.50

Bipolar disorder gives rise to significant disability and expense, which result from medication costs, psychiatric hospitalization, and time lost from work. Even though the prevalence of bipolar disorder is roughly 17% that of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder has an associated aggregate economic burden that is more than twice that of major depressive disorder ( 1 ). Such data suggest that bipolar disorder has a disproportionate impact on health care costs and service use.

Psychiatric hospitalization in bipolar disorder can occur during manic or depressed phases of the disorder. In a study of 6,072 patients diagnosed as having bipolar disorder, 9% were hospitalized in a year, which accounted for 11% of the health care costs of the sample ( 2 ). Despite the importance of psychiatric hospitalization, little work has been done to determine what factors are most closely associated with psychiatric hospitalization of patients with bipolar disorder. The first study of risk factors for psychiatric hospitalization found that patients presenting with severe neurovegetative or manic symptoms were more likely than those without such symptoms to be rehospitalized within six months ( 3 ). Epidemiological studies have revealed that patients with bipolar disorder and comorbid alcohol abuse have more psychiatric hospitalizations, compared with those with bipolar disorder alone ( 4 , 5 ), and patients with substance use disorders have a higher prevalence of work-related disability ( 6 ). There is additional evidence that cannabis use is associated with an increased amount of time spent in affective episodes ( 7 ). Similarly, the diagnosis of an alcohol use disorder was the strongest risk factor for psychiatric hospitalization among older patients with dementia and comorbid bipolar disorder ( 8 ).

Although there are reports of associations between rehospitalization rates and substance use disorders, there are no clinical profiles that could be used to assess a patient's risk of psychiatric hospitalization or determine the relative importance of various risk factors. Risk profiles can provide information about the interaction of different clinical and demographic characteristics that are associated with psychiatric hospitalization, which in turn give clinicians predictive information and suggest areas of focus for additional treatment. In the study presented here, we used the aggregate administrative Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System database to gather clinical information on all patients diagnosed as having bipolar disorder during a one-year period. We then used an iterative receiver operating characteristic (ROC) ( 9 ) approach to develop risk profiles of psychiatric hospitalization based on comorbid diagnoses of substance abuse or dependence and other demographic characteristics.

Methods

Database

The primary criterion for inclusion in our data set was a diagnosis of bipolar disorder I, II, or not otherwise specified ( ICD-9 codes 296.0 and 296.4–296.8) from the VA Veterans Integrated Service Network 21. Patients were included in the sample if the diagnosis of bipolar disorder was present in their problem lists as a primary or secondary diagnosis during the 2004 fiscal year (October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004). The possible predictors used in this retrospective study were coded at both outpatient and inpatient encounters during the entire study period. The VA uses comprehensive assessment tools in both the outpatient and inpatient environments in combination with annual mandated reviews of alcohol and drug use, including nicotine. Of the 2,963 patients in the sample, 2,553 (86%) were male and 410 (14%) were female. The mean±SD age was 52.9±12.3 years. The Stanford University Institutional Review Board approved this study.

Statistical analyses

An iterative ROC analysis ( 9 ) was performed with software available in the public domain ( www.stanford.edu/~yesavage/roc.html ). In an ROC analysis, the event to be predicted, or the "gold standard," is identified and the ROC software is used to identify the best initial predictor. The data set is split into subgroups at a cutoff point identified by the analysis. Within each subgroup, the remaining variables are searched for the next-best predictor. Each time the "best" predictor is found, a chi square test is performed, and the variable is retained as a predictor if p<.01. The process of searching for predictors continues until the predictor is not significant or until there are fewer than ten observations in a subgroup.

In the first ROC analysis, the gold standard was whether a patient experienced at least one psychiatric hospitalization during the year. Potential risk factors for hospitalization (that is, variables chosen for consideration) included marital status (never married, married, divorced, separated, widowed, or unknown); gender; age (categorized as <40, 40–49, 50–59, or ≥60 years); alcohol dependence, abuse, or intoxication ( ICD-9 codes 303.0, 303.9, or 305.0); opioid dependence or abuse (304.0 or 305.5); cannabis dependence or abuse (304.3 or 305.2); cocaine dependence or abuse (304.2 or 305.6); amphetamine dependence or abuse (304.4 or 305.7); sedative or hypnotic dependence or abuse (304.1 or 305.4); or polysubstance dependence (304.8). We did not include ethnicity in the analysis because of a large amount of missing data; responses regarding ethnicity are voluntary in this database, and fewer than half of the patients had provided the information. Data regarding patients' income were not available. We did not use recency of military conflict as predictive variables in the analysis presented here, because it is largely confounded with age and because only 1.4% (N=41) of these patients were from the recent Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts.

In the second ROC analysis, we used data from only the 598 patients (20%) who were hospitalized during the study period to create risk profiles for length of hospitalization. In this analysis, the gold standard was whether the length of stay was short (≤14 days) or long (<14 days). We selected 14 days as the demarcation because it represents a target length of stay for inpatient psychiatry within the VA hospital system. The second ROC analysis used the same set of risk factors as the first analysis, except that actual ages were used, as opposed to the four categories, in an effort to identify specific age cutoff points. The VA Health Care System has a variety of substance abuse treatment programs available that have typical lengths of stay from 30 to 60 days; these were not included in any of our analyses, because they do not represent acute psychiatric hospitalization.

Results

Prevalence of substance use disorders

In Table 1 we provide the prevalence of substance use disorders for hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients with bipolar disorder. Alcohol use disorders were the most prevalent, especially among patients with a psychiatric hospitalization, followed by polysubstance dependence. All substance use disorders were more prevalent among patients who were hospitalized, compared with those who were not. Figure 1 provides the distribution of substance use disorders across the age groups defined for our primary analyses. Alcohol use disorders were the most common substance disorders across all age groups, followed by polysubstance dependence. The number needed to treat to observe a hospitalization ranged from four for alcohol use disorders to 50 for sedative or hypnotic use disorders. In Table 2 , we provide the distribution of length of psychiatric hospitalization and the corresponding average age for each. Increasing age was associated with increasing length of hospital stay. The average age of patients increased as length of hospitalization increased.

Table 1 Prevalence of substance use disorders among hospitalized and nonhospitalized veterans with bipolar disorder
Table 1 Prevalence of substance use disorders among hospitalized and nonhospitalized veterans with bipolar disorder
Enlarge table
Figure 1 Distribution of substance use disorders among 2,963 veterans with bipolar disorder, by age group
Table 2 Distribution of lengths of psychiatric hospitalization among 2,963 veterans with bipolar disorder
Table 2 Distribution of lengths of psychiatric hospitalization among 2,963 veterans with bipolar disorder
Enlarge table

Psychiatric hospitalization risk profiles

To create risk profiles for psychiatric hospitalization, we performed an iterative ROC analysis. Twenty percent (N=598) of the patients were hospitalized over the course of the year. As shown in Figure 2 , the primary risk factor for psychiatric hospitalization was an alcohol use disorder. The group at highest risk (100%) for psychiatric hospitalization comprised patients who were diagnosed as having an alcohol use disorder and polysubstance dependence and who were separated from their spouses. In fact, this combination of characteristics led to a 100% risk for hospitalization. The group at the next highest risk (87%) comprised patients with an alcohol use disorder, with no diagnosis of polysubstance dependence, and who were separated from their spouses. The third highest risk group had a 76% risk of hospitalization and was defined by the absence of a substance use disorder but separation from their spouses. In contrast, patients with the lowest risk of psychiatric hospitalization (12%) were those with no alcohol use disorder or polysubstance dependence who were not separated from their partners.

Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic output illustrating risk profiles for psychiatric hospitalization among 2,963 veterans with bipolar disorder

Predictors of length of hospitalization

Of the 598 patients with a psychiatric hospitalization during the year, the lengths of hospitalization ranged from one day to 867 days. (Exceptionally long hospitalizations typically reflect placement challenges in locked facilities.) The median length of stay was ten days; the mean±SD length of stay was 23.9±62.6 days. Age was treated as a continuous measure in this analysis, so that we would be able to define specific cutoff points in risk factors for the length of stay.

Of the hospitalized patients, 41% (N=245) had longer lengths of stay (that is, more than 14 days), and the greatest risk factor was an age of 52 years or older. Patients with an age of 77 years or older proved to be at even greater risk of a long hospitalization, with 77% of these patients being hospitalized psychiatrically for more than 14 days. For patients younger than 52 years, a cannabis use disorder was associated with a 69% risk of a stay longer than 14 days.

Unfortunately, with this aggregate data we could not provide precise information regarding medication adherence during this study period, but we were able to determine the percentage of people who received any psychotropic medication prescriptions during the study period ( Table 3 ).

Table 3 Prevalence of psychotropic medication prescriptions for 2,963 veterans with bipolar disorder during the one-year study period
Table 3 Prevalence of psychotropic medication prescriptions for 2,963 veterans with bipolar disorder during the one-year study period
Enlarge table

Discussion

Substance use in bipolar disorder is associated with nonadherence to treatment ( 10 ) and worse prognosis ( 11 ). Comorbid substance use disorders triple the risk of suicide among patients with bipolar disorder ( 12 ) and reduce medication adherence ( 13 ). Longitudinal studies have revealed an increased association with depressed or mixed episodes ( 14 ). Moreover, patients with comorbid bipolar disorder and substance use disorders generally experience delayed recovery from their mood episodes ( 15 ). Comorbid alcohol use disorders increase the rates of both disability and mortality among patients with bipolar disorder ( 16 ). Interestingly, patients with comorbid bipolar disorder and substance use disorders have generally been found to have an earlier onset of bipolar disorder than those without a coexisting substance use disorder ( 5 , 17 ), although this finding is not universal ( 18 ).

Despite the importance of alcohol use disorders and polysubstance dependence as risk factors for hospitalization, the prevalence of these disorders in our sample was somewhat lower than that reported in other samples. For example, in our study alcohol use disorders and polysubstance dependence had a prevalence of 20% and 10%, respectively. However, other researchers have reported a prevalence of substance use disorders of up to 40% of patients with bipolar disorder as soon as two years after diagnosis ( 14 ) and up to 60% over their lifetimes ( 11 ). The rates reported in this study are lower than those reported in other epidemiologic studies of substance use comorbidity, such as the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area study. Regier and colleagues ( 19 ) reported rates of alcohol dependence and drug abuse or dependence, respectively, for 32% and 61% of persons with bipolar disorder. It is important to note that psychiatric hospitalization is not synonymous with relapse of alcohol or drug use. It is unclear why the frequencies of substance use in our study were lower than those previously reported. One possibility is that during our one-year study clinicians may have assigned substance use diagnoses only for those with active substance abuse or dependence or that the average age of our sample was older than those in broader, epidemiological studies.

There are several important psychosocial implications highlighted by these results. Among patients with bipolar disorder but no diagnosis of comorbid alcohol or drug dependence, the strongest predictor of hospitalization was marital separation. Cannabis use disorders were not associated with the risk of hospitalization per se, although they were associated with length of hospital stay. It has been reported that patients with bipolar disorder and comorbid cannabis use disorders spend longer periods in affective episodes, compared with those without cannabis use disorders ( 7 ).

Our findings suggest several possible interventions for persons with bipolar disorder that may decrease the impact of comorbid substance use disorders on health care use. An important focus of psychosocial interventions is on interpersonal relationships, and interventions have been reported to improve functioning among patients with bipolar disorder ( 20 ). Recent work has also suggested that patients with bipolar disorder and comorbid substance use disorders are more likely to engage in psychosocial interventions, compared with patients with bipolar disorder but no comorbid substance use disorders ( 20 ). There is a significant association between marital difficulties, without gender differences, and the onset of mania ( 21 , 22 ), although women with bipolar disorder are more likely than men with this disorder to be arrested for substance-related charges ( 23 ). Studies have suggested that substance use can cause increased amounts of role conflicts and hence cause increased amounts of relationship distress ( 24 ).

Attention to and the treatment of comorbid alcohol and drug dependence should be a priority in the care of patients with bipolar disorder ( 25 ). A review of treatments for patients with severe mental illness and comorbid substance use disorders concluded that mental health treatment combined with substance abuse treatment is more effective than treatment occurring alone for either disorder or occurring concurrently without articulation between treatments ( 26 ). An example of an effective combined treatment approach is the integrated dual diagnosis treatment model, which integrates treatments for mental illness and substance use disorders ( 27 ). Programs that follow the integrated dual diagnosis treatment model are integrated with multidisciplinary treatment teams, are comprehensive in their use of psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions, encompass various modalities ranging from individual to family counseling, and may be offered in a long-term format ( 27 ). Such substance abuse programs are a valuable part of individualized mental health care. By actively referring patients with bipolar disorder and a comorbid substance use disorder to dual diagnosis programs, clinicians may be able to significantly alter the course of one or both psychiatric conditions, resulting in lower health care costs ( 28 ).

There are some limitations of our study. The VA patient population is mostly male and may not be representative of the broader population of individuals with bipolar disorder. Our study population may also differ with regard to an increased prevalence of both service-related stressors and posttraumatic stress disorder, because the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder as a primary or secondary diagnostic code in this study population was 21%. Because the diagnoses used in this study were given at clinics and during inpatient visits, they may lack the accuracy of those determined by standardized diagnostic instruments. Furthermore, the diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence may have been underestimated, because past diagnoses or disorders in remission may not have been recorded. The VA database may not capture all the health resource data, particularly for those whose disability is not service connected and who receive limited VA benefits and may thus seek service elsewhere, although only 24% of the individuals in this database had non-service-connected disabilities.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that alcohol use disorders are a major risk factor for psychiatric hospitalization and are further compounded by polysubstance dependence and marital separation. In fact, when all three of these factors were present, the risk of hospitalization in our sample was 100%. In contrast, patients without a substance use disorder who were not separated from their spouse or partner had only a 12% risk of hospitalization over the study year. Our findings stress the importance of addressing substance abuse issues and psychosocial difficulties as a means of improving patients' clinical status to avoid psychiatric hospitalization.

In keeping with previous findings that the prevalence of substance use disorders decreases with age ( 10 , 11 ), our findings demonstrated a decrease after age 50. Alcohol use disorders were more prevalent than other substance use disorders in our sample for all age ranges. Despite the trend toward lower prevalence of substance use disorders among older adults, some researchers have cautioned that as the baby-boomer generation ages, the prevalence of substance use disorders will increase among older adults ( 29 ).

Acknowledgments and disclosures

This research was supported in part by the Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center.

Dr. Hoblyn is on the speakers bureau for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Eli Lilly. Dr. Brooks is on the speakers bureau for Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca. The other authors report no competing interests.

Dr. Brooks is affiliated with the UCLA Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, B8-233b NPI, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (e-mail: [email protected]). Dr. Hoblyn and Ms. Woodard are with the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, California. Ms. Woodard is also with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, with which Dr. Balt is affiliated.

References

1. Kessler RC, Merikangas KR, Wang PS: Prevalence, comorbidity, and service utilization for mood disorders in the United States at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 3:137–158, 2007Google Scholar

2. Stensland MD, Jacobson JG, Nyhuis A: Service utilization and associated direct costs for bipolar disorder in 2004: an analysis in managed care. Journal of Affective Disorders 101:187–193, 2007Google Scholar

3. Perlick DA, Rosenheck RA, Clarkin JF, et al: Symptoms predicting inpatient service use among patients with bipolar affective disorder. Psychiatric Services 50:806–812, 1999Google Scholar

4. Goldstein BI, Velyvis VP, Parikh SV: The association between moderate alcohol use and illness severity in bipolar disorder: a preliminary report. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 67:102–106, 2006Google Scholar

5. Brady KT, Sonne SC: The relationship between substance abuse and bipolar disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 56(suppl 3):19–24, 1995Google Scholar

6. Wilk J, West JC, Rae DS, et al: Relationship of comorbid substance and alcohol use disorders to disability among patients in routine psychiatric practice. American Journal on Addictions 15:180–185, 2006Google Scholar

7. Strakowski SM, DelBello MP, Fleck DE, et al: Effects of co-occurring cannabis use disorders on the course of bipolar disorder after a first hospitalization for mania. Archives of General Psychiatry 64:57–64, 2007Google Scholar

8. Brooks JO, Hoblyn JC, Kraemer HC, et al: Factors associated with psychiatric hospitalization of individuals diagnosed with dementia and comorbid bipolar disorder. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 19:72–77, 2006Google Scholar

9. Kraemer HC: Evaluating Medical Tests. Newbury Park, Calif, Sage, 1992Google Scholar

10. Sajatovic M, Blow FC, Ignacio RV: Psychiatric comorbidity in older adults with bipolar disorder. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21:582–587, 2006Google Scholar

11. Cassidy F, Ahearn EP, Carroll BJ: Substance abuse in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders 3:181–188, 2001Google Scholar

12. Comtois KA, Russo JE, Roy-Byrne P, et al: Clinicians' assessments of bipolar disorder and substance abuse as predictors of suicidal behavior in acutely hospitalized psychiatric inpatients. Biological Psychiatry 56: 757–763, 2004Google Scholar

13. Sajatovic M, Valenstein M, Blow FC, et al: Treatment adherence with antipsychotic medications in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders 8:232–241, 2006Google Scholar

14. Baethge C, Baldessarini RJ, Khalsa HM, et al: Substance abuse in first-episode bipolar I disorder: indications for early intervention. American Journal of Psychiatry 162:1008–1010, 2005Google Scholar

15. Goldberg JF, Garno JL, Leon AC, et al: A history of substance abuse complicates remission from acute mania in bipolar disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 60:733–740, 1999Google Scholar

16. Weiss RD, Ostacher MJ, Otto MW, et al: Does recovery from substance use disorder matter in patients with bipolar disorder? Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 66:730–735, 2005Google Scholar

17. Sonne SC, Brady KT, Morton WA: Substance abuse and bipolar affective disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 182:349–352, 1994Google Scholar

18. DelBello MP, Strakowski SM, Sax KW, et al: Familial rates of affective and substance use disorders in patients with first-episode mania. Journal of Affective Disorders 56:55–60, 1999Google Scholar

19. Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al: Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. JAMA 264:2511–2518, 1990Google Scholar

20. Lembke A, Miklowitz DJ, Otto MW, et al: Psychosocial service utilization by patients with bipolar disorders: data from the first 500 participants in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 10:81–87, 2004Google Scholar

21. Kessing LV, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB: Major stressful life events and other risk factors for first admission with mania. Bipolar Disorders 6:122–129, 2004Google Scholar

22. Mathew MR, Chandrasekaran R, Sivakumar V: A study of life events in mania. Journal of Affective Disorders 32:157–161, 1994Google Scholar

23. McDermott BE, Quanbeck CD, Frye MA: Comorbid substance use disorder in women with bipolar disorder associated with criminal arrest. Bipolar Disorders 9:536–540, 2007Google Scholar

24. Bartholomew NG, Hiller ML, Knight K, et al: Effectiveness of communication and relationship skills training for men in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 18:217–225, 2000Google Scholar

25. Albanese MJ, Pies R: The bipolar patient with comorbid substance use disorder: recognition and management. CNS Drugs 18:585–596, 2004Google Scholar

26. Drake RE, Mueser KT, Brunette MF, et al: A review of treatments for people with severe mental illnesses and co-occurring substance use disorders. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 27:360–374, 2004Google Scholar

27. Brunette MF, Mueser KT: Psychosocial interventions for the long-term management of patients with severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 67(suppl 7):10–17, 2006Google Scholar

28. Judd PH, Thomas N, Schwartz T, et al: A dual diagnosis demonstration project: treatment outcomes and cost analysis. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 35(suppl 1):181–192, 2003Google Scholar

29. Patterson TL, Jeste DV: The potential impact of the baby-boom generation on substance abuse among elderly persons. Psychiatric Services 50:1184–1188, 1999Google Scholar