Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Protocol - Intervention

Probiotics in infants for prevention of allergy and food hypersensitivity

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To determine the effect of probiotics given to infants for the prevention of allergy or food hypersensitivity. Secondary objectives are:

  • to determine the effect of specific strains of probiotics;

  • to determine the effect of probiotics in 1) breast fed infants, 2) human milk fed infants, and 3) formula fed infants;

  • to determine the effect of probiotics used for 1) early / short term infant feeding, and 2) prolonged infant feeding;

  • to determine the effect of probiotics in 1) infants not selected for risk of allergy or food hypersensitivity, or at low risk, and 2) in infants at high risk of allergy or food hypersensitivity;

  • to determine the effect of probiotics given to 1) low birth weight or preterm infants, and 2) appropriate for gestation age term infants, and

  • to determine the effect of probiotics with added prebiotics ('symbiotics') for the prevention of allergy and food hypersensitivity.

Background

Food hypersensitivity and allergy are prevalent and represent a substantial health problem that may be increasing in developed countries (Burr 1989; Halken 2004; Prescott 2005; Schultz Larsen 1996). Genetic susceptibility plays a large role in the development of food allergy. Although less than half of those who develop childhood allergic disease have a first degree family history of allergy, the risk of development of allergic diseases increases substantially with family heredity. Approximately 10% of children without an allergic first degree relative develop allergic disease, compared to 20 ‐ 30% with single allergic heredity (parent or sibling) and 40 ‐ 50% with double allergic heredity (Arshad 2005; Bergmann 1997; Hansen 1993; Kjellman 1977). The manifestations of allergic disease are age dependent. Infants commonly present with symptoms and signs of atopic eczema, gastrointestinal symptoms and recurrent wheezing. Asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis become prevalent in later childhood. The patterns of sensitization to allergens tends to follow a characteristic pattern, with sensitization to food allergens in the first two to three years of life, then indoor allergens (e.g. house dust mite and pets) and subsequently outdoor allergens (e.g. rye and Timothy grass). The cumulative prevalence of allergic disease in childhood is high, with up to 7 ‐ 8% developing a food allergy, 15 ‐ 20% atopic eczema, and 31 ‐ 34% developing asthma or recurrent wheezing. Of these, 7 ‐ 10% will continue to have asthma symptoms beyond five years of age (Halken 2004). Food hypersensitivities affect approximately 6% of infants less than three years of age, with prevalence decreasing over the first decade (Sampson 2004; Osterballe 2005).

A major focus of current research is the mechanisms for development of immune tolerance and allergen sensitization in the fetus and newborn and primary prevention strategies. This review focuses on the evidence for use of probiotics in infants for the prevention of food hypersensitivity and allergy. A separate review will examine the effects of prebiotics compared to no prebiotics in infants for prevention of allergy and food hypersensitivity. Probiotics are live bacteria that colonize the gastrointestinal tract and provide a health benefit to the host. They have been defined as "living micro‐organisms which upon ingestion in certain numbers exert health benefits beyond inherent general nutrition" (Guarner 1998). Probiotics have been demonstrated to have anti‐inflammatory properties, associated with changes in cytokine expression with the potential to facilitate T1‐helper cell immune response (Heller 2003; Sudo 1997) that could inhibit the development of allergic T2‐helper cell response and allergic (IgE) antibody production. Benefits from the use of probiotic bacteria have been found in systematic review of randomised trials (Allen 2004) for the treatment of infectious diarrhoea. Several randomised studies have now demonstrated efficacy from use of probiotics in infants with active eczema (Majamaa 1997; Isolauri 2000; Rosenfeldt 2003), although not all studies have shown conclusive benefits (Viljanen 2005). Although rare, anecdotal case reports have described infants with sepsis from lactobacillus attributable to probiotic supplementation (Hammerman 2006).

An altered microbial exposure may be partly responsible for the increase of allergic diseases in populations with a western lifestyle (Holt 1997). Differences in intestinal microflora are found in infants delivered by caesarean section compared to those delivered vaginally, and in breast fed versus formula fed infants (Agostoni 2004). Breast feeding promotes the colonization of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli that inhibit growth of pathogenic microorganisms and compete with potentially pathogenic bacteria for nutrients and epithelial adhesion sites. The gastrointestinal flora may modulate mucosal physiology, barrier function and systemic immunologic and inflammatory responses (Agostoni 2004; Sudo 1997). Food allergy is a manifestation of an abnormal mucosal immune response to ingested dietary antigens (Sampson 2004 ). The gastrointestinal barrier is a complex physiochemical barrier and cellular barrier. However, some ingested food antigens are absorbed. The efficiency of this gastrointestinal barrier is reduced in the newborn period. Perinatal risk factors reported for asthma and / or allergy have included prematurity (Bernsen 2005; Jaakkola 2004; Raby 2004) and fetal growth restriction (Bernsen 2005), both of which are associated with an immature and potentially injured gastrointestinal mucosal barrier. The composition of the intestinal microflora may be different in those with atopic eczema, and such differences may precede the development of eczema. The most consistent finding in such studies is a reduced proportion of bifidobacteria species in the faeces of infants with eczema (Bjorksten 2001; Murray 2005) and atopic sensitization (Kalliomaki 2001), but not in the faeces of children with symptoms of asthma (Murray 2005). The recognition of the importance of intestinal flora has led to the development of strategies aimed at manipulating bacterial colonization in formula fed infants, including the use of prebiotics and probiotics.

Prevention of allergy is divided into primary prevention, the prevention of immunological sensitization (development of IgE antibodies); and secondary prevention, the prevention of allergic disease following sensitization (Asher 2004). A substantial proportion of infants who develop sensitization will not go on to have clinical manifestations of allergy or food hypersensitivity (Halken 2004). This review will focus on the prevention of clinical allergy (including asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis) and food hypersensitivity, not just sensitization (IgE responses). As the risk of allergy and food hypersensitivity is affected by heredity, subgroup analysis will examine the effect of probiotics in populations of infants at high risk of allergy or food hypersensitivity separately to infants at low risk or not selected on the basis of heredity. As breast feeding promotes the colonization of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli (Agostoni 2004), subgroup analysis will examine the effect of probiotics in human milk fed infants separately to probiotics in formula fed infants. Prebiotics are nondigestible food components that beneficially affect the host by selectively stimulating the growth or activity of bacteria in the colon. They can be added to infant formula. In infants, studies have demonstrated significant increases in faecal bifidobacteria in response to formula supplementation with oligosaccharides (Boehm 2002; Moro 2002; Moro 2006; Schmelzle 2003; Decsi 2005), with one study also demonstrating an increase in lactobacilli (Moro 2002). Subgroup analyses will be performed to determine if the effect of probiotics is modified by the addition of a prebiotic to infant feeds.

Objectives

To determine the effect of probiotics given to infants for the prevention of allergy or food hypersensitivity. Secondary objectives are:

  • to determine the effect of specific strains of probiotics;

  • to determine the effect of probiotics in 1) breast fed infants, 2) human milk fed infants, and 3) formula fed infants;

  • to determine the effect of probiotics used for 1) early / short term infant feeding, and 2) prolonged infant feeding;

  • to determine the effect of probiotics in 1) infants not selected for risk of allergy or food hypersensitivity, or at low risk, and 2) in infants at high risk of allergy or food hypersensitivity;

  • to determine the effect of probiotics given to 1) low birth weight or preterm infants, and 2) appropriate for gestation age term infants, and

  • to determine the effect of probiotics with added prebiotics ('symbiotics') for the prevention of allergy and food hypersensitivity.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Randomised and quasi‐randomised controlled trials that compare the use of a probiotic to a control (placebo or no treatment), or the use a specific probiotic compared to a different probiotic, or the use a specific probiotic compared to the same probiotic combined with a prebiotic ('symbiotic').

Types of participants

Enterally fed infants in the first six months of life without clinical evidence of allergy or food hypersensitivity, both with and without risk factors for allergy and food hypersensitivity.

Types of interventions

Probiotics added to human milk or infant formula, added in the manufacturing process or given separately compared to control (placebo or no treatment); or the use a specific probiotic compared to a different probiotic; or the use a specific probiotic with added prebiotic ('symbiotic') compared to control (placebo or no treatment).

Types of outcome measures

Definitions of allergy and food hypersensitivity should be consistent with the 'Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003' (Johansson 2003). Specific allergies are identified as atopic when confirmed by demonstration of an IgE response, either through skin testing or serological testing for specific IgE (e.g. RAST or EAST or CAP system).

Primary outcomes:

  • All allergy including asthma, eczema, rhinitis or food allergy;

  • Food hypersensitivity.

Secondary outcomes (specific allergies and food hypersensitivities):

  • Asthma

  • Dermatitis / eczema

  • Allergic rhinitis

  • Cow's milk or soy protein hypersensitivity

  • Cow's milk or soy protein allergy

  • Food allergy

  • Urticaria

  • Anaphylaxis

Potential harms:

  • Growth parameters including head circumference and weight gain when receiving probiotic supplements;

  • Cost including incremental cost per infant with allergy or food hypersensitivity prevented (reported in the currency of the country of assessment). Costs should include all health, family and societal related costs. Cost analyses of trials from different countries and using different methodology will not be combined in meta‐analysis, but reported separately if available;

  • Infant feed refusal;

  • Infection with probiotic bacteria.

A specific allergy or food hypersensitivity may be diagnosed on the basis of:

  • History of recurrent and persistent symptoms typical of the allergy or food hypersensitivity;

  • A clinician diagnosis of allergy or food intolerance based on clinical findings supported by the above history;

  • Clinical allergy and food intolerance confirmed by testing including detection of allergen sensitisation by either skin testing or serological testing for specific IgE (e.g. RAST or EAST or CAP system), asthma confirmed by respiratory function testing for presence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and food hypersensitivity confirmed by elimination/challenge.

The following definitions of age of allergy will be used:

  • Infant allergy incidence: allergy occurring up to two years of age;

  • Childhood allergy incidence: allergy occurring up to 10 years of age (or up to age of latest report between two and 10 years);

  • Childhood allergy prevalence: allergy reported that was present between two and 10 years of age;

  • Adolescent allergy: allergy present from 10 to 18 years age;

  • Adult allergy: allergy present after 18 years age.

Search methods for identification of studies

See: Neonatal Review Group search strategy. The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group will be used. This will include electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 ‐ 2007), EMBASE (1980 ‐ 2007) and CINAHL (1982 ‐2007) and previous reviews including cross references (all articles referenced), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conferences (Pediatric Academic Societies 1998 ‐ 2007; Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand 1998 ‐ 2007). The search strategy will include the following keywords, using the search fields of abstract, MeSH subject headings, exploded subject heading, publication type, subject heading word, text word, and title: A search on all fields for [infant* OR newborn* OR neonat* OR pediatric* OR paediatric*] AND [probiotic* OR Lactobacillus OR Bifidobacterium] will be conducted. The search will be limited to: [random* OR trial* OR comparative study OR controlled study].

Data collection and analysis

Eligibility of studies for inclusion will be assessed independently by each review author. The criteria and standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group will be used to assess the methodological quality of the included trials. Quality of the included trials will be evaluated in terms of adequacy of randomisation and allocation concealment, blinding of parents or carers and assessors to intervention, and completeness of assessment in all randomised individuals. Each review author will extract the data separately. Data will be compared and differences resolved by consensus. The standard methods of the Neonatal Review Group will used to synthesise the data. Effects will be expressed as relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical data, and weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI for continuous data. Data will be examined for heterogeneity using the chi‐square test for heterogeneity. Heterogeneity will be quantified using the I2 statistic. The fixed effect model will be used for meta‐analysis where enrolled infants and interventions are similar and no significant heterogeneity is found. Sources of heterogeneity will be explored in subgroup analysis.

The following comparisons are prespecified:
1. Probiotics versus no probiotics (all studies);
2. Specific probiotic versus no probiotic;
3. Specific probiotic versus other specific probiotic.

The following subgroup analyses are prespecified within the above comparisons:
1. According to infant heredity for allergy or food hypersensitivity:

  • Infants at high risk of allergy or food hypersensitivity (at least one first degree relative with allergy or food hypersensitivity);

  • Infants at low risk of allergy or food hypersensitivity, or not selected on basis of heredity.

2. According to method of infant feeding:

  • Infants fed human milk;

  • Infants fed standard cow's milk formula;

  • Infants fed with a hypoallergenic formula (consisting of hydrolysed or elemental protein).

3. According to co‐intervention with prebiotic:

  • Infants supplemented with prebiotic (either in infant formula or given separately);

  • Infants with no prebiotic supplement.

4. According to duration of supplementation:

  • Infants given early (first few days), short term (days) supplementation;

  • Infants given prolonged supplementation (weeks or months).

5. According to infant maturity or birth weight:

  • Infants born at or near term (healthy or appropriate for gestational age);

  • Infants born preterm (< 37 weeks gestation) or low birth weight (< 2500 g).

Studies that include other allergy prevention interventions (e.g. maternal dietary avoidance measures, environmental allergy reduction measures) in the treatment and not the control group will be excluded. Studies that have other allergy prevention interventions in both treatment and control groups are eligible.

A sensitivity analysis will be performed to determine if the findings are affected by including only studies of adequate methodology, defined as adequate randomisation and allocation concealment, blinding of intervention and measurement, and < 10% losses to follow up.