Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Palliative chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

available in

Background

Despite the increasing use of palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer, there remains uncertainty as to the true effectiveness of this intervention. This review was therefore undertaken to assess the available evidence for the benefit of palliative chemotherapy in this disease.

Objectives

To determine the benefits and harms of palliative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. A secondary objective was to investigate outcomes for younger and elderly patients.

Search methods

Trials were identified by computerised and hand searches of the literature, scanning references and contacting investigators.

Selection criteria

All randomised controlled trials of palliative chemotherapy compared with supportive care alone in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Both randomised and non‐randomised studies were considered when searching for data on quality of life, resource use and cost effectiveness of palliative chemotherapy.

Data collection and analysis

Investigators from all eligible studies were asked to supply individual patient data. Meta‐analysis was performed using both published data and individual patient data. Studies were grouped according to whether chemotherapy was administered regionally or systemically.

Main results

13 randomised controlled trials representing a total of 1365 randomised patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis of a subset of trials that provided individual patient data demonstrated that palliative chemotherapy was associated with a 35% (95% CI 24% to 44%) reduction in the risk of death. This translates into an absolute improvement in survival of 16% at both 6 months and 12 months and an improvement in median survival of 3.7 months. The overall quality of evidence relating to treatment toxicity, symptom control and quality of life was poor.

Authors' conclusions

Chemotherapy is effective in prolonging time to disease progression and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The survival benefit may be underestimated by this meta‐analysis, as a proportion of patients in the control arms of some trials received chemotherapy. No age related differences were found in the effectiveness of chemotherapy, but elderly patients were under represented in trials. Treatment toxicity and impact upon quality of life and symptom control have been inadequately assessed in the majority of trials and further research is needed to clarify the palliative benefit of chemotherapy.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

available in

Chemotherapy improves the survival of people with advanced colorectal cancer, but the adverse effects and impact on quality of life are not yet known.

Colorectal (bowel) cancer is common worldwide, but can often be treated effectively with surgery. In some people, however, the cancer returns and sometimes also spread to other parts of the body. When this happens, chemotherapy (anti‐cancer drugs) can be used to try to slow the progression of the cancer. However, chemotherapy also have adverse effects.
The review of trials found that chemotherapy improves survival of people with advanced colorectal cancer. However, the effects of treatment upon quality of life are not yet clear and need more study.