Abstract
A scientific theory is a set of ideas that coherently describes selected phenomena in the world. Theories in health services research align with empirical research data and aim at providing interpretations and explanations of findings. Theory can be practically used in research to formulate research questions, derive measures, develop interventions and predict their outcomes. The use of theories also helps to make assumptions of a study explicit. In health services research, the explicit use of theory in studies is recommended but not common practice. Different types of theory can be described in terms of scope, aggregation level, aims, format, content and empirical basis. Given the interdisciplinary character and scope of health services research, considering a range of theories is often a fruitful approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Recommended Readings
Alderson P. (1998). The importance of theories in healthcare. British Medical Journal, 317, 1007–1010.
Kislov, R., Pope, C., Martin, G. P., et al. (2019). Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science. Implementation Science, 14, 103.
References
Alderson P. (1998). The importance of theories in healthcare. British Medical Journal, 317, 1007–1010.
Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Shea, et al. (2017). Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implementation Science, 12(1), 124.
Bosch, M., Dijkstra, R., Wensing, M., et al. (2008). Organizational culture, team climate and diabetes care in small office-based practices. BMC Health Services Research, 8, 150.
Davidoff, F., Dixon-Woods, M., Leviton, et al. (2015). Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. British Medical Journal Quality & Safety, 24(3), 228–238.
Dixon-Woods, M., Leslie, M., Bion, J. et al. (2012). What counts? An ethnographic study of infection data reported to a patient safety program. Milbank Quarterly, 90(3), 548–591.
Eccles, M. P., Grimshaw, J. M., MacLennan, G., et al. (2012). Explaining behaviors using multiple theoretical models. Implementation Science, 7, 99.
Esmail, R., Hanson, H. M., Holroyd-Leduc, J., et al. (2020). A scoping review of full-spectrum knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks. Implementation Science, 15(1), 11.
ICEBERG (Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group). (2006). Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science, 1, 4.
Kislov, R., Pope, C., Martin, G. P., et al. (2019). Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science. Implementation Science, 14, 103.
Leeman, J., Baquero, B., Bender, et al. (2019). Advancing the use of organization theory in implementation science. Preventive Medicine, 129, 105832.
Lewis, C. C., Boyd, M. R., Walsh-Bailey, et al. (2020). A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health. Implementation Science, 15, 21.
Michie, S., & Johnston, M. (2017). Optimising the value of the evidence generated in implementation science: the use of ontologies to address the challenges. Implementation Science, 12, 131.
Moser, A., Puhan, M., & Zwahlen, M. (2020). The role of causal inference in health services research I: tasks in health services research. International Journal of Public Health, 65, 227–230.
Nilsen P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10, 53.
Oxman, A. D., Fretheim, A., & Flottorp, S. (2005). The OFF theory of research utilization. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(2), 113–116.
Presseau, J., Johnston, M., Heponiemi, T., et al. (2014). Reflective and automatic processes in health care professional behaviour: A dual process model tested across multiple behaviours. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 48(3), 347–358.
Strifler, L., Barnsley, J. M., Hillmer, M., et al. (2020). Identifying and selecting implementation theories, models and frameworks: a qualitative study to inform the development of a decision support tool. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20, 91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wensing, M., Ullrich, C. (2023). Use of Theories in Health Services Research. In: Wensing, M., Ullrich, C. (eds) Foundations of Health Services Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29998-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29998-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29997-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29998-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)