Skip to main content

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 12))

Abstract

In this chapter the authors assess the application of the circular migration framework to the six Gulf Cooperation Council member states of Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, and Oman. By some estimations, the six GCC states comprise the third largest migratory destination in the contemporary world, and for decades these states have hosted large transient migrant populations that, in some manner or another, appear to fit the definition of circular migration. Through an analysis of migration to the Gulf States this chapter provides an empirical contribution to the expanding discussion of circular migration. In this chapter the nexus between the Gulf migration system and the circular migration framework is configured around two focal points. After an overview of migration in the Gulf States, the authors first examine the policy frameworks that regulate and govern migration to the GCC. Second, using an ethnographic lens, the authors explore the experiences of the migrants at work in the region. They conclude with a discussion of the implications of promoting the circular migration framework in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See ESCWA (2007).

  2. 2.

    A string of research projects underpin this research. Those projects were funded and sponsored by a variety of institutions, including the Fulbright Program, the Wenner-Gren Foundation, the Bahrain Training Institute, Qatar University, and the Center for International and Regional Studies at the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in Qatar. In addition, this paper relies heavily on research funded by the Qatar National Research Fund under its National Priorities Research Program (award number NPRP 09-857-5-123). Note that the contents of this chapter are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Qatar National Research Fund, nor any of the other institutions that have supported the research underpinning this chapter.

  3. 3.

    There are limited opportunities for naturalization in some GCC states, but generally speaking, these opportunities are not available to the vast majority of labor migrants who stream to the region.

  4. 4.

    See Gardner (2010a: 159–164) and Beaugrand (2011) for a longer discussion of Bahrain’s claims regarding the abolishment of the sponsorship system.

  5. 5.

    There is often confusion with these terms. We use labor brokerages to refer to those agencies in sending countries that connect potential migrants with employment in the Gulf states, a service for which they typically charge. Manpower companies refer to those companies that receive labor in the Gulf states. These manpower agencies are oftentimes also referred to as labor supply companies. They employ labor, often in large quantities, and contract with companies to provide labor services.

  6. 6.

    See Longva 1997, 1999; Gardner 2010a, b, 2011, 2012; U.S. Department of State 2007; Human Rights Watch 2006, 2009.

  7. 7.

    In contrast to a human rights-based approach, for example.

  8. 8.

    A pseudonym.

  9. 9.

    In a nod to the work of Gibson-Graham, we see the neoliberalism and its many manifestations in the contemporary world not as the empirical and de facto reality, but rather as a myth of totality that disempowers other alternatives and marginalizes those alternatives’ histories. To make this argument specific to migration, we suggest that the repeated apprehension of circular migration schemes as somehow aligned with a de facto and empirical reality as a political and ideological move that serves the interests of some stakeholders at the expense of others.

References

  • Ahmad, A. (2010). Migrant domestic workers in Kuwait: The role of state institutions. Middle East Institute Viewpoints, 27–29. http://www.mei.edu/content/migrant-workers-kuwait-role-state-institutions

  • Babar, Z. (2011). Free mobility within the gulf cooperation council. CIRS occasional paper series. Center for International and Regional Studies, Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in Qatar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin-Edwards, M. (2011, March). Labour immigration and labour markets in GCC countries: National patterns and trends. Research Paper, Kuwait Programme on Development, Governance and Globalisation in the Gulf States. No. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basch, L. G., Glick, N., & Blanc, C. S. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Langhorne: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaugrand, C. (2011, December). Cancelling the Kafala: How serious can it be? The Bahrain experiment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Middle East Studies Association, Washington, DC, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruslé, T. (2008, May). The Nepali-Qatari migrant world. Himal, 21(5). http://old.himalmag.com/himal-feed/48/1033-the-nepali-qatari-migrant-world.html

  • ESCWA (2007). International migration and development in the Arab Region: Challenges and opportunities. UN Population and Development Report, (3rd Issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G. (2012). The migration apparatus: Security, labor, and policymaking in the European Union. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forstenlechner, I., & Rutledge, E. J. (2011). The GCC’s demographic imbalance perceptions, realities and policy options. Middle East Policy, 28(4), 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, E. (2008). Of maids and madams: Sri Lankan domestic workers and their employers in Jordan. Critical Asian Studies, 40, 609–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamburd, M. R. (2000). The kitchen spoon’s handle: Transnationalism and Sri Lanka’s migrant housemaids. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. (2010a). City of strangers: Gulf migration and the Indian community in Bahrain. Ithaca: Cornell/ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. (2010b). Engulfed: Indian guest workers, Bahraini citizens and the structural violence of the Kafala system. In N. Genova & N. Peutz (Eds.), The Deportation Regime: sovereignty, space, and freedom of movement (pp. 305–349). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. (2011). Gulf migration and the family. The Journal of Arabian Studies, 1(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. (2012). Why do they keep coming? Labor migrants in the gulf states. In M. Kamrava & Z. Babar (Eds.), Migrant labour in the Persian gulf. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. (2006). Building towers, cheating workers: Exploitation of migrant construction workers in the United Arab Emirates. New York: Human Rights Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. (2009). The island of happiness: Exploitation of migrant workers on Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi. New York: Human Rights Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapiszewski, A. (2001). Nationals and expatriates: Population and labour dilemmas of the gulf cooperation council states. Ithaca: Ithaca Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longva, A. (1997). Walls built on sand: Migration, exclusion and society in Kuwait. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longva, A. (1999). Keeping migrant workers in check: The Kafala system in the gulf. Middle East Report, 211, 20–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meillassoux, C. (1981). Maidens, meal and money: Capitalism and the domestic economy. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, S. (1998). ‘This Time I Think I’ll Try a Filipina’: Global and local influences on relations between foreign household workers and their employers in Doha, Qatar. City and Society, 10, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pries, L. (Ed.). (2001). New transnational social spaces: International migration and transnational companies in the early twenty-first century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, A. (2010). Migration and human rights in the gulf. Middle East Institute Viewpoints. 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its discontents. New York: New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2001). Cracked casings: Notes towards an analytics for studying transnational processes. In L. Pries (Ed.), New transnational social spaces. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, N. M. (2008). Recent labor immigration policies in the oil-rich gulf: How effective are they likely to be? International Publications. Paper 52. Cornell University ILF School.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of State (2007, June). Trafficking in persons report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Circular migration: The way forward in global policy? International Migration Institute (Working Paper 4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vora, N. (2010). Business elites, unofficial citizenship, and privatized governance in Dubai. Middle East Institute Viewpoints. http://www.mei.edu/content/business-elites-unofficial-citizenship-and-privatized-governance-dubai

  • Walters, W. (2002). Deportation, expulsion, and the international police of aliens. Citizenship Studies, 6, 265–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickramasekara, P. (2011). Circular migration: A triple win or a dead end. Discussion Paper No. 15. International Labour Office, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willen, S. (2007). Toward a critical phenomenology of ‘Illegality’: State power, criminalization, and embodied experience among undocumented migrant workers in Tel Aviv, Israel. International Migration, 45(3), 8–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winckler, O. (1997). Immigration policy of the GCC states. Middle Eastern Studies, 33(3), 480–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Babar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Babar, Z., Gardner, A. (2016). Circular Migration and the Gulf States. In: Solé, C., Parella, S., Martí, T., Nita, S. (eds) Impact of Circular Migration on Human, Political and Civil Rights. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28896-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics