Skip to main content

Genetic Subtyping of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Comparative Genomic Hybridization

  • Conference paper
Molecular Staging of Cancer

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 162))

Abstract

The prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) varies dependent on histologic tumor subtypes. However, differentiation between RCC types may sometimes be difficult on histologic grounds alone. Furthermore, the prognostic value of histologic parameters for the individual prognosis is limited. Additional information on the molecular level seems necessary to obtain more certainty in diagnostic and prognostic evaluation. By investigating genetic alterations in different RCC subtypes, we sought to obtain a genotype-phenotype correlation. Eighty-two clear-cell, 53 papillary, 23 chromophobe RCCs and 26 renal oncocytomas were investigated. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed on DNA from paraffin-embedded tissue samples. DNA was isolated from tumor areas by microdissection and amplified by degenerated oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR). CGH was performed according to standard protocols. We were able to detect specific alterations in each RCC subtype: clear cell RCC showed -3p, +5/5q, -8p, -9, -14, -18; papillary (chromophilic) RCC gains of chromosomes 7, 17, 16, 3, 12; chromophobe RCC loss of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, 21; renal oncocytomas loss of chromosomes 1/1p and 14. Furthermore, for clear cell RCC, it was possible to define alterations which are associated with metastatic disease: loss of 9, 10, 14. Our results demonstrate that each RCC subtype is characterized by distinct genetic alterations. The definition of genetic alterations seems helpful for a tumor typing especially when morphology is equivocal. Therefore, genetic analyses represent a powerful diagnostic and prognostic tool for RCC

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Guinan P, Sobin LH, Algaba F, Badellino F, Karneyama S, MacLennan G, Novick A (1997) TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: Workgroup No. 3. Union International Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer 80:992–933

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Storkel, S (1999) [Epithelial tumors of the kidney. Pathological subtyping and cytogenetic correlation]. Urologe A 38:425–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chudoba IHT, Senger G, Claussen U, Haas OA (1997) Comparative genomic hybridization using DOP-PCR amplified DNA from a small number of nuclei. Cs Pediat 52:519–521

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kovacs G (1994) The value of molecular genetic analysis in the diagnosis and prognosis of renal cell tumours. World J Urol 12:64–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. van den Berg E, van der Hout AH, Oosterhuis JW, Storkel S, Dijkhuizen T, Dam A, Zweers HM, Mensink HJ, Buys CH, de Jong B (1993) Cytogenetic analysis of epithelial renal-cell tumors: relationship with a new histopathological classification. Int J Cancer 55:223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Velickovic M, Delahunt B, Grebe SK (1999) Loss of heterozygosity at 3pl4.2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma is an early event and is highly localized to the FHIT gene locus. Cancer Res 59:1323–1326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernues M, CasadevallC, Miro R, Caballin MR, Gelabert A, Ejarque MJ, Chechile G, Egozcue J (1998) Analysis of 3p allelic losses in renal cell carcinomas: comparison with cytogenetic results. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 107:121–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kattar MM, Grignon DJ, Wallis T, Haas GP, Sakr WA, Pontes JE, Visscher DW (1997) Clinicopathologic and interphase cytogenetic analysis of papillary (chromophilic) renal cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 10:1143–1150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kovacs G, Fuzesi L, Emanual A, Kung HF (1991) Cytogenetics of papillary renal cell tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 3:249–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Junker, K., Weirich, G., Amin, M.B., Moravek, P., Hindermann, W., Schubert, J. (2003). Genetic Subtyping of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Comparative Genomic Hybridization. In: Allgayer, H., Heiss, M.M., Schildberg, F.W. (eds) Molecular Staging of Cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 162. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59349-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59349-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63945-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59349-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics