Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of pimozide on sucrose consumption and preference

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of pimozide on sucrose intake were examined, in a two-bottle preference test (sucrose versus water), and in single-bottle tests at five different sucrose concentrations. In the two-bottle test, pimozide dose dependently decreased sucrose intake but increased water intake. In the single-bottle test pimozide decreased sucrose intake at low concentrations but had no effect at high concentrations. The results support a role for dopamine in mediating the rewarding effect of sucrose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antin J, Gibbs J, Smith GP (1975) Cholecystokinin elicits the complete behavioural sequence of satiety in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 89:784–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ (1983) The role of dopamine in locomotion activity and learning. Brain Res Rev 6:173–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernz JA, Smith GP, Gibbs J (1983) A comparison of the effectiveness of intraperitoneal injections of bombesin (BBS) and cholecystokinin (CCK-8) to reduce sham feeding of different sucrose solutions. Proc EPA 54:95

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernits T, Corbit JD (1973) Taste as a dipsogenic stimulus. J Comp Physiol Psychol 83:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouriezos G, Wise RA (1976) Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: Response patterns rule out motor performance deficits. Brain Res 103:377–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouriezos G, Hansson P, Wise RA (1978) Neuroleptic-induced attenuation of brain stimulation reward. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:659–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia J, Kimdeldorf DJ, Hunt EL (1957) Spatial avoidance in the rat as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation. Br J Radiat 30:318–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary N, Smith GP (1985) Pimozide decreases the positive reinforcing effect of sham feed sucrose in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:787–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert D, Cooper SJ (1983) p-Phenylethylamine, d-amphetamine and l-amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 95:311–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ (1970) On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav 13:243–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman GM (1983) A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine. J Exp Anal Behav 40:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman GM, Kinzie DL, Seiden LS (1986) Chloropromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance. Psychopharmacology 88:346–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoebel BG, Hernandez L, McLean S, Stanley BG, Aulissi EF, Glimcher P, Margolin D (1981) Catecholamines, enkephalin and neurotensin in feeding and reward. In: Hoebel BG, Novin D (eds) The neurobiology of feeding and reward. Haer Institute, Brunswick, Maine

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman J (1983) Discriminating between reward and performance: A critical review of self-stimulation methodology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 7:45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Mook DG (1969) Some determinants of preference and aversion in the rat. Ann NY Acad Sci 157:1158–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffman C (1982) Taste: a model of incentive motivation. In: Pfaff DW (ed) The physiological mechanisms of motivation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 61–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder RM, Brogden RN, Sawyer PR, Speight TM, Spencer R, Avery GS (1976) Pimozide: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic uses in psychiatry. Drugs 12:1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg D, Vaillancourt M, Wise R, Stewart J (1982) Effects of pimozide on saccharin and sucrose concentrations. Soc Neurosci Abstr 8:603

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith GP, Gibbs J (1979) Postprandial satiety. In: Sprague J, Epstein A (eds) Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology, vol 8. Academic, New York, pp 179–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982) Attenuation by haloperidol of place preference conditioning using food reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 77:379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish S, Cooper SJ (1982) Naloxone and naltrexone change food selection in hungry rats under conditions of famimliarity. Soc Neurosci Abstr 8:712

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten HP, Watson SD (1982) Sham feeding as a procedure for assessing the influence of diet palatability on food intake. Physiol Behav 28:401–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner P (1983) Dopamine and depression: a review of recent evidence. II. Theoretical approaches. Brain Res Rev 6:225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behaviour: The anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5:39–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenakis S, Sclafani A (1981) The effects of pimozide on the consumption of a palatable saccharin-glucose solution in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:435–442

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Towell, A., Muscat, R. & Willner, P. Effects of pimozide on sucrose consumption and preference. Psychopharmacology 92, 262–264 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177926

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177926

Key words

Navigation