Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Classification, typology, taxonomy

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adanson, M. (1763). Familles des plantes, Paris: Vincent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertus, M. (1205). De Vegetabilis. Köln.

  • Berger, J. & Zelditch, M. (1968). Review of T. Parsons: Sociological Theory and Modern Society, in “American Sociological Review” XXXIII, 3 (June): 446–50.

  • Berka, K. (1983). Measurement. Its Concepts, Theories and Problems. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H.M. (1960). Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill. Quotations from the Italian transl. Statistica per la ricerca sociale. Bologna: 11 Mulino, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E.G. (1961). The Beginning and Growth of Measurement in Psychology, pp. 108–127 in Harry, Woolf (ed.), Quantification. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.A. (1967). Scientific Research, vol. I: The Search for System. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, A. J. (1974) Classification: Biological, pp. 683–691 in The New Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. IV. London.

  • Candolle, A.P.de (1813). Théorie élémentaire de la botanique. Paris: Déterville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capecchi, V. (1964a). Une méthode de classification fondée sur l'entropie, in “Revue Française de Sociologie” V, 3: 290–306.

  • Capecchi, V. (1964b). I modelli di classificazione e l'analisi della struttura latente, in “Quaderni di Sociologia” XIII, 3 (luglio): 289–340.

  • Capecchi, V. (1966). Typologies in Relation to Mathematical Models, in “Ikon”, n. 58 (lugliosettembre), supplement: 1–62.

  • Capecchi, V. & Moeller, F. (1968). Some Applications of Entropy to the Problems of Classification, in “Quality & Quantity” II, 1–2: 63–84.

  • Carnap, R. (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago University Press.

  • Cohen, M.R. & Nagel, E. (1934). An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1975). Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C.H. (1953). Theory and Methods of Social Measurement, pp. 471–535 in Leon, Festinger and Daniel, Katz (eds.), Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrenoy, P.A. (1845). Traité de minéralogie. Paris.

  • Durkheim, E. & Mauss, M. (1902). De quelques formes primitives de classification, in “L'année sociologique” VI: 1–71. Quotations from the English edition Primitive Classification. London: Cohen & West 1963.

  • Ellis, B. (1968). Basic Concepts of Measurement. Cambridge University Press.

  • Fox, J. (1982). Selective Aspects of Measuring Resemblance for Taxonomy, pp. 127–151 in Herschel C., Hudson (ed.), Classifying Social Data. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1967). Theory and Methods of Social Research. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giedymin, J. (1982). Science and Convention. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, F. (1981). Sistematica e classificazione, pp. 1024–1044 in Enciclopedia, vol. VIII. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, J.S.L. (1940). Taxonomy and Philosophy, in Julian, Huxley (ed.), The New Systematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, G.-G. (1960). Pensée formelle et sciences de l'homme. Paris: Montaigne. English translation Formal Thought and the Sciences of Man. Dordrecht: Reidel 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1957). The Nature and Uses of Linguistic Typologies, in “Intern. Journal of American Linguistics” XXIII, 2: 68–72.

  • Hayek, F.A.von (1952). The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe: Free Press. Quotations from the Italian transl. L'abuso della ragione. Firenze: Vallecchi, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. (1952a). Typological Methods in the Natural and the Social Sciences, in “Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association”: 65–86.

  • Hempel, C.G. (1952b). Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago University Press.

  • Hempel, C.G. (1961). Fundamentals of Taxonomy, in J., Zubin (ed.), Field Studies in Mental Disorders. New York: Grune & Stratton. Quotations from the version reprinted pp. 137–154 in C.G., Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation. Glencoe: Free Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. & Oppenheim, P. (1936). Der Typusbegriff im Lichte der neuen Logik. Leyden.

  • Hennig, W. (1979). Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, H.C. (1982). Cluster and Factor Analysis of Cultural Data from Continuous Geographical Areas, pp. 56–83 in H.C., Hudson (ed.), Classifying Social Data. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. (ed.) (1940). The New Systematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco. Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J.G. (1959). A Philosopher Looks at Science. Princeton: Van Nostrand. Quotations from the Italian transl. Il filosofo e la scienza. Milano: 11 Saggiatore, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerner, S. (1974). Classification Theory, pp. 691–694 in The New Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. IV. London.

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago Univ. Press. Quotations from the Italian transl. La struttura delle rivoluzioni scientifiche. Torino: Einaudi, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1937). Some Remarks on the Typological Procedures in Social Research, in “Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung” VI: 119–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. & Barton, A.H. (1951). Qualitative Measurement in the Social Sciences: Classifications, Typologies, and Indices. pp. 155–92 in D. Lerner and H.D. Lasswell (eds.), The Policy Sciences. Stanford University Press. Quotations from the Italian transl. Classificazioni, tipologie e indici, pp. 231–306, in P.F. Lazarsfeld, Metodologia e ricerca sociologica. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1967.

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. & Barton, A.H. (1955). Some Principles of Questionnaire Classification, pp. 83–93 in P.F., Lazarsfeld and Morris, Rosenberg (eds.), The Language of Social Research. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzel, V.F. (1938). Procedures of Empirical Science. Vol. I, n. 5, Internat. Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Chicago Univ. Press.

  • Levy-Bruhl, L. (1910). Les fonctions mentales dans les sociétés inférieures. Paris. English transl. How Natives Think. Princeton Universitv Press 1985.

  • Linnaeus, C. (C. von Linné). (1735) Systema naturae. Stockholm.

  • Lundberg, G.A. (1938). The Concept of Law in the Social Sciences, in “Philosophy of Science” V, 2 (april): 189–203.

  • Malinowski, B. (1944). A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.W. (1982). Discriminant Analysis in Cluster Analysis, pp. 39–55 in Herschel C., Hudson (ed.), Classifying Social Data. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokrzycki, E. (1983). Philosophy of Science and Sociology. From the Methodological Doctrine to Research Practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.L. (1977). Wittgenstein and the Scientific Knowledge. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1959). La genèse des structures logiques élémentaires chez l'enfant: classifications et sériations. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.E., et al. (1974). Vascular Plants Systematics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnitzky, G. (1968). Contemporary Schools of Metascience. Goeteborg: Akademiforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, F.W. (1979). The Importance of Concepts: Some Considerations on How They Might Be Designated Less Ambiguously, in “American Sociologist” XIV, 4 (november): 172–85.

  • Sandri, G. (1969). On the Logic of Classification, in “Quality & Quantity” III, 1–2 (january): 80–124.

  • Sartori, G. (1970). Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics, in “American Political Science Review” LXIV, 4 (december): 1033–53.

  • Sartori, G. (1984). Guidelines for Concept Analysis, pp. 15–85 in G., Sartori (ed.), Social Science Concepts. A Systematic Analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F.de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I. (1967). Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Quotations from the Italian trans. Scienza e soggettività. Roma: Armando 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, F. von (1808). Uber die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier. Heidelberg: Mohr & Simmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1954). Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences, in “Journal of Philosophy” LI, 9 (april 29): 257–73.

  • Sneath, P.H.A. (1957). Some Thoughts on Bacterial Classification, in “Journal of General Microbiology” XVII.

  • Sokal, R.R. (1958) Distance as a Measure of Taxonomic Similarity, in “Systematic Zoology” X, 1: 70–79.

  • Sokal, R.R. & Sneath, P.H.A. (1963). Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1892). The Principles of Sociology, vol. II & III. London: Williams & Noorgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S. (1951). Mathematics, Measurement and Psychophysics, pp. 1–49 in S., Stevens (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G.E. (1972). Frameworks for Comparative Research: Structural Anthropology and the Theory of Action, pp. 141–202 in I., Vallier (ed.), Comparative Methods in Sociology. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiryakian, E.A. (1968). Typologies, pp. 177–85 in Intern. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. XVI. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, W.S. (1958). Theory and Methods of Scaling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.A. (1981). Some Practical Aspects of Qualitative Data Analysis: One Way of Organizing the Cognitive Process Associated with the Generation of Grounded Theory, in “Quality & Quantity” XV, 3 (june): 225–247.

  • Zetterberg, H.L. (1954). On Theory and Verification in Sociology. Totowa: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienza Politica, Via Santa Caterina d'Alessandria 3, 50129, Firenze, Italy

    Alberto Marradi

Authors
  1. Alberto Marradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marradi, A. Classification, typology, taxonomy. Qual Quant 24, 129–157 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209548

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209548

Search

Navigation