Skip to main content
Log in

Morphogenesis and fate of the residual body in human spermiogenesis

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the human testis the formation of the residual body of the spermatid and its morphological changes during and after spermiation were studied by means of electron microscopy. The caudal cytoplasmic mass of the late spermatid contains a Golgi complex, mitochondria, annulate lamellae, a chromatoid body, flower-like structures, ribosomes, a few large vacuoles, myelin-like membrane profiles and sporadic lipid droplets. When, by detachment of the caudal cytoplasm from the free spermatozoon, the residual body is formed, the chromatoid body has disappeared; the mitochondria are clustered peripherally; the ribosomes appear as a single complex in contact with a large vacuole containing granular material; in place of the Golgi complex aggregations of vesicles are present. The lipid droplets remain unchanged. The residual bodies or their fragments are either extruded via the seminiferous tubular lumen into the excurrent ducts or they are engulfed by Sertoli cells where in the supranuclear region the successive steps of decomposition can be observed. The participation of the various constituents in the disintegration of the residual body is discussed. In contrast to other mammalian species, in man the sporadic lipid droplets seem to be of minor importance in the fate of the residual body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bloom G, Nicander L (1961) On the ultrastructure and development of the protoplasmic droplet of spermatozoa. Z Zellforsch 55:833–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Brökelmann J (1963) Fine structure of germ cells and Sertoli cells during the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in the rat. Z Zellforsch 59:820–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietert SE (1966) Fine structure of the formation and fate of the residual bodies of mouse spermatozoa with evidence for the participation of lysosomes. J Morphol 120:317–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett DW (1975a) Male reproductive system. In: Bloom W, Fawcett DW (eds) A textbook of histology, 10th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia London Toronto, pp 824–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett DW (1975b) Ultrastructure and function of the Sertoli cell. In: Hamilton DW, Greep RO (eds) Male reproductive system. American Physiological Society, Washington DC, pp 21–55 (Handbook of physiology, sect 7, vol 5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Firlit CF, Davis JR (1965) Morphogenesis of the residual body of the mouse testis. Quart J Micr Sci 106:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouquet JP (1974) La spermiation et la formation des corps résiduels chez le hamster: role des cellules de Sertoli. J Microsc 19:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein AF (1976) Ultrastructural observations on the differentiation of spermatids in man. Andrologia 8:157–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein AF, Roosen-Runge EC (1981) Atlas of human spermatogenesis. Grosse, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein AF, Schäfer E (1978) A further type of transient cytoplasmic organelles in human spermatids. Cell Tissue Res 192:359–361

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JB, de Kretser DM (1974) The role of the Sertoli cell in phagocytosis of the residual bodies of spermatids. J Reprod Fertil 36:439–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JB, de Kretser DM (1975) Cyclic variations in Sertoli cell lipid content throughout the spermatogenic cycle in the rat. J Reprod Fertil 43:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JB, Mayberry RA, Irby DC (1984) Morphometric studies on lipid inclusions in Sertoli cells during the spermatogenic cycle in the rat. Cell Tissue Res 236:699–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley Smith BV, Lacy D (1959) Residual bodies of seminiferous tubules of the rat. Nature 184:249–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy D (1960) Light and electron microscopy and its use in the study of factors influencing spermatogenesis in the rat. J Roy Micr Soc 79:209–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi M, Kormano M (1965) Cyclical changes in and significance of lipids and acid phosphatase activity in the seminiferous tubules of the rat testis. Anat Rec 151:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Regaud C (1901) Études sur la structure des tubes séminifères et sur la spermatogenèse chez les mammifères. Arch Anat Micr Morphol Exp 4:101–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Retzius G (1909) Die Spermien des Menschen. Biologische Untersuchungen, Neue Folge XIV, 20. Fischer, Jena, pp 205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell LR (1984) Spermiation — the sperm release process: Ultrastructural observations and unresolved problems. In: Van Blerkom J, Motta PM (eds) Ultrastructure of reproduction. Gametogenesis, fertilization, and embryogenesis. Nijhoff, Boston The Hague Dordrecht Lancaster, pp 46–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapsford CS, Rae CA, Cleland KW (1969) The fate of residual bodies and degenerating germ cells and the lipid cycle in Sertoli cells in the bandicoot Perameles nasuta Geoffroy (Marsupialia). Aust J Zool 17:729–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze C (1974) On the morphology of the human Sertoli cell. Cell Tissue Res 153:339–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze C (1984) Sertoli cells and Leydig cells in man. In: Beck F, Hild W, Ortmann R, Pauly JE, Schiebler TH (eds) Advances in anatomy, embryology and cell biology, vol 88. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg H, Holstein AF (1975) Morphology of the “spindle-shaped body” in the developing tail of human spermatids. Cell Tissue Res 159:435–443

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breucker, H., Schäfer, E. & Holstein, AF. Morphogenesis and fate of the residual body in human spermiogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 240, 303–309 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222339

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222339

Key words

Navigation