Abstract
Macromastia is a common cause of physical and emotional suffering. Reduction mammoplasty can provide relief from shoulder grooving, back and neck pain, intertrigo, and symptoms of ulnar nerve compression. Similarly, emotional well being is enhanced by improved self-image, increased capacity to participate in sports and work, and the ability to wear normal, attractive clothes. In the last three years, we have performed reduction mammoplasty using the inferior pedicle technique or free nipple graft in 75 patients. Preoperative symptoms typically included back pain, shoulder grooving, and a stooped posture. Fat necrosis was the most common complication and was associated with large resections. Patient satisfaction was high for both procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ariyan S: Reduction mammaplasty with a nipple-areola carried on a single, narrow inferior pediole. Ann Plast Surg d516 :7, 1980
Bolger WE, Seyfer AE, Jackson SM: Reduction mammaplasty using the inferior glandular “pyramid” pedicle: experiences with 300 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg80:75, 1987
Brown FE, Sargent SK, Cohen SR, et al: Mammographic changes following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg80:691, 1987
Conway H: Weight of breasts as handicap to respiration. Argument for reduction mammaplasty. Am J Surg103:674, 1962
Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM: Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg58:1, 1976
Crepau R, Klein HW: Reduction mammaplasty with inferiorly based glandular pedicle flap. Ann Plast Surg9:463, 1982
Georgiade MG, Serafin T, Morris R, et al: Reduction mammaplasty utilizing the inferior pedicle nipple-areola flap. Ann Plast Surg3:211, 1979
Goin K, Goin J, Gianini H: The psychic consequences of a reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg59:533, 1977
Goldwyn RM: Reduction Mammoplasty. Boston: Little, Brown, 1990, p xi
Isaacs G, Rozner L, Tudball C: Breast lumps after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg15:394, 1985
Kallen R, Broome A, Muhlow A, et al: Reduction mammoplasty: results of preoperative mammography and patient inquiry. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg20(3):303, 1986
Kaye BL: Neurologic changes with excessively large breasts. South Med J65:177, 1972
Labandter HP, Dowden RV, Dinner NI: The inferior segment technique for breast reduction. Ann Plast Surg8:493, 1982
McKissock PK: Reduction mammaplasty. In: Courtiss EH (ed): Aesthetic Surgery. Trouble: How to Avoid It and How to Treat It. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1978, pp 189–203
McKissock PK: Complications and undesirable results with reduction mammaplasty. In: Goldwyn RM (ed): The Unfavorable Result in Plastic Surgery: Avoidance and Treatment, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1984, pp 739–759
Miller CL, Feig SA, Fox JW IV: Mammographic changes after reduction mammoplasty. Am J Roentgenol149:35, 1987
Pitanguy I: Reduction mammoplasty: a personal odyssey In: Goldwyn RM (ed): Reduction Mammoplasty. Boston: Little, Brown, 1990, p 95–128
Reus WF, Mathes SJ: Preservations of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg82:644, 1988
Silversmith PE, Crepau R: Reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg11:266, 1983
Strombeck JL: Reduction mammaplasty by Strombeck Technique. In: Goldwyn RM (ed): Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Breast. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976, p 209
Zelnick JN, Pearl RM, Johnson D: Use of an axial flap for reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg7:204, 1981
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, D.M., Young, V.L. Reduction mammoplasty for macromastia. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 17, 211–223 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00636264
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00636264